Connect with us


Kashmir: politics or politics




Once the plebiscite proposed by the UN Security Council is held under the auspices of the United Nations and the people of Kashmir decide to join Pakistan, they will still have the option of being independent or staying with the United Nations. Pakistan. By reiterating his pledge, Prime Minister Imran Khan added a new dimension to Pakistan’s principled position on the conflict in Jammu and Kashmir.

The declaration assumes that one day a free and fair plebiscite will be held under the auspices of the United Nations and that the people of Kashmir will vote for membership in Pakistan. Soon Islamabad will unilaterally hold some sort of referendum for the people of Kashmir to decide whether they still want to stay with Pakistan or be an independent entity. The declaration also assumes that Pakistan would have the support of other stakeholders like India and China to give the option of independence to the Kashmiris. It further assumes that Parliament, officials, the judiciary, armed forces, media and over 220 million Pakistanis would have no objection to living alongside an independent Kashmir.

To begin with, this “commitment” needs to be understood in context as to whether it was a policy announcement or just a political statement. Responding to the opposition’s apprehension that he might turn Azad Jammu and Kashmir into a province, Prime Minister Imran Khan set out a sort of roadmap for the final settlement of the Kashmir dispute. On the surface, it was a political statement that actually served the purpose. Despite the many ifs and buts attached to it, the “promise” arguably turned out to be the deciding factor in the recent elections in Azad Jammu and Kashmir. PTI’s decisive victory speaks volumes about the magic that this “promise” possessed latent.

Politicians around the world appear to be permitted to issue a number of statements in order to address certain issues of immediate concern, leaving the outcome to future generations or to be cited and misquoted at appropriate times. Following Gandhi’s directive, it was Indian Prime Minister Nehru who pledged to organize a plebiscite in Kashmir in 1947, a promise never kept either by him or by several of his successors. Did heaven fall just because a Prime Minister made a promise that was not kept during his lifetime? Do you remember all those promises and promises of reconstruction of Afghanistan and their fate?

The absence of a clarification from the Foreign Ministry does not help to confirm the nature of the “pledge”. Therefore, those who might view it as a policy statement would be right in their assessment and would raise many questions as to its timing, rationale, practicality, authenticity and relevance, especially in the context of the India’s bold actions taken on August 5, 2019. Does Pakistan have the necessary support from India, China, the United States and the UN to turn this road map into reality? What are the factors that would make the existing mute international community suddenly favorable to Pakistan’s position on the Kashmir dispute? After taking decisive action on the status of occupied Jammu and Kashmir two years ago, how would India agree or be persuaded to conduct a plebiscite, a legitimate demand to which New Delhi categorically does not agree. not answered in the past seven decades? Why wouldn’t the Kashmiris have insisted on having the third option at the time of the UN-sponsored plebiscite if they knew they would be given that choice anyway? Following the emergence of an independent Kashmir, what if other provinces in Pakistan also claim a similar prerogative? What will be the status of Gilgit Baltistan? Would the people of Azad and occupied Jammu and Kashmir think the same? What if they do? What if they don’t? Last but not least, can the Pakistani Prime Minister alone announce a policy change on a settled foreign policy issue without holding a national debate or reaching a consensus in Parliament?

During the current government establishment of the PTI, Pakistan has undeniably remained steadfast in its principled position on Kashmir; reiterating it emphatically throughout this period while offering its unwavering and unwavering support to the people of occupied Jammu and Kashmir. In fact, Prime Minister Imran Khan himself has made the case for Kashmir in every possible forum. Islamabad not only unequivocally condemned India for its illegal acts committed especially since August 5, 2019, but also urged New Delhi to come up with a roadmap to reverse its decision to pave the way for the opening of talks. bilateral. Therefore, it is difficult to infer that Islamabad has made some fundamental changes to its policy in Kashmir or whether the third option promised is a policy statement. Second, the “promise” says nothing about what Islamabad’s position on Kashmir would be from now until the desired plebiscites are held. He also did not specify the times for the first and second plebiscites, or visualize which political parties would run the affairs of Pakistan and India when the two plebiscites were to take place. In all probability, it was a political statement.

