Connect with us


US Supreme Court hears dispute over football coach’s prayers




Jan. 14 (Reuters) – The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday approved an appeal from a former Christian high school soccer coach who was suspended from his Washington state high school job for refusing to stop praying in midfield after games – a case that could extend the religious rights of employees of public institutions.

The judges appealed Joseph Kennedy, who worked as an assistant football coach in the city of Bremerton, against a lower court ruling that dismissed his claims that the school district’s actions violated its freedom of speech and religious rights under the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

The San Francisco-based 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against Kennedy last year, ruling that local officials would have violated the government’s First Amendment prohibition on establishing religion if they allowed Kennedy’s prayers and Christian speeches to continue.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to

Kennedy was an assistant football coach at his alma mater, Bremerton High School from 2008 to 2015.

The issue in this case is whether Kennedy’s religious devotion alongside players on the football field, as a civil servant, was a government speech that can be regulated under Supreme Court precedents, or a private act that would protect the Constitution.

Kennedy states that his prayers and speeches were private in nature and not part of his official duties as a coach. Bremerton School District disagreed, noting that Kennedy regularly prayed after the game for crowds of players and others for years until officials learned about the religious nature of these sessions in 2015.

The school district said such prayers from the coach could be coercive, and some parents said their children felt compelled to participate.

The dispute began when the school district, wary that Kennedy’s actions could be seen as an impermissible endorsement of religion by the government, notified him to stop the prayers while he was on duty and offered other private locations in the school as an alternative. .

Kennedy declined and appeared in the media to publicize his dispute with the school district, which drew national attention. After repeatedly defying the demands of school officials, he was given paid time off from his season contract and did not reapply as coach for the following season.

“No child attending public school should pray to play sports in school,” said Rachel Laser, president of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, a secularism advocacy group that represents the school district.

The school district, Laser said, followed the law and protected students’ religious freedom when it prevented Kennedy from having forced prayers with players.

“No teacher or coach should lose their job just for publicly expressing their faith,” said Kelly Shackelford, president and CEO of First Liberty Institute, a conservative religious rights group that Kennedy helps represent. “By taking this important case, the Supreme Court can protect the right of every American to participate in private religious expression, including praying in public, without fear of punishment.”

The Supreme Court, which has a conservative majority of 6-3, has taken a generous view of religious rights in several rulings in recent years.

Kennedy, who has said he was “not rehired,” sued in federal court in 2016. He asked for a court order to be reinstated as a coach, for religious discrimination and violations of his freedom of expression.

Highlighting the coach’s efforts to draw national attention to his challenge, the 9th Circuit said Kennedy engaged in “public speech of an overtly religious nature” while working as a public servant. The school district allegedly violated the Constitution “by allowing Kennedy to pray at the end of football games, in the middle of the field, with students who felt pressured to join him,” the 9th added. Circuit to it.

In arguments in another case last month, conservative Supreme Court justices seemed poised to further expand public funding for religiously-based entities in a case involving a Maine tuition assistance program that excludes private schools that promote religious beliefs.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to

Reporting by Andrew Chung in New York; Editing by Will Dunham

Our standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.




The mention sources can contact us to remove/changing this article

What Are The Main Benefits Of Comparing Car Insurance Quotes Online

LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 24, 2020, / Compare-autoinsurance.Org has launched a new blog post that presents the main benefits of comparing multiple car insurance quotes. For more info and free online quotes, please visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/the-advantages-of-comparing-prices-with-car-insurance-quotes-online/ The modern society has numerous technological advantages. One important advantage is the speed at which information is sent and received. With the help of the internet, the shopping habits of many persons have drastically changed. The car insurance industry hasn't remained untouched by these changes. On the internet, drivers can compare insurance prices and find out which sellers have the best offers. View photos The advantages of comparing online car insurance quotes are the following: Online quotes can be obtained from anywhere and at any time. Unlike physical insurance agencies, websites don't have a specific schedule and they are available at any time. Drivers that have busy working schedules, can compare quotes from anywhere and at any time, even at midnight. Multiple choices. Almost all insurance providers, no matter if they are well-known brands or just local insurers, have an online presence. Online quotes will allow policyholders the chance to discover multiple insurance companies and check their prices. Drivers are no longer required to get quotes from just a few known insurance companies. Also, local and regional insurers can provide lower insurance rates for the same services. Accurate insurance estimates. Online quotes can only be accurate if the customers provide accurate and real info about their car models and driving history. Lying about past driving incidents can make the price estimates to be lower, but when dealing with an insurance company lying to them is useless. Usually, insurance companies will do research about a potential customer before granting him coverage. Online quotes can be sorted easily. Although drivers are recommended to not choose a policy just based on its price, drivers can easily sort quotes by insurance price. Using brokerage websites will allow drivers to get quotes from multiple insurers, thus making the comparison faster and easier. For additional info, money-saving tips, and free car insurance quotes, visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ Compare-autoinsurance.Org is an online provider of life, home, health, and auto insurance quotes. This website is unique because it does not simply stick to one kind of insurance provider, but brings the clients the best deals from many different online insurance carriers. In this way, clients have access to offers from multiple carriers all in one place: this website. On this site, customers have access to quotes for insurance plans from various agencies, such as local or nationwide agencies, brand names insurance companies, etc. "Online quotes can easily help drivers obtain better car insurance deals. All they have to do is to complete an online form with accurate and real info, then compare prices", said Russell Rabichev, Marketing Director of Internet Marketing Company. CONTACT: Company Name: Internet Marketing CompanyPerson for contact Name: Gurgu CPhone Number: (818) 359-3898Email: [email protected]: https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ SOURCE: Compare-autoinsurance.Org View source version on accesswire.Com:https://www.Accesswire.Com/595055/What-Are-The-Main-Benefits-Of-Comparing-Car-Insurance-Quotes-Online View photos


to request, modification Contact us at Here or [email protected]