Connect with us

International

House votes to reapprove law allowing warrantless surveillance of US citizens | American politics

House votes to reapprove law allowing warrantless surveillance of US citizens |  American politics
House votes to reapprove law allowing warrantless surveillance of US citizens |  American politics

 


House lawmakers voted Friday to reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, or Fisa, including a key measure that allows warrantless surveillance of Americans. The controversial law allows extensive surveillance of foreign communications, but has also led to the collection of messages and phone calls from American citizens.

Lawmakers voted 273,147 votes to approve the law, which the Biden administration has supported for years as an important counterterrorism tool. An amendment that would have required authorities to seek a mandate failed, in a tied vote 212 to 212 across party lines.

Donald Trump opposed reauthorization of the bill, posting on his Truth Social platform on Wednesday: KILL FISA, IT WAS ILLEGALLY USED AGAINST ME AND MANY OTHERS. THEY SPY ON MY CAMPAIGN!!!

The law, which gives the government sweeping powers to review emails, calls and text messages, has long been divisive and led to allegations from civil liberties groups that it violates the right to privacy. private life. House Republicans were divided ahead of the vote on reauthorizing Section 702, the most controversial aspect of the bill, with House Speaker Mike Johnson struggling to unify them around a revised version of the bill. the pre-existing law.

Republicans on Wednesday rejected a procedural vote that would have allowed Johnson to bring the bill to a floor vote, dealing a further blow to the speakers' ability to find compromise within his party. After the defeat, the bill was changed from a five-year extension to a two-year extension of Section 702, in an attempt to appease far-right Republicans who believe Trump will be president at the time of its expiration.

Section 702 allows government agencies such as the National Security Administration to collect data and monitor the communications of foreign citizens outside U.S. territory without the need for a warrant, with authorities touting it as a key tool for targeting the cybercrime, international drug trafficking and terrorism. plots. Since foreign data collection can also collect communications between people abroad and those in the United States, the result of Section 702 is that federal law enforcement can also monitor citizens' communications Americans.

Section 702 has previously faced opposition, but it became particularly tense last year after court documents revealed the FBI had used it inappropriately nearly 300,000 times, targeting racial justice protesters , January 6 suspects and others. This overreach has emboldened resistance to the law, particularly among far-right Republicans who view intelligence agencies like the FBI as their adversary.

Trump's all-caps message further weakened Johnson's position. Trump's online remarks appeared to reference an FBI investigation into one of his former campaign advisers, which was unrelated to Section 702. Other far-right Republicans such as Matt Gaetz also swore to derail the legislation, putting its passage in jeopardy.

Meanwhile, Ohio Rep. Mike Turner, Republican chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, told lawmakers Friday that not reauthorizing the bill would be a gift to spy programs of the Chinese government, as well as Hamas and Hezbollah.

We will be blindsided when they try to recruit people for terrorist attacks in the United States, Turner said on the House floor Friday.

California Democratic Rep. and former Speaker Nancy Pelosi also made a statement in favor of passing Section 702 with its warrantless surveillance capabilities intact, urging lawmakers to vote against an amendment that would weaken its scope.

“I don't have time right now, but if members want to know, I'll tell you how we could have been saved from 9/11 if we didn't need additional mandates,” Pelosi said.

The debate over Section 702 pitted Republicans who alleged the law was a tool for spying on American citizens against other members of the Republican Party who sided with intelligence officials and viewed it as a necessary measure to stop foreign terrorist groups. A proposed amendment required authorities to obtain a warrant before using Section 702 to view the communications of U.S. citizens, an idea that intelligence officials oppose because it limits their ability to act quickly. Another sticking point in the debate was whether to ban law enforcement from buying information about U.S. citizens from data brokerage companies, which collect and sell personal data on dozens of millions of people, including phone numbers and email addresses.

Section 702 dates back to the administration of George W. Bush, which secretly conducted warrantless wiretapping and surveillance programs following the September 11 terrorist attacks. In 2008, Congress passed Section 702 as part of the Fisa Amendment Act and placed foreign surveillance under more formal government oversight. Since then, lawmakers have renewed the law twice, including in 2018 when they rejected an amendment that would have required authorities to obtain warrants for U.S. citizens' data.

Last year, Merrick Garland, the attorney general, and Avril Haines, director of national intelligence, sent a letter to congressional leaders asking them to reauthorize Section 702. They claimed that the intelligence obtained through it had allowed to foil numerous plots against the United States, and that she was partly responsible for facilitating the drone strike that killed al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri in 2022.

Sources

1/ https://Google.com/

2/ https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/apr/12/fisa-surveillance-act-reauthorized

The mention sources can contact us to remove/changing this article

What Are The Main Benefits Of Comparing Car Insurance Quotes Online

LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 24, 2020, / Compare-autoinsurance.Org has launched a new blog post that presents the main benefits of comparing multiple car insurance quotes. For more info and free online quotes, please visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/the-advantages-of-comparing-prices-with-car-insurance-quotes-online/ The modern society has numerous technological advantages. One important advantage is the speed at which information is sent and received. With the help of the internet, the shopping habits of many persons have drastically changed. The car insurance industry hasn't remained untouched by these changes. On the internet, drivers can compare insurance prices and find out which sellers have the best offers. View photos The advantages of comparing online car insurance quotes are the following: Online quotes can be obtained from anywhere and at any time. Unlike physical insurance agencies, websites don't have a specific schedule and they are available at any time. Drivers that have busy working schedules, can compare quotes from anywhere and at any time, even at midnight. Multiple choices. Almost all insurance providers, no matter if they are well-known brands or just local insurers, have an online presence. Online quotes will allow policyholders the chance to discover multiple insurance companies and check their prices. Drivers are no longer required to get quotes from just a few known insurance companies. Also, local and regional insurers can provide lower insurance rates for the same services. Accurate insurance estimates. Online quotes can only be accurate if the customers provide accurate and real info about their car models and driving history. Lying about past driving incidents can make the price estimates to be lower, but when dealing with an insurance company lying to them is useless. Usually, insurance companies will do research about a potential customer before granting him coverage. Online quotes can be sorted easily. Although drivers are recommended to not choose a policy just based on its price, drivers can easily sort quotes by insurance price. Using brokerage websites will allow drivers to get quotes from multiple insurers, thus making the comparison faster and easier. For additional info, money-saving tips, and free car insurance quotes, visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ Compare-autoinsurance.Org is an online provider of life, home, health, and auto insurance quotes. This website is unique because it does not simply stick to one kind of insurance provider, but brings the clients the best deals from many different online insurance carriers. In this way, clients have access to offers from multiple carriers all in one place: this website. On this site, customers have access to quotes for insurance plans from various agencies, such as local or nationwide agencies, brand names insurance companies, etc. "Online quotes can easily help drivers obtain better car insurance deals. All they have to do is to complete an online form with accurate and real info, then compare prices", said Russell Rabichev, Marketing Director of Internet Marketing Company. CONTACT: Company Name: Internet Marketing CompanyPerson for contact Name: Gurgu CPhone Number: (818) 359-3898Email: [email protected]: https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ SOURCE: Compare-autoinsurance.Org View source version on accesswire.Com:https://www.Accesswire.Com/595055/What-Are-The-Main-Benefits-Of-Comparing-Car-Insurance-Quotes-Online View photos

ExBUlletin

to request, modification Contact us at Here or [email protected]