Health
Athletes continue to play amid the COVID-19 pandemic
In their rush to bring college athletes back to campus amid a dangerous global pandemic and launch a football season this fall with no real answers to the level of risk they are asking students to take on, the group of people who run athletics has fundamentally ignored about the company they run.
The athletes paid close attention.
It doesn’t matter what the main commissioners of the conference and the athletics directors are to improve college football optics as COVID-19 devastates the country no matter how far they want to move the goal posts for what is appropriate in a collegiate setting, no matter how much they to blame the clumsy NCAA, everyone involved sees the truth.
The 2020 college football season will take place to the extent that it is possible because athletics departments need the money, and they put the burden on unpaid amateurs who risk their health and discomfort for their lives without any additional incentive to do so. to do.
That is the reality that the players see. That is the moral, ethical and practical dilemma that administrators are trying to put aside while the financial need presses on them. And that convergence of circumstances is why cracks arise at the root of a system that has always found just enough sympathy in arguing that the vast majority of football and basketball scholarships get a deal more than what they’re worth .
On Sunday morning, an unnamed group of Pac-12 players affiliated with the National Collegiate Players Association announced a list of requirements that was also published on The Players Tribune to ensure their participation in the football season.
Some requirements are more easily attainable, such as comprehensive medical insurance for players after their fitness, COVID-19 safety standards agreed by players and monitored by an independent third party, and initiatives to address racial injustice. Others will be considered controversial or simply impossible, in particular the demand to evenly distribute 50% of each sports conference revenue to athletes in their respective sports.
Let’s keep the debate on the merits or the financial implications of that issue for later and place it in the context of other events across the country instead.
On Saturday, the Washington Post released a story recording the content of a conversation between more than a dozen SEC footballers and congressional officials, and leaked it to the newspaper. One of the revelations from that call was the fact that the health experts at the leagues acknowledged that they were unsure of the long-term consequences of entering into COVID-19, that the league acknowledged that it expected positive cases on every team in the SEC and that the biggest threat to their season would be regular students who act in an irresponsible manner and contribute to outbreaks on campus.
The answers were so unsatisfying that at one point, according to the Post, Texas A&M linebacker Keith Magee II intervened that it just wasn’t good enough and with all this uncertainty all that stuff still circulating in the air, you knowing it all still makes some of us scratch my head.
The SEC largely responded to the story, complaining that the meeting leaked as it pledged to support the health of SEC student athletes while Commissioner Greg Sankey took to Twitter to note that the players thanked him for his call.
But it’s clear that those comments that go public are damaging to the SEC because they’ve blown a hole in the longstanding public position that their players, regardless of anything, would be better off campus than at home.
That’s what Sankey basically said during a recent interview with HBO’s Real Sports When asked if players are coming back to campus for training this summer, they are at increased risk of infection.
Compared to what? Sankey said. To get them to train gyms at home that might have been their own hotspots without the supervision of sports medicine specialists, without strength and conditioning coaches? And that reality gave me the idea what I think was the right decision.
When you’re running a billion-dollar patriarchy that doesn’t have to negotiate workplace conditions, it’s probably pretty easy to say things like that before you figure out if it’s really true.
But Sankeys’ logic breaks down at a very fundamental level, simply by looking at the fact that more than a dozen teams across the country have already seen outbreaks so large they had to stop training. So when you told a group of athletes that they and some of their peers would inevitably get COVID-19 simply because you brought them to campus to play football, you cannot deny with an increased conscience that you increased their risk of infection .
The central question now, both for athletes and for schools, is how to rationalize that risk.
For professional athletes in the different leagues who are trying to start again this summer, there are very clear financial incentives that players can analyze and determine if they are worthwhile. But for college athletes, who receive nothing more than the same scholarships and medical care and training they would receive regardless of COVID-19, the schools have only offered this: the players want to play.
Of course they do. We all know that. But instead of being treated as critical partners in an entertainment company, they are asked to act as essential employees so that schools that have spent years lavishly and irresponsibly on facilities and coaching salaries minimize the tough decisions they will have to make and TV networks can recoup some of the money they lost without live sports to show most of this year.
That’s hard to justify, even taking into account that those who benefit most from a season are predominantly white administrators and those who are asked to continue are overwhelmingly black players.
