Connect with us

Health

COVID-19 has tested us. Will we be ready for the next pandemic?

COVID-19 has tested us. Will we be ready for the next pandemic?

 


In A Tale of Two Cities, Charles Dickens’s 1859 novel set during the French Revolution, he wrote: “It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness.” Such has been the case with the COVID-19 pandemic.

On the one hand, science saved lives. Less than a year after the virus was identified, the United States had created and tested vaccines. Then it determined how to mass-produce, mass-distribute, and mass-administer them at no cost to the public—without a preexisting infrastructure in place for mass-vaccinating adults. COVID vaccines are estimated to have saved at least 3.2 million lives in the U.S. alone. These accomplishments offer hope for how quickly we can respond to the next pandemic.

On the other hand, public health officials had inadvertently leaned into a libertarian left hook. About 30 states have now passed laws limiting health authorities from imposing protective measures without permission from state legislators. “One day we’re going to have a really bad global crisis and a pandemic far worse than COVID, and we’ll look to the government to protect us, but it’ll have its hands behind its back and a blindfold on,” Lawrence Gostin, faculty director of Georgetown University’s O’Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, told the Washington Post. “We’ll die with our rights on—we want liberty, but we don’t want protection.”

How exactly did we get here? In 2020 I was an attending physician in the Division of Infectious Diseases at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. Then I was asked by Francis Collins, a doctor and head of the National Institutes of Health, to be part of a group that advised pharmaceutical companies on how best to construct and test COVID vaccines. I have also been a voting member on the Food and Drug Administration’s Vaccine Advisory Committee since 2017.

Because of my role on these bodies, I was often asked to appear on network news programs and morning shows to explain events that were unfolding in real time. I was frequently quoted in the media, and like many in my position, I felt an enormous responsibility to get things right. As the pandemic progressed, however, we found that we weren’t always right, because our decisions were often based on incomplete information. At times we would give conflicting recommendations, and as a result, many Americans lost faith in the institutions and the individuals responsible for protecting the public.

But perhaps our experiences with SARS-CoV-2—which so far has killed some seven million people worldwide—can prepare us to cope better with the next pandemic. We should heed these lessons.

Vaccinating the world is in everyone’s self interest

The United States has the technological capacity and resources to vaccinate the world, and it wouldn’t necessarily be an altruistic act. SARS-CoV-2 will continue to circulate and continue to create variants for decades to come. Indeed, at the end of 2023, nearly one-third of the people living on the planet had not received a single dose of a COVID vaccine. The degree to which any country is at risk for severe disease is the degree to which we’re all at risk. No one is safe until everyone is safe.

The scientific process truly is a process

Recommendations for the treatment and prevention of COVID have evolved as we’ve learned more about how the virus is transmitted and who is at greatest risk. At first people were told to wash hands constantly and clean surfaces and store-bought items. Eventually it became clear that while masking was important, washing and cleaning had a lesser impact. Scientists, clinicians, and public health officials should be more careful about informing the public that all recommendations are based on what we know at the time and that things might change. Otherwise the fluidity of scientific knowledge will remain disconcerting.

Grassroots campaigns can build real trust

Although countering misinformation at a national or statewide scale is virtually impossible, it is possible at a local level. During the pandemic, Ala Stanford showed us how. She and her Black Doctors COVID-19 Consortium sat in people’s homes in North Philadelphia and provided residents with a consistent and trustworthy source of information. In a community resistant to vaccination, she and her colleagues reassured and educated more than 50,000 to vaccinate themselves and their children.

Separating partisan politics and science will save lives

For the first time in human history, deaths from a vaccine-preventable disease were divided along party lines. As of December 2022, 37 percent of Republicans but only 9 percent of Democrats were unvaccinated. And according to a study published in the journal Preventive Medicine Reports, counties in states governed by Republicans had higher rates of mortality from COVID. Because it’s about resources and values, public health will always to some extent be political. But it doesn’t have to be partisan—something all political parties should keep in mind.

Stopping the spread of misinformation is crucial

Good luck with this one. It’s like trying to clean up the flooding from Hurricane Katrina with a plastic cup. Early in the pandemic, key public health and government officials claimed that COVID was human-made—something that had never happened before in the history of the world. If you believe Carl Sagan’s statement that “extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence,” then this was an extraordinary claim backed by no direct evidence—only conspiracy and innuendo.

Always prioritize the most vulnerable

Everyone at every age is susceptible to COVID, but not everyone is equally susceptible to serious illness. Older adults suffered a death rate about a thousandfold greater than children; at times, as many as 40 percent of COVID deaths in the U.S. occurred in nursing homes. Similarly, studies of booster dosing showed that those most likely to benefit included people over 75, people with multiple health problems, those who were immunocompromised, and those who were pregnant. For as long as this virus circulates, the primary focus should be on protecting these four groups.

(Multiple COVID infections can lead to chronic health issues. Here’s what to know.)

