Connect with us

International

Brexit: Boris Johnson says powers will ensure UK cannot be ‘broken’

Published

on


Media playback is not supported on your device

Media titleBoris Johnson: “I have no desire to use these measures”

Boris Johnson has said the UK should reserve the right to cancel the Brexit deal to protect the country’s “economic and political integrity”.

The prime minister said legislation was needed to resolve “tensions” in the EU-UK agreement.

He said this would ensure that the UK could not be “broken” by a foreign power and the EU was acting in an “extreme way”, threatening food exports.

Labor said the prime minister had caused a “mess” by giving up a deal he had previously called a “triumph”.

The Internal Market bill is expected to pass its first parliamentary test soon, when MPs vote on it around 22.00 BST, despite the reservations of many MPs giving the UK the power to break international law.

A number of Conservative MPs have said they will not support the bill as it is now and some may record their concerns by abstaining.

The UK left the EU on 31 January after negotiating and signing the withdrawal agreement with the bloc.

A key part of the agreement – which is now an international treaty – was the Northern Ireland Protocol, designed to prevent the return of a strong border to the island of Ireland.

The Internal Market bill proposed by the government will prevail over that part of that agreement when it comes to the movement of goods between Northern Ireland and Britain and will allow the UK to re-interpret the “state aid” rules on subsidies to firms in Northern Ireland the event when both parties do not agree on a future trade agreement.

‘Protective powers’

Speaking at the start of the five-hour debate, the Prime Minister said the bill should be “welcomed by all” who care about “the sovereignty and integrity of the United Kingdom”.

He said the UK had signed the “finely balanced” withdrawal agreement, including the Northern Ireland Protocol, in “good faith” and was committed to meeting its obligations, including the introduction of “light touch” controls. “in trade between Britain and Northern Ireland.

But he said additional “defense powers” were now needed to hedge against the EU’s “proven willingness” to interpret aspects of the deal in “absurd” ways, “simply to leverage” in trade talks.

Media playback is not supported on your device

Media titleEd Miliband says it’s not an Leave vs. Remain argument, but an argument about right versus wrong.

“What we can not tolerate now is a situation where our EU counterparts seriously believe they have the power to ruin our country,” he told lawmakers.

“We can not have a situation where the very borders of our country can be dictated by a foreign power or an international organization.”

He also suggested that the EU was threatening not to allow British firms to export products of animal origin to either the mainland or Northern Ireland.

“Absurd and self-destructive as that action would be … The EU has not yet removed this revolver from the table,” he told lawmakers.

However, he tried to reassure MPs that the powers were a “security policy” and that Parliament would be given a vote before they were ever convened, insisting “I have absolutely no desire to use these measures”.

‘Hooliganism’

But former Labor leader Ed Miliband, standing in favor of Sir Keir Starmer behind the Labor leader was forced to self-isolate himself at home, said that “the act of passing the law itself” would constitute a violation of international law.

He told lawmakers that the prime minister “could not blame anyone else” after drafting and signing the Brexit agreement himself.

“Dealsht his deal, it’s his mess, it’s his failure,” he said. “For the first time in his life, it ‘s time to take responsibility and take action,” he said. “Either he was not right with the place in the first place or he did not understand it.”

He added: “This is not just legislative hooliganism on any issue, but it is on the most sensitive issue of all.”

Among the Tory MPs to speak were former ministers Andrew Mitchell, Sir Bob Neill and Stephen Hammond, all urging the government to resolve disputes with the EU through the arbitration process in the Agreement.

Conservative MP Charles Walker said the EU was a “neck pain” but urged the government not to “push the nuclear button” before all other options had been exhausted.

“I will not vote for this bill in the second reading because if you continue to shake a dog, do not be surprised when he returns it to you,” he said.

And former Chancellor Sajid Javid has joined the ranks of potential rebels, saying he could not understand why it was necessary to “remove in advance” the withdrawal deal.

“Violation of international law is never a step that should be taken lightly.” he wrote on Twitter.

