Connect with us


Boris Johnson has broken the huge promise he made to the British a year ago today




The 2019 Queen’s Speech, which set out the government’s intentions, took place on October 14 of this year. In the speech, the queen relayed Boris Johnson’s plan to bring forward proposals to ban imports of trophy hunting. It is now a year before the date of this promise.

The government has since conducted a consultation that Free some potential “options” for a ban. But he has yet to come up with firm proposals on the ban, or even publish the results of his consultation. In short, the UK is hardly any closer to banning trophy hunting imports than it was a year ago.

“Go for it”

Johnson reiterated his government’s intention to ban the import of trophies in February. Responding to comments from her Conservative colleague Pauline Latham, in which she urged the Prime Minister to act “ decisively ” on the ban, Johnson said:

We want to end the importation into this country of trophies hunted elsewhere.

Most recently, Conservative MP Roger Gale urged the government to “keep going”. Addressing the Campaign to Ban Trophy Hunting (CBTH) in its webinar at the Conservative Party Conference, Gale said:

Banning trophy hunting, banning the importation of trophies into the UK, can almost be done with the stroke of a pen. It doesn’t require a massive bill to do it, it takes political will, determination and decision. And I see absolutely no reason why this government cannot do this tomorrow.


As The Canary previously reported, however, the debate over trophy hunting is controversial. He has divided the conservation community, with a certain stance in favor of what is called a conservation tool. Others vigorously challenge this notion, arguing that it is deeply damaging to wildlife and offers little to communities that live alongside target species.

Hunting advocacy groups, meanwhile, have succeeded in gaining a foothold in the world’s wildlife watchdogs, further confusing matters. Because it means that they have the ear of the decision-makers within these bodies. There is no doubt that such groups also tried to get the Ministry of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) to hear in the consultation on the ban. One of the main players in the industry is Safari Club International (SCI). he urged hunters, regardless of nationality, to tell the UK government that “further restrictions are not necessary”. Like SCI, the British Association for Shooting and Conservation (BASC) opposite any action.

The position of these groups contrasts with most of the British public. As Arthur Thomas of Humane Society International explained during the CBTH webinar, the public is “overwhelmingly” in favor of a ban. In polls, 80% of people support such a measure.


Another ban has recently come about. Facebook removed a network of Instagram accounts, pages and accounts due to “inauthentic coordinated behavior” on October 6. Facebook’s behavioral survey was prompted by a Washington post article on the social media activities of a group called Turning Point Action, a subsidiary of the pro-Trump group Turning Point USA. A marketing company called Rally Forge was at the center of the controversy. As the Washington post reported, Facebook has since announced that the company will be “ permanently banned ” from the platform.

This ban, and removal from the network, was due to accounts linked to Rally Forge, posting comments or content that “appeared popular but were in fact paid comment”, known as astroturfing, a report by the detailed Stanford Internet Observatory. Along with Turning Point Action, it appears Rally Forge also counted a company called Inclusive Conservation Group (ICG) as one of its clients, and some of the now-deleted accounts were running trophy hunting propaganda on behalf of ICG.


As the Stanford Internet Observatory noted:

Freelance wildlife conservation writer Jared Kukura posted a series of articles on his site, Wild Things Initiative, documenting what he believed to be suspicious social media activity by the inclusive conservation group.

In his blanket Of ICG’s activity, Kukura noted that “most” of its funding comes from the Safari Club International Foundation (SCIF) and the Shikar-Safari Club International Foundation. He also detailed a grant request that ICG made to SCIF for additional funding in 2019. As Kukura pointed out, in a slogan in the grant application, the ICG offered an idea of ​​what its operations involve:

shape, inform, manipulate, mislead, expose, diminish, promote, deceive, constrain, dissuade, mobilize, convince.

Kukura attributed two Facebook pages to ICG including in his articles, which ICG himself had branded as examples of his work in the 2019 grant application, Proud American Hunter and Let Africa Live. Facebook deleted these two pages in its recent enforcement action.

Credibility struck

Talk to The Canary, Kukura said he was “happy” that Facebook deleted the accounts and that his “research helped their investigation.” But he said:

I raised these concerns with Facebook in June and received no response. It wasn’t until the Washington Post started investigating the disinformation being spread by Turning Point USA that Facebook really took the initiative to do something about it.

Although Kukura expressed doubts that Facebook’s action would affect the overall behavior of the trophy hunting industry, he said:

this significantly damages the credibility of the trophy hunting industry and I personally do not understand how anyone would be willing to work in good faith with organizations like Safari Club International in light of these recent events.

Indeed, the credibility of the industry has taken a hit. Because it has been shown that it has to finance “inauthentic” information operations to give the impression that it enjoys substantial public support. As polls show, support for trophy hunting among the UK public is actually very limited. But the public need Johnson to keep their promise for an import ban on trophy hunting to take effect.

Featured Image Via the independent / YouTube

What Are The Main Benefits Of Comparing Car Insurance Quotes Online

LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 24, 2020, / Compare-autoinsurance.Org has launched a new blog post that presents the main benefits of comparing multiple car insurance quotes. For more info and free online quotes, please visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/the-advantages-of-comparing-prices-with-car-insurance-quotes-online/ The modern society has numerous technological advantages. One important advantage is the speed at which information is sent and received. With the help of the internet, the shopping habits of many persons have drastically changed. The car insurance industry hasn't remained untouched by these changes. On the internet, drivers can compare insurance prices and find out which sellers have the best offers. View photos The advantages of comparing online car insurance quotes are the following: Online quotes can be obtained from anywhere and at any time. Unlike physical insurance agencies, websites don't have a specific schedule and they are available at any time. Drivers that have busy working schedules, can compare quotes from anywhere and at any time, even at midnight. Multiple choices. Almost all insurance providers, no matter if they are well-known brands or just local insurers, have an online presence. Online quotes will allow policyholders the chance to discover multiple insurance companies and check their prices. Drivers are no longer required to get quotes from just a few known insurance companies. Also, local and regional insurers can provide lower insurance rates for the same services. Accurate insurance estimates. Online quotes can only be accurate if the customers provide accurate and real info about their car models and driving history. Lying about past driving incidents can make the price estimates to be lower, but when dealing with an insurance company lying to them is useless. Usually, insurance companies will do research about a potential customer before granting him coverage. Online quotes can be sorted easily. Although drivers are recommended to not choose a policy just based on its price, drivers can easily sort quotes by insurance price. Using brokerage websites will allow drivers to get quotes from multiple insurers, thus making the comparison faster and easier. For additional info, money-saving tips, and free car insurance quotes, visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ Compare-autoinsurance.Org is an online provider of life, home, health, and auto insurance quotes. This website is unique because it does not simply stick to one kind of insurance provider, but brings the clients the best deals from many different online insurance carriers. In this way, clients have access to offers from multiple carriers all in one place: this website. On this site, customers have access to quotes for insurance plans from various agencies, such as local or nationwide agencies, brand names insurance companies, etc. "Online quotes can easily help drivers obtain better car insurance deals. All they have to do is to complete an online form with accurate and real info, then compare prices", said Russell Rabichev, Marketing Director of Internet Marketing Company. CONTACT: Company Name: Internet Marketing CompanyPerson for contact Name: Gurgu CPhone Number: (818) 359-3898Email: [email protected]: https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ SOURCE: Compare-autoinsurance.Org View source version on accesswire.Com:https://www.Accesswire.Com/595055/What-Are-The-Main-Benefits-Of-Comparing-Car-Insurance-Quotes-Online View photos

picture credit


to request, modification Contact us at Here or [email protected]