Connect with us

Politics

Muslim protesters say Indian authorities are destroying homes in retaliation

Published

on

 


Indian security personnel monitor the demolition of the house of Javed Ahmed, a local politician who was allegedly involved in violent protests against the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), in Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, India on June 12 2022. Officials insist the house was destroyed because it was built illegally.  / Credit: SANJAY KANOJIA/AFP/Getty

Indian security personnel monitor the demolition of the house of Javed Ahmed, a local politician who was allegedly involved in violent protests against the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), in Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, India on June 12 2022. Officials insist the house was destroyed because it was built illegally. / Credit: SANJAY KANOJIA/AFP/Getty

India’s Supreme Court in New Delhi on Thursday warned the Uttar Pradesh state government against the controversial practice of demolishing the homes of Muslim protesters accused of inciting violence during nationwide protests last week, but she refused to order a halt to the demolitions.

“Demolitions must be in accordance with the law, they cannot be retaliatory,” the highest court has said, responding to a case brought by Muslims in Uttar Pradesh who allege the state government punished members of India’s 200 million strong Islamic minority to take part in protests.

Protests have erupted in several states on June 10 following disparaging remarks made by prominent members of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s political party about the Prophet Muhammad. The mostly Muslim protesters demanded the arrest of Nupur Sharma and Naveen Jindal, the ruling Bhartiya Janata (BJP) party officials who made the remarks. Both were fired by the party.

Hundreds of protesters were arrested the same day, and a day later authorities in at least two towns in Uttar Pradesh sent bulldozers to raze the homes of some of the protesters accused of rioting.

An excavator is used to demolish the house of Javed Ahmed, a local politician who was allegedly involved in violent protests over inflammatory remarks about the Prophet Muhammad made by officials of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), in Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh , India, June 12, 2022. / Credit: SANJAY KANOJIA/AFP/Getty

An excavator is used to demolish the house of Javed Ahmed, a local politician who was allegedly involved in violent protests over inflammatory remarks about the Prophet Muhammad made by officials of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), in Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh , India, June 12, 2022. / Credit: SANJAY KANOJIA/AFP/Getty

One of the demolished houses, in Prayagraj district, belonged to the father of Afren Fatima, a prominent student activist. Her father, local politician Javed Mohammad, was accused of planning the protests, some of which turned violent.

Uttar Pradesh police have arrested more protesters since the demolitions, taking a total of 357 people into custody according to a report by the Times of India. Some of these families have expressed concern that their homes could still be destroyed under the Uttar Pradesh government’s practice, which has been described as “bulldozing justice”.

The state government insists demolitions are only carried out on ‘illegal constructions’, but millions of homes across India have been built without planning permission, leading critics to wonder why only the houses of the demonstrators are destroyed.

CU Singh, a lawyer for the petitioners who took the case to the Supreme Court, accused the government of targeting the Muslim community. A representative of the Uttar Pradesh administration insisted in court that “the normal course of the law” had been followed.

The Supreme Court has asked the Uttar Pradesh government to file a response to the allegations by June 21, when it will hear the case again. The court said it would not stop the demolitions in the meantime, rejecting the resident’s request for an interim stay and raising the prospect of further demolitions in the coming days.

“We cannot suspend the demolitions. We can say to go ahead according to the law,” Supreme Court Justices AS Bopanna and Vikram Nath said in their statement on Thursday.

“Everything must be fair (…) we expect the authorities to act only in accordance with the law,” added one of the judges.

Activists from Brotherhood movement, Student Islamic Organization of India (SIO) and others hold placards and protest against the demolition of the house of activist Afreen Fatima and her father Javed Mohammad in the district of Prayagraj in Uttar Pradesh on June 13, 2022 in New Delhi, India.  / Credit: Ajay Aggarwal/Hindustan Times/Getty

Activists from Brotherhood movement, Student Islamic Organization of India (SIO) and others hold placards and protest against the demolition of the house of activist Afreen Fatima and her father Javed Mohammad in the district of Prayagraj in Uttar Pradesh on June 13, 2022 in New Delhi, India. / Credit: Ajay Aggarwal/Hindustan Times/Getty

The court petitioners allege the demolitions were “unlawful, shocking and appalling”, and they are seeking legal action against the government officials who ordered the homes to be razed.

