Connect with us


Fact Check: The list of unofficial COVID-19 vaccine response reports is not evidence that the vaccine caused death.




Fact Check: The list of unofficial COVID-19 vaccine response reports is not evidence that the vaccine caused death.Partial view

Does this list of reports from the Federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) prove that the COVID-19 vaccine causes sudden death in a surprising number of young and middle-aged people? No, it’s not. The individual cases of the VAERS system have not been validated, as the VAERS builder clearly states. Anyone can submit a report For the VAERS system, the database does not indicate any confirmed response to the vaccine. Physicians are required by law to report all adverse events that occur within a certain period of time after vaccination. Ten lead story spot checks of the 28 random cases listed revealed that many of them had existing serious health conditions and were residents of long-term care facilities. Mortality is much higher Than the entire population.

A list of 28 VAERS reports with ID numbers post (archive Here) Published on February 9, 2021 by the Facebook page “Learn the Risk”. This post provides steps for navigating the search function of the VAERS database, but does not include a referral. Below is a sample presentation of the three cases from the top of the list.

25 years old.male

I was vaccinated on December 22, 2020. It turned out to be unresponsive and subsequently expired at home on January 11, 2021. Moderna vaccine.


VAERS ID # 943397-1

28 years old.male

I was vaccinated on December 23, 2020. He died on January 14, 2021. The patient was found to be unresponsive at work in the hospital. The patient’s pupil was fixed and dilated. Pfizer vaccine.


VAERS ID # 93900-1

32 years old.Female

I was vaccinated on December 28, 2020. He died at 7:20 am on 1/4/21. Moderna vaccine.

This is what it looks like on Facebook at the time of writing.

Facebook screenshot

(Source: Friday, February 12, 22:11:49 Facebook screenshot taken at 2021 UTC)

Given that it was posted on a Facebook page aimed at preventing people from being vaccinated, the intent of publishing this list was to prevent people from being vaccinated with the COVID-19 vaccine. It is clear that there is. The “Learn the Risk” mission statement on leaves little doubt about its intention to post a list of vaccine response reports.

Learn The Risk is a US-based non-profit organization that is a powerful force in educating people around the world about the dangers of medicines that literally kill us, such as vaccines and unwanted treatments.

The VAERS system uses a version of the “data depletion” method. This is a data science approach that screens large amounts of rough or unreliable data to search for patterns. Individual data points are, as the VAERS builder clearly states, unverified, self-reported cases, not points of the VAERS approach. This is an early warning system, not an accurate measure.

Even if the data were confirmed, “Learn The Risk” might have chosen a young and unhealthy VAERS case file instead of taking a representative sample of all the reports. Ten spot checks of the 28 random cases listed revealed that many of them had existing serious health conditions and were residents of long-term care facilities.

Lead Stories spot-checked 10 of the 28 cases on the list posted on Facebook to make sure they were genuine items in the VAERS database. they are.

The report ID numbers correspond to the actual VAERS reports and the details of these reports. Age, gender, date of vaccination, date of death, and vaccine administered were all accurate in the spot check. However, digging into the VAERS database revealed that “Learn the Risk” selected young patients with serious health problems. In many cases, the decedents were residents of long-term care facilities, despite their relatively young age, and it was clear that most reports listed multiple existing health problems. The patient’s medical history and the list of medications he was taking at that time were included in most VAERS reports, but not in the list shared on the Facebook post.

The Facebook “Learn the Risk” post omits important context. The main purpose of the VAERS reporting system is “rapid signal detection of rare adverse events”. In other words, as a crowdsourced dataset, it is only useful for aggregations and not so much for the details of each unsubstantiated report.

It can be difficult to follow the instructions contained in the post on how to search the database. The CDC has a 13 minute video (Here) Describes how to navigate the search function. This video covers some of the strengths and limitations of VAERS data.

Strengths of VAERS data

  • National data
  • We accept reports from anyone
  • Collected information on vaccines, vaccination characteristics, and adverse events
  • Published data
  • Rapid signal detection of rare adverse events-
    Signals are a potential safety issue and usually require more controlled research to assess whether the signal represents a real risk.

VAERS data limits

  • Reporting bias
  • Inconsistent data quality and integrity
  • No unvaccinated comparison group
  • Unable to calculate how often adverse events occur
  • In general, it is not possible to assess whether a vaccine has caused an adverse event

Overview of the above reporting system The website contains some additional considerations regarding VAERS data limits.

  • Vaccine providers are encouraged to report to VAERS any clinically significant health problems after vaccination, whether or not they believe the vaccine is the cause.
  • The report may contain incomplete, inaccurate, accidental, and unconfirmed information.
  • The number of reports alone cannot be interpreted or used to draw conclusions about the existence, severity, frequency, or proportion of vaccine-related problems.
  • VAERS data is limited to vaccine adverse event reports received between 1990 and the latest date for which data are available.
  • VAERS data do not represent all known safety information for vaccines and should be interpreted in the context of other scientific information.

