Health
Metabolic heterogeneity and cross-feeding within isogenic yeast populations captured by DILAC
Saint, M. et al. Single-cell imaging and RNA sequencing reveal patterns of gene expression heterogeneity during fission yeast growth and adaptation. Nat. Microbiol. 4, 480–491 (2019).
Nadal-Ribelles, M. et al. Sensitive high-throughput single-cell RNA-seq reveals within-clonal transcript correlations in yeast populations. Nat. Microbiol. 4, 683–692 (2019).
Jackson, C. A., Castro, D. M., Saldi, G.-A., Bonneau, R. & Gresham, D. Gene regulatory network reconstruction using single-cell RNA sequencing of barcoded genotypes in diverse environments. eLife 9, e51254 (2020).
Jariani, A. et al. A new protocol for single-cell RNA-seq reveals stochastic gene expression during lag phase in budding yeast. eLife 9, e55320 (2020).
Rugbjerg, P. & Olsson, L. The future of self-selecting and stable fermentations. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 47, 993–1004 (2020).
González-Cabaleiro, R., Mitchell, A. M., Smith, W., Wipat, A. & Ofiţeru, I. D. Heterogeneity in pure microbial systems: measurements and modeling. Front. Microbiol. 8, 1813 (2017).
Campbell, K., Vowinckel, J. & Ralser, M. Cell-to-cell heterogeneity emerges as consequence of metabolic cooperation in a synthetic yeast community. Biotechnol. J. 11, 1169–1178 (2016).
Morawska, L. P., Hernandez-Valdes, J. A. & Kuipers, O. P. Diversity of bet-hedging strategies in microbial communities–recent cases and insights. WIREs Mech. Dis. 14, e1544 (2022).
Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018).
Dewachter, L., Fauvart, M. & Michiels, J. Bacterial heterogeneity and antibiotic survival: understanding and combatting persistence and heteroresistance. Mol. Cell 76, 255–267 (2019).
Bódi, Z. et al. Phenotypic heterogeneity promotes adaptive evolution. PLoS Biol. 15, e2000644 (2017).
Levy, S. F., Ziv, N. & Siegal, M. L. Bet hedging in yeast by heterogeneous, age-correlated expression of a stress protectant. PLoS Biol. 10, e1001325 (2012).
Balaban, N. Q., Merrin, J., Chait, R., Kowalik, L. & Leibler, S. Bacterial persistence as a phenotypic switch. Science 305, 1622–1625 (2004).
Li, S., Giardina, D. M. & Siegal, M. L. Control of nongenetic heterogeneity in growth rate and stress tolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by cyclic AMP-regulated transcription factors. PLoS Genet. 14, e1007744 (2018).
Lukačišin, M., Espinosa-Cantú, A. & Bollenbach, T. Intron-mediated induction of phenotypic heterogeneity. Nature 605, 113–118 (2022).
Avery, S. V. Microbial cell individuality and the underlying sources of heterogeneity. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4, 577–587 (2006).
Holland, S. L., Reader, T., Dyer, P. S. & Avery, S. V. Phenotypic heterogeneity is a selected trait in natural yeast populations subject to environmental stress. Environ. Microbiol. 16, 1729–1740 (2014).
Olin-Sandoval, V. et al. Lysine harvesting is an antioxidant strategy and triggers underground polyamine metabolism. Nature 572, 249–253 (2019).
Alam, M. T. et al. The metabolic background is a global player in Saccharomyces gene expression epistasis. Nat. Microbiol 1, 15030 (2016).
Yin, H., He, Y., Dong, J. & Lu, J. Transcriptional profiling of amino acid supplementation and impact on aroma production in a lager yeast fermentation. J. Inst. Brew. 124, 425–433 (2018).
Boer, V. M. et al. Transcriptional responses of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to preferred and nonpreferred nitrogen sources in glucose-limited chemostat cultures. FEMS Yeast Res. 7, 604–620 (2007).
Godard, P. et al. Effect of 21 different nitrogen sources on global gene expression in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27, 3065–3086 (2007).
Costa, C. et al. New mechanisms of flucytosine resistance in C. glabrata unveiled by a chemogenomics analysis in S. cerevisiae. PLoS ONE 10, e0135110 (2015).
Yu, J. S. L. et al. Microbial communities form rich extracellular metabolomes that foster metabolic interactions and promote drug tolerance. Nat. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-022-01072-5 (2022).
