Connect with us


U.S. ETF Investors Mainly Motivated by Tax Loophole, Study Finds




Learn more about ETFs

Visit FT’s ETF Hub for news and analysis, investor education, and tools to help you select the right ETFs.

According to a team of academics, the shift of U.S. investors from mutual funds to exchange-traded funds is driven primarily by a tax loophole, rather than a perk inherent in the ETF’s structure.

Over the past decade, U.S. investors have withdrawn $ 1 billion from actively managed U.S. mutual funds, with a similar amount going into ETFs.

Although the mutual fund industry is still much larger, the majority of U.S. mutual fund lines have seen net outflows every year since 2014, according to the Investment Company Institute, even though around three-quarters of ETFs have registered entries.

This drastic change is leading some large asset managers, such as Dimensional Fund Advisors, Fidelity and T Rowe Price, to convert some of their existing mutual funds to ETFs or launch ETF clones of their existing funds.

However, research by Rabih Moussawi, Ke Shen, and Raisa Velthuis from Villanova University, Wharton School at University of Pennsylvania, and Lehigh University suggests that migration to ETFs is primarily driven by tax considerations. , rather than by other factors such as ETFs typically. lower costs and greater liquidity.

“The ETF tax advantage is the main catalyst for the massive migration from active mutual funds to ETFs over the past two decades,” they wrote.

“It was kind of a surprise for us,” Moussawi said. “Everyone is talking about the importance of expense and underperformance in driving these rides. [from mutual funds]. “

The greater tax efficiency of ETFs, at least in the United States, stems from a quirk of the capital gains tax system.

When mutual fund investors wish to redeem their units, the fund sells a portion of its underlying holdings in a “cash” transaction.

If these holdings have appreciated since the fund bought them, a capital gains tax liability is triggered for the fund and all of its investors, even those who do not redeem. This liability can also be triggered whenever the fund manager makes changes to the underlying portfolio.

From a political point of view, I think [the different tax treatment of ETFs and mutual funds] must be approached head-on. It’s not fair and it’s not a level playing field

In contrast, when faced with redemption requests, ETFs generally do not need to sell their underlying securities. Instead, they can deliver baskets of securities “in kind” to their authorized participants, the big banks that create and redeem stocks in ETFs.

As a result, trading activity, and any resulting capital gain, occurs outside the fund, so there is no pass-through to the end investor.

It can make a significant difference. Last year, some mutual funds managed by companies like Columbia Threadneedle, Invesco, JPMorgan and T Rowe Price made capital gains tax distributions equivalent to double-digit percentages of their net assets, some up to 30%, according to Morningstar.

Previous research has estimated that a group of around 400 ETFs investing in U.S. stocks deferred taxes on more than $ 211 billion in earnings in 2018 alone.

By avoiding the distribution of realized capital gains, the average ETF has had a tax burden that is 0.92 percentage points lower than that of a typical mutual fund over the past five years, Moussawi et al.

Their research looked at individual mutual funds with a relatively high tax burden and found that they saw more outflows from tax-sensitive investors at the same time as ETFs with similar investing styles enjoyed high levels of investment. inputs.

Additionally, the paper found that ETF adoption is most pronounced among investment advisers registered with high net worth clients, who are most likely to be subject to capital gains tax. In 2017, ETFs represented 21% of the overall portfolio of these advisers, compared to 5% for RIAs with clients of more modest means.

This divergence widened sharply after 2012, when President Barack Obama raised the capital gains tax rates to 23.8% for short-term gains and to 43.4% for longer-term gains. (rates then lowered by President Donald Trump), according to research.

“The tax change has accelerated the substitution. People wanted to get out of mutual funds. Tax management is a great benefit of RIA for high net worth investors, ”Moussawi said.

Todd Rosenbluth, head of ETF and mutual fund research at CFRA Research, said he was “surprised” by the discovery that greater tax efficiency was the main driver of flows to ETFs, given that “Investors who do it pay less and their focus is on relative performance.”

While the tax liability is, in theory, only deferred, not avoided, it allows investors to convert short-term capital gains into long-term gains, thereby reducing the tax rate. Even without this benefit, Jack Bogle, the father of index investing, described the deferral as an interest-free government loan reinvested in the ETF.

