Islamabad court grants bail to Imran Khan in case related to remarks against judge – Pakistan

An Islamabad District and Sessional Court on Thursday granted interim bail to PTI Chairman Imran Khan in a case related to his controversial remarks against Additional District and Sessions Judge (ADSJ) Zeba Chaudhry during a public gathering on August 20.

Last week, senior civilian judge Rana Mujahid Rahim issued arrest warrants for Imran on September 30.

After the High Court in Islamabad overturned the terrorism charges of the case registered against Imran, the case was transferred to a magistrate court and the PTI leader failed to secure bail.

Subsequently, the head of the PTI approached the IHC on October 2 with a plea for bail before the arrest. The court accepted the plea and ordered Imran to appear in lower court by October 7.

Earlier in the day, the former prime minister arrived in court amid elaborate security with his lawyer Babar Awan.

During the brief hearing, Civil Judge Kamran Basharat asked if this was Imran’s first bail application, to which Awan replied in the affirmative. The hearing in another case has been set for October 13.

The court then granted provisional bail to the head of the PTI against bonds worth Rs 50,000 and issued notices to the police for the next hearing.

In a media interview outside the court, Awan said all the complaints filed against Imran were bogus and an imported government plot.

If there is one person in Pakistan who can make changes to the Constitution, it is Imran Khan, the lawyer claimed, adding that the existing parliament came through cipher.

Soon we will return to parliament with a two-thirds majority, Awan added.

Contempt cases

The decision to initiate contempt proceedings against Imran was made by IHC Judge Aamer Farooq on August 22 during the hearing of a motion challenging Gills’ pre-trial detention by police. The court summoned Imran on August 31 and then issued him with a show cause notice.

The day before the hearing, the former prime minister had filed a response to the IHC in which he expressed his willingness to withdraw his remarks about Judge Chaudhry if they were deemed inappropriate. He had argued before the IHC that judges who had agreed to prosecute him should consider stepping down from the bench because he said they had prejudged the case.

However, the IHC found the response unsatisfactory and asked the head of PTI to submit a carefully considered response.

Following this, Imran submitted another response to the court. In the revised response, Imran refrained from issuing an unconditional apology.

On September 8, the IHC moved to charge Imran, once again calling his response unsatisfactory.

However, at the next hearing on September 22, when charges were expected to be brought against the PTI leader, Imran offered to apologize to Judge Chaudhry and escaped the act. of accusation.

Following his statement to the court, the larger panel handling the case said it was satisfied with the apology and asked the head of the PTI to submit an affidavit.

Before submitting the affidavit, Imran appeared in a court in Islamabad on Friday to personally apologize to Judge Chaudhry, but his apology was left on hold as the judge was on leave.

Meanwhile, in his affidavit, Imran said he realized during these (contempt) proceedings before the honorable court that he might have crossed a red line. However, he added, he never intended to threaten Judge Chaudhry and there was no intention behind that statement to take any action other than legal action.

He said he wanted to assure the IHC that he was willing to explain and clarify before Judge Chaudhry that neither he nor his party were/were seeking any action against her and that he was willing to apologize to from her if she felt like the submitter (Imran) had crossed a line.

He also expressed his willingness to take any other action the IHC deems necessary and appropriate for the satisfaction of the honorable court that he never intended to interfere in the court process or bring violation of the dignity or independence of the judiciary.

At the last hearing on Monday, October 3, the IHC dismissed the show cause notice issued to Imran, thus ending the contempt proceedings against the head of the PTI.

Sources 1/ https://Google.com/ 2/ https://www.dawn.com/news/1713765/islamabad-court-grants-interim-bail-to-imran-khan-in-case-linked-to-remarks-against-judge The mention sources can contact us to remove/changing this article

What Are The Main Benefits Of Comparing Car Insurance Quotes Online

LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 24, 2020, / Compare-autoinsurance.Org has launched a new blog post that presents the main benefits of comparing multiple car insurance quotes. For more info and free online quotes, please visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/the-advantages-of-comparing-prices-with-car-insurance-quotes-online/ The modern society has numerous technological advantages. One important advantage is the speed at which information is sent and received. With the help of the internet, the shopping habits of many persons have drastically changed. The car insurance industry hasn't remained untouched by these changes. On the internet, drivers can compare insurance prices and find out which sellers have the best offers. View photos The advantages of comparing online car insurance quotes are the following: Online quotes can be obtained from anywhere and at any time. Unlike physical insurance agencies, websites don't have a specific schedule and they are available at any time. Drivers that have busy working schedules, can compare quotes from anywhere and at any time, even at midnight. Multiple choices. Almost all insurance providers, no matter if they are well-known brands or just local insurers, have an online presence. Online quotes will allow policyholders the chance to discover multiple insurance companies and check their prices. Drivers are no longer required to get quotes from just a few known insurance companies. Also, local and regional insurers can provide lower insurance rates for the same services. Accurate insurance estimates. Online quotes can only be accurate if the customers provide accurate and real info about their car models and driving history. Lying about past driving incidents can make the price estimates to be lower, but when dealing with an insurance company lying to them is useless. Usually, insurance companies will do research about a potential customer before granting him coverage. Online quotes can be sorted easily. Although drivers are recommended to not choose a policy just based on its price, drivers can easily sort quotes by insurance price. Using brokerage websites will allow drivers to get quotes from multiple insurers, thus making the comparison faster and easier. For additional info, money-saving tips, and free car insurance quotes, visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ Compare-autoinsurance.Org is an online provider of life, home, health, and auto insurance quotes. This website is unique because it does not simply stick to one kind of insurance provider, but brings the clients the best deals from many different online insurance carriers. In this way, clients have access to offers from multiple carriers all in one place: this website. On this site, customers have access to quotes for insurance plans from various agencies, such as local or nationwide agencies, brand names insurance companies, etc. "Online quotes can easily help drivers obtain better car insurance deals. All they have to do is to complete an online form with accurate and real info, then compare prices", said Russell Rabichev, Marketing Director of Internet Marketing Company. CONTACT: Company Name: Internet Marketing CompanyPerson for contact Name: Gurgu CPhone Number: (818) 359-3898Email: [email protected]: https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ SOURCE: Compare-autoinsurance.Org View source version on accesswire.Com:https://www.Accesswire.Com/595055/What-Are-The-Main-Benefits-Of-Comparing-Car-Insurance-Quotes-Online View photos