For schools nervous about that, the first answer may be to try more sports this fall, not less. As the NCAA Board of Directors will continue discussing whether to cancel or postpone their fall championships this week, on Saturday Sports Illustrated discussed some preliminary talks among Power Five administrators on whether it would be possible to have their own to hold on.
In other words, if the NCAA decides it’s just not feasible to host national championship events this autumn in cross country, field hockey, men’s and women’s football, women’s volleyball and men’s water polo, the Power Five can try to get together and in any case.
The big, lively headline of that news is that it could be a first step towards the power schools breaking away from an NCAA that was not very popular on the ground floor anyway, but which became increasingly ineffective and non during the pandemic -responsive is considered.
Good. But what really matters here is the fact that schools that want to earn tens of millions in football don’t want to be thrown into a corner where other fall sports are canceled and it seems like a football season is moving forward in uncertain and potentially dangerous conditions so that their operational budgets don’t collapse.
Power Five schools were so desperate to play football that they went so far as to drive a very expensive and logistically challenging idea to host championships in sports that are guaranteed to lose money just to make the optics better tell you all you need to know about where the priorities are.
The athletes see that too. They watch out like never before and organize in ways that their predecessors found too risky.
Of course, the significant economic questions and consequences that everyone weighs are not easy. Athletic departments that reduce or downsize sports mean job losses. Certain college city businesses rely heavily on six or seven Saturdays a year and may need to fold if no football is played in 2020. Any bad news is bringing the industry closer to catastrophe.
But what has supported all planning colleges to have football this year is the willingness of players to go along with the same deal they’ve always had, regardless of the risks or circumstances they have to endure. And the more they hear, the less they like it.
If college sports don’t take that into account, a pandemic is just the beginning of their problems.
What Are The Main Benefits Of Comparing Car Insurance Quotes Online
LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 24, 2020, / Compare-autoinsurance.Org has launched a new blog post that presents the main benefits of comparing multiple car insurance quotes. For more info and free online quotes, please visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/the-advantages-of-comparing-prices-with-car-insurance-quotes-online/ The modern society has numerous technological advantages. One important advantage is the speed at which information is sent and received. With the help of the internet, the shopping habits of many persons have drastically changed. The car insurance industry hasn't remained untouched by these changes. On the internet, drivers can compare insurance prices and find out which sellers have the best offers. View photos The advantages of comparing online car insurance quotes are the following: Online quotes can be obtained from anywhere and at any time. Unlike physical insurance agencies, websites don't have a specific schedule and they are available at any time. Drivers that have busy working schedules, can compare quotes from anywhere and at any time, even at midnight. Multiple choices. Almost all insurance providers, no matter if they are well-known brands or just local insurers, have an online presence. Online quotes will allow policyholders the chance to discover multiple insurance companies and check their prices. Drivers are no longer required to get quotes from just a few known insurance companies. Also, local and regional insurers can provide lower insurance rates for the same services. Accurate insurance estimates. Online quotes can only be accurate if the customers provide accurate and real info about their car models and driving history. Lying about past driving incidents can make the price estimates to be lower, but when dealing with an insurance company lying to them is useless. Usually, insurance companies will do research about a potential customer before granting him coverage. Online quotes can be sorted easily. Although drivers are recommended to not choose a policy just based on its price, drivers can easily sort quotes by insurance price. Using brokerage websites will allow drivers to get quotes from multiple insurers, thus making the comparison faster and easier. For additional info, money-saving tips, and free car insurance quotes, visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ Compare-autoinsurance.Org is an online provider of life, home, health, and auto insurance quotes. This website is unique because it does not simply stick to one kind of insurance provider, but brings the clients the best deals from many different online insurance carriers. In this way, clients have access to offers from multiple carriers all in one place: this website. On this site, customers have access to quotes for insurance plans from various agencies, such as local or nationwide agencies, brand names insurance companies, etc. "Online quotes can easily help drivers obtain better car insurance deals. All they have to do is to complete an online form with accurate and real info, then compare prices", said Russell Rabichev, Marketing Director of Internet Marketing Company. CONTACT: Company Name: Internet Marketing CompanyPerson for contact Name: Gurgu CPhone Number: (818) 359-3898Email: [email protected]: https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ SOURCE: Compare-autoinsurance.Org View source version on accesswire.Com:https://www.Accesswire.Com/595055/What-Are-The-Main-Benefits-Of-Comparing-Car-Insurance-Quotes-Online View photos
picture credit
to request, modification Contact us at Here or [email protected]
 |
 |
 |
