Connect with us

Politics

The escalation of great power protest in Taiwan: can it lead to war?

Published

on

 


The brutal war between Russia and Ukraine that threatens to last as long as it takes is believed to be the reason Finland and Sweden have applied for NATO membership. On the day NATO leaders met in Madrid, a retired US Army lieutenant colonel called the decision an American mistake. Some Western critics also believe NATO expansion isn’t just bad news for America, it’s more of a threat than a boost for Europe. Furthermore, as the United States and NATO celebrate the loss of neutrality of the two Nordic countries, Bidens claims he has come under scrutiny that both states voluntarily enter the Organization.

The news from Madrid was that NATO has formalized its invitation to Sweden and Finland to join the security alliance. The only delay in the two Nordic countries joining the security bloc within a year or less is the ratification by the parliaments of the 30 member countries of the Madrid decision. Describing the decision as NATO’s biggest expansion in decades, the global media chose to downplay the decision which could potentially turn Europe into a dangerous rather than a safer place. Comments such as NATO brought war to Ukraine, expanding NATO membership could push Europe into war, are now commonplace in major European capitals, as well as in Washington.

What is NATO?

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), also known as the North Atlantic Alliance, is an intergovernmental military alliance founded by 12 countries in Washington, DC on April 4, 1949. During the Cold War, the purpose of the US-led European security alliance was to defend its member states against the perceived threat of the Soviet Union. After the dissolution of the USSR in 1991, not only was the alliance not disbanded, but rather expanded its membership and military operations. It now has 30 member states 28 in Europe as well as the United States and Canada.

In the years following the Cold War, analysts in Europe as well as the United States argued that after its main security threat had disappeared, with the Soviet Union gone, there was no reason for NATO to continue and therefore should be disbanded. However, in the years that followed, not only did the alliance increasingly become seen as no longer defensive, but it conducted military operations in the Balkans, the Middle East, South Asia and Africa. In China, analysts and officials from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs refer to the most powerful military alliance in the world as global NATO. Or, as Professor John Mearsheimer said: It is totally wrong to say that the crisis in Ukraine is largely the result of Russian aggression. The United States and its European allies are primarily responsible for the crisis. The root of the problem is the expansion of NATO.

NATO-ization of Finland: a threat or a boost for Europe

Welcoming the two Nordic countries into the NATO family, President Biden said in May that NATO is an alliance of choice, not coercion. As if endorsing the above statement from Bidens, Swedish Prime Minister Magdalena Andersson also pointed out: I have to say that Sweden chose a new path at one point. However, the truth is something quite different. According reportsefforts to bring Finland and Sweden into NATO continued for months before the Russian-Ukrainian conflict erupted in February.

Speaking of expanded NATO membership and Europe’s shared security, Biden said in Madrid, Putin thought he could break the transatlantic alliance. [Putin] wanted the Finnishization of NATO. He obtained the NATOisation of Finland. Well, for starters, the term finlandization entered German political debate in the 1960s and 1970s and it referred to a country modeled after Finland’s decision not to challenge a more powerful neighbor in foreign policy.

Also, it is now generally recognized in the West that by invading Ukraine, the Russian leader achieved his own goal. Or in other words, the immediate short-term fallout for Russia with a huge and irreversible specific military consequence of Sweden and Finland’s quick decision to join the military alliance for Russia is the additional eight hundred kilometers border with NATO. Like Susan B. Glasser wrote in his New Yorker column that the two Nordic states will bring two additional military personnel who are among the most capable in Europe. This will bolster the prospect that the alliance could bottle up the Baltic Sea and keep the Russians out, she added.

On the other hand, for both NATO and Europe, there is an urgent need to overcome immediate challenges such as overcoming the cracks in the alliance and forging political unity against Russia among the major European powers, including the Germany, France, Italy, UK, etc. Or, as several analysts had announced, the embrace of two new members would increase rather than decrease the chances of war on the one hand, and would increase the risk of future conflict for the whole alliance on the other hand.

NATO enlargement: what is at stake for the United States?

In an attempt to place the sometimes hot, sometimes cold relationship between Russia and the United States and Europe in historical perspective, the Polish academic dbskiquoted above, called the Law on the Russia-NATO Foundation as the root cause of the dramatic ups and downs between Russia and NATO. The law, which no one is talking about today, was signed in 1997 between NATO and Russia and was essentially NATO’s political commitment to Moscow not to deploy substantial combat forces in new member states. of the covenant. Even as brutal war rages in Ukraine, as in the past when Russia attacked Georgia and annexed Crimea respectively, the NATO establishment at the Madrid summit has made every concerted effort to protect the Act of foundation.