Campbell, K. et al. Self-establishing communities enable cooperative metabolite exchange in a eukaryote. eLife 4, e09943 (2015).
Momeni, B., Brileya, K. A., Fields, M. W. & Shou, W. Strong inter-population cooperation leads to partner intermixing in microbial communities. eLife 2, e00230 (2013).
Takhaveev, V. & Heinemann, M. Metabolic heterogeneity in clonal microbial populations. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 45, 30–38 (2018).
Fröhlich, F., Christiano, R. & Walther, T. C. Native SILAC: metabolic labeling of proteins in prototroph microorganisms based on lysine synthesis regulation. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 12, 1995–2005 (2013).
Dannenmaier, S. et al. Complete native stable isotope labeling by amino acids of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for global proteomic analysis. Anal. Chem. 90, 10501–10509 (2018).
Hammer, T., Bode, R., Schmidt, H. & Birnbaum, D. Distribution of three lysine-catabolizing enzymes in various yeast species. J. Basic Microbiol. 31, 43–49 (1991).
Mülleder, M. et al. Functional metabolomics describes the yeast biosynthetic regulome. Cell 167, 553–565 (2016).
Demichev, V., Messner, C. B., Vernardis, S. I., Lilley, K. S. & Ralser, M. DIA-NN: neural networks and interference correction enable deep proteome coverage in high throughput. Nat. Methods 17, 41–44 (2020).
Vowinckel, J. et al. Cost-effective generation of precise label-free quantitative proteomes in high-throughput by microLC and data-independent acquisition. Sci. Rep. 8, 4346 (2018).
Demichev, V. et al. dia-PASEF data analysis using FragPipe and DIA-NN for deep proteomics of low sample amounts. Nat. Commun. 13, 3944 (2022).
Meier, F. et al. diaPASEF: parallel accumulation-serial fragmentation combined with data-independent acquisition. Nat. Methods 17, 1229–1236 (2020).
Feller, A., Dubois, E., Ramos, F. & Piérard, A. Repression of the genes for lysine biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is caused by limitation of Lys14-dependent transcriptional activation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 6411–6418 (1994).
Kamrad, S. et al. Pyruvate kinase variant of fission yeast tunes carbon metabolism, cell regulation, growth and stress resistance. Mol. Syst. Biol. 16, e9270 (2020).
Murphy, J. P., Stepanova, E., Everley, R. A., Paulo, J. A. & Gygi, S. P. Comprehensive temporal protein dynamics during the diauxic shift in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 14, 2454–2465 (2015).
Brauer, M. J., Saldanha, A. J., Dolinski, K. & Botstein, D. Homeostatic adjustment and metabolic remodeling in glucose-limited yeast cultures. Mol. Biol. Cell 16, 2503–2517 (2005).
Björkeroth, J. et al. Proteome reallocation from amino acid biosynthesis to ribosomes enables yeast to grow faster in rich media. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 21804–21812 (2020).
Hiesinger, M., Wagner, C. & Schüller, H. J. The acetyl-CoA synthetase gene ACS2 of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is coregulated with structural genes of fatty acid biosynthesis by the transcriptional activators Ino2p and Ino4p. FEBS Lett. 415, 16–20 (1997).
Kornberg, H. L. The role and control of the glyoxylate cycle in Escherichia coli. Biochem. J. 99, 1–11 (1966).
Duntze, W., Neumann, D., Gancedo, J. M., Atzpodien, W. & Holzer, H. Studies on the regulation and localization of the glyoxylate cycle enzymes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eur. J. Biochem. 10, 83–89 (1969).
Xiao, T., Khan, A., Shen, Y., Chen, L. & Rabinowitz, J. D. Glucose feeds the tricarboxylic acid cycle via excreted ethanol in fermenting yeast. Nat. Chem. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-022-01091-7 (2022).
Cole, J. A., Kohler, L., Hedhli, J. & Luthey-Schulten, Z. Spatially-resolved metabolic cooperativity within dense bacterial colonies. BMC Syst. Biol. 9, 15 (2015).
Wolfsberg, E., Long, C. P. & Antoniewicz, M. R. Metabolism in dense microbial colonies: C metabolic flux analysis of E. coli grown on agar identifies two distinct cell populations with acetate cross-feeding. Metab. Eng. 49, 242–247 (2018).