Earlier this week, several senior former judges and lawyers wrote a joint letter to India’s Chief Justice urging him to take note of the “brutal crackdown” and “violation of citizens’ rights”.

India faces a huge diplomatic backlash earlier this month from at least 15 Muslim-majority countries, including Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Iran and Oman, following remarks by ruling party officials against the prophet of islam.

Many of these countries have registered official protests with India, and officials from two Gulf states have called for boycotts of Indian products.

Prime Minister Modi’s Hindu nationalist government has been accused of deliberately trying to marginalize the country’s Muslims through legislation and other moves. Modi and others in his party vehemently deny allegations that they fuel bigotry.

Medical expert Dr. David Agus answers questions about childhood vaccines and lingering COVID symptoms

Harry Styles interrupts the concert to find his former teacher in the crowd

Shawn Amos grew up as the son of ‘Famous Amos’

Sources

1/ https://Google.com/

2/ https://news.yahoo.com/muslim-protesters-indian-authorities-destroying-140614911.html

The mention sources can contact us to remove/changing this article

What Are The Main Benefits Of Comparing Car Insurance Quotes Online

LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 24, 2020, / Compare-autoinsurance.Org has launched a new blog post that presents the main benefits of comparing multiple car insurance quotes. For more info and free online quotes, please visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/the-advantages-of-comparing-prices-with-car-insurance-quotes-online/ The modern society has numerous technological advantages. One important advantage is the speed at which information is sent and received. With the help of the internet, the shopping habits of many persons have drastically changed. The car insurance industry hasn't remained untouched by these changes. On the internet, drivers can compare insurance prices and find out which sellers have the best offers. View photos The advantages of comparing online car insurance quotes are the following: Online quotes can be obtained from anywhere and at any time. Unlike physical insurance agencies, websites don't have a specific schedule and they are available at any time. Drivers that have busy working schedules, can compare quotes from anywhere and at any time, even at midnight. Multiple choices. Almost all insurance providers, no matter if they are well-known brands or just local insurers, have an online presence. Online quotes will allow policyholders the chance to discover multiple insurance companies and check their prices. Drivers are no longer required to get quotes from just a few known insurance companies. Also, local and regional insurers can provide lower insurance rates for the same services. Accurate insurance estimates. Online quotes can only be accurate if the customers provide accurate and real info about their car models and driving history. Lying about past driving incidents can make the price estimates to be lower, but when dealing with an insurance company lying to them is useless. Usually, insurance companies will do research about a potential customer before granting him coverage. Online quotes can be sorted easily. Although drivers are recommended to not choose a policy just based on its price, drivers can easily sort quotes by insurance price. Using brokerage websites will allow drivers to get quotes from multiple insurers, thus making the comparison faster and easier. For additional info, money-saving tips, and free car insurance quotes, visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ Compare-autoinsurance.Org is an online provider of life, home, health, and auto insurance quotes. This website is unique because it does not simply stick to one kind of insurance provider, but brings the clients the best deals from many different online insurance carriers. In this way, clients have access to offers from multiple carriers all in one place: this website. On this site, customers have access to quotes for insurance plans from various agencies, such as local or nationwide agencies, brand names insurance companies, etc. "Online quotes can easily help drivers obtain better car insurance deals. All they have to do is to complete an online form with accurate and real info, then compare prices", said Russell Rabichev, Marketing Director of Internet Marketing Company. CONTACT: Company Name: Internet Marketing CompanyPerson for contact Name: Gurgu CPhone Number: (818) 359-3898Email: [email protected]: https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ SOURCE: Compare-autoinsurance.Org View source version on accesswire.Com:https://www.Accesswire.Com/595055/What-Are-The-Main-Benefits-Of-Comparing-Car-Insurance-Quotes-Online View photos

ExBUlletin

to request, modification Contact us at Here or [email protected]