Connect with us


COVID-19: Three U-college instructors sue school, province for vaccine mandate – Winnipeg




Three instructors from the University College of Winnipeg plan to take the province and school to court for a vaccination mandate they call “off-board, unreasonable and discriminatory”.

University of Winnipeg, Manitoba province and chief of public health Dr. Brent Roussin have been named as defendants in the statement of claim that was filed last Monday.

Manitoba Health and the Ministry of Advanced Education, Skills and Immigration are also listed as defendants.

The three instructors say the U of W vaccine policy violates the human rights code in Manitoba.

Plaintiffs include Renise Mlodzinski, Evan Maltman and Kyle Du Val. Their teaching time in the institution lasts from three to eight years.

The University of Winnipeg has made COVID-19 vaccines mandatory from September 7, 2021. The policy requires that anyone entering a campus building be fully or partially vaccinated with plans to be fully immunized by October 15, 2021.

The story goes down the ad

Plaintiffs say they did not receive notice of this claim until October 4, 2021.

Read more:

Springs Church poses challenge in court over public health orders banning car entry services

As a result of immunization, they were placed on involuntary leave of absence on September 7, 2021. They claim to have faced public “mockery, hatred, discrimination and delegitimization”, among other forms of abuse because of their vaccine status .

“The collection of vaccine status is not confidential. “Once an employee is placed on unpaid leave, his or her status becomes immediately apparent.”

The three instructors claim that the vaccine policy violates their Charter right to be protected from unreasonable searches and seizures, including the disclosure of private medical information, such as vaccine status or COVID-19 test results.

“The policy seeks to force employees to be vaccinated against their will, without informed consent. “Politics is a clear intention to get involved in a conspiracy to carry out an attack.”

Read more:

AHS threatens constitutional challenge over COVID-19 vaccine mandate

The parties also argue that the vaccines are and that they have not undergone long-term safety monitoring. They say a false sense of security has been created because of the COVID-19 vaccines.

The story goes down the ad

They say vaccines “simply offer some ‘benefits’ or ‘protection’ that in certain circumstances at best reduce the severity of symptoms or potentially reduce the risk of hospitalization”.

They claim that the ingredients of the vaccine have not been made public, so people are not able to know if they may be fatally allergic to any of them.

“MRNA vaccines are a new type of vaccine technology and this is the first time such vaccines are being administered to humans without first widespread and lengthy clinical trials,” the statement said.

“Vaccination program in Canada is being adjusted in motion as the negative effects appear by demanding the need for constant changes in safety guidelines. This underscores the nature of these vaccines.

Read more:

A lawsuit was filed against Alberta Health Services over its COVID-19 vaccine mandate

The instructors listed eleven injuries they suffered as a result, including severe and permanent psychological, psychic, and emotional trauma. They also say this has caused loss of employment opportunities, post-traumatic stress disorder and loss of trust in others among others.

Instructors are demanding that the mandate of the U of W vaccine be suspended until it can be reviewed by a judge. They are also seeking up to $ 1 million in damages for “intentionally causing mental distress, and assault and battery,” and another $ 1 million in damages for violating their statutory rights.

The story goes down the ad

In a statement to Global News, the University of Winnipeg says the University of Winnipeg and the College are following public health guidelines, which are based on the best scientific evidence. Our vaccine mandate is part of our plan to provide a safe working and learning environment for faculty, staff and students. The lawsuit is misconceived and will be challenged accordingly.

Attorney Leighton Gray, who represents all three instructors, declined to comment.

The Manitoba government says they are unable to comment as the matter is before the courts. However, they said they “take into account the health and well-being of all Manitobans when drafting public health orders and rely on all Manitobans to do what is right.”

Legal battle

Benjamin Hecht is a labor lawyer with Pitblado law and he says the case was not suspicious of him.

“The long and short thing I’ll tell you about their claim … is that I think they have a tough quarrel to throw,” he told Global News.

He says this case and others that are similar are unlikely to succeed in court.

