Health
Enterococci enhance Clostridioides difficile pathogenesis
Abbas, A. & Zackular, J. P. Microbe–microbe interactions during Clostridioides difficile infection. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 53, 19–25 (2020).
Buffie, C. G. et al. Precision microbiome reconstitution restores bile acid mediated resistance to Clostridium difficile. Nature 517, 205–208 (2015).
Lessa, F. C., Winston, L. G. & McDonald, L. C., Team, E. I. P. C. d. S. Burden of Clostridium difficile infection in the United States. N. Engl. J. Med. 372, 2369–2370 (2015).
Schubert, A. M. et al. Microbiome data distinguish patients with Clostridium difficile infection and non-C. difficile-associated diarrhea from healthy controls. mBio 5, e01021–01014 (2014).
Auchtung, J. M., Preisner, E. C., Collins, J., Lerma, A. I. & Britton, R. A. Identification of simplified microbial communities that inhibit Clostridioides difficile infection through dilution/extinction. mSphere 5, e00387–20 (2020).
Zackular, J. P. et al. Dietary zinc alters the microbiota and decreases resistance to Clostridium difficile infection. Nat. Med. 22, 1330–1334 (2016).
Tomkovich, S., Stough, J. M. A., Bishop, L. & Schloss, P. D. The initial gut microbiota and response to antibiotic perturbation influence Clostridioides difficile clearance in mice. mSphere 5, e00869–20 (2020).
Berkell, M. et al. Microbiota-based markers predictive of development of Clostridioides difficile infection. Nat. Commun. 12, 2241 (2021).
Antharam, V. C. et al. Intestinal dysbiosis and depletion of butyrogenic bacteria in Clostridium difficile infection and nosocomial diarrhea. J. Clin. Microbiol. 51, 2884–2892 (2013).
Poduval, R. D., Kamath, R. P., Corpuz, M., Norkus, E. P. & Pitchumoni, C. S. Clostridium difficile and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus: the new nosocomial alliance. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 95, 3513–3515 (2000).
Ubeda, C. et al. Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus domination of intestinal microbiota is enabled by antibiotic treatment in mice and precedes bloodstream invasion in humans. J. Clin. Invest. 120, 4332–4341 (2010).
Taur, Y. et al. Intestinal domination and the risk of bacteremia in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Clin. Infect. Dis. 55, 905–914 (2012).
Willett, J. L. E. et al. Comparative biofilm assays using Enterococcus faecalis OG1RF identify new determinants of biofilm formation. mBio 12, e0101121 (2021).
Willett, J. L. E., Robertson, E. B. & Dunny, G. M. The phosphatase Bph and peptidyl–prolyl isomerase PrsA are required for gelatinase expression and activity in Enterococcus faecalis. J. Bacteriol. 204, e0012922 (2022).
Lee, I. P. A., Eldakar, O. T., Gogarten, J. P. & Andam, C. P. Bacterial cooperation through horizontal gene transfer. Trends Ecol. Evol. 37, 223–232 (2021).
Roberts, A. P. & Mullany, P. Tn916-like genetic elements: a diverse group of modular mobile elements conferring antibiotic resistance. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 35, 856–871 (2011).
Chambers, C. J., Roberts, A. K., Shone, C. C. & Acharya, K. R. Structure and function of a Clostridium difficile sortase enzyme. Sci. Rep. 5, 9449 (2015).
Jenior, M. L. et al. Novel drivers of virulence in Clostridioides difficile identified via context-specific metabolic network analysis. mSystems 6, e0091921 (2021).
Fang, X., Lloyd, C. J. & Palsson, B. O. Reconstructing organisms in silico: genome-scale models and their emerging applications. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 18, 731–743 (2020).
Jenior, M. L., Moutinho, T. J., Dougherty, B. V. & Papin, J. A. Transcriptome-guided parsimonious flux analysis improves predictions with metabolic networks in complex environments. PLoS Comput. Biol. 16, e1007099 (2020).
Pruss, K. M. et al. Oxidative ornithine metabolism supports non-inflammatory C. difficile colonization. Nat Metab 4, 19–28 (2022).
Barker, H. A. Amino acid degradation by anaerobic bacteria. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 50, 23–40 (1981).
Matthews, M. L. et al. Chemoproteomic profiling and discovery of protein electrophiles in human cells. Nat. Chem. 9, 234–243 (2017).
Keogh, D. et al. Enterococcal metabolite cues facilitate interspecies niche modulation and polymicrobial infection. Cell Host Microbe 20, 493–503 (2016).
