Smoking is to blame for much of British society

Image: A sign indicating a non-smoking environment. look more Credits: Cristian Guerrero, Unsplash, CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) A new study published September 21 in an open access journal found that if no one smoked between 2013 and 2017 in the United Kingdom, socioeconomic disparities in cancer incidence, or deprivation gaps, would increase. We could have prevented the part. pro swan By Nick Payne and colleagues from Cancer Research UK. Smoking is the leading cause of preventable cancer and death in the UK, accounting for approximately 15% of all UK cancer cases in 2015. Cancer incidence also varies by socioeconomic status across the UK, with an overall cancer incidence that is 17% higher. in the lowest income quintile of the population compared to the highest incomes in England. In the new study, researchers focused on 15 cancer types with strong evidence of an association with smoking. This contributes to more than 8 of his 10 cases of deprivation-related cancer in the UK. The number of cancer cases attributed to smoking in 2013–17 is based on cancer incidence and smoking prevalence (2003–07, accounting for the time lag between smoking and cancer diagnosis) and cancer rates in smokers and nonsmokers. was calculated by combining the relative risks of being diagnosed with These smoking-attributable cases were presented as a percentage of the total deprivation-related cancer cases. In this study, 21.1% of cancer cases in the most deprived quintile of the population can be attributed to smoking, but only 9.7% of cancers in the most deprived quintile are attributed to smoking. It turns out that there is a possibility. This is almost a 2.2x difference. If all had the same smoking prevalence as the least deprived quintile, 20.3% of deprivation-related cancers, or more than 5,000 cases each year, could have been prevented. If no one smoked at all, 61% of deprivation-related cancer incidences, or more than 16,000 cases each year, could have been prevented. Among cancer types, the proportion of cases attributable to smoking was highest for lung, laryngeal, pharynx, bladder, and esophageal squamous cell carcinomas. The authors conclude that tobacco control policies that address smoking inequalities can prove cost-effective given their effectiveness in reducing smoking-related ill health, including cancer incidence. . The authors add: The findings help confirm that smoking is a major cause of inequality in cancer incidence in the UK. Policy measures must therefore continue to bring down smoking rates, with a particular focus on the most disadvantaged. ” ##### In your reporting, use this URL to provide access to the article, which is freely available. pro swan: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id10.1371/journal.pone.0272202 Quote: Payne NWS, Brown KF, Delon C, Kotrotsios Y, Soerjomataram I, Shelton J (2022) Socioeconomic deprivation and cancer incidence in the United Kingdom: quantifying the role of smoking. PLoS ONE 17(9): e0272202. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272202 Author country: Great Britain, France Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work. Survey method observational study Research theme people article title Socioeconomic deprivation and cancer incidence in the UK: quantifying the role of smoking Article publication date September 21, 2022 COI statement The authors declare that no competing interests exist. Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! EurekAlert! is not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted. Use of information by contributors or via the EurekAlert system. Sources 1/ https://Google.com/ 2/ https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/964701 The mention sources can contact us to remove/changing this article

ExBulletin

Smoking is to blame for much of British society

Health

Smoking is to blame for much of British society

Survey method

Research theme

article title

Article publication date

COI statement

Related

Recent Posts

Add ExBulletin to your Home screen!