Connect with us


Earthquake-prone Indonesia has no earthquake mitigation plan


Earthquake proof typical house built by local handyman in Sekka. Credit: Jonathan Lhasa

More than 340 people are dead or missing in the aftermath of a relatively small but shallow 5.6-magnitude earthquake in Cianjur, West Java, Indonesia.

The National Disaster Mitigation Agency reported that about 7,700 people were injured by falling structures and debris. While 73,000 people have been displaced, about 62,000 housing units and 368 schools have been damaged or destroyed.

Over the past fifteen years I have observed how, when small or moderate earthquakes become catastrophic, preliminary assertions are made and blame is regularly attributed to poor shelters and buildings.

Disaster management is often reduced to simply distributing emergency relief followed by incomplete recovery. Then the cycle begins again when another supposedly preventable disaster strikes.

What is missing is a master plan for earthquake mitigation that hardly exists in earthquake-prone Indonesia.

Presence of seismic hazard maps but without implementation map

Indonesia’s Meteorology, Climatology and Geophysics Agency explained three main elements that led to the catastrophic damage of the Cianjur earthquake:

It showed typical characteristics of shallow earthquakes, local buildings do not meet seismic standards, and settlements are located on soft soils and hills.

The government already has a national seismic map that provides information on potential earthquakes. The government also provides information about practical solutions for small families during earthquakes.

However, it does not have a plan to force the seismic map. After 15 years of disaster management reform in Indonesia, the government still needs a clear operational map in implementing and enforcing mitigation policies.

The earthquake mitigation operational map should be reduced to the unit or house level – risk assessment and plans drawn up with individual name and address. This needs to be followed by regular monitoring.

Breaking the building’s chain of loopholes

I propose seven steps to ensure the continuity of implementation of earthquake-safe housing at the grassroots level.

First, the government must immediately produce a detailed institutional roadmap, reduced to the district and district level. Such a map should show how local governments routinely adopt and implement laws and standards for earthquake-resistant shelters.

Second, to create a public management system that constantly controls safety standards for housing and infrastructure. Current implementation of the minimum service standards for local governments should include ensuring safe shelters and buildings in disaster-prone areas.

Third, integrating the building permit process with the disaster mitigation agenda. Measures must act as the first filter to ensure public safety. In general, the regulation often manages only to allow punishment without any technical provisions regarding the intricacies of how to anticipate disaster.

Fourth, transform the bureaucracy responsible for issuing building permits. The licensing bureaucracy is often prone to corruption. As a result, homeowners often adopt a “build first, let later” approach because “money can arrange everything.” The official procedure I tested was that it took 2-3 years to get a permit to build a house.

I propose that the government eliminate the administrative costs of building permits for poor families in disaster-prone areas. Fees often force low-income groups to avoid building permit procedures.

Fifth, to empower the local builders in the villages to be agents of change. My research is in Sika, Flores, East Nusa Tenggara, one of the earthquake-prone areas in Indonesia where more than half of the dwellings collapsed in 1992 – often many local builders tout earthquake mitigation measures.

Of the dozens of builders and employees I interviewed between 2008 and 2018 at Sekka, they most often advise homeowners to consider earthquake risk reduction. The staff explained that more often than not, poor families are unwilling to invest in “extra materials.” In fact, there is always an additional cost to strengthening buildings.

The reinforced wall photo below is an example of a product from local builders. Reinforcing brick walls with reinforced concrete can help protect them.

Sixth: Changing the behavior of the private sector in housing construction. Profit over quality often compromises safety.

Seventh, the government should develop and implement an ambitious retrofit program at all levels. This can strengthen existing buildings and still functioning homes to withstand the next earthquake or hurricane.

What’s Next

In the Cianjur earthquake, again, we saw that failure to ensure the safety of school buildings and homes resulted in the deaths of children.

Even in the presence of successful technical solutions, a safe systemic impact from earthquakes can only be achieved if there is a clear implementation plan.

The government needs to systematically reduce the hidden transaction costs of house construction. For example, attempts to extort local gangs must be eliminated.

The challenge is getting wider as there are more and more old buildings and homes in earthquake-prone areas. These shelters may still be strong today, but there is no guarantee 25 years from now when these shelters will be tested by severe weather events and earthquakes on a regular basis.

Introduction to the conversation

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Citation: Lessons from Cianjur: Earthquake-prone Indonesia has no earthquake mitigation plan (2022, December 8) Retrieved December 8, 2022 from indonesia-seismic.html

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without written permission. The content is provided for informational purposes only.




The mention sources can contact us to remove/changing this article

What Are The Main Benefits Of Comparing Car Insurance Quotes Online

LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 24, 2020, / Compare-autoinsurance.Org has launched a new blog post that presents the main benefits of comparing multiple car insurance quotes. For more info and free online quotes, please visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/the-advantages-of-comparing-prices-with-car-insurance-quotes-online/ The modern society has numerous technological advantages. One important advantage is the speed at which information is sent and received. With the help of the internet, the shopping habits of many persons have drastically changed. The car insurance industry hasn't remained untouched by these changes. On the internet, drivers can compare insurance prices and find out which sellers have the best offers. View photos The advantages of comparing online car insurance quotes are the following: Online quotes can be obtained from anywhere and at any time. Unlike physical insurance agencies, websites don't have a specific schedule and they are available at any time. Drivers that have busy working schedules, can compare quotes from anywhere and at any time, even at midnight. Multiple choices. Almost all insurance providers, no matter if they are well-known brands or just local insurers, have an online presence. Online quotes will allow policyholders the chance to discover multiple insurance companies and check their prices. Drivers are no longer required to get quotes from just a few known insurance companies. Also, local and regional insurers can provide lower insurance rates for the same services. Accurate insurance estimates. Online quotes can only be accurate if the customers provide accurate and real info about their car models and driving history. Lying about past driving incidents can make the price estimates to be lower, but when dealing with an insurance company lying to them is useless. Usually, insurance companies will do research about a potential customer before granting him coverage. Online quotes can be sorted easily. Although drivers are recommended to not choose a policy just based on its price, drivers can easily sort quotes by insurance price. Using brokerage websites will allow drivers to get quotes from multiple insurers, thus making the comparison faster and easier. For additional info, money-saving tips, and free car insurance quotes, visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ Compare-autoinsurance.Org is an online provider of life, home, health, and auto insurance quotes. This website is unique because it does not simply stick to one kind of insurance provider, but brings the clients the best deals from many different online insurance carriers. In this way, clients have access to offers from multiple carriers all in one place: this website. On this site, customers have access to quotes for insurance plans from various agencies, such as local or nationwide agencies, brand names insurance companies, etc. "Online quotes can easily help drivers obtain better car insurance deals. All they have to do is to complete an online form with accurate and real info, then compare prices", said Russell Rabichev, Marketing Director of Internet Marketing Company. CONTACT: Company Name: Internet Marketing CompanyPerson for contact Name: Gurgu CPhone Number: (818) 359-3898Email: [email protected]: https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ SOURCE: Compare-autoinsurance.Org View source version on accesswire.Com:https://www.Accesswire.Com/595055/What-Are-The-Main-Benefits-Of-Comparing-Car-Insurance-Quotes-Online View photos


to request, modification Contact us at Here or [email protected]