Dal Co, A., van Vliet, S. & Ackermann, M. Emergent microscale gradients give rise to metabolic cross-feeding and antibiotic tolerance in clonal bacterial populations. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 374, 20190080 (2019).
Plocek, V., Váchová, L., Šťovíček, V. & Palková, Z. Cell distribution within yeast colonies and colony biofilms: how structure develops. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 3873 (2020).
Yuan, D. S. Zinc-regulated genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae revealed by transposon tagging. Genetics 156, 45–58 (2000).
Ghosh, A. et al. A peptide-based method for 13C metabolic flux analysis in microbial communities. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003827 (2014).
Kleiner, M. Metaproteomics: much more than measuring gene expression in microbial communities. mSystems 4, e00115–19 (2019).
Jehmlich, N., Vogt, C., Lünsmann, V., Richnow, H. H. & von Bergen, M. Protein-SIP in environmental studies. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 41, 26–33 (2016).
Taubert, M. SIP-metaproteomics: linking microbial taxonomy, function, and activity. Methods Mol. Biol. 2046, 57–69 (2019).
DeGennaro, C. M., Savir, Y. & Springer, M. Identifying metabolic subpopulations from population level mass spectrometry. PLoS ONE 11, e0151659 (2016).
Sachsenberg, T. et al. MetaProSIP: automated inference of stable isotope incorporation rates in proteins for functional metaproteomics. J. Proteome Res. 14, 619–627 (2015).
Zeng, X. et al. Gut bacterial nutrient preferences quantified in vivo. Cell 185, 3441–3456 (2022).
Urban, P. L. et al. Carbon-13 labelling strategy for studying the ATP metabolism in individual yeast cells by micro-arrays for mass spectrometry. Mol. Biosyst. 7, 2837–2840 (2011).
Cooper, A. L., Dean, A. C. & Hinshelwood, C. Factors affecting the growth of bacterial colonies on agar plates. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 171, 175–199 (1968).
Pirt, S. J. A kinetic study of the mode of growth of surface colonies of bacteria and fungi. J. Gen. Microbiol. 47, 181–197 (1967).
Vulin, C. et al. Growing yeast into cylindrical colonies. Biophys. J. 106, 2214–2221 (2014).
Pipe, L. Z. & Grimson, M. J. Spatial-temporal modelling of bacterial colony growth on solid media. Mol. Biosyst. 4, 192–198 (2008).
Díaz-Pascual, F. et al. Spatial alanine metabolism determines local growth dynamics of colonies. eLife 10, e70794 (2021).
Mülleder, M. et al. A prototrophic deletion mutant collection for yeast metabolomics and systems biology. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 1176–1178 (2012).
Opalek, M. & Wloch-Salamon, D. Aspects of multicellularity in yeast: a review of evolutionary and physiological mechanisms. Genes (BASEL) 11, 690 (2020).
Cáp, M., Stěpánek, L., Harant, K., Váchová, L. & Palková, Z. Cell differentiation within a yeast colony: metabolic and regulatory parallels with a tumor-affected organism. Mol. Cell 46, 436–448 (2012).
Palková, Z. & Váchová, L. Spatially structured yeast communities: understanding structure formation and regulation with omics tools. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 19, 5613–5621 (2021).
Wilkinson, D. et al. Transcriptome remodeling of differentiated cells during chronological ageing of yeast colonies: new insights into metabolic differentiation. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2018, 4932905 (2018).
Traven, A. et al. Transcriptional profiling of a yeast colony provides new insight into the heterogeneity of multicellular fungal communities. PLoS ONE 7, e46243 (2012).
Varahan, S., Walvekar, A., Sinha, V., Krishna, S. & Laxman, S. Metabolic constraints drive self-organization of specialized cell groups. eLife 8, e46735 (2019).
Varahan, S., Sinha, V., Walvekar, A., Krishna, S. & Laxman, S. Resource plasticity-driven carbon-nitrogen budgeting enables specialization and division of labor in a clonal community. eLife 9, e57609 (2020).
Smukalla, S. et al. FLO1 is a variable green beard gene that drives biofilm-like cooperation in budding yeast. Cell 135, 726–737 (2008).
Bojsen, R., Regenberg, B. & Folkesson, A. Saccharomyces cerevisiae biofilm tolerance towards systemic antifungals depends on growth phase. BMC Microbiol. 14, 305 (2014).
Mülleder, M., Bluemlein, K. & Ralser, M. A high-throughput method for the quantitative determination of free amino acids in by hydrophilic interaction chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2017, db.prot089094 (2017).
