Connect with us


Drugs and Development in Afghanistan: Analysis of National Policies and Actors – Afghanistan




Adam Pain, Kaweh Kerami and Orzala Nemat


The opium poppy economy in Afghanistan poses a complex political problem. It stands at the intersection of various seemingly conflicting policy challenges: an emergency or a development issue; a public order problem or a security threat; a peacebuilding opportunity or conflict resource; and a health problem or a means of earning a living.

To some extent, the various facets of the fight against narcotics reflect the multifaceted and interrelated political challenges that the opium poppy economy has posed. But nearly 20 years after the start of the fight against narcotics in Afghanistan in 2001, its political ambitions to eliminate, or at least control, poppy production in the country, have clearly failed.

There has been an inexorable increase in the area of ​​the cultivation area of ​​some 70,000 ha. in 1994 to more than 200,000 ha. in 2016 (UNODC, 2016). Since 2001, the US government alone has spent some US $ 7.28 billion (SIGAR, 2018) on anti-narcotics programs for a limited return against its policy goals. This policy failure in terms of explicit goals needs an explanation.

This report seeks to provide that explanation; It provides an overview and general understanding of the anti-narcotics laws, policies and programs that have underpinned the anti-narcotics efforts in Afghanistan since 2001.

In doing so, it seeks to map opportunities for the Drugs & (Dis) Order project to engage in relevant policy processes. It builds on earlier drafts based on a desk review and key informant interviews, and was further developed with a review of additional sources.

The report first presents the context for policy development in Afghanistan before providing a comprehensive assessment of the legal and policy frameworks to combat drugs. These are then examined, focusing on key players in policy areas and their narratives regarding drugs and security, peace, health and livelihoods, concluding with a review of the data and evidence that informed policy development practices.

The report concludes with a broader discussion of the challenges of Afghanistan’s counter-narcotics policy.

There have been diverse, contradictory and even conflicting approaches to the fight against narcotics among the main political actors, including the Afghan government. In addition, there have been strong divisions of interest within the US government.

The US government has become the main actor in the fight against narcotics because of its level of funding. US efforts have shifted from a focus on eradication and ban to a focus more on the links between drugs and counterinsurgency, with alternative development playing a relatively minor role. An internal US government review concluded that the United States had failed to implement an effective anti-narcotics strategy.

Indeed, it is the lack of coherence between the main actors of the drug control policy that is its most striking feature. Different actors have different strategic interests and the Afghan government, divided as it has been, has not been able to lead and assert its interests. It is also clear that different actors defined Afghanistan’s political problems in different ways and therefore could not be agreed on possible solutions.

It is at the strategic level that the failure has been most important: the ambition to achieve security, peace, statebuilding and development simultaneously, but by immeasurable means, has derailed everything. attempt to constructively approach the opium poppy economy.

The political “ trilemma ” (Rodrik, 2011; Goodhand et al., 2020) of incompatible goals combined with an inability to prioritize, order and manage the trade-offs between achieving security, statebuilding, Reduction in opium poppy cultivation and development meant that few of the goals of the reconstruction effort were met.

For the Drugs & (dis) command project, it is difficult to find possible avenues for effective political engagement. Greater opportunities may lie in research to contribute to public debate on key drug control issues, and there may be room for more specific engagement around drugs and health, and alternative development, at the operational level.

What Are The Main Benefits Of Comparing Car Insurance Quotes Online

LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 24, 2020, / Compare-autoinsurance.Org has launched a new blog post that presents the main benefits of comparing multiple car insurance quotes. For more info and free online quotes, please visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/the-advantages-of-comparing-prices-with-car-insurance-quotes-online/ The modern society has numerous technological advantages. One important advantage is the speed at which information is sent and received. With the help of the internet, the shopping habits of many persons have drastically changed. The car insurance industry hasn't remained untouched by these changes. On the internet, drivers can compare insurance prices and find out which sellers have the best offers. View photos The advantages of comparing online car insurance quotes are the following: Online quotes can be obtained from anywhere and at any time. Unlike physical insurance agencies, websites don't have a specific schedule and they are available at any time. Drivers that have busy working schedules, can compare quotes from anywhere and at any time, even at midnight. Multiple choices. Almost all insurance providers, no matter if they are well-known brands or just local insurers, have an online presence. Online quotes will allow policyholders the chance to discover multiple insurance companies and check their prices. Drivers are no longer required to get quotes from just a few known insurance companies. Also, local and regional insurers can provide lower insurance rates for the same services. Accurate insurance estimates. Online quotes can only be accurate if the customers provide accurate and real info about their car models and driving history. Lying about past driving incidents can make the price estimates to be lower, but when dealing with an insurance company lying to them is useless. Usually, insurance companies will do research about a potential customer before granting him coverage. Online quotes can be sorted easily. Although drivers are recommended to not choose a policy just based on its price, drivers can easily sort quotes by insurance price. Using brokerage websites will allow drivers to get quotes from multiple insurers, thus making the comparison faster and easier. For additional info, money-saving tips, and free car insurance quotes, visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ Compare-autoinsurance.Org is an online provider of life, home, health, and auto insurance quotes. This website is unique because it does not simply stick to one kind of insurance provider, but brings the clients the best deals from many different online insurance carriers. In this way, clients have access to offers from multiple carriers all in one place: this website. On this site, customers have access to quotes for insurance plans from various agencies, such as local or nationwide agencies, brand names insurance companies, etc. "Online quotes can easily help drivers obtain better car insurance deals. All they have to do is to complete an online form with accurate and real info, then compare prices", said Russell Rabichev, Marketing Director of Internet Marketing Company. CONTACT: Company Name: Internet Marketing CompanyPerson for contact Name: Gurgu CPhone Number: (818) 359-3898Email: [email protected]: https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ SOURCE: Compare-autoinsurance.Org View source version on accesswire.Com:https://www.Accesswire.Com/595055/What-Are-The-Main-Benefits-Of-Comparing-Car-Insurance-Quotes-Online View photos

picture credit


to request, modification Contact us at Here or [email protected]