Legal struggle against big tech is similar to fighting organized crime

These hearings led to a wave of enforcement, new legislation, and, in the end, 1970 the organizations affected by Lacquer and the Corrupt Organization Law. What we learned at Wednesday’s hearing suggests that Facebook, Microsoft, Apple, and Amazon’s actions call for a relatively comprehensive and powerful response. (Amazon CEO Bezos owns the Washington Post.)

There are some similarities between organized crime and these four companies. As with the Mafia, the threats Apple, Amazon, Facebook, and Google pose to American democracy are through their dominance over major services (from email to social media, music and movies), dominance in some areas. Flowing from the way to achieve dominance. Ability to use other people and fear to stop trying to control themselves.

Like the Mafia, they are resilient, surveillance-based shadow governments. Citizens are, therefore, a dual subject of the country and a flawed online market subject created by these companies. Like mobs, big tech has friends in very high places. Similarly, Big Tech is a silence with some bosses, they compete in some areas, but generally divide power between them without consulting elected authorities. ..

Apparently, I’m not saying Facebook or Google are killing enemies, injuring knees, or burning businesses that refuse to play their rules. I don’t equate technology companies with mobs. Almost all mafia companies were illegal, but Big Tech operates in the legal gray territory. These companies claim not to violate the law. They use legal loopholes to avoid taxes, rather than by mobs simply refusing to report income. Still, this similarity is useful. Because it helps to think about the governance power of some oligarchy, which is mixed with the corresponding democratic system. It helps to think about what effective government response to systematic interference, control and bullying with less force might look like.

A compressed hearing in the afternoon attended by all CEOs at one time wasn’t ideal, but there’s no doubt that the best parliament can get without getting caught up in an extended court battle over the subpoena .. At one of the weirdest moments, Bezos said, I shouldn’t sit here, so I went back and uncovered the basic truth.

Surveillance hearings often feature a series of sleepy (or meaningless grandstanding) speeches, and more than expected for Titan given that big technology is free to use the powerful lobbyists and consultants of any recent presidential administration. Much worse.

Subcommittee chair David N. Sicilin (DR.I.) claims that the chief of a tech company behaves like an emperor and uses three basic strategies, which is explosive. The opening statement started the hearing. And get to make it impossible for startups to get a foothold. Congressman Joe Neguse (D-Colo.) wouldn’t want to make a new product or service if he knew the idea would be threatened and stolen, suppressed, or bought at a discounted price. , Explained the result as Innovation Kill Zone. .. Many of the questions are about territories, fearing how the Big 4 built territories, protect them, and threaten small business owners and app developers.

The Cicillines Subcommittee took good advantage of time constraints, identified CEOs with easy-to-understand examples of abuse strategies, and explained how they undermine freedom, equality and impartiality.

In an Amazon lawsuit, a hearing showed how the company could compete directly with independent sellers in the online marketplace. Congressman Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) has acknowledged that Mr. Bezos has a policy that prohibits the use of data collected by the company to make products for competitors, and violates that policy. I couldn’t promise not to. Bezos also acknowledged that search results may be prioritized if you use related Amazon services such as Amazon fulfillment, Amazons storage, packaging, and shipping services. result? Amazon earned $60 billion last year from seller fees, and Amazon’s average fees charged to sellers jumped from 19% to 30% of average sales over five years.

While Amazon demands compliments, Google is focused on bringing us search engine-dependent to our products. An analysis by technology-focused research non-profit organization Markup shows that an average of 40% of the space on the first page of Google search results directs users to Google products. Rivals charge that the company scrapes content from other sites and uses it for their own purpose-of-use content, such as photos from Yelp restaurant reviews. According to Cicilline, the committee said that when Yelp complained to Google of this behavior, there was evidence that Google threatened that Yelp wouldn’t appear in search results.

Apple’s Cook said its rival’s Screentime app was coming out of the store about the 30% reduction Apple makes when consumers pay for apps by an independent company, and at the very moment Apple is promoting similar products. There was a keen question as to why it disappeared. Cooks repeatedly replied that protecting consumer privacy and security is the reason for expulsing these apps without protecting Apple’s financial interests, a state that government authorities often give when questioned about suspicious activity. It reminded me of overall security.

The committee presented a document that revealed that two months before buying Instagram, Zuckerberg revealed that the early business could be very confusing for us. The day Facebook bought Instagram, he told the engineer that Instagram was right our threat: one thing about startups is that you can often get them.

