Connect with us

Health

The Vaccine-Hesitant Moment | NEJM

Published

on

 


  • 1. World Health Organization. Influenza A (H1N1): pandemic 2009–2010. 2010 (https://www.who.int/emergencies/situations/influenza-a-(h1n1)-outbreak).

  • 2. Black S, Rappuoli R. A crisis of public confidence in vaccines. Sci Transl Med 2010;2(61):61mr161mr1.

  • 3. Schwarzinger M, Flicoteaux R, Cortarenoda S, Obadia Y, Moatti J-P. Low acceptability of A/H1N1 pandemic vaccination in French adult population: did public health policy fuel public dissonance? PLoS One 2010;5(4):e10199e10199.

  • 4. Ofri D. The emotional epidemiology of H1N1 influenza vaccination. N Engl J Med 2009;361:25942595.

  • 5. Cascini F, Pantovic A, Al-Ajlouni Y, Failla G, Ricciardi W. Attitudes, acceptance and hesitancy among the general population worldwide to receive the COVID-19 vaccines and their contributing factors: a systematic review. EClinicalMedicine 2021;40:101113101113.

  • 6. Cooper S, Van Rooyen H, Wiysonge CS. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in South Africa: a complex social phenomenon. S Afr Med J 2021;111:702703.

  • 7. Dzinamarira T, Nachipo B, Phiri B, Musuka G. COVID-19 vaccine roll-out in South Africa and Zimbabwe: urgent need to address community preparedness, fears and hesitancy. Vaccines (Basel) 2021;9:250250.

  • 8. Ipsos. Covid-19 vaccine intent: Ipsos survey for the World Economic Forum. 2021 (https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2021-05/COVID-19-Vaccination%20Intent%20-April-2021-report.pdf).

  • 9. Johnson NF, Velásquez N, Restrepo NJ, et al. The online competition between pro- and anti-vaccination views. Nature 2020;582:230233.

  • 10. UNICEF, World Health Organization. Progress towards global immunization goals — 2018. 2018 (https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/documents/immunization/data/progress-towards-global-immunization-goals-2018.pdf?sfvrsn=aa30c225_2).

  • 11. Meeting of the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization, November 2011 — conclusions and recommendations. Wkly Epidemiol Rec 2012;87:116.

  • 12. MacDonald NE; SAGE Working Group on Vaccine Hesitancy. Vaccine hesitancy: definition, scope and determinants. Vaccine 2015;33:41614164.

  • 13. World Health Organization. Ten threats to global health in 2019. 2019 (https://www.who.int/news-room/spotlight/ten-threats-to-global-health-in-2019).

  • 14. Dubé E, Laberge C, Guay M, Bramadat P, Roy R, Bettinger J. Vaccine hesitancy: an overview. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2013;9:17631773.

  • 15. Peretti-Watel P, Larson HJ, Ward JK, Schulz WS, Verger P. Vaccine hesitancy: clarifying a theoretical framework for an ambiguous notion. PLoS Curr 2015;7:6844c80ff9f5b273f34c91f71b7fc2896844c80ff9f5b273f34c91f71b7fc289.

  • 16. Goldenberg MJ. Vaccine hesitancy: public trust, expertise, and the war on science. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2021:33.

  • 17. Larson HJ, Broniatowski DA. Volatility of vaccine confidence. Science 2021;371:12891289.

  • 18. de Albuquerque Veloso Machado M, Roberts B, Wong BLH, van Kessel R, Mossialos E. The relationship between the COVID-19 pandemic and vaccine hesitancy: a scoping review of literature until August 2021. Front Public Health 2021;9:747787747787.

  • 19. Piot P, Larson HJ, O’Brien KL, et al. Immunization: vital progress, unfinished agenda. Nature 2019;575:119129.

  • 20. Davies P, Chapman S, Leask J. Antivaccination activists on the world wide web. Arch Dis Child 2002;87:2225.

  • 21. Jennings W, Stoker G, Bunting H, et al. Lack of trust, conspiracy beliefs, and social media use predict COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Vaccines (Basel) 2021;9:593593.

  • 22. Dolman AJ, Fraser T, Panagopoulos C, Aldrich DP, Kim D. Opposing views: associations of political polarization, political party affiliation, and social trust with COVID-19 vaccination intent and receipt. J Public Health (Oxf) 2022 January 25 (Epub ahead of print).

  • 23. Kata A. Anti-vaccine activists, Web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm — an overview of tactics and tropes used online by the anti-vaccination movement. Vaccine 2012;30:37783789.

  • 24. DeStefano F, Thompson WW. MMR vaccine and autism: an update of the scientific evidence. Expert Rev Vaccines 2004;3:1922.

