Connect with us


Imran Khan challenges SC ruling on April 3 VP actions




Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) leader Imran Khan has challenged the Supreme Court (SC) judgment which declared unconstitutional the decision of the Deputy Speaker of the National Assembly regarding the rejection of a motion of censure against him.

The petition for review held that the seat of the Supreme Court erred in assessing the provisions of Articles 66, 67 and 69 of the Constitution read with Article 248 which prohibits the superior court from interfering in the proceedings of parliament and/or to hold debates. among others the president, the prime minister, the president as well as the vice-president of the National Assembly.

“The declared institution cannot be subordinated and responsible to the jurisdiction of a seat of the supreme court because of the unequivocal prohibition of jurisdiction contained in the above-mentioned articles of the Constitution,” the petition argues.

The Supreme Court erred in assessing the mandate of the Constitution which guarantees that the parliament, together with its members/leaders, the President as well as the Prime Minister, are not responsible for the exercise of their functions as well as the powers discretionary powers in any court nor their performance of constitutional duties may not be questioned in any court under the Constitution.

It is relevant to mention here that the judgment delivered by the Vice-President of the National Assembly was intended for the application of Article 5… It had no connection with the applicant [Imran Khan]who, as the executive head of government, has nothing to do with the duties and/or decision of the vice president,” the call said.

“In fact, the speaker had certified that there was no ‘motion of no confidence’ pending against the petitioner. The petitioner then presented a notice for the dissolution of the National Assembly; there is no evidence on the record neither in suo moto nor in any other proceeding that the stated action was improperly reasoned and/or contrary to law and the Constitution.Even otherwise, the petitioner under Section 248 is not liable before any court, i.e. the exercise of his constitutional powers/duties.

The former prime minister further argued in his plea that the court exercised jurisdiction in an “unprecedented” manner insofar as it instructed the entire 342-member National Assembly to ‘it acts in a regulated manner’.

The Supreme Court restricted “their rights/discretion with respect to the performance of constitutional duties,” the appeal said, adding that “the interference and/or direction, with respect, is not consistent with the Constitution”.

That the contested order, in the absence of detailed reasons, is not a judicial decision within the meaning of article 184, paragraph 3, read with article 189 of the Constitution.

The plea further reads: “That, under Ordinance X of the Rules referred to, read with the provisions of Sections 184 and or 186 of the Constitution, the Honorable Bench of the Supreme Court may not, by ordinance, to discharge constitutional obligations directly, by holders of constitutional offices under the Constitution; obligations which enjoy constitutional protection and indemnities in accordance with, inter alia, Article 69 read together with Article 248 of the Constitution. “

Presidential reference

He further stated that the Supreme Court “erred in rendering no decision in Presidential Reference No. 01/2022 filed under Article 186 of the Constitution which was heard with the captioned cases and is of paramount importance”.

In the absence of the decision in the referred remand, the contested order has prejudiced the remand proceedings and tainted the entire proceeding which was to be held on April 9, 2022 without any decision therein.

The contested ordinance interfered with the work of parliament, which constituted “a violation of the prohibition contained in Article 69 of the Constitution”.

According to the appeal, “…the Supreme Court erred in recognizing that under the proceedings of the House, that is, Parliament is sovereign, independent and not subject to the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court or any other court under the Constitution.”

“That the Supreme Court erred in finding that the ‘motion of no confidence’ lapsed due to the influx of time as provided for in Section 95(2) of the Constitution; any instruction to consider/d “to hear/prosecute is a direct violation of the stated mandate of the Constitution. Any subsequent proceedings of the National Assembly will also be wrong in law and in the Constitution,” he added.

“That the procedures for a motion of no confidence, the election of a new Prime Minister, etc. have been thoroughly provided for in the Constitution…therefore the honorable Supreme Court has no right to micro-manage business of parliament,” he added. concluded.




The mention sources can contact us to remove/changing this article

What Are The Main Benefits Of Comparing Car Insurance Quotes Online

LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 24, 2020, / Compare-autoinsurance.Org has launched a new blog post that presents the main benefits of comparing multiple car insurance quotes. For more info and free online quotes, please visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/the-advantages-of-comparing-prices-with-car-insurance-quotes-online/ The modern society has numerous technological advantages. One important advantage is the speed at which information is sent and received. With the help of the internet, the shopping habits of many persons have drastically changed. The car insurance industry hasn't remained untouched by these changes. On the internet, drivers can compare insurance prices and find out which sellers have the best offers. View photos The advantages of comparing online car insurance quotes are the following: Online quotes can be obtained from anywhere and at any time. Unlike physical insurance agencies, websites don't have a specific schedule and they are available at any time. Drivers that have busy working schedules, can compare quotes from anywhere and at any time, even at midnight. Multiple choices. Almost all insurance providers, no matter if they are well-known brands or just local insurers, have an online presence. Online quotes will allow policyholders the chance to discover multiple insurance companies and check their prices. Drivers are no longer required to get quotes from just a few known insurance companies. Also, local and regional insurers can provide lower insurance rates for the same services. Accurate insurance estimates. Online quotes can only be accurate if the customers provide accurate and real info about their car models and driving history. Lying about past driving incidents can make the price estimates to be lower, but when dealing with an insurance company lying to them is useless. Usually, insurance companies will do research about a potential customer before granting him coverage. Online quotes can be sorted easily. Although drivers are recommended to not choose a policy just based on its price, drivers can easily sort quotes by insurance price. Using brokerage websites will allow drivers to get quotes from multiple insurers, thus making the comparison faster and easier. For additional info, money-saving tips, and free car insurance quotes, visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ Compare-autoinsurance.Org is an online provider of life, home, health, and auto insurance quotes. This website is unique because it does not simply stick to one kind of insurance provider, but brings the clients the best deals from many different online insurance carriers. In this way, clients have access to offers from multiple carriers all in one place: this website. On this site, customers have access to quotes for insurance plans from various agencies, such as local or nationwide agencies, brand names insurance companies, etc. "Online quotes can easily help drivers obtain better car insurance deals. All they have to do is to complete an online form with accurate and real info, then compare prices", said Russell Rabichev, Marketing Director of Internet Marketing Company. CONTACT: Company Name: Internet Marketing CompanyPerson for contact Name: Gurgu CPhone Number: (818) 359-3898Email: [email protected]: https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ SOURCE: Compare-autoinsurance.Org View source version on accesswire.Com:https://www.Accesswire.Com/595055/What-Are-The-Main-Benefits-Of-Comparing-Car-Insurance-Quotes-Online View photos


to request, modification Contact us at Here or [email protected]