Connect with us

Health

Triptans are more effective at relieving migraine pain than newer, more expensive drugs

Triptans are more effective at relieving migraine pain than newer, more expensive drugs

 


The researchers recommend that these triptans be included on the WHO Essential Medicines List to facilitate global dissemination, improve access and standardize treatment.

Study: Comparative effectiveness of pharmacological interventions for the acute management of migraine attacks in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Image credit: Antonio Guillem/Shutterstock.com
study: Comparative effectiveness of pharmacological interventions for the acute management of migraine attacks in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysisImage credit: Antonio Guillem/Shutterstock.com

In a recently published meta-analysis, BMJThe researchers compared oral medications approved as monotherapy for the acute management of migraine attacks in adults.

background

Migraine is a common neurological disorder characterized by moderate or severe headache lasting for many days. Migraine affects an individual's health, productivity, and socio-economic impact. Pharmacological treatment of acute migraine headaches provides immediate pain relief.

Regulatory authorities recommend nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) as first-line therapy, with triptans reserved for moderate to severe attacks or inadequate response. Patients in whom triptans are contraindicated due to possible vasoconstrictor effects or who are at high risk for cardiovascular disease may prefer more recently marketed drugs such as lasmiditan or gepant. However, there is no universal consensus on the ranking of migraine medications.

About the Research

This meta-analysis provides comprehensive information on medications used to manage acute migraine attacks in adults.

Data sources included the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Embase, Medline, ClinicalTrials.gov, the World Health Organization (WHO) Clinical Trials Registry, and the European Union (EU) Clinical Trials Registry. The researchers searched pharmaceutical company and regulatory agency websites up to June 24, 2023, with no language restrictions.

Included studies were double-blind randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating orally administered medications as monotherapy for migraine compared with placebo or other active medications for managing acute migraine attacks in adults. Narcotic use was not investigated and no emergency department evaluations were performed. Migraine diagnosis was according to International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD) criteria. International regulatory agencies recommend these medications for migraine.

Data were screened and extracted by two independent researchers. Disagreements between team members were resolved through discussion. The second version of the Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB2) indicated the risk of bias in included studies. The reliability of network meta-analyses (CINeMA) tool assessed the certainty of evidence.

Primary study outcomes included the proportion of people who were pain-free 2 hours after taking the drug and the proportion of people who were pain-free 2 hours to 1 day after administration without the use of rescue medication. Secondary outcomes were pain relief 2 hours after taking the drug, pain recurrence 2 hours to 2 days, and use of rescue medication 2 hours to 24 hours after the intervention. Other outcomes included the tolerability and safety of the drug intervention.

Primary data were analyzed using random-effects network meta-analysis. Odds ratios (OR) indicate the magnitude of treatment effect. Researchers incorporated public input and feedback from migraine sufferers. Researchers presented their results to expert clinicians and patient representatives from international institutions in Argentina, Canada, Europe, and the United States (US).

result

The meta-analysis included 137 RCTs, involving 89,445 participants. The mean age of participants was 40 years, 86% were women, and 32% experienced migraine with aura. The certainty of the evidence ranged from high to very low. For the assessment of pain relief, 21% of RCTs were at low risk of bias and 16% were at high risk of bias. For sustained pain relief, 29% of RCTs were at low risk of bias and 11% were at high risk of bias.

All treatments were more effective than placebo in reducing pain at 2 hours (ORs ranged from 1.7 for naratriptan to 5.2 for eletriptan). efficacy Eletriptan was most effective in relieving pain over 24 hours (OR 1.7 for celecoxib and 7.6 for ibuprofen). Eletriptan was most effective in providing pain relief over 2 hours (OR 1.5-3.0). Other highly effective drugs were rizatriptan (OR 1.6-2.4), sumatriptan (OR 1.4-2.0), and zolmitriptan (OR 1.5-2.0). Eletriptan and ibuprofen were most effective in providing long-term pain relief (OR 1.4-4.8).