  • 25. The Lancet Child Adolescent Health. Vaccine hesitancy: a generation at risk. Lancet Child Adolesc Health 2019;3:281281.

  • 26. Akehurst C. France suspends hepatitis B immunisation for adolescents in schools. Euro Surveill 1998;2:11431143.

  • 27. McLenon J, Rogers MAM. The fear of needles: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adv Nurs 2019;75:3042.

  • 28. Herman R, McNutt L-A, Mehta M, Salmon DA, Bednarczyk RA, Shaw J. Vaccination perspectives among adolescents and their desired role in the decision-making process. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2019;15:17521759.

  • 29. Karafillakis E, Simas C, Jarrett C, et al. HPV vaccination in a context of public mistrust and uncertainty: a systematic literature review of determinants of HPV vaccine hesitancy in Europe. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2019;15:16151627.

  • 30. Yang YT, Olick RS, Shaw J. Adolescent consent to vaccination in the age of vaccine-hesitant parents. JAMA Pediatr 2019;173:11231124.

  • 31. Rosenbaum L. Escaping Catch-22 — overcoming Covid vaccine hesitancy. N Engl J Med 2021;384:13671371.

  • 32. Plotkin SA, Offit PA, DeStefano F, et al. The science of vaccine safety: summary of meeting at Wellcome Trust. Vaccine 2020;38:18691880.

  • 33. Lighter J. We’re ignoring the biggest cause of the measles crisis. New York Times. September 22, 2019 (https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/22/opinion/anti-vaccine-parents.html).

  • 34. Amin DP, Palter JS. COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy among healthcare personnel in the emergency department deserves continued attention. Am J Emerg Med 2021;48:372373.

  • 35. Suryadevara M, Handel A, Bonville CA, Cibula DA, Domachowske JB. Pediatric provider vaccine hesitancy: an under-recognized obstacle to immunizing children. Vaccine 2015;33:66296634.

  • 36. Biswas N, Mustapha T, Khubchandani J, Price JH. The nature and extent of COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy in healthcare workers. J Community Health 2021;46:12441251.

  • 37. Karafillakis E, Larson HJ. The paradox of vaccine hesitancy among healthcare professionals. Clin Microbiol Infect 2018;24:799800.

  • 38. Larson HJ, Jarrett C, Eckersberger E, Smith DMD, Paterson P. Understanding vaccine hesitancy around vaccines and vaccination from a global perspective: a systematic review of published literature, 2007–2012. Vaccine 2014;32:21502159.

  • 39. Mesch GS, Schwirian KP. Social and political determinants of vaccine hesitancy: lessons learned from the H1N1 pandemic of 2009–2010. Am J Infect Control 2015;43:11611165.

  • 40. Sallam M. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy worldwide: a concise systematic review of vaccine acceptance rates. Vaccines (Basel) 2021;9:160160.

  • 41. Machingaidze S, Wiysonge CS. Understanding COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Nat Med 2021;27:13381339.

  • 42. Carcelen AC, Prosperi C, Mutembo S, et al. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Zambia: a glimpse at the possible challenges ahead for COVID-19 vaccination rollout in sub-Saharan Africa. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2022;18:16.

  • 43. Aw J, Seng JJB, Seah SSY, Low LL. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy — a scoping review of literature in high-income countries. Vaccines (Basel) 2021;9:900900.

  • 44. Sturgis P, Brunton-Smith I, Jackson J. Trust in science, social consensus and vaccine confidence. Nat Hum Behav 2021;5:15281534.

  • 45. Baker JP. Mercury, vaccines, and autism: one controversy, three histories. Am J Public Health 2008;98:244253.

  • 46. Larson H. Poison pill: not all mercury is toxic. New Scientist. January 9, 2013 (https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21728990-200-poison-pill-not-all-mercury-is-toxic/).

  • 47. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Thimerosal in vaccines: a joint statement of the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Public Health Service. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1999;48:563565.

  • 48. Hurie MB, Saari TN, Davis JP. Impact of the joint statement by the American Academy of Pediatrics/US Public Health Service on thimerosal in vaccines on hospital infant hepatitis B vaccination practices. Pediatrics 2001;107:755758.

  • 49. Institute of Medicine. Immunization safety review: vaccines and autism. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2004.

  • 50. Motta M, Stecula D. Quantifying the effect of Wakefield et al. (1998) on skepticism about MMR vaccine safety in the U.S. PLoS One 2021;16(8):e0256395e0256395.

