Connect with us

Sports

LANE ONE: Now that the EOPAAA committee is in place, what will it do in her study of the US Olympic and Paralympic Committee?

Avatar

Published

on


The Empowering Olympic, Paralympic and Amateur Athletes Act of 2020 (EOPAAA: S. 2330) became law on October 30 last year, creating the potentially powerful Commission for the Study of the Olympic and Paralympic Games in the US.

Membership ended last Friday, so what now?

The composition of the Commission includes 16 members, eight of whom are women and eight are men, and ten current or former athletes in the Olympic, Paralympic or Pan American Games:

Olympians (6):
John Dane (sailing)
Benita Fitzgerald Mosley (track and field)
Nancy Hogshead-Makar (swimming)
Edwin Moses (athletics)
Brittney Reese (track and field)
Jordyn Wieber (gymnastics)

Paralympians (3):
Patty Cisneros Prevo (basketball)
Karin Korb (tennis)
Melissa Stockwell (swimming & triathlon)

Athlete Advisory Board of USOPC (1):
Han Xiou (ex-chairman; played table tennis)

The six non-sporting members include:

Rob Cohen, president of IMA Financial Group and a trustee of the USOPC Foundation;
Mitch Daniels, former Governor of Indiana;
Bill Hybl, Managing Director, El Pomar Foundation; twice USOC President;
Dionne Koller, professor of law at the University of Baltimore;
Rob Mullens, Athletics Director at the University of Oregon;
Joe Schmitz, former Inspector General of the United States Department of Defense.

It is a powerful group and no one can say that the athlete’s voice is not well represented, with 10 out of 16 members (62.5%). Koller has been announced as co-chair and Xiao could be the other.

What will the Commission do now? His responsibilities are described in detail, including 10 items specified:

an overview of the most recent reforms implemented by the United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee;

a description of the proposed reforms to the structure of the United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee;

an assessment of whether the board of directors of the United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee is composed of diverse members, including athletes

an assessment of the participation of athletes in the United States in the Olympic and Paralympic Games;

a description of the status of a license agreement for the United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee;

an assessment of whether the United States is achieving the goals for the Olympic and Paralympic Games set by the United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee;

an analysis of the participation in amateur athletics of (I) women; (II) disabled persons; and (III) minorities;

a description of the ongoing efforts of the United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee to bring the Olympic and Paralympic Games to the United States;

an evaluation of the functions of the national governing bodies (as defined in section 220501 of Title 36, United States Code) and an analysis of the responsiveness of the national governing bodies to athletes with respect to the duties of the national governing bodies under article 220524 ( a) (3) of Title 36, United States Code; and

a review of the finances and financial organization of the United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee.

The Commission must meet within 30 days of the appointment of the last member, i.e. by 2 May 2021 at the latest, and will need to obtain funding and appoint a staff. It must hold at least one public hearing and has a subpoena authority. The Commission is responsible for:

No later than 270 days from the date of entry into force of this Act, the Commission shall submit to Congress a report on the results of the study conducted… including a detailed statement of findings, conclusions, recommendations and proposed policy changes.

That would mean that the Commission would have to complete its work before the end of July, when the Tokyo Olympics are actually underway. That is not going to happen, and the deadline will undoubtedly be extended.

Membership in the Commission has many athletes, as well as a number of people who know a lot about the US Olympic and Paralympic Committee. Hybl served as a two-time president of the organization, Fitzgerald Mosley was the organization’s Chief of Organizational Excellence and later Chief Operating Officer. As a trustee of the USOPC Foundation, Cohen has a deep understanding of the organization’s finances.

Moses has a long and distinguished career as an athlete advocate, as well as a deep commitment to anti-doping, and one of the most respected people in the Olympic Movement. Wieber, 25, is not only an Olympic gold medalist but also a Larry Nassar survivor and will add an important perspective on athlete safety.

Hogshead-Makar is a civil and athlete rights attorney and has been a virulent critic of the USOPC. No one can say that the organization’s harshest critics are not sitting around the table; it remains to be seen how effective it will be in promoting meaningful change.

So what are the priorities?

MoneyNo surprise; the USOPC lives on a percentage of US television rights payments to the International Olympic Committee and the TOP sponsors of the IOC. The question is how the organization spends it, for example, is it worth having the Olympic training centers? Should the members of the Olympic team be paid for training fees? and whether any effort has been made to create new financing options.

StructureThe EOPAAA required changes to athlete representation at the USOPC level and for U.S. national governing bodies. They have been implemented or are being implemented, but the Commission could go further. At its core, the American Olympic Movement is a volunteer organization built on the foundation work of thousands of people helping young athletes learn, train, and compete in sports. Will they get help?

