Uncategorized
Data-based spatiotemporal assessment of the event magnitude distribution of the extraction-induced Groningen seismic catalog
Foulger, GR, Wilson, MP, Gluyas, JG, Julian, BR, & Davies, RJ A global review of human-caused earthquakes. geology. Rev. 178, 438-514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.07.088 (2018).
Muntendam Bose, AG et al. An overview of induced seismic activity in the Netherlands. Neith. J. Geosci. https://doi.org/10.1017/njg.2021.14 (2022).
Smith, DC & Richards, J.M. Social licensing to operate: Hydraulic fracturing challenges facing the oil and gas industry. nat gas oil. Resur. Energy C 1 (2), 81–163 (2015).
Google Scholar
Ghofrani, H., Atkinson, G.M., Schultz, R. & Assatourians, K. Short-term forecasts of seismic hazards in the Western Canada sedimentary basin due to induced and natural earthquakes. sismol. Precision. Leaves. 90 (3), 1420–1435. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220180285 (2019).
Dong, L. & Luo, Q. Investigations and new insights into earthquake mechanics from slip experiments. geology. Rev. 228, 104019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104019 (2022).
Bomer, J. J. et al. Control of earthquake hazards caused by geothermal project hot fractured rocks. M. Jeol. 83, 287-306 (2006).
Bommer, JJ, Crowley, H. & Pinho, R. A risk mitigation approach to managing induced earthquakes. J. Sismol. 19 (2), 623–646 (2015).
Van Elk, J. et al. A probabilistic model for evaluating options for induced earthquake risk mitigation. your earth. Spectra 35 (2), 537–564 (2019).
Schultz, R., Beroza, G. C., Ellsworth, W. L. & Baker, J. Thor. sismol. Akon Corporation. 110, 2411-2422 (2020).
Schultz, R., Beroza, GC & Ellsworth, WL A risk-based approach to managing hydraulic fracturing earthquakes. Science 372 (6541), 504–507. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abg5451 (2021).
Gulia, L., Tormann, T., Wiemer, S., Hermann, M. & Seif, S. Geophysics. Precision. Lett. 43, 1100–1108. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL066686 (2016).
Muntendam-Bos, AG, Roest, JPA & De Waal, JA The effect of production measures imposed on gas extraction causes seismic risk. Neith. J. Geosci. 96 (5), BC 271–278. https://doi.org/10.1017/njg.2017.29 (2017).
Bachmann, CE, Wiemer, S., Goertz-Allman, BP & Woessner, J. The effect of pore pressure on the event size distribution of induced earthquakes. Geophysics. Precision. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051480 (2012).
Hiemer, S. & Kamer, Y. Improved seismic forecasts with a spatially varying magnitude distribution. sismol. Precision. Leaves. 87 (2a), 327-336. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220150182 (2016).
Schorlemmer, D., Wiemer, S. & Wyss, M. Differences in earthquake magnitude distribution across different stress regimes. Nature 437, 539-542. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04094 (2005).
Marzocchi, W., Spaassiani, I., Stallone, A. & Taroni, M. How to get fooled into looking for significant differences in b value. Geophysics. J. Int. 220, 1845-1856. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggz541 (2020).
Wiemer, S. & Wyss, M. Mapping the frequency-size distribution in graceful states: an improved technique for calculating repetition times?. Geoffs. Precision. Solid Earth 102 (B7), 15115-15128. https://doi.org/10.1029/97JB00726 (1997).
Wiemer, S. & Wyss, M. Mapping the spatial variance of the frequency magnitude distribution of earthquakes. case. Geophysics. 45, 259-302 (2002).
Kamer, Y. Commented on “Systematic scanning of b-value high-resolution imaging along California errors: Gravity inference” by Tormann et al. Geoffs. Precision. 119 (3), 2029–2054 (2014).
Kamer, Y. & Hiemer, S. Data-based spatial value estimation with applications to California seismicity: to b or not to b. Geoffs. Precision. 120 (7), 2191-5214 (2015).
Google Scholar
Kagan, YY Revisiting the Seismic Moment Distribution: I. Statistical Results. Geophysics. J. Int. 148, 520-541 (2002).