Sundermann, A. J. et al. Whole genome sequencing surveillance and machine learning of the electronic health record for enhanced healthcare outbreak detection. Clin. Infect. Dis. 75, 476–482 (2021).
Bryan, N. C. et al. Genomic and functional characterization of Enterococcus faecalis isolates recovered from the International Space Station and their potential for pathogenicity. Front. Microbiol. 11, 515319 (2020).
Deibel, R. H. Utilization of arginine as an energy source for the growth of Streptococcus faecalis. J. Bacteriol. 87, 988–992 (1964).
Fishbein, S. R. et al. Multi-omics investigation of Clostridioides difficile-colonized patients reveals pathogen and commensal correlates of C. difficile pathogenesis. eLife 11, e72801 (2022).
Karasawa, T., Maegawa, T., Nojiri, T., Yamakawa, K. & Nakamura, S. Effect of arginine on toxin production by Clostridium difficile in defined medium. Microbiol. Immunol. 41, 581–585 (1997).
Fredrick, C. M., Lin, G. & Johnson, E. A. Regulation of botulinum neurotoxin synthesis and toxin complex formation by arginine and glucose in Clostridium botulinum ATCC 3502. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 83, e00642–17 (2017).
Bushman, F. D. et al. Multi-omic analysis of the interaction between Clostridioides difficile infection and pediatric inflammatory bowel disease. Cell Host Microbe 28, 422–433.e7 (2020).
Keith, J. W. et al. Impact of antibiotic-resistant bacteria on immune activation and Clostridioides difficile infection in the mouse intestine. Infect. Immun. 88, e00362–19 (2020).
Lesniak, N. A. et al. The gut bacterial community potentiates Clostridioides difficile infection severity. mBio 13, e0118322 (2022).
Girinathan, B. P. et al. In vivo commensal control of Clostridioides difficile virulence. Cell Host Microbe 29, 1693–1708.e1697 (2021).
Hirose, Y. et al. Streptococcus pyogenes upregulates arginine catabolism to exert its pathogenesis on the skin surface. Cell Rep. 34, 108924 (2021).
Stabler, R. A. et al. Comparative genome and phenotypic analysis of Clostridium difficile 027 strains provides insight into the evolution of a hypervirulent bacterium. Genome Biol. 10, R102 (2009).
Carter, G. P. et al. Defining the roles of TcdA and TcdB in localized gastrointestinal disease, systemic organ damage, and the host response during Clostridium difficile infections. mBio 6, e00551 (2015).
Hanahan, D. Studies on transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmids. J. Mol. Biol. 166, 557–580 (1983).
Dale, J. L. et al. Comprehensive functional analysis of the Enterococcus faecalis core genome using an ordered, sequence-defined collection of insertional mutations in strain OG1RF. mSystems 3, e00062–18 (2018).
Theriot, C. M. et al. Cefoperazone-treated mice as an platform to assess differential virulence of Clostridium difficile strains. Gut Microbes 2, 326–334 (2011).
Kumar, L., Cox, C. R. & Sarkar, S. K. Matrix metalloprotease-1 inhibits and disrupts Enterococcus faecalis biofilms. PLoS One 14, e0210218 (2019).
Bloedt, K., Riecker, M., Poppert, S. & Wellinghausen, N. Evaluation of new selective culture media and a rapid fluorescence in situ hybridization assay for identification of Clostridium difficile from stool samples. J. Med. Microbiol. 58, 874–877 (2009).
Wellinghausen, N., Bartel, M., Essig, A. & Poppert, S. Rapid identification of clinically relevant Enterococcus species by fluorescence in situ hybridization. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45, 3424–3426 (2007).
Knippel, R. J. et al. Heme sensing and detoxification by HatRT contributes to pathogenesis during Clostridium difficile infection. PLoS Pathog. 14, e1007486 (2018).
Dixon, P. VEGAN, a package of R functions for community ecology. J. Veg. Sci. 14, 927–930 (2003).
Calle, M. L., Urrea, V., Boulesteix, A. L. & Malats, N. AUC-RF: a new strategy for genomic profiling with random forest. Hum. Hered. 72, 121–132 (2011).
Hankin, J. A., Barkley, R. M. & Murphy, R. C. Sublimation as a method of matrix application for mass spectrometric imaging. J. Am. Soc. Mass. Spectrom. 18, 1646–1652 (2007).