In a June 29 statement, the White House said all NATO decisions in Madrid were made in the spirit of the founding act. However, commentators claim that when some members of the alliance in Madrid demanded the denunciation of the law, the answer has been a compromise formula, that is, don’t ask, don’t tell. Such indecision or miscalculation signals of NATO to Russia could mean more war for Europe. [My emphasis]

Indeed, the decision of the two Nordic countries to join NATO received an extremely positive response both in Europe and in the United States. However, no one knows what other risks to Europe are in place from Russia (with currently only 6% of its borders with NATO) which already feels threatened and surrounded by the current 30-member NATO. Within days of Sweden’s announcement to abandon neutrality, the Swedish capital was turned into a naval garrison with the arrival of the US Amphibious Battle Group consisting of assault ships etc. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley, standing atop the assault ship USS Kearsarge, declared American intention to make the Baltic Sea a NATO lake?

Also, seen against former U.S. Army Lt. Col. Daniel L. Davis saying NATO enlargement may seem like a good idea, [but] adding more members will likely have the opposite effect, what does the claim that Russian military aggression has reshaped US-European relations mean after all? Interestingly, according to an American political affairs analyst, even long-time proponents of American and European security concerns fear NATO 31st and 32n/a members. The analyst cited former director of policy planning for the US State Department, Anne-Marte Slaughter, said [But] a weak and humiliated Russia is a dangerous Russia. Putin may well be able to stay in power even longer thanks to the strength of the foreign enemy encroaching on Russia’s borders.

In conclusion, not only in Europe, but even in Sweden, opinions differ on the question of whether the enlargement of NATO membership will aggravate tensions with Russia. Joining NATO would be preparing for war, said Gabriella Irsten of the Swedish Society for Peace and Arbitration. There is no denying that Finland’s and Sweden’s simultaneous declaration to join NATO sparked the fiercest debate in Europe since the end of the Cold War over NATO’s mission. The ongoing debate has once again brought back what one of NATO’s earliest critics warned its European member states in the closing years of the last century.

In an op-ed for the NYT in 1997, George F. Kennan wrote: NATO expansion after the demise of the Soviets would be the most fatal mistake of American policy in the entire post-war era. cold. Now that the membership of the two Nordic countries in NATO is almost a given, imagine how Europe would transform, especially for Finland after NATOisation, remember what Liana Fix and Michael Kimmage had warned us around in the Foreign Affairs just days before Russia launches a military attack on Ukraine on February 24: What if Russia wins?

Sources

1/ https://Google.com/

2/ https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2022/08/06/escalating-big-power-contestation-on-taiwan-can-it-lead-to-war/

The mention sources can contact us to remove/changing this article

What Are The Main Benefits Of Comparing Car Insurance Quotes Online

LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 24, 2020, / Compare-autoinsurance.Org has launched a new blog post that presents the main benefits of comparing multiple car insurance quotes. For more info and free online quotes, please visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/the-advantages-of-comparing-prices-with-car-insurance-quotes-online/ The modern society has numerous technological advantages. One important advantage is the speed at which information is sent and received. With the help of the internet, the shopping habits of many persons have drastically changed. The car insurance industry hasn't remained untouched by these changes. On the internet, drivers can compare insurance prices and find out which sellers have the best offers. View photos The advantages of comparing online car insurance quotes are the following: Online quotes can be obtained from anywhere and at any time. Unlike physical insurance agencies, websites don't have a specific schedule and they are available at any time. Drivers that have busy working schedules, can compare quotes from anywhere and at any time, even at midnight. Multiple choices. Almost all insurance providers, no matter if they are well-known brands or just local insurers, have an online presence. Online quotes will allow policyholders the chance to discover multiple insurance companies and check their prices. Drivers are no longer required to get quotes from just a few known insurance companies. Also, local and regional insurers can provide lower insurance rates for the same services. Accurate insurance estimates. Online quotes can only be accurate if the customers provide accurate and real info about their car models and driving history. Lying about past driving incidents can make the price estimates to be lower, but when dealing with an insurance company lying to them is useless. Usually, insurance companies will do research about a potential customer before granting him coverage. Online quotes can be sorted easily. Although drivers are recommended to not choose a policy just based on its price, drivers can easily sort quotes by insurance price. Using brokerage websites will allow drivers to get quotes from multiple insurers, thus making the comparison faster and easier. For additional info, money-saving tips, and free car insurance quotes, visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ Compare-autoinsurance.Org is an online provider of life, home, health, and auto insurance quotes. This website is unique because it does not simply stick to one kind of insurance provider, but brings the clients the best deals from many different online insurance carriers. In this way, clients have access to offers from multiple carriers all in one place: this website. On this site, customers have access to quotes for insurance plans from various agencies, such as local or nationwide agencies, brand names insurance companies, etc. "Online quotes can easily help drivers obtain better car insurance deals. All they have to do is to complete an online form with accurate and real info, then compare prices", said Russell Rabichev, Marketing Director of Internet Marketing Company. CONTACT: Company Name: Internet Marketing CompanyPerson for contact Name: Gurgu CPhone Number: (818) 359-3898Email: [email protected]: https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ SOURCE: Compare-autoinsurance.Org View source version on accesswire.Com:https://www.Accesswire.Com/595055/What-Are-The-Main-Benefits-Of-Comparing-Car-Insurance-Quotes-Online View photos

ExBUlletin

to request, modification Contact us at Here or [email protected]