Angri Kea boss says New March House resident with Covid-19 should have gone directly to the hospital | Australian News

“Looking back,” Angricare CEO says, “Go after,” the government decides to immediately send all Covid-19-positive people in New March House’s nursing home to the hospital and put them in a facility. I have suggested that.

18 residents of New March House, western Sydney, Who died and 71 more are associated with the facility at the center of the worst outbreak in the country.

Grant Millard told ABC Radio Monday morning.

“Look, and if I have the time again, positive Covid people will insist that they go to the hospital,” Millard said.

“That’s what I thought, after all.”

Later in the interview, Millard stepped back from these statements and suggested a case-by-case approach.

“These people are actually in their own homes, which is a comfortable place for them …” It’s not so clear as saying “take someone to the hospital.” However, I heard that they were not selective surgery and not many hospital staff, given the scale of the outbreak here and the staffing challenges, so I wondered if they should have just gone. The hospital that is throwing. “

Mr. Millard stayed away from the decision to treat the majority of his home-tested population.

“I think there was a state health containment strategy, and we adhered to it, and a” hospital home “program was implemented,” he said. “I understand there was a real concern at the time of the public health outbreak that I didn’t want another ruby ​​princess.”

The outbreak of New March is believed to have started when infected staff worked multiple times with very mild symptoms. Reactions from Angricare and government agencies have been criticized after the complete blockade of the house continued to show new infections for over two weeks.

No new cases have been reported among residents during the last 19 days, and no new cases have been reported by staff associated with the facility for 11 years.

Monday morning New South Wales Dr. Kerry Chant, Chief Health Officer, upheld the decisions made early in the outbreak.

“There was a process of getting expert clinical advice about what the residents of New March House would be in the best interest, and that was a strategy that was considered appropriate. There are many problems balancing the elderly with moving to a facility, ”she said.

“There was an expert group of experts involved in planning … it’s a very complex decision. At that time, I don’t want to infer the decisions made by clinicians again.”

She said state and federal health departments worked together to prevent outbreaks.

Chant acknowledged that there are lessons to be learned from New March House, but her comments focused on ways to avoid introducing the virus, rather than the government’s response to the new cluster.

According to Millard, residents of New March House are not barred from hospital treatment, and all Covid-19-positive residents are being consulted for treatment options, with the majority staying at home. Is selected.

During the epidemic at New March House, some families of the inhabitants stood outside the house in the afternoon protesting the lack of contact from the facility.

Millard admitted that Angry Care failed to keep the family in a loop.

“I immediately admit that communication was a problem. We were scrambling [for] We sent staff only to provide basic care, but we weren’t doing a good job of communicating with our family, “he said.

Earlier that month, senior care royal care commissioners Tony Pagon and Liner Briggs announced that the study would be particularly focused on “lessons from what happened at New March House.”

Mr Millard said he wasn’t worried about inquiries from the committee.

“I don’t worry about the facts being known. The situation in which this happened, the serious challenges everyone was facing, the government, and what we will learn from now on. I think, “Millard said.

We called for comments from the office of the Federal Minister for Care for the Elderly, Mr. Richard Corbeck.