New Facebook whistleblowers say the company has deliberately allowed hate speech reports | Facebook

According to a new report, another Facebook whistleblower filed a motion against the company, alleging that it deliberately allowed hate speech and illegal activity on its platform.

An anonymous former Facebook employee told The Washington Post that he had filed a complaint with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which deals with regulations to protect investors in listed companies.

The new allegations are the same as those of whistleblower Frances Haugen, a former Facebook staff member, who states that the company repeatedly prioritizes profits over public security. Haugens recently caused a social network crisis that is said to be preparing plans for a brand change, with abominable testimony in the US Parliament and future testimony in the British Parliament.

The latest whistleblower reportedly worked on Facebook’s integrity team responsible for the platform’s content moderation policy.

The affidavit details how Facebook officials frequently refused to enforce safety rules for fear of offending Donald Trump and his allies and offsetting the company’s huge growth. Did.

In one alleged example, Facebook correspondent Tucker Bounds dismissed concerns about the role of the platform in the 2016 election campaign.

According to the affidavit reported by the post, it would be a hot pot flush, Bounds said. Some lawmakers will get tired of it. And within a few weeks they move on to something else. Meanwhile, we are printing money in the basement, and we are fine.

The details are consistent with what Haugen and colleagues share internally, emphasizing a comprehensive stance of prioritizing profits at all costs.

In a comment to the post, Bounds said: Four years ago, when asked about a one-on-one conversation with a blind person, there was no source other than the empty accusation itself.

Facebook spokeswoman Erin McPike also posted in a statement to the news agency, stating that she set a dangerous precedent for hanging the entire story from a single source that makes broad claims without explicit support. Criticized the report.

It’s under the Washington Post, and for the past five years she’ll only report articles after deep reporting with supporting sources, she told the Guardian in a statement.

However, the report is consistent with what others have shared about the company. Haugen said in his testimony that Facebook had at some point fine-tuned its algorithms to improve security and reduce inflammatory content, but abandoned post-election changes. Haugen was directly linked to the January 6 riots at the Capitol. Facebook also disbanded a team of civil integrity after the election.

As soon as the elections were over, they either turned them off or reverted their settings to prioritize growth over safety. And it really feels like a betrayal of democracy to me, she said in her testimony on October 5.

Regarding the algorithm changes, Haugen added: Facebook will spend less time on the site, click less ads, and change its algorithms more securely. [Facebook] You will make less money.

Haugens’ own SEC filing argued that Facebook’s leadership avoided reporting such issues in investor-available SEC filings. The SEC is tasked with scrutinizing whether public companies should disclose such information to investors.

The report faces congressional pressure on various fronts, including pending legislation from Congress, a lawsuit by the U.S. Justice Secretary, and a Federal Trade Commission lawsuit by new government agency chairman Lina Khan. It is submitted because it is.

Facebook’s Watchdog says the latest whistleblower accounts for fraud emphasize the need to regulate the platform.

Jessica J Gonzlez, co-CEO of civil rights group FreePress Action, said it was time for Congress and the Biden administration to investigate Facebook business models that would benefit from spreading the most extreme hatred and disinformation. It’s time for immediate action to hold the company accountable for the many harms it has done to our democracy.

Sources 1/ https://Google.com/ 2/ https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2021/oct/22/facebook-whistleblower-hate-speech-illegal-report The mention sources can contact us to remove/changing this article

What Are The Main Benefits Of Comparing Car Insurance Quotes Online

LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 24, 2020, / Compare-autoinsurance.Org has launched a new blog post that presents the main benefits of comparing multiple car insurance quotes. For more info and free online quotes, please visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/the-advantages-of-comparing-prices-with-car-insurance-quotes-online/ The modern society has numerous technological advantages. One important advantage is the speed at which information is sent and received. With the help of the internet, the shopping habits of many persons have drastically changed. The car insurance industry hasn't remained untouched by these changes. On the internet, drivers can compare insurance prices and find out which sellers have the best offers. View photos The advantages of comparing online car insurance quotes are the following: Online quotes can be obtained from anywhere and at any time. Unlike physical insurance agencies, websites don't have a specific schedule and they are available at any time. Drivers that have busy working schedules, can compare quotes from anywhere and at any time, even at midnight. Multiple choices. Almost all insurance providers, no matter if they are well-known brands or just local insurers, have an online presence. Online quotes will allow policyholders the chance to discover multiple insurance companies and check their prices. Drivers are no longer required to get quotes from just a few known insurance companies. Also, local and regional insurers can provide lower insurance rates for the same services. Accurate insurance estimates. Online quotes can only be accurate if the customers provide accurate and real info about their car models and driving history. Lying about past driving incidents can make the price estimates to be lower, but when dealing with an insurance company lying to them is useless. Usually, insurance companies will do research about a potential customer before granting him coverage. Online quotes can be sorted easily. Although drivers are recommended to not choose a policy just based on its price, drivers can easily sort quotes by insurance price. Using brokerage websites will allow drivers to get quotes from multiple insurers, thus making the comparison faster and easier. For additional info, money-saving tips, and free car insurance quotes, visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ Compare-autoinsurance.Org is an online provider of life, home, health, and auto insurance quotes. This website is unique because it does not simply stick to one kind of insurance provider, but brings the clients the best deals from many different online insurance carriers. In this way, clients have access to offers from multiple carriers all in one place: this website. On this site, customers have access to quotes for insurance plans from various agencies, such as local or nationwide agencies, brand names insurance companies, etc. "Online quotes can easily help drivers obtain better car insurance deals. All they have to do is to complete an online form with accurate and real info, then compare prices", said Russell Rabichev, Marketing Director of Internet Marketing Company. CONTACT: Company Name: Internet Marketing CompanyPerson for contact Name: Gurgu CPhone Number: (818) 359-3898Email: [email protected]: https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ SOURCE: Compare-autoinsurance.Org View source version on accesswire.Com:https://www.Accesswire.Com/595055/What-Are-The-Main-Benefits-Of-Comparing-Car-Insurance-Quotes-Online View photos