Health
Two short low complexity regions (LCRs) are hallmark sequences of the Delta SARS-CoV-2 variant spike protein
Haerty, W. & Golding, G. B. Low-complexity sequences and single amino acid repeats: Not just “junk” peptide sequences. Genome 53, 753–762. https://doi.org/10.1139/g10-063 (2010).
Mier, P. et al. Disentangling the complexity of low complexity proteins. Brief Bionform. 21, 458–472. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbz007 (2020).
Ntountoumi, C. et al. Low complexity regions in the proteins of prokaryotes perform important functional roles and are highly conserved. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, 9998–10009. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz730 (2019).
Jorda, J. & Kajava, A. V. Protein homorepeats sequences, structures, evolution, and functions. Adv. Protein Chem. Str. 79, 59–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1876-1623(10)79002-7 (2010).
Kajava, A. V. Tandem repeats in proteins: From sequence to structure. J. Struct. Biol. 179, 279–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2011.08.009 (2012).
Haerty, W. & Golding, G. B. Genome-wide evidence for selection acting on single amino acid repeats. Genome Res. 20, 755–760. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.101246.109 (2010).
Fankhauser, N., Nguyen-Ha, T.-M., Adler, J. & Mäser, P. Surface antigens and potential virulence factors from parasites detected by comparative genomics of perfect amino acid repeats. Proteome Sci. 5, 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-5956-5-20 (2007).
Mendes, T. A. O. et al. Repeat-enriched proteins are related to host cell invasion and immune evasion in parasitic protozoa. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 951–963. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst001 (2013).
Velasco, M. A. et al. Low complexity regions (LCRs) contribute to the hypervariability of the HIV-1 gp120 protein. J. Theor. Biol. 338, 80–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.08.039 (2013).
Mier, P. & Andrade-Navarro, M. A. The conservation of low complexity regions in bacterial proteins depends on the pathogenicity of the strain and subcellular location of the protein. Genes (Basel) 12(3), 451. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12030451 (2021).
Gruca, A. et al. Common low complexity regions for SARS-CoV-2 and human proteomes as potential multidirectional risk factor in vaccine development. BMC Bioinform. 22, 182. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-021-04017-7 (2021).
Li, Y. C., Korol, A. B., Fahima, T. & Nevo, E. Microsatellites within genes: structure, function, and evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 991–1007. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msh073 (2004).
Lin, W. H. & Kussell, E. Evolutionary pressures on simple sequence repeats in prokaryotic coding regions. Nucleic Acids Res. 40(6), 2399–2413. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr1078 (2012).
Alam, C. M., Iqbal, A., Sharma, A., Schulman, A. H. & Ali, S. Microsatellite diversity, complexity, and host range of mycobacteriophage genomes of the siphoviridae family. Front. Genet. 10, 207. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.00207 (2019).
Laskar, R., Jilani, M. G. & Ali, S. Implications of genome simple sequence repeats signature in 98 Polyomaviridae species. 3 Biotech. 11, 35; https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-020-02583-w (2021).
Zhao, X. et al. Microsatellites in different Potyvirus genomes: Survey and analysis. Gene 488, 52–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2011.08.016 (2011).
Alam, C. M., Singh, A. K., Sharfuddin, C. & Ali, S. In-silico analysis of simple and imperfect microsatellites in diverse tobamovirus genomes. Gene 530, 193–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2013.08.046 (2013).
George, B., Mashhood Alam, C., Jain, S. K., Sharfuddin, C. & Chakraborty, S. Differential distribution and occurrence of simple sequence repeats in diverse geminivirus genomes. Virus Genes 45, 556–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11262-012-0802-1 (2012).
Wu, X., Zhou, L., Zhao, X. & Tan, Z. The analysis of microsatellites and compound microsatellites in 56 complete genomes of Herpesvirales. Gene 551, 103–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2014.08.054 (2014).
Chen, M. et al. Similar distribution of simple sequence repeats in diverse completed Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 genomes. FEBS Lett. 583, 2959–2963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2009.08.004 (2009).
Alam, C., Sharfuddin, C. & Ali, S. Analysis of simple and imperfect microsatellites in Ebolavirus species and other genomes of Filoviridae family. Gene Cell Tissue 2(2), e26204. https://doi.org/10.17795/gct-26204 (2015).