Prime Minister Imran Khan is aware that the third option on Kashmir violates and negates relevant UN Security Council resolutions as well as Article 257 of Pakistan’s constitution and means virtually abandoning the principled position of many. decades of Islamabad on the conflict in Jammu and Kashmir. Therefore, if it was not a political statement, such a massive change in the most important pillar of Pakistan’s foreign policy must have a solid basis and reasoning. The issuance of a statement of such enormity also cannot be based on an academic exercise. This brings us to a more serious question. Aside from conspiracy theories and apprehensions of outside influence to change Pakistan’s principled position on Kashmir, has Pakistan actually reached some sort of agreement on the permanent settlement of the Kashmir dispute by the government? through some off-the-beaten-path arrangements? If the Kashmir conflict is resolved under the PTI government, Prime Minister Imran Khan is expected to be Pakistan’s third Nobel Prize winner.




The mention sources can contact us to remove/changing this article

What Are The Main Benefits Of Comparing Car Insurance Quotes Online

LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 24, 2020, / Compare-autoinsurance.Org has launched a new blog post that presents the main benefits of comparing multiple car insurance quotes. For more info and free online quotes, please visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/the-advantages-of-comparing-prices-with-car-insurance-quotes-online/ The modern society has numerous technological advantages. One important advantage is the speed at which information is sent and received. With the help of the internet, the shopping habits of many persons have drastically changed. The car insurance industry hasn't remained untouched by these changes. On the internet, drivers can compare insurance prices and find out which sellers have the best offers. View photos The advantages of comparing online car insurance quotes are the following: Online quotes can be obtained from anywhere and at any time. Unlike physical insurance agencies, websites don't have a specific schedule and they are available at any time. Drivers that have busy working schedules, can compare quotes from anywhere and at any time, even at midnight. Multiple choices. Almost all insurance providers, no matter if they are well-known brands or just local insurers, have an online presence. Online quotes will allow policyholders the chance to discover multiple insurance companies and check their prices. Drivers are no longer required to get quotes from just a few known insurance companies. Also, local and regional insurers can provide lower insurance rates for the same services. Accurate insurance estimates. Online quotes can only be accurate if the customers provide accurate and real info about their car models and driving history. Lying about past driving incidents can make the price estimates to be lower, but when dealing with an insurance company lying to them is useless. Usually, insurance companies will do research about a potential customer before granting him coverage. Online quotes can be sorted easily. Although drivers are recommended to not choose a policy just based on its price, drivers can easily sort quotes by insurance price. Using brokerage websites will allow drivers to get quotes from multiple insurers, thus making the comparison faster and easier. For additional info, money-saving tips, and free car insurance quotes, visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ Compare-autoinsurance.Org is an online provider of life, home, health, and auto insurance quotes. This website is unique because it does not simply stick to one kind of insurance provider, but brings the clients the best deals from many different online insurance carriers. In this way, clients have access to offers from multiple carriers all in one place: this website. On this site, customers have access to quotes for insurance plans from various agencies, such as local or nationwide agencies, brand names insurance companies, etc. "Online quotes can easily help drivers obtain better car insurance deals. All they have to do is to complete an online form with accurate and real info, then compare prices", said Russell Rabichev, Marketing Director of Internet Marketing Company. CONTACT: Company Name: Internet Marketing CompanyPerson for contact Name: Gurgu CPhone Number: (818) 359-3898Email: [email protected]: https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ SOURCE: Compare-autoinsurance.Org View source version on accesswire.Com:https://www.Accesswire.Com/595055/What-Are-The-Main-Benefits-Of-Comparing-Car-Insurance-Quotes-Online View photos


to request, modification Contact us at Here or [email protected]