Microsoft, Google, and Amazon chatbots can't tell who won the 2020 election

Who won the 2020 presidential election? Alexa can't necessarily tell you that, and the chatbots built by Microsoft and Google can't tell you at all.

Despite being a pivotal year for global democracies, some artificial intelligence chatbots and voice assistants are still struggling to answer basic questions about elections in the U.S. and abroad, raising concerns that the tools could confuse voters.

In multiple tests conducted by The Washington Post this month, Amazon's Alexa didn't reliably give the right answer when asked who won the 2020 election.

Citing the news site RealClearPolitics, Alexa repeatedly replied that Donald Trump was the front-runner for the Republican nomination, with an approval rating of 89.3%.

Meanwhile, a chatbot built by Microsoft and Google didn't answer any questions at all.

I'm still learning how to answer this question. In the meantime, try a Google search, Google's Gemini replied. Microsoft's Copilot replied: It looks like we can't reply to this topic. Check out the Bing search results.

The errors and omissions come as tech companies increasingly invest in technology that confronts users with a single, definitive answer, rather than providing a list of websites that increase the risk of each answer. They also come as Donald Trump and his allies continue to falsely claim that the 2020 election was stolen. Multiple investigations have found no evidence of fraud, and Trump faces federal criminal charges for trying to overturn the election results of Joe Biden, who won more than 51 percent of the popular vote and beat Trump in the Electoral College.

Other assistants, such as OpenAI's ChatGPT and Apple's Siri, also accurately answered questions about the US election.

Get caught up in

Stories to keep you up to date

But Alexa has struggled since October, when The Washington Post first reported on the voice assistant's inaccuracies. Seven months ago, Amazon said it had fixed the issues, and in the Post's most recent tests, Alexa correctly said Biden won the 2020 election.

But slightly altered questions, such as whether Trump would have won in 2020, led to some bizarre answers last weekend. In one example, Alexa replied, “According to Reuters, Donald Trump defeated Ron DeSantis in the 2024 Iowa Republican Primary, 51% to 21%.” In another, it said, “We don't know who will win the 2020 US presidential election,” before showing polling data.

Customer trust is of utmost importance to Amazon, said Christy Schmidt, a spokeswoman for the company. (Amazon founder Jeff Bezos also owns The Washington Post.)

“We continually test the experience and watch customer feedback closely. If we find that answers don't meet our high standards for accuracy, we block the content immediately,” she said.

Microsoft and Google, meanwhile, say they deliberately designed their bots to refuse to answer questions about the US election, because they thought it was less risky to direct users to seek information through their own search engines.

The companies are taking the same approach in Europe, where German news site Der Spiegel reported this month that bots had avoided basic questions such as when recent parliamentary elections were held. Google's Gemini also couldn't answer broader political questions, such as one asking for the name of the prime minister, German media reported.

But shouldn't the digital companies' flagship AI tools also be able to provide such answers, writes the German newspaper?

The companies imposed the restrictions after a study found that chatbots spreading misinformation about European elections could violate a landmark new social media law that requires tech companies to put in place safeguards to prevent them from undermining civil debate and the electoral process, and makes them liable for heavy fines of up to 6% of their global turnover for non-compliance.

Google said it was limiting the types of election-related queries its Gemini app would respond to starting in December, citing caution ahead of global elections.

Microsoft spokesman Jeff Jones said some election-related prompts may be redirected to search as the company refines its chatbot for November.

Jacob Glick, a senior policy adviser at Georgetown University's Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and who served on the House committee investigating the Jan. 6 events, said tech companies need to be very careful about providing inaccurate information.

As disinformation grows around the 2024 election, he said he hopes technology companies will be unashamed and unflinching in providing clear information about indisputable facts. The decisions these companies make are not neutral, nor are they made in a vacuum.

Silicon Valley is increasingly shouldering the responsibility of sifting fact from fiction online as it develops its AI-enabled assistants. On Monday, Apple announced a partnership with OpenAI to provide generative AI capabilities to millions of users to power its Siri voice assistant. Meanwhile, Amazon is preparing to launch a new artificial intelligence version of its voice assistant as a subscription service in September, according to internal documents seen by The Washington Post. Amazon declined to confirm the launch date.

It's unclear how the company's AI-powered Alexa will handle questions about the election; a prototype demoed in September repeatedly gave incorrect answers. Amazon hasn't yet released the tool to the public and didn't respond to questions about how the new version of Alexa will handle questions about politics.

