Connect with us

International

Mehta's changes to police could lead to clashes with EU and UK, experts say | meta

Mehta's changes to police could lead to clashes with EU and UK, experts say | meta

 


Major changes to the policies of the Metas social media platform have put the tech company at odds with lawmakers in Britain and the European Union, experts and politicians said.

Lawmakers in Brussels and London have criticized Mark Zuckerberg's decision to abolish fact-checkers for Facebook, Instagram and Threads in the United States, with one lawmaker calling it “very scary.”

Changes to Metas' global policy on hateful content now include allowing users to call transgender people hateful and include the following guidelines: We allow claims of mental illness or abnormality based on gender or sexual orientation.

Chi Onwurah, a Labor lawmaker and chair of the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee, which is investigating how online disinformation sparked last summer's riots, said Zuckerberg would replace professional fact-checkers with users who would moderate the accuracy of posts. He said his decision was concerning and quite frightening. .

After hearing that Meta is removing all fact-checking tools. [in the US] She said it was about people's right to be protected from the harmful effects of misinformation. The fact that Zuckerberg has said he is following X's example raises concerns when you compare that X is a far greater platform for misinformation than Facebook.

Meta said it would rely on social media users to check each other's posts in a community notes system similar to the one Elon Musk adopted at X. This has raised concerns about misinformation coming out of the United States on issues including elections, health, epidemics and pandemics. Armed conflicts and leaks into digital feeds around the world, where Meta has over 3 billion users.

On Wednesday, Nobel Peace Prize-winning American-Filipino journalist Maria Ressa predicted extremely dangerous times ahead for journalism, democracy and social media users. She faced criminal charges after publishing an article critical of former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte. She said meta will allow lies, anger, fear and hatred to infect everyone on the platform.

Meta's move, which Zuckerberg made clear, was a response to the election of incoming President Donald Trump, and also prompted predictions that a major challenge to laws such as online safety laws was coming from the Trump administration.

Damian Collins, the former British technology secretary, said the challenge would likely come through trade deals that would pressure Britain to accept American standards for digital regulation.

He said: We must stand firm against such proposals. Doing so eliminates the possibility of holding technology executives accountable and requiring them to enforce safety standards for their platforms that are mandated by our laws.

Mehta whistleblower told the Guardian: I am very concerned about what this means for teenagers.

Arturo Bjar, former chief engineer responsible for child safety measures at Meta, said: “Meta will become increasingly exposed to all categories of content that need to be protected.

Harmful content, including violent or pornographic material, may be more accessible to younger users, Bejar said. It cited Zuckerberg's statement that handling lower-severity violations will now rely on users flagging content before Meta takes action.

In Brussels, the European Commission hit back at Zuckerberg's comments in which he cited Europe as home to a growing number of laws institutionalizing censorship, citing the EU's own Digital Services Act that regulates online content.

A spokesperson for the EU administration said: “We categorically refute all claims of censorship and nothing in the Digital Services Act compels, requests or requests platforms to remove lawful content.”

Zuckerberg has said his policy of ditching fact-checkers only applies to the United States for now, but his broader stance on Europe has raised concerns that he plans to implement this approach there.

Arnav Joshi, senior technology lawyer at law firm Clifford Chance, said Meta would face intense regulatory scrutiny in the UK and EU.

As we move from human fact-checkers to more automation, regulators will want to see evidence of the effectiveness of these changes, which has been difficult to quantify and justify in the past.

Valrie Hayer, member of the European Parliament and leader of the centrist Renew Europe group, said: “The EU will remain uncomfortable with social media giants by defending freedom of expression and the integrity and independence of democratic processes. Europe will never accept manipulation and disinformation as the norm in society. By abandoning fact-checking in the United States, Mehta is making a major strategic and ethical mistake.

Oliver Marsh, a former Downing Street adviser and head of technology research at the Berlin and Zurich non-profit Algorithmwatch, said: “If these policy changes allow them to spread lies that end up being attacks on groups, there is a possibility that Meta will go against the EU's Digital Services Act. The question is whether Zuckerberg cares about his decisions and whether he will impress Trump. With the growing likelihood of non-compliance with any enforcement measures to ban meth, the moment for the EU to decide whether it has the power to ban meth, or how it can be held to account, is getting closer.

Meta said content about suicide, self-harm and eating disorders would still be considered a high severity offense and would continue to use automated systems to detect high severity content, but British child protection charity the NSPCC expressed concerns. . .

Rani Govender, Online Child Safety Regulatory Policy Manager, said: Meta must explain how removing its fact-checking program in the US and changing its content policy will not increase the risk of harm to children in the UK.

Sources

1/ https://Google.com/

2/ https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/jan/08/metas-changes-to-social-media-policing-will-lead-to-clash-with-eu-and-uk-say-experts

The mention sources can contact us to remove/changing this article

What Are The Main Benefits Of Comparing Car Insurance Quotes Online

LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 24, 2020, / Compare-autoinsurance.Org has launched a new blog post that presents the main benefits of comparing multiple car insurance quotes. For more info and free online quotes, please visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/the-advantages-of-comparing-prices-with-car-insurance-quotes-online/ The modern society has numerous technological advantages. One important advantage is the speed at which information is sent and received. With the help of the internet, the shopping habits of many persons have drastically changed. The car insurance industry hasn't remained untouched by these changes. On the internet, drivers can compare insurance prices and find out which sellers have the best offers. View photos The advantages of comparing online car insurance quotes are the following: Online quotes can be obtained from anywhere and at any time. Unlike physical insurance agencies, websites don't have a specific schedule and they are available at any time. Drivers that have busy working schedules, can compare quotes from anywhere and at any time, even at midnight. Multiple choices. Almost all insurance providers, no matter if they are well-known brands or just local insurers, have an online presence. Online quotes will allow policyholders the chance to discover multiple insurance companies and check their prices. Drivers are no longer required to get quotes from just a few known insurance companies. Also, local and regional insurers can provide lower insurance rates for the same services. Accurate insurance estimates. Online quotes can only be accurate if the customers provide accurate and real info about their car models and driving history. Lying about past driving incidents can make the price estimates to be lower, but when dealing with an insurance company lying to them is useless. Usually, insurance companies will do research about a potential customer before granting him coverage. Online quotes can be sorted easily. Although drivers are recommended to not choose a policy just based on its price, drivers can easily sort quotes by insurance price. Using brokerage websites will allow drivers to get quotes from multiple insurers, thus making the comparison faster and easier. For additional info, money-saving tips, and free car insurance quotes, visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ Compare-autoinsurance.Org is an online provider of life, home, health, and auto insurance quotes. This website is unique because it does not simply stick to one kind of insurance provider, but brings the clients the best deals from many different online insurance carriers. In this way, clients have access to offers from multiple carriers all in one place: this website. On this site, customers have access to quotes for insurance plans from various agencies, such as local or nationwide agencies, brand names insurance companies, etc. "Online quotes can easily help drivers obtain better car insurance deals. All they have to do is to complete an online form with accurate and real info, then compare prices", said Russell Rabichev, Marketing Director of Internet Marketing Company. CONTACT: Company Name: Internet Marketing CompanyPerson for contact Name: Gurgu CPhone Number: (818) 359-3898Email: [email protected]: https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ SOURCE: Compare-autoinsurance.Org View source version on accesswire.Com:https://www.Accesswire.Com/595055/What-Are-The-Main-Benefits-Of-Comparing-Car-Insurance-Quotes-Online View photos

ExBUlletin

to request, modification Contact us at Here or [email protected]