Messner, C. B. et al. Ultra-fast proteomics with Scanning SWATH. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 846–854 (2021).
Messner, C. B. et al. The proteomic landscape of genome-wide genetic perturbations. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.17.492318 (2022).
Cox, J. et al. Accurate proteome-wide label-free quantification by delayed normalization and maximal peptide ratio extraction, termed MaxLFQ. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 13, 2513–2526 (2014).
MacLean, B. et al. Skyline: an open source document editor for creating and analyzing targeted proteomics experiments. Bioinformatics 26, 966–968 (2010).
Virtanen, P. et al. SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat. Methods 17, 261–272 (2020).
Raudvere, U. et al. g:Profiler: a web server for functional enrichment analysis and conversions of gene lists (2019 update). Nucleic Acids Res. 47, W191–W198 (2019).
Darzi, Y., Letunic, I., Bork, P. & Yamada, T. iPath3.0: interactive pathways explorer v3. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, W510–W513 (2018).
Deutsch, E. W. et al. The ProteomeXchange consortium in 2020: enabling “big data” approaches in proteomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, D1145–D1152 (2020).
Perez-Riverol, Y. et al. The PRIDE database and related tools and resources in 2019: improving support for quantification data. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D442–D450 (2019).
Sharma, V. et al. Panorama Public: a public repository for quantitative data sets processed in Skyline. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 17, 1239–1244 (2018).
|
Sources 2/ https://www.nature.com/articles/s41564-022-01304-8 The mention sources can contact us to remove/changing this article |
What Are The Main Benefits Of Comparing Car Insurance Quotes Online
LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 24, 2020, / Compare-autoinsurance.Org has launched a new blog post that presents the main benefits of comparing multiple car insurance quotes. For more info and free online quotes, please visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/the-advantages-of-comparing-prices-with-car-insurance-quotes-online/ The modern society has numerous technological advantages. One important advantage is the speed at which information is sent and received. With the help of the internet, the shopping habits of many persons have drastically changed. The car insurance industry hasn't remained untouched by these changes. On the internet, drivers can compare insurance prices and find out which sellers have the best offers. View photos The advantages of comparing online car insurance quotes are the following: Online quotes can be obtained from anywhere and at any time. Unlike physical insurance agencies, websites don't have a specific schedule and they are available at any time. Drivers that have busy working schedules, can compare quotes from anywhere and at any time, even at midnight. Multiple choices. Almost all insurance providers, no matter if they are well-known brands or just local insurers, have an online presence. Online quotes will allow policyholders the chance to discover multiple insurance companies and check their prices. Drivers are no longer required to get quotes from just a few known insurance companies. Also, local and regional insurers can provide lower insurance rates for the same services. Accurate insurance estimates. Online quotes can only be accurate if the customers provide accurate and real info about their car models and driving history. Lying about past driving incidents can make the price estimates to be lower, but when dealing with an insurance company lying to them is useless. Usually, insurance companies will do research about a potential customer before granting him coverage. Online quotes can be sorted easily. Although drivers are recommended to not choose a policy just based on its price, drivers can easily sort quotes by insurance price. Using brokerage websites will allow drivers to get quotes from multiple insurers, thus making the comparison faster and easier. For additional info, money-saving tips, and free car insurance quotes, visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ Compare-autoinsurance.Org is an online provider of life, home, health, and auto insurance quotes. This website is unique because it does not simply stick to one kind of insurance provider, but brings the clients the best deals from many different online insurance carriers. In this way, clients have access to offers from multiple carriers all in one place: this website. On this site, customers have access to quotes for insurance plans from various agencies, such as local or nationwide agencies, brand names insurance companies, etc. "Online quotes can easily help drivers obtain better car insurance deals. All they have to do is to complete an online form with accurate and real info, then compare prices", said Russell Rabichev, Marketing Director of Internet Marketing Company. CONTACT: Company Name: Internet Marketing CompanyPerson for contact Name: Gurgu CPhone Number: (818) 359-3898Email: [email protected]: https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ SOURCE: Compare-autoinsurance.Org View source version on accesswire.Com:https://www.Accesswire.Com/595055/What-Are-The-Main-Benefits-Of-Comparing-Car-Insurance-Quotes-Online View photos
to request, modification Contact us at Here or [email protected]
 |
 |
 |
