WAura can achieve the same effect with only half the amount of exercise as men. longevity benefitsaccording to new research Published in Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
Good news for such women have a hard time motivating themselves Study co-author Dr. Martha Gulati, director of preventive cardiology at Cedars-Sinai Hospital in Los Angeles, says going to the gym is a good idea. “For me, the news for women is that a little goes a long way,” says Gulati.
The study found that men who did about 300 minutes of aerobic exercise each week had an 18% lower risk of death than men who did not exercise. However, women needed only 140 minutes of exercise per week to achieve the same benefits, and women who exercised about 300 minutes per week had a 24% lower risk of death. (For both men and women, the longevity benefits seem to plateau after 300 minutes of exercise per week.)
The researchers conducted a similar analysis for muscle-strengthening exercises such as weight training. The researchers found the same pattern. For women, a once-a-week strength training session was found to have just as much longevity benefit as three times a week for men.
Because women tend to have less muscle mass than men, “when performing the same amount of strength-strengthening exercises, you may get more benefit from less, based on the fact that you have less muscle mass to begin with.” ,” explains Gulati. ” Other gender-based physiological differences, e.g. lung and cardiopulmonary Systems can also be affected.
read more: the brain doesn't want exercise
To reach their findings, Gulati and colleagues analyzed the self-reported exercise habits of more than 400,000 U.S. adults who participated in the National Health Interview Survey from 1997 to 2017 and compared those data with death records. . Approximately 40,000 of the participants died during the study period.
Its observational approach, which means researchers looked for patterns in existing data, cannot prove cause and effect. Perhaps exercise didn't make people live longer, but rather that the active people in the study were healthier overall or had other lifestyle habits that promoted longevity. By excluding people who had serious pre-existing conditions or mobility limitations, or who died during the first two years of study follow-up, the researchers found that by excluding people who may have been unhealthy to begin with, I tried to control these possibilities.
The study was also limited in that it relied on self-reported exercise data, which is not always accurate. The survey also asked about exercise people did in their free time, so it may not have taken into account physical activity, a form of exercise, done while at work or at home. Research increasingly suggests that health can be meaningfully improved.
Due in part to these limitations, Gulati says more research is needed to confirm the findings.But, she says, her research – and others Papers reaching similar conclusions send a clear signal that “women are not just little men” and that gender-based differences must be incorporated into research and public health policy. “For years, we've used men as the standard,” Gulati says. Even if it's not accurate.
Please take Federal guidelines for physical activity, has issued similar comprehensive recommendations for U.S. adults. That means at least 150 minutes of moderate aerobic exercise (or 75 minutes of vigorous aerobic exercise) and two strength-building sessions each week. In 2020, about 28% of U.S. men achieved both standards, compared to 20% of U.S. women. data show.
Gulati's research suggests, at the very least, that even if women don't fully achieve these goals, they may still see significant longevity benefits. But she says the study shouldn't be discouraging to men either.
The latest research shows that people of both genders Even very short periods of activity can benefit youas a mere thing Moving your body for a few minutes a day can extend your lifespan.
“Our pitch should be the same for men and women: something is better than nothing,” Gulati says. “Sit less and move more.”