The cure shouldn’t be worse than the disease

At first, the only strategy for decreasing COVID was to limit human-to-human contact. We closed businesses and shuttered schools. No one paid a bigger price for this approach than children, who suffered severely from the lack of education and socialization. The effect of these deficits will no doubt be felt for years to come. Our interest in getting children back to school should have been just as intense as our interest in getting people back to work. Indeed, at the beginning of the pandemic, the American Academy of Pediatrics strongly advocated for a return to in-person classes for students, detailing steps and considerations. This, as it turned out, was probably the best advice.

Working together makes us stronger

Perhaps the brightest point of light during the pandemic was Operation Warp Speed. Only 11 months after SARS-CoV-2 was isolated, two vaccines had been tested in large clinical trials and found to be both effective and safe. Later the White House successfully partnered with pharmacies and hospitals to distribute and administer vaccines, as well as to provide test kits and antivirals. It was an amazing effort and bodes well for our ability to create and distribute vaccines against future pandemic viruses.

America has a long history of banding together. During the 1940s and 1950s, polio was a feared and devastating infection. Americans responded by sending their dimes to the National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis, otherwise known as the March of Dimes. The organization received millions of dollars, which led to a vaccine that over time eliminated the disease from most of the world. We saw polio for what it was: a shared tragedy.

On September 11, 2001, planes hijacked by Islamist terrorists crashed into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and a field in Pennsylvania, killing 2,977 people. Police and firefighters rushed into the collapsing buildings. We all hugged each other and cried, once again united by a shared national tragedy. To further unite us, President George W. Bush made it clear that this event had nothing to do with Muslim Americans. “The face of terror is not the true faith of Islam,” he said. Again we were all in this together.

On January 20, 2020, the first case of SARS-CoV-2 was confirmed in the United States. Since then, more than a million Americans have lost their lives to this virus. Using a novel technology, we created safe and effective vaccines in record time. Nurses and doctors worked extra hours, even without proper personal protective equipment. It was all hands on deck. Again we responded to a national tragedy. We saw ourselves as part of a whole.

It’s in us. We can do this. When we see ourselves as part of something greater, we tap into the better angels of our nature.

Paul A. Offit is director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, as well as the Maurice R. Hilleman Professor of Vaccinology and a professor of pediatrics at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania.

This story appears in the February 2024 issue of National Geographic magazine.

Sources

1/ https://Google.com/

2/ https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/main-lessons-covid-19-pandemic-excerpt

The mention sources can contact us to remove/changing this article

What Are The Main Benefits Of Comparing Car Insurance Quotes Online

LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 24, 2020, / Compare-autoinsurance.Org has launched a new blog post that presents the main benefits of comparing multiple car insurance quotes. For more info and free online quotes, please visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/the-advantages-of-comparing-prices-with-car-insurance-quotes-online/ The modern society has numerous technological advantages. One important advantage is the speed at which information is sent and received. With the help of the internet, the shopping habits of many persons have drastically changed. The car insurance industry hasn't remained untouched by these changes. On the internet, drivers can compare insurance prices and find out which sellers have the best offers. View photos The advantages of comparing online car insurance quotes are the following: Online quotes can be obtained from anywhere and at any time. Unlike physical insurance agencies, websites don't have a specific schedule and they are available at any time. Drivers that have busy working schedules, can compare quotes from anywhere and at any time, even at midnight. Multiple choices. Almost all insurance providers, no matter if they are well-known brands or just local insurers, have an online presence. Online quotes will allow policyholders the chance to discover multiple insurance companies and check their prices. Drivers are no longer required to get quotes from just a few known insurance companies. Also, local and regional insurers can provide lower insurance rates for the same services. Accurate insurance estimates. Online quotes can only be accurate if the customers provide accurate and real info about their car models and driving history. Lying about past driving incidents can make the price estimates to be lower, but when dealing with an insurance company lying to them is useless. Usually, insurance companies will do research about a potential customer before granting him coverage. Online quotes can be sorted easily. Although drivers are recommended to not choose a policy just based on its price, drivers can easily sort quotes by insurance price. Using brokerage websites will allow drivers to get quotes from multiple insurers, thus making the comparison faster and easier. For additional info, money-saving tips, and free car insurance quotes, visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ Compare-autoinsurance.Org is an online provider of life, home, health, and auto insurance quotes. This website is unique because it does not simply stick to one kind of insurance provider, but brings the clients the best deals from many different online insurance carriers. In this way, clients have access to offers from multiple carriers all in one place: this website. On this site, customers have access to quotes for insurance plans from various agencies, such as local or nationwide agencies, brand names insurance companies, etc. "Online quotes can easily help drivers obtain better car insurance deals. All they have to do is to complete an online form with accurate and real info, then compare prices", said Russell Rabichev, Marketing Director of Internet Marketing Company. CONTACT: Company Name: Internet Marketing CompanyPerson for contact Name: Gurgu CPhone Number: (818) 359-3898Email: [email protected]: https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ SOURCE: Compare-autoinsurance.Org View source version on accesswire.Com:https://www.Accesswire.Com/595055/What-Are-The-Main-Benefits-Of-Comparing-Car-Insurance-Quotes-Online View photos

ExBUlletin

to request, modification Contact us at Here or [email protected]