Connect with us


Xi Jinping, Bolsonaro, Putin and Morrison: the four leaders who resist global climate action




Energy Minister Angus Taylor and Prime Minister Scott Morrison watch the opening speech at the Leaders Climate Summit hosted by US President Joe Biden in April.  (Image AAP / Mick Tsikas)

In global climate circles, Australia has often been lumped into the global “ugly corner” with traditional allies that include the United States, Canada and Japan.

But Australia’s recent reluctance to climate change sees it associated with a new, more powerful group of climate action antagonists – China, Brazil and Russia – who are accused of pushing the world towards catastrophic levels of global warming.

Last week, the environment, climate and energy ministers of the G20 countries gathered in Naples, under the chairmanship of the Italian government, for a meeting that some hoped could be a platform for commitments more significant ahead of the COP26 climate summit to be held in Glasgow in November.

While the meeting of environment ministers approved a series of statements on biodiversity, resource use and public finance measures, climate and energy ministers failed to reach consensus on important issues related to long-term climate efforts.

The main points of contention are the failure to reach an agreement to set dates for the phase-out of fossil fuel use, as well as a failure to agree on a specific timeframe to achieve emissions. net zero. It is understood that these proposals have been blocked by Russia, India, Saudi Arabia and China.

Also missing from the meeting’s draft communiqué were commitments by G20 ministers to increase their interim emission reduction targets, nor any commitment that would see countries reduce their use of fossil fuels.

Australian Energy and Emissions Reduction Minister Angus Taylor attended the online meeting, but it is not clear if Taylor was active in discussions on whether G20 members ” commit to phasing out fossil fuels or achieving a zero emission target.

Confirmation was sought from Taylor’s office on the positions taken by Australia at the meeting, but it is understood that Taylor presented the current line which focuses on a “tech, not tax” approach to energy policy and a preference to achieve zero emissions by 2050..

This follows a substantial diplomatic effort on the part of Federal Environment Minister Sussan Ley, who succeeded in convincing enough members of the UNESCO World Heritage Committee to delay the inscription of the Great Barrier Reef. Coral as “endangered”.

The UNESCO committee appeared ready to adopt the recommendations of the scientists, who argued that the reef is at significant risk due to the impacts of climate change.

Australia’s diplomatic corps was able to enlist the support of members including Russia, Saudi Arabia and Bahrain to delay listing on the “endangered” list and avoid major international embarrassment for the Morrison government.

During international climate and environment negotiations, Australia has aligned itself with its traditional allies – including Japan, Canada and the United States – in a group that is part of the so-called “Umbrella Group”. “.

Australia has often conducted negotiations on behalf of this ‘umbrella group’, which has generally been viewed as a group of industrialized countries that recognized the need to act on climate change, but often hesitated to lead efforts to reduce climate change. emissions.

But Australia’s traditional allies are advancing and Prime Minister Scott Morrison now finds himself in the company of leaders of countries such as China’s Xi Jinping, Brazilian Jair Bolsonaro and Russian Vladimir Putin in terms of active resistance to global action. against climate change.

Like was recently highlighted by the Guardian – peer-reviewed research from the Paris equity control showed Australia is one of four G20 members – with Brazil, China and Russia as countries undermining global efforts to limit global warming to safe levels.

The initiative, supported by the Australian-German College for Climate and Energy at the University of Melbourne, assessed the emission reduction targets adopted by countries and determined the likely level of global warming with which each target was. compatible.

The assessment found that more than 40 countries have set targets consistent with global warming of more than five degrees, including Brazil, Russia and China, and a dozen countries, including Australia, have joined. currently committed to meeting emission targets that would cause more than four degrees of warming.

Scientific consensus suggests that global warming beyond 4 ° C would be catastrophic for most parts of the world, leading to an increase in the frequency and intensity of severe heat waves, destructive levels of the world rise. sea ​​level and extensive levels of species extinction.