Dost, B., Ruigrok, E. & Spetzler, J. Seismic development and probabilistic risk assessment of the Groningen gas field. Neith. J. Geosci. 96 (5), s235–s245. https://doi.org/10.1017/njg.2017.20 (2017).
Holschneider, M., Zöller, G. & Hainzl, S. Estimation of the maximum possible volume under the doubly truncated Gutenberg-Richter model. ox. sismol. Akon Corporation. 101 (4), 1649–1659. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120100289 (2011).
Bourne, S. J., Oates, S. J., van Elk, J. & Doornhof, D. Seismic model of earthquakes induced by fluid extraction from a subsurface reservoir. Geoffs. Precision. Solid Earth 119, 8991-9015. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JB011663 (2014).
De Jager, J. & Visser, C. The geology of the Groningen field: an overview. Neith. J. Geosci. 95 (5), s3-s15. https://doi.org/10.1017/njg.2017.22 (2017).
Candela, T.; et al. Depletion-induced seismicity in the Groningen gas field: rate and Coulomb state models including the effect of differential pressure. Geoffs. Precision. Solid Earth 124, 7081-7104. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JB016670 (2019).
Bomer, J. J. et al. Framework of a ground motion model for seismic induced and hazard analysis in the Groningen gas field, the Netherlands. your earth. Spectra 33 (2), 481-498. https://doi.org/10.1193/082916EQS138M (2017).
Van der Voort, N. & Vanclay, F. Social effects of earthquakes from gas extraction in the province of Groningen, the Netherlands. environment. Impact assessment. Rev. 50, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2014.08.008 (2014).
Van Eck, T., Goudbeek, F., Haak, H. & Dost, B. Earthquake risk due to small-scale and shallow-source earthquakes occurring in the Netherlands. M. Jeol. 87, 105-121 (2006).
Bourne, S. J. & Oates, S. J. Maximum threshold failures within a heterogeneous flexible thin plate and the spatiotemporal evolution of induced earthquakes within the Groningen gas field. Geoffs. Precision. Solid Earth 122, 10299-10320. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JB014356 (2017).
Bourne, S. J., Oates, S. J. & Elk, J. V. Accelerated rise of induced earthquakes with increasing stress levels in the Groningen gas field and its implications for seismic risk control. Geophysics. J. Int. 213, 1693-1700 (2018).
Bourne, S. J. & Oates, S. J. Strain dependence from induced earthquakes in the Groningen gas field. Geoffs. Precision. Solid ground https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JB02013 (2020).
Willacy, C et al. Full-waveform event location and instantaneous tensor reflection of induced earthquakes. Geophysics 84 (2), KS39 – KS47. https://doi.org/10.1190/GEO2018-0212.1 (2019).
Gutenberg, B. & Richter, C.F. Earthquake frequency in California. ox. sismol. Akon Corporation. 34 (8), 185-188 (1944).
Aki, K. Maximum probability estimate for b in the formula log N = a-bM and its confidence limits. ox. your earth. Precision. inst. (Tokyo) 43, 237-239 (1965).
Google Scholar
Utsu, T. A method for determining the value of “b” in the equation log n = a-bm showing the relationship between magnitude and frequency for earthquakes. Geophysics. ox. Hokkaido University. 13, 99-103 (1965).
Google Scholar
Ogata, Y. & Yamashina, K. Unbiased estimation of the b-value for volume frequency. J. Phys. Earth 34, 187-194 (1986).
Woessner, J. & Wiemer, S. Quality assessment of earthquake catalogs: estimation of completeness and uncertainty. ox. sismol. Akon Corporation. 95 (2), 684–698 (2005).
Schwarz, G. E. Estimating model dimensions. that. stat. 6 (2), 461–464. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136 (1978).
Boslaugh, S. Statistics in a Nutshell (O’Reilly Media, 2012).
Google Scholar
Bender, b. Estimate the probability of the maximum b-values for the data grouped by volume. ox. earthquakes. Akon Corporation. 73 (3), 831–851 (1983).
Jeffers, G.-M. , Main, I.G. & Naylor, M. Biases in estimating b values from catalogs of small earthquakes: How high are b values?. Geophysics. J. Int. 229, 1840-1855. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggac028 (2022).