Lead Stories emailed the US Food and Drug Administration to learn more about how to investigate VAERS reports, including deaths. FDA spokesman Allison Hunt answered our question:

In particular, the report to VAERS is an unconfirmed report. Reporting an adverse event to VAERS is not a document that the vaccine caused the event. Additional details regarding VAERS data limits can be found here:

If the death toll increases, it will attract government action, Hunt said:

The FDA takes all reports of vaccine-related adverse events seriously, and in the case of the COVID-19 vaccine, the FDA is actively working with the CDC to monitor the safety of these vaccines … Vaccines Post-dose mortality reporting The FDA and CDC are jointly investigating quickly and rigorously. Such studies include working with healthcare providers to obtain medical history and clinical follow-up information. Clinical case reviews are conducted by the FDA and CDC. In addition, the FDA and CDC have various systems for monitoring vaccine safety. Details are here:

At the time of writing this lead story report, no such spikes in the data were detected, an FDA spokesman said.

To date, no new safety signals have been seen after administration of the approved COVID-19 vaccine … with validated analytical methods that can quickly detect signals for possible vaccine safety issues. Multiple complementary systems will be introduced. The US Government has an established post-approval / post-approval vaccine safety monitoring infrastructure that is scaled up to meet the needs of large-scale COVID-19 vaccination programs. The US government will work with healthcare systems, academic centers, and private sector partners to monitor COVID-19 vaccines after and during the approval period using multiple existing vaccine safety monitoring systems. These systems include VAERS, Vaccine Safety Data Link (VSD), Biologic Efficacy and Safety (BEST) Initiative, and Medicare Claims Data. If the FDA and CDC identify new safety signals through this safety monitoring, that information will be communicated to the public.

Lead Stories recently published an article addressing questions about. Statistical necessity Some vaccinated people die from unrelated causes.

It is expected that a certain number of people will die in a particular week for a particular reason. The assumption that a particular death or illness was caused by the vaccine because the vaccine was given just before someone got sick is an example of a logical fallacy. The fact that one event precedes another does not necessarily mean that the first event triggered the second event. Correlation and causality are not the same thing.

Obviously, as people get older, they are more likely to die. That is true regardless of the vaccine. The hope of the shot is that it reduces the number of people who get sick, thereby reducing the number of additional illnesses and deaths.

What Are The Main Benefits Of Comparing Car Insurance Quotes Online

LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 24, 2020, / Compare-autoinsurance.Org has launched a new blog post that presents the main benefits of comparing multiple car insurance quotes. For more info and free online quotes, please visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/the-advantages-of-comparing-prices-with-car-insurance-quotes-online/ The modern society has numerous technological advantages. One important advantage is the speed at which information is sent and received. With the help of the internet, the shopping habits of many persons have drastically changed. The car insurance industry hasn't remained untouched by these changes. On the internet, drivers can compare insurance prices and find out which sellers have the best offers. View photos The advantages of comparing online car insurance quotes are the following: Online quotes can be obtained from anywhere and at any time. Unlike physical insurance agencies, websites don't have a specific schedule and they are available at any time. Drivers that have busy working schedules, can compare quotes from anywhere and at any time, even at midnight. Multiple choices. Almost all insurance providers, no matter if they are well-known brands or just local insurers, have an online presence. Online quotes will allow policyholders the chance to discover multiple insurance companies and check their prices. Drivers are no longer required to get quotes from just a few known insurance companies. Also, local and regional insurers can provide lower insurance rates for the same services. Accurate insurance estimates. Online quotes can only be accurate if the customers provide accurate and real info about their car models and driving history. Lying about past driving incidents can make the price estimates to be lower, but when dealing with an insurance company lying to them is useless. Usually, insurance companies will do research about a potential customer before granting him coverage. Online quotes can be sorted easily. Although drivers are recommended to not choose a policy just based on its price, drivers can easily sort quotes by insurance price. Using brokerage websites will allow drivers to get quotes from multiple insurers, thus making the comparison faster and easier. For additional info, money-saving tips, and free car insurance quotes, visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ Compare-autoinsurance.Org is an online provider of life, home, health, and auto insurance quotes. This website is unique because it does not simply stick to one kind of insurance provider, but brings the clients the best deals from many different online insurance carriers. In this way, clients have access to offers from multiple carriers all in one place: this website. On this site, customers have access to quotes for insurance plans from various agencies, such as local or nationwide agencies, brand names insurance companies, etc. "Online quotes can easily help drivers obtain better car insurance deals. All they have to do is to complete an online form with accurate and real info, then compare prices", said Russell Rabichev, Marketing Director of Internet Marketing Company. CONTACT: Company Name: Internet Marketing CompanyPerson for contact Name: Gurgu CPhone Number: (818) 359-3898Email: [email protected]: https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ SOURCE: Compare-autoinsurance.Org View source version on accesswire.Com:https://www.Accesswire.Com/595055/What-Are-The-Main-Benefits-Of-Comparing-Car-Insurance-Quotes-Online View photos

Pictures Credit


to request, modification Contact us at Here or [email protected]