  • 51. Jenness SM, Aavitsland P, White RA, Winje BA. Measles vaccine coverage among children born to Somali immigrants in Norway. BMC Public Health 2021;21:668668.

  • 52. Larson HJ. Stuck: how vaccine rumors start — and why they don’t go away. New York: Oxford University Press, 2020.

  • 53. Donzelli G, Palomba G, Federigi I, et al. Misinformation on vaccination: a quantitative analysis of YouTube videos. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2018;14:16541659.

  • 54. Covolo L, Ceretti E, Passeri C, Boletti M, Gelatti U. What arguments on vaccinations run through YouTube videos in Italy? A content analysis. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2017;13:16931699.

  • 55. Briones R, Nan X, Madden K, Waks L. When vaccines go viral: an analysis of HPV vaccine coverage on YouTube. Health Commun 2012;27:478485.

  • 56. Ache KA, Wallace LS. Human papillomavirus vaccination coverage on YouTube. Am J Prev Med 2008;35:389392.

  • 57. Keelan J, Pavri-Garcia V, Tomlinson G, Wilson K. YouTube as a source of information on immunization: a content analysis. JAMA 2007;298:24822484.

  • 58. Tomacruz S. A year after Dengvaxia: immunization drops, measles outbreaks soar. Rappler. December 1, 2018 (https://www.rappler.com/newsbreak/in-depth/217912-dengvaxia-one-year-after-outbreaks-series-part-1/).

  • 59. Gørtz M, Brewer NT, Hansen PR, Ejrnæs M. The contagious nature of a vaccine scare: how the introduction of HPV vaccination lifted and eroded MMR vaccination in Denmark. Vaccine 2020;38:44324439.

  • 60. Immunization stress-related responses. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2019 (https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/330277/9789241515948-eng.pdf).

  • 61. Simas C, Munoz N, Arregoces L, Larson HJ. HPV vaccine confidence and cases of mass psychogenic illness following immunization in Carmen de Bolivar, Colombia. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2019;15:163166.

  • 62. Haruyama R, Obara H, Fujita N. Japan resumes active recommendations of HPV vaccine after 8.5 years of suspension. Lancet Oncol 2022;23:197198.

  • 63. Larson HJ, Wilson R, Hanley S, Parys A, Paterson P. Tracking the global spread of vaccine sentiments: the global response to Japan’s suspension of its HPV vaccine recommendation. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2014;10:25432550.

  • 64. Simms KT, Hanley SJB, Smith MA, Keane A, Canfell K. Impact of HPV vaccine hesitancy on cervical cancer in Japan: a modelling study. Lancet Public Health 2020;5(4):e223e234.

  • 65. Puri N, Coomes EA, Haghbayan H, Gunaratne K. Social media and vaccine hesitancy: new updates for the era of COVID-19 and globalized infectious diseases. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2020;16:25862593.

  • 66. Liu R, Li GM. Hesitancy in the time of coronavirus: temporal, spatial, and sociodemographic variations in COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. SSM Popul Health 2021;15:100896100896.

  • 67. Wilson SL, Wiysonge C. Social media and vaccine hesitancy. BMJ Glob Health 2020;5(10):e004206e004206.

  • 68. García-Saisó S, Marti M, Brooks I, et al. The COVID-19 infodemic. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2021;45:e56e56.

  • 69. Fridman A, Gershon R, Gneezy A. COVID-19 and vaccine hesitancy: a longitudinal study. PLoS One 2021;16(4):e0250123e0250123.

  • 70. Muric G, Wu Y, Ferrara E. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy on social media: building a public Twitter data set of antivaccine content, vaccine misinformation, and conspiracies. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2021;7(11):e30642e30642.

  • 71. Piedrahita-Valdés H, Piedrahita-Castillo D, Bermejo-Higuera J, et al. Vaccine hesitancy on social media: sentiment analysis from June 2011 to April 2019. Vaccines (Basel) 2021;9:2828.

  • 72. Bragazzi NL, Gianfredi V, Villarini M, et al. Vaccines meet big data: state-of-the-art and future prospects. From the classical 3Is (“isolate-inactivate-inject”) vaccinology 1.0 to vaccinology 3.0, vaccinomics, and beyond: a historical overview. Front Public Health 2018;6:6262.

  • 73. The Delphi Group. COVID-19 Symptom Survey: topline report on COVID-19 vaccination in the United States, survey waves 6–8, January 10–February 27, 2021. March 12, 2021 (https://www.cmu.edu/delphi-web/surveys/CMU_Topline_Vaccine_Report_20210312.pdf).