“They are asking the university to ease their policy in anticipation of the hearing, this will not happen because a hearing can last for years.”

The story goes down the ad

Hecht says that on the issue of the claim that it is a violation of the Manitoba Human Rights Code, it is not a viable argument.

“My body is my choice yes, but the main task of safety and health concerns allows an employer to make a vaccine policy,” he said. “And you have to choose, but then that means you can not go to work.

“Personal choice or preference is not a characteristic protected under the human rights code and it cannot be reasonably argued that a person has been discriminated against because of their choice or preference not to be vaccinated.”

He says it depends on the employees who follow the act of health and safety in the workplace.

“Community health and safety in general should have precedent in general towards the needs of a group of people against the vaccine or any individual employee.”

The province has been given 20 days to file a protection declaration. However, Hecht says this is only the first step in a process that could take years to function through the judicial system.

Click to play video: 'Province announces changes in COVID-19 contact tracking while students will be back on Monday'

Province announces changes in COVID-19 contact tracking as students return on Monday

Province announces changes in COVID-19 contact tracking as students return on Monday

View link »

© 2022 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.




The mention sources can contact us to remove/changing this article

What Are The Main Benefits Of Comparing Car Insurance Quotes Online

LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 24, 2020, / Compare-autoinsurance.Org has launched a new blog post that presents the main benefits of comparing multiple car insurance quotes. For more info and free online quotes, please visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/the-advantages-of-comparing-prices-with-car-insurance-quotes-online/ The modern society has numerous technological advantages. One important advantage is the speed at which information is sent and received. With the help of the internet, the shopping habits of many persons have drastically changed. The car insurance industry hasn't remained untouched by these changes. On the internet, drivers can compare insurance prices and find out which sellers have the best offers. View photos The advantages of comparing online car insurance quotes are the following: Online quotes can be obtained from anywhere and at any time. Unlike physical insurance agencies, websites don't have a specific schedule and they are available at any time. Drivers that have busy working schedules, can compare quotes from anywhere and at any time, even at midnight. Multiple choices. Almost all insurance providers, no matter if they are well-known brands or just local insurers, have an online presence. Online quotes will allow policyholders the chance to discover multiple insurance companies and check their prices. Drivers are no longer required to get quotes from just a few known insurance companies. Also, local and regional insurers can provide lower insurance rates for the same services. Accurate insurance estimates. Online quotes can only be accurate if the customers provide accurate and real info about their car models and driving history. Lying about past driving incidents can make the price estimates to be lower, but when dealing with an insurance company lying to them is useless. Usually, insurance companies will do research about a potential customer before granting him coverage. Online quotes can be sorted easily. Although drivers are recommended to not choose a policy just based on its price, drivers can easily sort quotes by insurance price. Using brokerage websites will allow drivers to get quotes from multiple insurers, thus making the comparison faster and easier. For additional info, money-saving tips, and free car insurance quotes, visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ Compare-autoinsurance.Org is an online provider of life, home, health, and auto insurance quotes. This website is unique because it does not simply stick to one kind of insurance provider, but brings the clients the best deals from many different online insurance carriers. In this way, clients have access to offers from multiple carriers all in one place: this website. On this site, customers have access to quotes for insurance plans from various agencies, such as local or nationwide agencies, brand names insurance companies, etc. "Online quotes can easily help drivers obtain better car insurance deals. All they have to do is to complete an online form with accurate and real info, then compare prices", said Russell Rabichev, Marketing Director of Internet Marketing Company. CONTACT: Company Name: Internet Marketing CompanyPerson for contact Name: Gurgu CPhone Number: (818) 359-3898Email: [email protected]: https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ SOURCE: Compare-autoinsurance.Org View source version on accesswire.Com:https://www.Accesswire.Com/595055/What-Are-The-Main-Benefits-Of-Comparing-Car-Insurance-Quotes-Online View photos


to request, modification Contact us at Here or [email protected]