In addition, Moussawi said that some high net worth investors pass their portfolios to their heirs “so we are seeing more and more that these investors pay no CGT on their ETF investments.”

The results come at a time when calls to end the disparate tax treatment of mutual funds and ETFs are starting to gain some political clout.

The favorable tax treatment of ETFs “leads to externalities on other investors and taxpayers,” the newspaper said. “Policymakers may want to further investigate who bears the costs of ETF tax efficiency, especially since it presents unfair treatment of different investors.

Whereas “removing the exemption would be difficult. . . politically, I think it should be tackled head-on. It is not fair and it is not a level playing field, ”Moussawi said.

If nothing changes, “we will have [tax exempt] retirement accounts and then all taxable investments for ETFs. From a tax policy perspective, is this something they want to happen? ” he said.

Ben Johnson, director of global ETF research at Morningstar, said many people have raised this issue, which “to some appears to be unfair tax treatment between mutual funds and ETFs, and that the treatment of FNB is a loophole that must be closed. “

However, Johnson said: “What Morningstar has long argued is that where appropriate the playing field should be leveled by taxing mutual funds the same way ETFs are effectively taxed, and the same way that mutual fund investors are taxed in our other tax regimes. “

Click here to visit the ETF Hub

What Are The Main Benefits Of Comparing Car Insurance Quotes Online

LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 24, 2020, / Compare-autoinsurance.Org has launched a new blog post that presents the main benefits of comparing multiple car insurance quotes. For more info and free online quotes, please visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/the-advantages-of-comparing-prices-with-car-insurance-quotes-online/ The modern society has numerous technological advantages. One important advantage is the speed at which information is sent and received. With the help of the internet, the shopping habits of many persons have drastically changed. The car insurance industry hasn't remained untouched by these changes. On the internet, drivers can compare insurance prices and find out which sellers have the best offers. View photos The advantages of comparing online car insurance quotes are the following: Online quotes can be obtained from anywhere and at any time. Unlike physical insurance agencies, websites don't have a specific schedule and they are available at any time. Drivers that have busy working schedules, can compare quotes from anywhere and at any time, even at midnight. Multiple choices. Almost all insurance providers, no matter if they are well-known brands or just local insurers, have an online presence. Online quotes will allow policyholders the chance to discover multiple insurance companies and check their prices. Drivers are no longer required to get quotes from just a few known insurance companies. Also, local and regional insurers can provide lower insurance rates for the same services. Accurate insurance estimates. Online quotes can only be accurate if the customers provide accurate and real info about their car models and driving history. Lying about past driving incidents can make the price estimates to be lower, but when dealing with an insurance company lying to them is useless. Usually, insurance companies will do research about a potential customer before granting him coverage. Online quotes can be sorted easily. Although drivers are recommended to not choose a policy just based on its price, drivers can easily sort quotes by insurance price. Using brokerage websites will allow drivers to get quotes from multiple insurers, thus making the comparison faster and easier. For additional info, money-saving tips, and free car insurance quotes, visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ Compare-autoinsurance.Org is an online provider of life, home, health, and auto insurance quotes. This website is unique because it does not simply stick to one kind of insurance provider, but brings the clients the best deals from many different online insurance carriers. In this way, clients have access to offers from multiple carriers all in one place: this website. On this site, customers have access to quotes for insurance plans from various agencies, such as local or nationwide agencies, brand names insurance companies, etc. "Online quotes can easily help drivers obtain better car insurance deals. All they have to do is to complete an online form with accurate and real info, then compare prices", said Russell Rabichev, Marketing Director of Internet Marketing Company. CONTACT: Company Name: Internet Marketing CompanyPerson for contact Name: Gurgu CPhone Number: (818) 359-3898Email: [email protected]mpany.BizWebsite: https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ SOURCE: Compare-autoinsurance.Org View source version on accesswire.Com:https://www.Accesswire.Com/595055/What-Are-The-Main-Benefits-Of-Comparing-Car-Insurance-Quotes-Online View photos

picture credit


to request, modification Contact us at Here or [email protected]