Thomas, A., Charbonneau, J. L., Fournaise, E. & Chaurand, P. Sublimation of new matrix candidates for high spatial resolution imaging mass spectrometry of lipids: enhanced information in both positive and negative polarities after 1,5-diaminonapthalene deposition. Anal. Chem. 84, 2048–2054 (2012).
Yang, J. & Caprioli, R. M. Matrix sublimation/recrystallization for imaging proteins by mass spectrometry at high spatial resolution. Anal. Chem. 83, 5728–5734 (2011).
Prentice, B. M. et al. Dynamic range expansion by gas-phase ion fractionation and enrichment for imaging mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 92, 13092–13100 (2020).
Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S. & Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 671–675 (2012).
Jackson, S., Calos, M., Myers, A. & Self, W. T. Analysis of proline reduction in the nosocomial pathogen Clostridium difficile. J. Bacteriol. 188, 8487–8495 (2006).
Evans, D. R. et al. Systematic detection of horizontal gene transfer across genera among multidrug-resistant bacteria in a single hospital. eLife 9, e53886 (2020).
Seemann, T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30, 2068–2069 (2014).
Shannon, P. et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 13, 2498–2504 (2003).
Bryan, E. M., Bae, T., Kleerebezem, M. & Dunny, G. M. Improved vectors for nisin-controlled expression in Gram-positive bacteria. Plasmid 44, 183–190 (2000).
Chilambi, G. S. et al. Evolution of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium during colonization and infection in immunocompromised pediatric patients. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 11703–11714 (2020).
Page, A. J. et al. Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics 31, 3691–3693 (2015).
Obeid, J. S. et al. Procurement of shared data instruments for Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap). J. Biomed. Inform. 46, 259–265 (2013).
|
Sources 2/ https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-05438-x The mention sources can contact us to remove/changing this article |
What Are The Main Benefits Of Comparing Car Insurance Quotes Online
LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 24, 2020, / Compare-autoinsurance.Org has launched a new blog post that presents the main benefits of comparing multiple car insurance quotes. For more info and free online quotes, please visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/the-advantages-of-comparing-prices-with-car-insurance-quotes-online/ The modern society has numerous technological advantages. One important advantage is the speed at which information is sent and received. With the help of the internet, the shopping habits of many persons have drastically changed. The car insurance industry hasn't remained untouched by these changes. On the internet, drivers can compare insurance prices and find out which sellers have the best offers. View photos The advantages of comparing online car insurance quotes are the following: Online quotes can be obtained from anywhere and at any time. Unlike physical insurance agencies, websites don't have a specific schedule and they are available at any time. Drivers that have busy working schedules, can compare quotes from anywhere and at any time, even at midnight. Multiple choices. Almost all insurance providers, no matter if they are well-known brands or just local insurers, have an online presence. Online quotes will allow policyholders the chance to discover multiple insurance companies and check their prices. Drivers are no longer required to get quotes from just a few known insurance companies. Also, local and regional insurers can provide lower insurance rates for the same services. Accurate insurance estimates. Online quotes can only be accurate if the customers provide accurate and real info about their car models and driving history. Lying about past driving incidents can make the price estimates to be lower, but when dealing with an insurance company lying to them is useless. Usually, insurance companies will do research about a potential customer before granting him coverage. Online quotes can be sorted easily. Although drivers are recommended to not choose a policy just based on its price, drivers can easily sort quotes by insurance price. Using brokerage websites will allow drivers to get quotes from multiple insurers, thus making the comparison faster and easier. For additional info, money-saving tips, and free car insurance quotes, visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ Compare-autoinsurance.Org is an online provider of life, home, health, and auto insurance quotes. This website is unique because it does not simply stick to one kind of insurance provider, but brings the clients the best deals from many different online insurance carriers. In this way, clients have access to offers from multiple carriers all in one place: this website. On this site, customers have access to quotes for insurance plans from various agencies, such as local or nationwide agencies, brand names insurance companies, etc. "Online quotes can easily help drivers obtain better car insurance deals. All they have to do is to complete an online form with accurate and real info, then compare prices", said Russell Rabichev, Marketing Director of Internet Marketing Company. CONTACT: Company Name: Internet Marketing CompanyPerson for contact Name: Gurgu CPhone Number: (818) 359-3898Email: [email protected]: https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ SOURCE: Compare-autoinsurance.Org View source version on accesswire.Com:https://www.Accesswire.Com/595055/What-Are-The-Main-Benefits-Of-Comparing-Car-Insurance-Quotes-Online View photos
to request, modification Contact us at Here or [email protected]
 |
 |
 |
