Supreme Court Conservatives Accused of Promoting ‘White Supremacist Agenda’ | American immigration

Lawmakers and immigration advocacy groups sharply denounced two U.S. Supreme Court rulings Thursday that allowed the Trump administration to strip away some immigration protections and fundamentally reshape the asylum system.

Dozens of groups, advocates and members of Congress called the court’s rulings “disastrous” and “cruel,” while the Trump administration, Republican lawmakers and anti-immigration groups celebrated the rulings.

“Today, Trump loyalists on the Supreme Court joined forces with him to deny the internationally recognized human rights of immigrants and promote an authoritarian, white supremacist agenda at home,” said Illinois Democratic Rep. Delia Ramirez. “The Supreme Court’s decisions put more than 350,000 TPS holders at risk of deportation and the lives of countless other asylum seekers are at risk.”

One of the rulings issued Thursday by the Supreme Court revoked temporary protected status (TPS) from hundreds of thousands of Haitians and Syrians, who were living and working legally in the United States and were protected from deportation. The TPS policy allows immigrants from specific countries to live and work in the United States without the threat of deportation, due to conditions of violence or instability in their countries.

Although the State Department currently warns against travel to Haiti or Syria, citing violence, Haitians and Syrians in the United States receiving TPS are now vulnerable to deportation, even if they have pending applications for other forms of immigration status.

“Simply put, the Supreme Court’s decision will directly result in the violent and unnecessary deaths of thousands of innocent people,” attorneys Geoff Pipoly and Andy Tauber, who represented the Haitians before the Supreme Court in the TPS case, said in a statement. “This decision will endanger Haitian TPS holders who fled their country in search of what generations of immigrants yearned for when they made the painful decision to leave everything they knew: to live in safety. »

A number of Democratic senators and representatives — and even one Republican — agreed, adding that the 6-3 decision on TPS would put hundreds of thousands of people at risk.

People with TPS are allowed to live and work in the United States because the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has deemed their home country unsafe. The Trump administration has attempted to gut the program in various countries as part of its anti-immigration crusade. Last year, the Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to remove TPS from more than 300,000 Venezuelans.

Now, analysts fear the move could open the door to further TPS cuts for all countries, which would constitute the largest de-documentation measure in U.S. history.

“The Supreme Court opened the door to a broader effort by the president to dismantle TPS for all 1.3 million holders,” said Insha Rahman, president and director of the Vera Justice Institute. “This decision highlights a troubling reality: too many immigrants in the United States, who have spent years contributing to their communities, remain trapped in temporary statuses that can be revoked according to political agendas. »

Andrea Flores, an immigration expert and former director of border management at the National Security Council under the Biden administration, called Thursday’s TPS decision “the greatest moment of delegalization in modern history.”

Some groups have denounced the potential effects of the GST decision on the American economy. A report released earlier this year showed that GST holders contribute about $29 billion to the economy each year.

Similarly, the court’s other immigration ruling Thursday allowed the Trump administration to fundamentally reshape asylum policy at the U.S.-Mexico border.

In a 6-3 decision, where the conservative majority of nine justices prevailed, the Supreme Court ruled that U.S. government officials can turn away asylum seekers at the southern border, allowing officials to physically block people indefinitely from seeking asylum in the United States. The court ruled that U.S. border officials are not required to accept asylum requests from migrants who have not actually reached U.S. soil.

Immigrant rights organizations, which initially filed the lawsuit in 2017 during the first Trump administration, argued that the U.S. government was violating federal law by turning away asylum seekers at ports of entry, a now-defunct policy called “counting.” Returned migrants found themselves in dangerous conditions in Mexico. The Biden administration reversed this policy and it is still not in effect. But the current Trump administration has asked the Supreme Court to overturn an earlier court ruling declaring the policy illegal.

“We believe that today’s decision violates international law,” said Erika Pinheiro, executive director of Al Otro Lado. Al Otro Lado was the main organization that defended the end of the meter policy. “This decision has destroyed the United States’ position as a global leader in promoting refugee rights and threatens to serve as a dangerous justification for other countries that illegally prevent refugees from crossing borders in search of safety.”

“In a world where conflicts and climate disasters are increasing, this hardening of borders to exclude the most vulnerable will certainly lead to many additional losses of lives,” added Pinheiro.

Although the organizations argued that the counting policy violated federal law, including the Refugee Convention, the Supreme Court ruled that border officials could deny asylum to people who did not enter the United States but arrived at the border.

“This decision should be a wake-up call for everyone who cares about human rights and the rule of law,” said Melissa Crow, litigation director at the Center for Gender and Refugee Studies. Crow said the court’s decision suggests that “the president can unilaterally override decades of established law and trample on citizens’ legal rights if it fits his political agenda.”

“The pushback policy has not simply delayed the entry of people seeking safety. For far too many asylum seekers, the policy has denied entry altogether. In some cases, this has turned into a death sentence,” Crow added.

What Are The Main Benefits Of Comparing Car Insurance Quotes Online

LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 24, 2020, / Compare-autoinsurance.Org has launched a new blog post that presents the main benefits of comparing multiple car insurance quotes. For more info and free online quotes, please visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/the-advantages-of-comparing-prices-with-car-insurance-quotes-online/ The modern society has numerous technological advantages. One important advantage is the speed at which information is sent and received. With the help of the internet, the shopping habits of many persons have drastically changed. The car insurance industry hasn't remained untouched by these changes. On the internet, drivers can compare insurance prices and find out which sellers have the best offers. View photos The advantages of comparing online car insurance quotes are the following: Online quotes can be obtained from anywhere and at any time. Unlike physical insurance agencies, websites don't have a specific schedule and they are available at any time. Drivers that have busy working schedules, can compare quotes from anywhere and at any time, even at midnight. Multiple choices. Almost all insurance providers, no matter if they are well-known brands or just local insurers, have an online presence. Online quotes will allow policyholders the chance to discover multiple insurance companies and check their prices. Drivers are no longer required to get quotes from just a few known insurance companies. Also, local and regional insurers can provide lower insurance rates for the same services. Accurate insurance estimates. Online quotes can only be accurate if the customers provide accurate and real info about their car models and driving history. Lying about past driving incidents can make the price estimates to be lower, but when dealing with an insurance company lying to them is useless. Usually, insurance companies will do research about a potential customer before granting him coverage. Online quotes can be sorted easily. Although drivers are recommended to not choose a policy just based on its price, drivers can easily sort quotes by insurance price. Using brokerage websites will allow drivers to get quotes from multiple insurers, thus making the comparison faster and easier. For additional info, money-saving tips, and free car insurance quotes, visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ Compare-autoinsurance.Org is an online provider of life, home, health, and auto insurance quotes. This website is unique because it does not simply stick to one kind of insurance provider, but brings the clients the best deals from many different online insurance carriers. In this way, clients have access to offers from multiple carriers all in one place: this website. On this site, customers have access to quotes for insurance plans from various agencies, such as local or nationwide agencies, brand names insurance companies, etc. "Online quotes can easily help drivers obtain better car insurance deals. All they have to do is to complete an online form with accurate and real info, then compare prices", said Russell Rabichev, Marketing Director of Internet Marketing Company. CONTACT: Company Name: Internet Marketing CompanyPerson for contact Name: Gurgu CPhone Number: (818) 359-3898Email: [email protected]: https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ SOURCE: Compare-autoinsurance.Org View source version on accesswire.Com:https://www.Accesswire.Com/595055/What-Are-The-Main-Benefits-Of-Comparing-Car-Insurance-Quotes-Online View photos