All interventions were more effective at providing pain relief after 2 hours and rescue medication after 2 to 24 hours. Eletriptan was most effective at providing pain relief after 2 hours (OR 1.3 to 2.6) and rescue medication (OR 0.4 to 0.6). Side effects of eletriptan use included dizziness, fatigue, sedation, and chest discomfort. Rimegepant was well tolerated, but ubrogepant caused more nausea than placebo. Participants reported dizziness, paresthesia, and sedation after using lasmiditan.

The team found similar results in a sensitivity analysis that included only studies with FDA-approved doses and low bias: participants in these trials experienced moderate or severe headaches, had no comorbidities, and were not using preventive medications.

Conclusion

Findings indicate that triptans, including rizatriptan, eletriptan, zolmitriptan, and sumatriptan, are the most effective and well-tolerated medications for the acute treatment of migraine in adults. These medications are more effective than recently marketed medications (ubrogepant, lasmiditan, and rimegepant) that have shown efficacy comparable to NSAIDs. Inclusion of high-potency triptans on the WHO essential medicines list could improve access and treatment globally. Cost-effectiveness analyses are needed to inform clinical decision-making.

Sources

1/ https://Google.com/

2/ https://www.news-medical.net/news/20240923/Triptans-better-at-relieving-migraine-pain-than-recently-marketed-and-more-expensive-drugs.aspx

The mention sources can contact us to remove/changing this article

What Are The Main Benefits Of Comparing Car Insurance Quotes Online

LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 24, 2020, / Compare-autoinsurance.Org has launched a new blog post that presents the main benefits of comparing multiple car insurance quotes. For more info and free online quotes, please visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/the-advantages-of-comparing-prices-with-car-insurance-quotes-online/ The modern society has numerous technological advantages. One important advantage is the speed at which information is sent and received. With the help of the internet, the shopping habits of many persons have drastically changed. The car insurance industry hasn't remained untouched by these changes. On the internet, drivers can compare insurance prices and find out which sellers have the best offers. View photos The advantages of comparing online car insurance quotes are the following: Online quotes can be obtained from anywhere and at any time. Unlike physical insurance agencies, websites don't have a specific schedule and they are available at any time. Drivers that have busy working schedules, can compare quotes from anywhere and at any time, even at midnight. Multiple choices. Almost all insurance providers, no matter if they are well-known brands or just local insurers, have an online presence. Online quotes will allow policyholders the chance to discover multiple insurance companies and check their prices. Drivers are no longer required to get quotes from just a few known insurance companies. Also, local and regional insurers can provide lower insurance rates for the same services. Accurate insurance estimates. Online quotes can only be accurate if the customers provide accurate and real info about their car models and driving history. Lying about past driving incidents can make the price estimates to be lower, but when dealing with an insurance company lying to them is useless. Usually, insurance companies will do research about a potential customer before granting him coverage. Online quotes can be sorted easily. Although drivers are recommended to not choose a policy just based on its price, drivers can easily sort quotes by insurance price. Using brokerage websites will allow drivers to get quotes from multiple insurers, thus making the comparison faster and easier. For additional info, money-saving tips, and free car insurance quotes, visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ Compare-autoinsurance.Org is an online provider of life, home, health, and auto insurance quotes. This website is unique because it does not simply stick to one kind of insurance provider, but brings the clients the best deals from many different online insurance carriers. In this way, clients have access to offers from multiple carriers all in one place: this website. On this site, customers have access to quotes for insurance plans from various agencies, such as local or nationwide agencies, brand names insurance companies, etc. "Online quotes can easily help drivers obtain better car insurance deals. All they have to do is to complete an online form with accurate and real info, then compare prices", said Russell Rabichev, Marketing Director of Internet Marketing Company. CONTACT: Company Name: Internet Marketing CompanyPerson for contact Name: Gurgu CPhone Number: (818) 359-3898Email: [email protected]: https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ SOURCE: Compare-autoinsurance.Org View source version on accesswire.Com:https://www.Accesswire.Com/595055/What-Are-The-Main-Benefits-Of-Comparing-Car-Insurance-Quotes-Online View photos

ExBUlletin

to request, modification Contact us at Here or [email protected]