  • 74. Salomon JA, Reinhart A, Bilinski A, et al. The US COVID-19 Trends and Impact Survey: continuous real-time measurement of COVID-19 symptoms, risks, protective behaviors, testing, and vaccination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2021;118(51):e2111454118e2111454118.

  • 75. Collis A, Garimella K, Moehring A, et al. Global survey on COVID-19 beliefs, behaviors, and norms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Sloan School of Management, November 30, 2020 (https://covidsurvey.mit.edu/covid_survey_files/COVID_BBN_survey_report.pdf).

  • 76. Reinhart A, Kim E, Garcia A, LaRocca S. Using the COVID-19 Symptom Survey to track vaccination uptake and sentiment in the United States. Pittsburgh: CMU Delphi Group, January 28, 2021 (https://delphi.cmu.edu/blog/2021/01/28/using-the-covid-19-symptom-survey-to-track-vaccination-uptake-and-sentiment-in-the-united-states/).

  • 77. Ratzan S, Schneider EC, Hatch H, Cacchione J. Missing the point — how primary care can overcome Covid-19 vaccine “hesitancy.” N Engl J Med 2021;384(25):e100.

  • 78. Gallup. Wellcome global monitor. 2018 (https://wellcome.org/sites/default/files/wellcome-global-monitor-2018.pdf).

  • 79. CUNY School of Public Health. Vaccine confidence grows under new administration, latest CUNY SPH survey reveals. January 2021 (https://sph.cuny.edu/research/covid-19-tracking-survey/january-vaccines/).

  • 80. Hamel L, Lopes L, Kearney A, Brodie M. KFF COVID-19 Vaccine Monitor: March 2021. March 30, 2021 (https://www.kff.org/coronavirus-covid-19/poll-finding/kff-covid-19-vaccine-monitor-march-2021/).

  • Sources

    1/ https://Google.com/

    2/ https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMra2106441

    The mention sources can contact us to remove/changing this article

    What Are The Main Benefits Of Comparing Car Insurance Quotes Online

    LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 24, 2020, / Compare-autoinsurance.Org has launched a new blog post that presents the main benefits of comparing multiple car insurance quotes. For more info and free online quotes, please visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/the-advantages-of-comparing-prices-with-car-insurance-quotes-online/ The modern society has numerous technological advantages. One important advantage is the speed at which information is sent and received. With the help of the internet, the shopping habits of many persons have drastically changed. The car insurance industry hasn't remained untouched by these changes. On the internet, drivers can compare insurance prices and find out which sellers have the best offers. View photos The advantages of comparing online car insurance quotes are the following: Online quotes can be obtained from anywhere and at any time. Unlike physical insurance agencies, websites don't have a specific schedule and they are available at any time. Drivers that have busy working schedules, can compare quotes from anywhere and at any time, even at midnight. Multiple choices. Almost all insurance providers, no matter if they are well-known brands or just local insurers, have an online presence. Online quotes will allow policyholders the chance to discover multiple insurance companies and check their prices. Drivers are no longer required to get quotes from just a few known insurance companies. Also, local and regional insurers can provide lower insurance rates for the same services. Accurate insurance estimates. Online quotes can only be accurate if the customers provide accurate and real info about their car models and driving history. Lying about past driving incidents can make the price estimates to be lower, but when dealing with an insurance company lying to them is useless. Usually, insurance companies will do research about a potential customer before granting him coverage. Online quotes can be sorted easily. Although drivers are recommended to not choose a policy just based on its price, drivers can easily sort quotes by insurance price. Using brokerage websites will allow drivers to get quotes from multiple insurers, thus making the comparison faster and easier. For additional info, money-saving tips, and free car insurance quotes, visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ Compare-autoinsurance.Org is an online provider of life, home, health, and auto insurance quotes. This website is unique because it does not simply stick to one kind of insurance provider, but brings the clients the best deals from many different online insurance carriers. In this way, clients have access to offers from multiple carriers all in one place: this website. On this site, customers have access to quotes for insurance plans from various agencies, such as local or nationwide agencies, brand names insurance companies, etc. "Online quotes can easily help drivers obtain better car insurance deals. All they have to do is to complete an online form with accurate and real info, then compare prices", said Russell Rabichev, Marketing Director of Internet Marketing Company. CONTACT: Company Name: Internet Marketing CompanyPerson for contact Name: Gurgu CPhone Number: (818) 359-3898Email: [email protected]: https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ SOURCE: Compare-autoinsurance.Org View source version on accesswire.Com:https://www.Accesswire.Com/595055/What-Are-The-Main-Benefits-Of-Comparing-Car-Insurance-Quotes-Online View photos

    ExBUlletin

    to request, modification Contact us at Here or [email protected]