Satyam, R. et al. Deciphering the SSR incidences across viral members of Coronaviridae family. Chem Biol Interact. 331, 109226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2020.109226 (2020).
Siddiqe, R. & Ghosh, A. Genome-wide in silico identification and characterization of Simple Sequence Repeats in diverse completed SARS-CoV-2 genomes. Gene Rep. 23, 101020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genrep.2021.101020 (2021).
Benton, D. J. et al. The effect of the D614G substitution on the structure of the spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 118, e2022586118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2022586118 (2021).
Hancock, J. M., Chaleeprom, W., Chaleeprom, W., Dale, J. & Gibbs, A. Replication slippage in the evolution of potyviruses. J. Gen. Virol. 76(Pt 12), 3229–3232. https://doi.org/10.1099/0022-1317-76-12-3229 (1995).
Rodamilans, B. et al. RNA polymerase slippage as a mechanism for the production of frameshift gene products in plant viruses of the potyviridae family. J. Virol. 89(13), 6965–6967. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00337-15 (2015).
Stewart, H., Olspert, A., Butt, B. G. & Firth, A. E. Propensity of a picornavirus polymerase to slip on potyvirus-derived transcriptional slippage sites. J. Gen. Virol. 100(2), 199–205. https://doi.org/10.1099/jgv.0.001189 (2019).
Syed, A. M. et al. Rapid assessment of SARS-CoV-2 evolved variants using virus-like particles. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abl6184 (2021).
O’Toole, Á. et al. Tracking the international spread of SARS-CoV-2 lineages. Wellcome Open Res. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16661.2 (2021).
Roy, B. & Roy, H. The Delta Plus variant of COVID-19: Will it be the worst nightmare in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic?. J. Biomed. Sci. 8, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.3126/jbs.v8i1.38449 (2021).
Alexandar, S., Ravinsakar, M., Senthil Kumar, R. & Jakkan, K. A Comprehensive review on Covid-19 Delta variant. Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Res. 5, 83–85 (2021).
Xia, X. Domains and functions of spike protein in SARS-CoV-2 in the context of vaccine design. Viruses 13, 109. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13010109 (2021).
Duan, L. et al. The SARS-CoV-2 Spike glycoprotein biosynthesis, structure, function, and antigenicity: Implications for the design of Spike-based vaccine immunogens. Front. Immunol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.576622 (2020).
Peacock, T. P. et al. The furin cleavage site in the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is required for transmission in ferrets. Nat. Microbiol. 6, 899–909. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-021-00908-w (2021).
Frazier, L. E. et al. Spike protein cleavage-activation mediated by the SARS-CoV-2 P681R mutation: A case-study from its first appearance in variant of interest (VOI) A.23.1 identified in Uganda. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.06.30.450632v5 (2021).
Saito, A. et al. SARS-CoV-2 spike P681R mutation, a hallmark of the Delta variant, enhances viral fusogenicity and pathogenicity. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.12.456173v3 (2021).
GISAID. Tracking of Variants. Retrieved on July 14, from https://www.gisaid.org/hcov19-variants/ (2021).
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. COVID Data Tracker. Retrieved on July 14, from https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#variant-proportions (2021).
Xia, S. et al. Fusion mechanism of 2019-nCoV and fusion inhibitors targeting HR1 domain in spike protein. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 17, 765–767. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41423-020-0374-2 (2020).
Duquerroy, S., Vigouroux, A., Rottier, P. J. M., Rey, F. A. & Jan Bosch, B. Central ions and lateral asparagine/glutamine zippers stabilize the post-fusion hairpin conformation of the SARS coronavirus spike glycoprotein. Virology 335, 276–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2005.02.022 (2005).
Feng, M., Bell, D. R., Kang, H., Shao, Q. & Zhou, R. Exploration of HIV-1 fusion peptide–antibody VRC34.01 binding reveals fundamental neutralization sites. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21, 18569–18576. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9CP02909E (2019).
Ispas, G. et al. Antiviral activity of TMC353121, a Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) fusion inhibitor, in a non-human primate model. PLoS ONE 10, e0126959. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126959 (2015).
