Connect with us

International

US Supreme Court considers Boston’s refusal to fly Christian flag at City Hall | United States Supreme Court

Published

on

 


The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday considered whether the city of Boston violated the freedom of speech of a Christian group that sought to fly a flag in front of City Hall.

The judges seemed to have little doubt that Boston was wrong to refuse to fly the banner, which was described as a Christian flag.

Three flagpoles stand in front of Boston City Hall. The American flag and the Massachusetts state flag are permanent features. The third pole is usually reserved for the Boston flag, but the city has allowed groups to use it when holding events in front of the building.

The flags that have been flown include the LGBTQ+ pride flag and those of different nations.

In 2017, Harold Shurtleff, the founder of Camp Constitution, a volunteer group that aims to improve understanding of the country’s Judeo-Christian heritage, asked to fly a white flag with a red cross over a blue square during an event featuring short speeches. by some local clergy focusing on Boston history, according to court documents.

The city denied the request and soon after issued rules stating that it would refuse flags that support discrimination, prejudice or religious movements.

Shurtleff sued, claiming the city violated his freedom of speech by denying him and Camp Constitution access to the flagpole, which he says is a public forum.

The city argued that the pole is government speech and that flying religious flags on it would constitute an unconstitutional endorsement of religion.

In court documents, Shurtleff’s attorneys argue the city has long exercised little control over who could use the flagpole, sometimes approving requests without looking at the flags that would be hoisted.

Prior to Shurtleff’s request, over a decade, the city approved 284 flag-raising events without denying any.

After the Supreme Court announced it would take up the Shurtleffs case, Boston said it would no longer accept requests to fly flags in front of City Hall.

Two lower courts have ruled in favor of the city, but those rulings could be overturned by a top court controlled 6-3 by conservative justices.

Additionally, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Biden’s Justice Department filed briefs on the side of Camp Constitution, claiming the flagpole was used essentially as a public forum.

[The city] flew political flags, national flags and the flags of private civic organizations, wrote David Cole, national legal director for the ACLU, in a Washington Post op-ed.

Free speech principles prohibit the government from discriminating against speakers because of their messages, including religious messages.

Arguments in the High Court on Tuesday appeared to unite justices left and right in favor of Shurtleff.

Samuel Alito, a conservative, noted that the Chinese and Cuban flags flew. Douglas Hallward-Driemeier, representing Boston, said it’s part of a policy that recognizes the heritage of Boston residents, not an endorsement of those plans.

Elena Kagan, a liberal, was among several judges who suggested the decision to deny Shurtleff’s request was a simple mistake.

Why couldn’t people fix this error? Kagan asked.

The case has an odd bedfellows aspect to it, in that Shurtleff, a former organizer for the far-right John Birch Society, uses his Camp Constitution website to question the January 6, 2021 insurrection on Capitol Hill. US, the 2020 election result that put President Joe Biden in power, the effectiveness of Covid-19 vaccines, and even who was behind the 9/11 attacks.

None of this was mentioned during Tuesday’s closing arguments. A decision is expected by late spring.

Sources

1/ https://Google.com/

2/ https://www.theguardian.com/law/2022/jan/18/boston-chriistian-group-flag-city-hall-supreme-court

The mention sources can contact us to remove/changing this article

What Are The Main Benefits Of Comparing Car Insurance Quotes Online

LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 24, 2020, / Compare-autoinsurance.Org has launched a new blog post that presents the main benefits of comparing multiple car insurance quotes. For more info and free online quotes, please visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/the-advantages-of-comparing-prices-with-car-insurance-quotes-online/ The modern society has numerous technological advantages. One important advantage is the speed at which information is sent and received. With the help of the internet, the shopping habits of many persons have drastically changed. The car insurance industry hasn't remained untouched by these changes. On the internet, drivers can compare insurance prices and find out which sellers have the best offers. View photos The advantages of comparing online car insurance quotes are the following: Online quotes can be obtained from anywhere and at any time. Unlike physical insurance agencies, websites don't have a specific schedule and they are available at any time. Drivers that have busy working schedules, can compare quotes from anywhere and at any time, even at midnight. Multiple choices. Almost all insurance providers, no matter if they are well-known brands or just local insurers, have an online presence. Online quotes will allow policyholders the chance to discover multiple insurance companies and check their prices. Drivers are no longer required to get quotes from just a few known insurance companies. Also, local and regional insurers can provide lower insurance rates for the same services. Accurate insurance estimates. Online quotes can only be accurate if the customers provide accurate and real info about their car models and driving history. Lying about past driving incidents can make the price estimates to be lower, but when dealing with an insurance company lying to them is useless. Usually, insurance companies will do research about a potential customer before granting him coverage. Online quotes can be sorted easily. Although drivers are recommended to not choose a policy just based on its price, drivers can easily sort quotes by insurance price. Using brokerage websites will allow drivers to get quotes from multiple insurers, thus making the comparison faster and easier. For additional info, money-saving tips, and free car insurance quotes, visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ Compare-autoinsurance.Org is an online provider of life, home, health, and auto insurance quotes. This website is unique because it does not simply stick to one kind of insurance provider, but brings the clients the best deals from many different online insurance carriers. In this way, clients have access to offers from multiple carriers all in one place: this website. On this site, customers have access to quotes for insurance plans from various agencies, such as local or nationwide agencies, brand names insurance companies, etc. "Online quotes can easily help drivers obtain better car insurance deals. All they have to do is to complete an online form with accurate and real info, then compare prices", said Russell Rabichev, Marketing Director of Internet Marketing Company. CONTACT: Company Name: Internet Marketing CompanyPerson for contact Name: Gurgu CPhone Number: (818) 359-3898Email: [email protected]: https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ SOURCE: Compare-autoinsurance.Org View source version on accesswire.Com:https://www.Accesswire.Com/595055/What-Are-The-Main-Benefits-Of-Comparing-Car-Insurance-Quotes-Online View photos

ExBUlletin

to request, modification Contact us at Here or [email protected]