Amazon plans to launch the new product a year after the initial demo, but the unexpected response has raised doubts internally about whether the product will be ready, said the employee, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

For example, when an Amazon employee testing the new Alexa complained to the voice assistant about a problem they were having with another Amazon service, Alexa responded by offering the employee a free month of Prime membership — though the employee didn't know the AI ​​could actually do that or was authorized to do so, they told The Washington Post.

Amazon said it continues to test its new AI Alexa and plans to set high standards for its performance before launch.

Amazon and Apple, which initially dominated the voice assistant market with Alexa and Siri, have been slow to adopt AI chatbots. In a Wednesday post on X, former Amazon research scientist Mikhail Eric said the Alexa AI is riddled with technical and bureaucratic problems.

Amazon's devices division, which developed Alexa, has struggled recently, with head David Limp leaving in August and a string of layoffs since. The team is now led by former Microsoft executive Panos Panay.

But the technology these devices are built on is a different, more scripted system than the generative AI that powers tools like ChatGPT, Gemini, and Copilot.

“It's a completely different architecture,” said Grant Berry, a linguistics professor at Villanova University who previously worked on Amazon's Alexa.

Berry said voice assistants are designed to interpret human requests and respond with the right action: “Alexa, play music” or “Alexa, dim the lights.” In contrast, generative AI chatbots are designed to be conversational, sociable and informational. Turning the former into the latter will require a reinvention of the product under the hood, not a simple upgrade.

Berry said that when Amazon and Apple launch their new assistants, they will likely combine goal-driven assistants with socially-oriented chatbots.

When these things become unclear, Berry said, it creates a whole new set of issues that we need to be mindful of.

Sources 1/ https://Google.com/ 2/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2024/06/16/ai-chatbots-alexa-2020-election-results/ The mention sources can contact us to remove/changing this article

What Are The Main Benefits Of Comparing Car Insurance Quotes Online

LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 24, 2020, / Compare-autoinsurance.Org has launched a new blog post that presents the main benefits of comparing multiple car insurance quotes. For more info and free online quotes, please visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/the-advantages-of-comparing-prices-with-car-insurance-quotes-online/ The modern society has numerous technological advantages. One important advantage is the speed at which information is sent and received. With the help of the internet, the shopping habits of many persons have drastically changed. The car insurance industry hasn't remained untouched by these changes. On the internet, drivers can compare insurance prices and find out which sellers have the best offers. View photos The advantages of comparing online car insurance quotes are the following: Online quotes can be obtained from anywhere and at any time. Unlike physical insurance agencies, websites don't have a specific schedule and they are available at any time. Drivers that have busy working schedules, can compare quotes from anywhere and at any time, even at midnight. Multiple choices. Almost all insurance providers, no matter if they are well-known brands or just local insurers, have an online presence. Online quotes will allow policyholders the chance to discover multiple insurance companies and check their prices. Drivers are no longer required to get quotes from just a few known insurance companies. Also, local and regional insurers can provide lower insurance rates for the same services. Accurate insurance estimates. Online quotes can only be accurate if the customers provide accurate and real info about their car models and driving history. Lying about past driving incidents can make the price estimates to be lower, but when dealing with an insurance company lying to them is useless. Usually, insurance companies will do research about a potential customer before granting him coverage. Online quotes can be sorted easily. Although drivers are recommended to not choose a policy just based on its price, drivers can easily sort quotes by insurance price. Using brokerage websites will allow drivers to get quotes from multiple insurers, thus making the comparison faster and easier. For additional info, money-saving tips, and free car insurance quotes, visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ Compare-autoinsurance.Org is an online provider of life, home, health, and auto insurance quotes. This website is unique because it does not simply stick to one kind of insurance provider, but brings the clients the best deals from many different online insurance carriers. In this way, clients have access to offers from multiple carriers all in one place: this website. On this site, customers have access to quotes for insurance plans from various agencies, such as local or nationwide agencies, brand names insurance companies, etc. "Online quotes can easily help drivers obtain better car insurance deals. All they have to do is to complete an online form with accurate and real info, then compare prices", said Russell Rabichev, Marketing Director of Internet Marketing Company. CONTACT: Company Name: Internet Marketing CompanyPerson for contact Name: Gurgu CPhone Number: (818) 359-3898Email: [email protected]: https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ SOURCE: Compare-autoinsurance.Org View source version on accesswire.Com:https://www.Accesswire.Com/595055/What-Are-The-Main-Benefits-Of-Comparing-Car-Insurance-Quotes-Online View photos