A senior government source told the BBC “all options are on the table” as to possible action against Tory MPs who do not support the bill.

The bill, which sets out how trade between the various nations of the UK will work after the UK leaves the EU single market on 31 December, is likely to face more difficulties in its later stages. , especially in the House of Lords.

DUP’s Sammy Wilson welcomed the bill, but said his party still had concerns and would introduce changes to “ensure that Northern Ireland is not left in a straightforward state aid jacket and our businesses do not weighed down by unnecessary documents when traded within the UK “.

SNP Ian Blackford said the bill was “the biggest threat” to the ousted government in Scotland since the Scottish Parliament was founded 20 years ago.

Media playback is not supported on your device

Media titleDavid Cameron said he has doubts about what is being proposed

“We are discussing the details of a bill which this government accidentally and shamelessly admits to violating international and domestic law,” he said.

Five former prime ministers have raised concerns about the bill, including Boris Johnson’s predecessor Theresa May – who is absent from Monday ‘s debate while on a visit to South Korea.

Speaking earlier Monday, David Cameron said “the passage of an act of Parliament and then the continuation of the breach of an international treaty obligation … should be the absolute final solution”.



What Are The Main Benefits Of Comparing Car Insurance Quotes Online

LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 24, 2020, / Compare-autoinsurance.Org has launched a new blog post that presents the main benefits of comparing multiple car insurance quotes. For more info and free online quotes, please visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/the-advantages-of-comparing-prices-with-car-insurance-quotes-online/ The modern society has numerous technological advantages. One important advantage is the speed at which information is sent and received. With the help of the internet, the shopping habits of many persons have drastically changed. The car insurance industry hasn't remained untouched by these changes. On the internet, drivers can compare insurance prices and find out which sellers have the best offers. View photos The advantages of comparing online car insurance quotes are the following: Online quotes can be obtained from anywhere and at any time. Unlike physical insurance agencies, websites don't have a specific schedule and they are available at any time. Drivers that have busy working schedules, can compare quotes from anywhere and at any time, even at midnight. Multiple choices. Almost all insurance providers, no matter if they are well-known brands or just local insurers, have an online presence. Online quotes will allow policyholders the chance to discover multiple insurance companies and check their prices. Drivers are no longer required to get quotes from just a few known insurance companies. Also, local and regional insurers can provide lower insurance rates for the same services. Accurate insurance estimates. Online quotes can only be accurate if the customers provide accurate and real info about their car models and driving history. Lying about past driving incidents can make the price estimates to be lower, but when dealing with an insurance company lying to them is useless. Usually, insurance companies will do research about a potential customer before granting him coverage. Online quotes can be sorted easily. Although drivers are recommended to not choose a policy just based on its price, drivers can easily sort quotes by insurance price. Using brokerage websites will allow drivers to get quotes from multiple insurers, thus making the comparison faster and easier. For additional info, money-saving tips, and free car insurance quotes, visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ Compare-autoinsurance.Org is an online provider of life, home, health, and auto insurance quotes. This website is unique because it does not simply stick to one kind of insurance provider, but brings the clients the best deals from many different online insurance carriers. In this way, clients have access to offers from multiple carriers all in one place: this website. On this site, customers have access to quotes for insurance plans from various agencies, such as local or nationwide agencies, brand names insurance companies, etc. "Online quotes can easily help drivers obtain better car insurance deals. All they have to do is to complete an online form with accurate and real info, then compare prices", said Russell Rabichev, Marketing Director of Internet Marketing Company. CONTACT: Company Name: Internet Marketing CompanyPerson for contact Name: Gurgu CPhone Number: (818) 359-3898Email: [email protected]: https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ SOURCE: Compare-autoinsurance.Org View source version on accesswire.Com:https://www.Accesswire.Com/595055/What-Are-The-Main-Benefits-Of-Comparing-Car-Insurance-Quotes-Online View photos



picture credit

ExBUlletin

to request, modification Contact us at Here or [email protected]

Please disable the ad-blocker on this page to see the content

plus