Role of the national administrative bodiesHow much support should be given to the NGBs versus the USOPC in Colorado Springs? This will be an important point of discussion, especially as the USOPC provides significant funding to many of the NGBs. Can some NGBs handle even more money?

IOC relationships The EOPAAA clearly violates the Olympic charter, in the sections empowering the United States Congress, by joint resolution, to to resolve the board of directors of USOPC or to end recognition of a national governing body. The IOC is fully aware of these issues but currently has other priorities; what will the Commission recommend?

Goals. Perhaps this question is the most discussed. The then US Olympic Committee emphasized the performance of the Olympics over basic programming many years ago and quickly became the best medal-winning National Olympic Committee in the Olympics. Will that change?

An important element of that discussion will be the consideration of the legal instructions to the USOPC, the Ted Stevens Act Olympic and Amateur Sports Act 36 USC 2205, originally passed on as the Amateur Sports Act 1978

It is clear from the actions of USOPCs over many years that it has only a limited understanding of what is in the Ted Stevens Act and Congress has even fewer. Therefore, the Commission would do well to appoint the architect of the Amateur Sports Act, Mike Harrigan, as Executive Director.

Harrigan lives in the Washington, DC area and has been continuously active in seeking greater attention to the demands of the law that no one pays attention to (for many years). With its help, both the Commission and the USOPC will gain a much stronger grasp of what the law requires and what they can do to help the Olympic movement in the US

There are those who see the Commission as the tool to deconstruct, or even destroy, the USOPC. There is no doubt that the organization needs to keep modernizing and has serious weaknesses, but the Commission itself is also on the ground: it has the burden of making the right choices and recommending the right solutions, otherwise the responsibility for failure lies on the agenda. it.

As the saying goes For those who are given a lot, a lot will be asked

Rich Perelman
Editor

You can receive our exclusive TSX report by e-mail by clicking on hereYou can also refer a friend by clicking here, and may donate here to keep this site going.

For our international sports calendar with 649 events for 2021 and beyond, by date and by sport, click here

What Are The Main Benefits Of Comparing Car Insurance Quotes Online

LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 24, 2020, / Compare-autoinsurance.Org has launched a new blog post that presents the main benefits of comparing multiple car insurance quotes. For more info and free online quotes, please visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/the-advantages-of-comparing-prices-with-car-insurance-quotes-online/ The modern society has numerous technological advantages. One important advantage is the speed at which information is sent and received. With the help of the internet, the shopping habits of many persons have drastically changed. The car insurance industry hasn't remained untouched by these changes. On the internet, drivers can compare insurance prices and find out which sellers have the best offers. View photos The advantages of comparing online car insurance quotes are the following: Online quotes can be obtained from anywhere and at any time. Unlike physical insurance agencies, websites don't have a specific schedule and they are available at any time. Drivers that have busy working schedules, can compare quotes from anywhere and at any time, even at midnight. Multiple choices. Almost all insurance providers, no matter if they are well-known brands or just local insurers, have an online presence. Online quotes will allow policyholders the chance to discover multiple insurance companies and check their prices. Drivers are no longer required to get quotes from just a few known insurance companies. Also, local and regional insurers can provide lower insurance rates for the same services. Accurate insurance estimates. Online quotes can only be accurate if the customers provide accurate and real info about their car models and driving history. Lying about past driving incidents can make the price estimates to be lower, but when dealing with an insurance company lying to them is useless. Usually, insurance companies will do research about a potential customer before granting him coverage. Online quotes can be sorted easily. Although drivers are recommended to not choose a policy just based on its price, drivers can easily sort quotes by insurance price. Using brokerage websites will allow drivers to get quotes from multiple insurers, thus making the comparison faster and easier. For additional info, money-saving tips, and free car insurance quotes, visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ Compare-autoinsurance.Org is an online provider of life, home, health, and auto insurance quotes. This website is unique because it does not simply stick to one kind of insurance provider, but brings the clients the best deals from many different online insurance carriers. In this way, clients have access to offers from multiple carriers all in one place: this website. On this site, customers have access to quotes for insurance plans from various agencies, such as local or nationwide agencies, brand names insurance companies, etc. "Online quotes can easily help drivers obtain better car insurance deals. All they have to do is to complete an online form with accurate and real info, then compare prices", said Russell Rabichev, Marketing Director of Internet Marketing Company. CONTACT: Company Name: Internet Marketing CompanyPerson for contact Name: Gurgu CPhone Number: (818) 359-3898Email: [email protected]: https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ SOURCE: Compare-autoinsurance.Org View source version on accesswire.Com:https://www.Accesswire.Com/595055/What-Are-The-Main-Benefits-Of-Comparing-Car-Insurance-Quotes-Online View photos



picture credit

ExBUlletin

to request, modification Contact us at Here or [email protected]