Connect with us

International

Critics call for debate or conclusion of debate committee after controversial English debate – National

Published

on

 


The Leadership Debate Commission was set up to put an end to machinations by major political parties to control how, when, what, and which leaders would debate during federal election campaigns.

But following the controversial English-language debate Thursday, some critics are calling for an end to the independent commission or at least a review of its mandate.

The two-hour fierce debate has been condemned for giving leaders too little time to explain their policies or resisting attacks by rivals, and giving too much time to moderator Shachi Kurl and questioning reporters to interrupt.

Kurl has also been accused of asking one-sided questions, particularly in relation to what she called Quebec’s “discriminatory” law banning some public servants from wearing religious symbols or clothing at work and a bill aimed at strengthening the role of French in the province.

Read more:

What happened during the English debate of federal leaders? Here are the highlights

The story goes down the ad

Justin Trudeau’s Liberal government set up the debate commission after winning the 2015 election.

In that campaign, the traditional English debate hosted by a consortium of television networks broke down after then-Prime Minister Stephen Harper refused to attend.

Five more debates were held, but far fewer viewers reached.

Even before, consortium debates had been criticized for allowing major parties to threaten non-participation in order to dictate the terms of the debates. The Green Party claimed that its leader had been systematically expelled as a result.


Click to play the video: 'Global National: September 10'







Global National: September 10th


Global National: September 10th

Television networks were also criticized for caring more about making a good show than about helping inform voters.

The debate committee, chaired by former Gov. David Johnston, aimed to rectify everything.

The story goes down the ad

The commission set the criteria for participating in Thursday’s English-language debate and the French-language debate on Wednesday, which resulted in the ouster of People’s Party leader Maxime Bernier.

But it gave most of the responsibility for generating debates to network consortia. For the English debate, the consortium included CBC News, CTV News, APTN News and Global News.

Read more:

Trudeau plays defense as opposition leaders fight for points in the English election debate

According to its website, the commission works with debate producers “to develop a format that reflects the public interest, while respecting journalistic independence”.

But in a statement Friday, the English broadcasting consortium said it “elects the moderator and participating journalists, who have full journalistic and editorial independence from the Leadership Debate Commission”.

Kurl referred to requests for comment in the consortium statement, which said its question to Yves-Francois Blanchet addressed the two county bills specifically and “did not declare the Quebecers racist,” dismissing a claim by the leader of Bloc Quebecois.

The committee confirmed that it was not involved in the selection of topics, questions or moderator.

The story goes down the ad

And that’s the problem, says Elly Alboim, a former CBC parliamentary bureau chief who has been involved in producing election debates since 1977-93 and has since helped various federal and provincial liberal leaders prepare. for them.

“They (the commission) seem to have accepted the advice of anyone who is producing the thing to turn it into a TV show,” Alboim said in an interview.

He said the networks are “interested in retaining the audience, in providing a kind of fast-paced, interesting television” and the journalists involved are acting on the journalistic impulse: What makes the news, how to make them accountable , how to tell them when it is not consistent, how to explain to the audience what their shortcomings are? “

But this is not what an election debate should be about, Alboim argued.


Click to play the video: 'Canada Elections 2021: Federal Leaders Debate in French'







Canada Elections 2021: Federal Leaders Debate in French (English translation)


Canada Elections 2021: Federal Leaders Debate in French (English translation)

“They are dealing with party leaders who are accountable to each other and explain their platforms and call on their voters. They do not need the mediation of journalists, “he said, noting that journalists have many opportunities to mature leaders every day in the campaign.

The story goes down the ad

“Democratic responsibility in my opinion is to get out of the way, let people appreciate what they are hearing and certainly give leaders adequate time to explain themselves and their programs. It cannot be done in bursts of 15 and 20 seconds. ”

Alboim said Thursday’s format allowed only a “small” time for any of the leaders to seriously discuss an issue or advance their policies.

Read more:

Trudeau’s ‘feminist’ brand clashed in election debate over military sexual misconduct crisis

But, in his view, the fact that he often did not leave time for a leader to oppose a direct attack by a rival was unforgivable.

“Not realizing that you have created a format where people can dismiss allegations in the air and get no response or no objection is a breach of duty,” Alboim said.

It meant that Trudeau, who was the main target of those attacks, was left playing the role of “stake pillow”.

“Everyone would make a stain with the car and then switch to something else and he would not have a chance to respond, so, of course, he suffered from the format.”

© 2021 Canadian Press

Sources

1/ https://Google.com/

2/ https://globalnews.ca/news/8182713/election-leaders-debates-under-fire/

The mention sources can contact us to remove/changing this article

What Are The Main Benefits Of Comparing Car Insurance Quotes Online

LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 24, 2020, / Compare-autoinsurance.Org has launched a new blog post that presents the main benefits of comparing multiple car insurance quotes. For more info and free online quotes, please visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/the-advantages-of-comparing-prices-with-car-insurance-quotes-online/ The modern society has numerous technological advantages. One important advantage is the speed at which information is sent and received. With the help of the internet, the shopping habits of many persons have drastically changed. The car insurance industry hasn't remained untouched by these changes. On the internet, drivers can compare insurance prices and find out which sellers have the best offers. View photos The advantages of comparing online car insurance quotes are the following: Online quotes can be obtained from anywhere and at any time. Unlike physical insurance agencies, websites don't have a specific schedule and they are available at any time. Drivers that have busy working schedules, can compare quotes from anywhere and at any time, even at midnight. Multiple choices. Almost all insurance providers, no matter if they are well-known brands or just local insurers, have an online presence. Online quotes will allow policyholders the chance to discover multiple insurance companies and check their prices. Drivers are no longer required to get quotes from just a few known insurance companies. Also, local and regional insurers can provide lower insurance rates for the same services. Accurate insurance estimates. Online quotes can only be accurate if the customers provide accurate and real info about their car models and driving history. Lying about past driving incidents can make the price estimates to be lower, but when dealing with an insurance company lying to them is useless. Usually, insurance companies will do research about a potential customer before granting him coverage. Online quotes can be sorted easily. Although drivers are recommended to not choose a policy just based on its price, drivers can easily sort quotes by insurance price. Using brokerage websites will allow drivers to get quotes from multiple insurers, thus making the comparison faster and easier. For additional info, money-saving tips, and free car insurance quotes, visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ Compare-autoinsurance.Org is an online provider of life, home, health, and auto insurance quotes. This website is unique because it does not simply stick to one kind of insurance provider, but brings the clients the best deals from many different online insurance carriers. In this way, clients have access to offers from multiple carriers all in one place: this website. On this site, customers have access to quotes for insurance plans from various agencies, such as local or nationwide agencies, brand names insurance companies, etc. "Online quotes can easily help drivers obtain better car insurance deals. All they have to do is to complete an online form with accurate and real info, then compare prices", said Russell Rabichev, Marketing Director of Internet Marketing Company. CONTACT: Company Name: Internet Marketing CompanyPerson for contact Name: Gurgu CPhone Number: (818) 359-3898Email: [email protected]: https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ SOURCE: Compare-autoinsurance.Org View source version on accesswire.Com:https://www.Accesswire.Com/595055/What-Are-The-Main-Benefits-Of-Comparing-Car-Insurance-Quotes-Online View photos

ExBUlletin

to request, modification Contact us at Here or [email protected]