While many countries have announced that they will formally adopt commitments to greater decarbonization efforts in the next round of international climate change negotiations – to be held in Glasgow at the end of the year – the Australia has firmly refused to step up its emission reduction targets.

Following the failure of agreement on key points at the G20 meeting, Italy’s Minister for Ecological Transition Roberto Cingolani said proposals for limits on the use of fossil fuels will now be discussed at the meeting. ‘a meeting of G20 national leaders later in the year, and will remain a priority for countries hoping to use year-end climate talks to secure a victory for climate action.

Despite the lack of agreement from G20 ministers, the Australia-based Investor Group on Climate Change (IGCC) released a new report which showed that the fossil fuel industries was still exposed to global decarbonization efforts and that investors encourage governments to provide greater certainty on the path to decarbonization.

“We know the transition is underway. It’s predictable. So it should be manageable, ”said IGCC CEO Rebecca Mikula-Wright.

“Investors and governments have an opportunity to act today to prioritize a just and orderly transition if we want Australia to emerge as a winner in the global race for net zero.”

Michael Mazengarb is a journalist at RenewEconomy, based in Sydney. Prior to joining RenewEconomy, Michael worked in the renewable energy industry for over a decade.




The mention sources can contact us to remove/changing this article

What Are The Main Benefits Of Comparing Car Insurance Quotes Online

LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 24, 2020, / Compare-autoinsurance.Org has launched a new blog post that presents the main benefits of comparing multiple car insurance quotes. For more info and free online quotes, please visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/the-advantages-of-comparing-prices-with-car-insurance-quotes-online/ The modern society has numerous technological advantages. One important advantage is the speed at which information is sent and received. With the help of the internet, the shopping habits of many persons have drastically changed. The car insurance industry hasn't remained untouched by these changes. On the internet, drivers can compare insurance prices and find out which sellers have the best offers. View photos The advantages of comparing online car insurance quotes are the following: Online quotes can be obtained from anywhere and at any time. Unlike physical insurance agencies, websites don't have a specific schedule and they are available at any time. Drivers that have busy working schedules, can compare quotes from anywhere and at any time, even at midnight. Multiple choices. Almost all insurance providers, no matter if they are well-known brands or just local insurers, have an online presence. Online quotes will allow policyholders the chance to discover multiple insurance companies and check their prices. Drivers are no longer required to get quotes from just a few known insurance companies. Also, local and regional insurers can provide lower insurance rates for the same services. Accurate insurance estimates. Online quotes can only be accurate if the customers provide accurate and real info about their car models and driving history. Lying about past driving incidents can make the price estimates to be lower, but when dealing with an insurance company lying to them is useless. Usually, insurance companies will do research about a potential customer before granting him coverage. Online quotes can be sorted easily. Although drivers are recommended to not choose a policy just based on its price, drivers can easily sort quotes by insurance price. Using brokerage websites will allow drivers to get quotes from multiple insurers, thus making the comparison faster and easier. For additional info, money-saving tips, and free car insurance quotes, visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ Compare-autoinsurance.Org is an online provider of life, home, health, and auto insurance quotes. This website is unique because it does not simply stick to one kind of insurance provider, but brings the clients the best deals from many different online insurance carriers. In this way, clients have access to offers from multiple carriers all in one place: this website. On this site, customers have access to quotes for insurance plans from various agencies, such as local or nationwide agencies, brand names insurance companies, etc. "Online quotes can easily help drivers obtain better car insurance deals. All they have to do is to complete an online form with accurate and real info, then compare prices", said Russell Rabichev, Marketing Director of Internet Marketing Company. CONTACT: Company Name: Internet Marketing CompanyPerson for contact Name: Gurgu CPhone Number: (818) 359-3898Email: [email protected]: https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ SOURCE: Compare-autoinsurance.Org View source version on accesswire.Com:https://www.Accesswire.Com/595055/What-Are-The-Main-Benefits-Of-Comparing-Car-Insurance-Quotes-Online View photos


to request, modification Contact us at Here or [email protected]