Connect with us

Health

WHO coronavirus failure should remind us of the tragic world of Ebola

 


The early failure of the World Health Organization to declare COVID-19 an international emergency was a hallmark of an old scandal in West Africa, with 11,300 deaths from Ebola.

In December 2013, Guinea, a small African country bordering the Atlantic, Liberia and Sierra Leone, had its first contact with a deadly infectious disease.

From that moment it took five months for WHO to declare an international emergency.
By then, it had plunged into neighboring countries and killed an extraordinary number of people.

Then, 20 Harvard health professionals, experts in their respective fields, published detailed reports on WHO’s failure. It read calmly that it faced a new global threat, the coronavirus.

“The most serious failure was due to WHO in delaying the alarm,” said Ashish Jha, a professor at Harvard Global Health Institute.

And, perhaps most disturbing, the leaked email that Professor Jar could get from a closed-door meeting with a WHO boss who decided it shouldn’t be declared an international emergency.

“The committee responsible for reviewing WHO’s performance in the event of an Ebola outbreak has banned open debate from West African leaders on public debate on sensitive issues such as political opposition concerns, economic consequences, and urgent declarations. We leaked an internal email that suggested several reasons for the delay, such as culture, “Jar wrote in a report.

Fearing to confuse potential donors.

I was afraid to make a difficult decision.

Dr. Jar recommended that WHO be deprived of the power to declare an international health emergency.
But the world did not turn to the tragedy of Africa. Perhaps death wasn’t close enough to home.

Seven years later, the same mistake was repeated. More than 144,000 people are currently dead alone, according to a data analysis that calculated tolls for those who did not act.

Deadly dejavu.

Also, while the world’s most important expert called on WHO to make all decisions publicly and transparently, SkyNews Australia’s survey kept the names of doctors who blocked early action secret. It was

SkyNews provided WHO with a list of names from the January 22 meeting in Geneva to explain who voted for the urgency declaration and who blocked it.

The WHO response should bring your blood to a boil.

“When it comes to your question about voting in the EC, the members are independent experts and the rules of procedure do not allow it to be disclosed,” said WHO spokesman Tarik Jašarević.

“It is important to note that what happened between the two meetings was evidence of human-to-human transmission outside China.”

WHO, like last week, argues that Chinese information is accurate and that there is not enough evidence to declare an emergency on January 22.

Well health professionals tore a sorry excuse for the cover-up of shreds.

For consistency, I recommend returning to the work of Professor Ashish Jha of Harvard University who investigated the Ebola catastrophe.

Today he published a new article in the medical journal Health Affairs. This points out that the rhetoric from both China and WHO is not only wrong but fatal.

What is the title of the article?

WHO’s false praise for China undermined world understanding of the pandemic

“This leads to WHO’s next major criticism-it has given China immature and excessive praise for its early response to the outbreak,” said Professor Jha.

“This is true and incomprehensible.

“It was clear from the beginning that China ignored the early signs of the seriousness of this outbreak and choked whistleblowers.

“They mishandled the initial response, underreported their case, and then took strict steps to stop the spread of the virus. Nevertheless, WHO praised the Chinese response and It made the departmental experts feel that they were later fooled by the nature of the crisis. ”

Whatever the reason for the deception, write to Professor Jha, the results were the same.

“Their gorgeous praise for China has confused the early understanding of the global outbreak,” he wrote.

What Are The Main Benefits Of Comparing Car Insurance Quotes Online

LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 24, 2020, / Compare-autoinsurance.Org has launched a new blog post that presents the main benefits of comparing multiple car insurance quotes. For more info and free online quotes, please visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/the-advantages-of-comparing-prices-with-car-insurance-quotes-online/ The modern society has numerous technological advantages. One important advantage is the speed at which information is sent and received. With the help of the internet, the shopping habits of many persons have drastically changed. The car insurance industry hasn't remained untouched by these changes. On the internet, drivers can compare insurance prices and find out which sellers have the best offers. View photos The advantages of comparing online car insurance quotes are the following: Online quotes can be obtained from anywhere and at any time. Unlike physical insurance agencies, websites don't have a specific schedule and they are available at any time. Drivers that have busy working schedules, can compare quotes from anywhere and at any time, even at midnight. Multiple choices. Almost all insurance providers, no matter if they are well-known brands or just local insurers, have an online presence. Online quotes will allow policyholders the chance to discover multiple insurance companies and check their prices. Drivers are no longer required to get quotes from just a few known insurance companies. Also, local and regional insurers can provide lower insurance rates for the same services. Accurate insurance estimates. Online quotes can only be accurate if the customers provide accurate and real info about their car models and driving history. Lying about past driving incidents can make the price estimates to be lower, but when dealing with an insurance company lying to them is useless. Usually, insurance companies will do research about a potential customer before granting him coverage. Online quotes can be sorted easily. Although drivers are recommended to not choose a policy just based on its price, drivers can easily sort quotes by insurance price. Using brokerage websites will allow drivers to get quotes from multiple insurers, thus making the comparison faster and easier. For additional info, money-saving tips, and free car insurance quotes, visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ Compare-autoinsurance.Org is an online provider of life, home, health, and auto insurance quotes. This website is unique because it does not simply stick to one kind of insurance provider, but brings the clients the best deals from many different online insurance carriers. In this way, clients have access to offers from multiple carriers all in one place: this website. On this site, customers have access to quotes for insurance plans from various agencies, such as local or nationwide agencies, brand names insurance companies, etc. "Online quotes can easily help drivers obtain better car insurance deals. All they have to do is to complete an online form with accurate and real info, then compare prices", said Russell Rabichev, Marketing Director of Internet Marketing Company. CONTACT: Company Name: Internet Marketing CompanyPerson for contact Name: Gurgu CPhone Number: (818) 359-3898Email: [email protected]: https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ SOURCE: Compare-autoinsurance.Org View source version on accesswire.Com:https://www.Accesswire.Com/595055/What-Are-The-Main-Benefits-Of-Comparing-Car-Insurance-Quotes-Online View photos



Pictures Credit

ExBUlletin

to request, modification Contact us at Here or [email protected]