These are not small revelations. Protecting exclusivity by buying or closing direct competitors is a violation of Sherman law. It is reported that the Parliamentary Commission has revealed these exchanges, rather than antitrust law enforcement agencies such as the Federal Trade Commission. State antitrust law enforcement agencies already in the midst of their own big tech investigations will probably use new evidence in their investigations, but it seems federal enforcement agencies did not.

However, the Subcommittee’s goal is not just to identify specific cases where the law may have been broken. This is where the Mafia Hearing Resonance is most intense. Like Kefeuver, Sicilyen wants to reveal and then eradicate the creeping oligopoly power.

The Kehoeber Hearing has educated the country on the power and scope of organized crime and has led to short-term and long-term legislative amendments. The Commission’s final report was given to a racket team within the Department of Justice, the Federal Criminal Commission, on some forms of betting and the racket-affected and corrupt organization law (finally passed in 1970. It is recommended that you prohibit the creation of what is called. RICO has instituted new and significant penalties and civil actions for crimes committed as part of an ongoing criminal organization.

After the Kehoeber hearing, what the country has learned is that large networked organizations are far more dangerous when engaging in organized bullying than accidental or personal mistakes. The shadow government cannot be crushed by the compulsion of a fragmentary mole strike.

By analogy with the hearing of the Kefauber mob, Wednesday’s hearing could mean the beginning of the end of an abusive great tech power. Parliament uses the power of subpoenas to dig even worse documents, and the public recognizes that four self-important men should not rule us.

The RICO legislation on big tech is a powerful new antitrust law and regulation, such as the structural division proposed by Senator Elizabeth Warren (D Mass). All of these companies own markets at the same time, compete in those markets and use their influence to maintain their influence. An effective solution is not just the practice Kefauver did in Mafia, but its power directly.

What Are The Main Benefits Of Comparing Car Insurance Quotes Online

LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 24, 2020, / Compare-autoinsurance.Org has launched a new blog post that presents the main benefits of comparing multiple car insurance quotes. For more info and free online quotes, please visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/the-advantages-of-comparing-prices-with-car-insurance-quotes-online/ The modern society has numerous technological advantages. One important advantage is the speed at which information is sent and received. With the help of the internet, the shopping habits of many persons have drastically changed. The car insurance industry hasn't remained untouched by these changes. On the internet, drivers can compare insurance prices and find out which sellers have the best offers. View photos The advantages of comparing online car insurance quotes are the following: Online quotes can be obtained from anywhere and at any time. Unlike physical insurance agencies, websites don't have a specific schedule and they are available at any time. Drivers that have busy working schedules, can compare quotes from anywhere and at any time, even at midnight. Multiple choices. Almost all insurance providers, no matter if they are well-known brands or just local insurers, have an online presence. Online quotes will allow policyholders the chance to discover multiple insurance companies and check their prices. Drivers are no longer required to get quotes from just a few known insurance companies. Also, local and regional insurers can provide lower insurance rates for the same services. Accurate insurance estimates. Online quotes can only be accurate if the customers provide accurate and real info about their car models and driving history. Lying about past driving incidents can make the price estimates to be lower, but when dealing with an insurance company lying to them is useless. Usually, insurance companies will do research about a potential customer before granting him coverage. Online quotes can be sorted easily. Although drivers are recommended to not choose a policy just based on its price, drivers can easily sort quotes by insurance price. Using brokerage websites will allow drivers to get quotes from multiple insurers, thus making the comparison faster and easier. For additional info, money-saving tips, and free car insurance quotes, visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ Compare-autoinsurance.Org is an online provider of life, home, health, and auto insurance quotes. This website is unique because it does not simply stick to one kind of insurance provider, but brings the clients the best deals from many different online insurance carriers. In this way, clients have access to offers from multiple carriers all in one place: this website. On this site, customers have access to quotes for insurance plans from various agencies, such as local or nationwide agencies, brand names insurance companies, etc. "Online quotes can easily help drivers obtain better car insurance deals. All they have to do is to complete an online form with accurate and real info, then compare prices", said Russell Rabichev, Marketing Director of Internet Marketing Company. CONTACT: Company Name: Internet Marketing CompanyPerson for contact Name: Gurgu CPhone Number: (818) 359-3898Email: [email protected]: https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ SOURCE: Compare-autoinsurance.Org View source version on accesswire.Com:https://www.Accesswire.Com/595055/What-Are-The-Main-Benefits-Of-Comparing-Car-Insurance-Quotes-Online View photos

picture credit