Cavanaugh, J.E. Consolidation of Akaike Derivations and Correction of Akaike Information Standards. stat. Probab. Lett. 31 (2), 201-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-7152(96)00128-9 (1997).
Kendall, MG Rank Correlation Methods (C. Griffin, 1948).
Van der Elst, NJ, Page, MT, Weiser, DA, Goebel, THW & Hosseini, SM The induced earthquakes are large as expected (statistically). Geoffs. Precision. Solid Earth 121, 4575-4590. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JB012818 (2016).
Muntendam-Bos, AG Aggregation characteristics of gas extraction-induced earthquakes in the Groningen gas field. Geophysics. J. Int. 221, 879–892. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaa038 (2020).
Muntendam-Bos, AG & De Waal, JA (2013) Reassessment of the probability of earthquakes of greater magnitude in the Groningen gas field. SODM Technical Report (2013).
Beirlant, J., Kijko, A., Reynkens, T. & Einmahl, J. H. J. Estimating the maximum possible earthquake using maximum value methodology: the Groningen case. nat. Hazards 98, 1091-1113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-3162-2 (2019).
NAM BV Report on the Mmax Expert Workshop 8-10 March 2016 World Trade Centre, Schiphol Airport, The Netherlands. Non-Aligned Movement Report (2016).
Sources 2/ https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-14451-z The mention sources can contact us to remove/changing this article |
What Are The Main Benefits Of Comparing Car Insurance Quotes Online
LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 24, 2020, / Compare-autoinsurance.Org has launched a new blog post that presents the main benefits of comparing multiple car insurance quotes. For more info and free online quotes, please visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/the-advantages-of-comparing-prices-with-car-insurance-quotes-online/ The modern society has numerous technological advantages. One important advantage is the speed at which information is sent and received. With the help of the internet, the shopping habits of many persons have drastically changed. The car insurance industry hasn't remained untouched by these changes. On the internet, drivers can compare insurance prices and find out which sellers have the best offers. View photos The advantages of comparing online car insurance quotes are the following: Online quotes can be obtained from anywhere and at any time. Unlike physical insurance agencies, websites don't have a specific schedule and they are available at any time. Drivers that have busy working schedules, can compare quotes from anywhere and at any time, even at midnight. Multiple choices. Almost all insurance providers, no matter if they are well-known brands or just local insurers, have an online presence. Online quotes will allow policyholders the chance to discover multiple insurance companies and check their prices. Drivers are no longer required to get quotes from just a few known insurance companies. Also, local and regional insurers can provide lower insurance rates for the same services. Accurate insurance estimates. Online quotes can only be accurate if the customers provide accurate and real info about their car models and driving history. Lying about past driving incidents can make the price estimates to be lower, but when dealing with an insurance company lying to them is useless. Usually, insurance companies will do research about a potential customer before granting him coverage. Online quotes can be sorted easily. Although drivers are recommended to not choose a policy just based on its price, drivers can easily sort quotes by insurance price. Using brokerage websites will allow drivers to get quotes from multiple insurers, thus making the comparison faster and easier. For additional info, money-saving tips, and free car insurance quotes, visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ Compare-autoinsurance.Org is an online provider of life, home, health, and auto insurance quotes. This website is unique because it does not simply stick to one kind of insurance provider, but brings the clients the best deals from many different online insurance carriers. In this way, clients have access to offers from multiple carriers all in one place: this website. On this site, customers have access to quotes for insurance plans from various agencies, such as local or nationwide agencies, brand names insurance companies, etc. "Online quotes can easily help drivers obtain better car insurance deals. All they have to do is to complete an online form with accurate and real info, then compare prices", said Russell Rabichev, Marketing Director of Internet Marketing Company. CONTACT: Company Name: Internet Marketing CompanyPerson for contact Name: Gurgu CPhone Number: (818) 359-3898Email: [email protected]: https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ SOURCE: Compare-autoinsurance.Org View source version on accesswire.Com:https://www.Accesswire.Com/595055/What-Are-The-Main-Benefits-Of-Comparing-Car-Insurance-Quotes-Online View photos
to request, modification Contact us at Here or [email protected]