Wu, Y. & Zhao, S. Furin cleavage sites naturally occur in coronaviruses. Stem Cell Res. 50, 102115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scr.2020.102115 (2021).
Scudellari, M. How the coronavirus infects cells—and why Delta is so dangerous. Nature 595, 640–644. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-02039-y (2021).
Hancock, J. M. Genome size and the accumulation of simple sequence repeats: Implications of new data from genome sequencing projects. Genetica 115, 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016028332006 (2002).
Weisblum, Y. et al. Escape from neutralizing antibodies by SARS-CoV-2 spike protein variants. Elife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.61312 (2020).
Davies, N. G. et al. Estimated transmissibility and impact of SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.1.7 in England. Science 372, eabg3055. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abg3055 (2021).
Zhou, W. & Wang, W. Fast-spreading SARS-CoV-2 variants: challenges to and new design strategies of COVID-19 vaccines. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 6, 226. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-021-00644-x (2021).
Wootton, J. & Federhen, S. Statistics of local complexity in amino acid sequence and sequences database. Comput. Chem. 17, 149–163 (1993).
Edgar, R. C. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1792–1797. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh340 (2004).
Crooks, G. E., Hon, G., Chandonia, J. M. & Brenner, S. E. WebLogo: A sequence logo generator. Genome Res. 14(6), 1188–1190. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.849004 (2004).
|
Sources 2/ https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-04976-8 The mention sources can contact us to remove/changing this article |
What Are The Main Benefits Of Comparing Car Insurance Quotes Online
LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 24, 2020, / Compare-autoinsurance.Org has launched a new blog post that presents the main benefits of comparing multiple car insurance quotes. For more info and free online quotes, please visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/the-advantages-of-comparing-prices-with-car-insurance-quotes-online/ The modern society has numerous technological advantages. One important advantage is the speed at which information is sent and received. With the help of the internet, the shopping habits of many persons have drastically changed. The car insurance industry hasn't remained untouched by these changes. On the internet, drivers can compare insurance prices and find out which sellers have the best offers. View photos The advantages of comparing online car insurance quotes are the following: Online quotes can be obtained from anywhere and at any time. Unlike physical insurance agencies, websites don't have a specific schedule and they are available at any time. Drivers that have busy working schedules, can compare quotes from anywhere and at any time, even at midnight. Multiple choices. Almost all insurance providers, no matter if they are well-known brands or just local insurers, have an online presence. Online quotes will allow policyholders the chance to discover multiple insurance companies and check their prices. Drivers are no longer required to get quotes from just a few known insurance companies. Also, local and regional insurers can provide lower insurance rates for the same services. Accurate insurance estimates. Online quotes can only be accurate if the customers provide accurate and real info about their car models and driving history. Lying about past driving incidents can make the price estimates to be lower, but when dealing with an insurance company lying to them is useless. Usually, insurance companies will do research about a potential customer before granting him coverage. Online quotes can be sorted easily. Although drivers are recommended to not choose a policy just based on its price, drivers can easily sort quotes by insurance price. Using brokerage websites will allow drivers to get quotes from multiple insurers, thus making the comparison faster and easier. For additional info, money-saving tips, and free car insurance quotes, visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ Compare-autoinsurance.Org is an online provider of life, home, health, and auto insurance quotes. This website is unique because it does not simply stick to one kind of insurance provider, but brings the clients the best deals from many different online insurance carriers. In this way, clients have access to offers from multiple carriers all in one place: this website. On this site, customers have access to quotes for insurance plans from various agencies, such as local or nationwide agencies, brand names insurance companies, etc. "Online quotes can easily help drivers obtain better car insurance deals. All they have to do is to complete an online form with accurate and real info, then compare prices", said Russell Rabichev, Marketing Director of Internet Marketing Company. CONTACT: Company Name: Internet Marketing CompanyPerson for contact Name: Gurgu CPhone Number: (818) 359-3898Email: [email protected]: https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ SOURCE: Compare-autoinsurance.Org View source version on accesswire.Com:https://www.Accesswire.Com/595055/What-Are-The-Main-Benefits-Of-Comparing-Car-Insurance-Quotes-Online View photos
to request, modification Contact us at Here or [email protected]
 |
 |
 |
