Coronavirus Sweden: Controversial COVID-19 strategy “proven”

Sweden has chosen to ignore the infamously heavy blockade call and has kept most schools, bars and restaurants open throughout the pandemic.

Sweden has recorded 5,843 coronavirus deaths overall, but the huge surge at the beginning of the pandemic has made Sweden one of the tallest countries in the world-ignoring the current daily moving average. I can do it. Since mid-July, the death toll has remained at one.

In contrast, Australia has so far recorded a total of 788 deaths, most of them. Since the second wave of Victoria struck in mid-July..

Currently, the country kills an average of 15 to 20 people each day.

One health official was reported to say it was the “ground” for Sweden’s controversial strategy. However, other virus watchers are not very convinced that Sweden should be a role model.

Relation: Follow live coronavirus broadcasts

Relation: Swedes Australians Call for So-called “Success” Stories

Swedish case COVID-19 (new coronavirus infectious disease) (# If there is no character limit, add parentheses when first appearing It peaked on June 24, with 1698 infections, according to data compiled by the United States. Johns Hopkins University.. Deaths in the days of April amount to 115 per day.

In contrast, in neighboring Denmark, which had a stricter blockade, only 390 and 22 deaths were seen daily.

But Denmark, like many other European countries, has seen proceedings go up again. Still, Swedish infectious diseases have remained at around 200 per day for several months. It’s still a lot, but it’s a big dip from where they were, and decisively it doesn’t seem to be stable and leading to many deaths.

Around mid-July, the daily death toll was one and has not increased since then. There are regular deaths only once a day.

Some openly say that this may be because Swedes are gaining more and more immunity to the herd against the virus.

“VINDICATED”

The director of epidemiologist and Swedish health agency Johan Karlsson said the country’s inhabitants may not have been at home during the first wave.

“Our strategy was consistent and sustainable. We are probably low risk [the virus] More widespread than other countries. “

One health official said it was the “ground” for the non-invasive COVID-19 strategy in the United Kingdom. Times newspaper.

Some estimates suggest that up to 30% of Swedes are infected with COVID-19 and most may be recovering.

However, in the UK Royal Medical Society By May, only about 15% of Sweden had been infected, and it was found that it was doubtful whether herd immunity would be achieved.

At some point in the early stages of the pandemic, 19% of the Swedes tested were virus-positive. Currently, despite testing 120,000 times a week, it’s similar to New South Wales, but just over 1% is positive.

Deaths per capita are currently lower than many in the neighborhood. Sweden’s total of 5842 coronavirus deaths are still close to the top 10 countries with the worst mortality rates.

Dr. Anders Tegnell, a leading Swedish epidemiologist, created and promoted a unique national COVID-19 strategy.

Most schools, all shops and hospitality facilities are open as usual. When Australians were banned from drinking beer at the bar, Stockholm residents were enjoying the sunset with their companions.

That does not mean that the country’s 10 million citizens were unlimited. People were forbidden to go to elderly housing with care, participated in large gatherings, and Swedes were encouraged by social distance-it seems they did almost as much as others.

“As a society, we are working carefully: informing people to continue to use measures and improving the need to adjust the measures we see every day,” Dr. Tegnell told the journal. Was Nature May.

Questions about Sweden

Dr. Tegnell said the pre-vaccination Swedish approach to combat COVID-19 was more sustainable than deferring lockdowns and resumptions labeled “in many ways disastrous.” I am.

However, this approach does not meet the general reputation of the deaths of thousands in geriatric care facilities.

Editor-in-chief Au Medical Journal Stra l heDr. Nick Talley told news.com.au that the Swedish model had failed.

“in my view, Swedish model has not been successful, At least until today, “he told news.com.au.

“The main cause of the failure of the voluntary approach was the spread of infection in homes for older people. Young people also seemed least likely to change their behavior, which may have contributed to the expansion of the community.

“Especially the economy wasn’t saved from the contraction of the approach. I’m not convinced that the Swedish model will be more successful here in Australia. Probably worse if compliance with voluntary recommendations is poor Look at the voluntary but highly recommended use of masks in Sydney.”

Relation: There are few new cases, but we will review the country’s COVID strategy

Professor Peter Corignon, an infectious disease expert at the Australian National University, states that neither the hard lockdown approach nor the more laissez-faire attitude would be the ideal approach to living at COVID-19.

“in my view, Neither New Zealand nor the Swedish approach is the way to go“He told news.com.au last month.

“The problem with Sweden is that many people have died. The problem with New Zealand is that it is difficult to achieve eradication.

“What’s happening at NSW with contact tracking and stopping spreading is similar to what we have to do over the next few years.”

Even Dr. Tegnell of Sweden has not yet warned that Sweden will be a success story. He said it may take until next year to know if the approach is correct.

– Additional report by Rohan Smith.