Connect with us

Politics

US judge overturns Trump’s deal to resolve IRS lawsuit in scathing ruling | Donald Trump

US judge overturns Trump’s deal to resolve IRS lawsuit in scathing ruling | Donald Trump


A federal judge on Monday overturned a deal between the government and Donald Trump and his sons over the leak of his tax returns. The judge lambasted the government and the president’s lawyers for using the legal process to try to concoct a deal beneficial to the president.

The ruling by U.S. Judge Kathleen Williams of the Southern District of Florida blocks a widely criticized deal between the government and the president’s lawyers reached earlier this year to resolve a $10 billion lawsuit filed by Trump and his sons over the leak of the president’s tax returns. The government never responded to the lawsuit and later announced it would settle the dispute by creating a $1.8 billion slush fund to compensate victims of “arming the government” and granting the president, his family and related entities immunity from tax audits.

Amid a bipartisan backlash, Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche announced that the Justice Department was eliminating the fund, but the tax immunity provisions remained in effect.

In her ruling Monday, Williams, who was appointed to the bench by Barack Obama, said there had never been any real controversy in the case — a prerequisite for any trial — since Trump controlled the Treasury Department. She also sanctioned Trump’s lawyers for their conduct in court.

“The nature of the suit itself and the conduct of the parties and attorneys in filing it make clear that it was an attempt to use the court to lend some legitimacy to an agreement to grant immunity to individuals and entities affiliated with the President and to appropriate billions of American taxpayer dollars to redress grievances not defined in the statute,” she wrote.

“The court finds that this case was brought for an improper purpose: to obtain the imprimatur of judicial legitimacy for a ‘settlement’ that had no viable basis in law or fact,” she added.

His decision prevents both Trump, his sons, the companies and the government from “using, offering, admitting or citing” anything from the so-called settlement agreement in any type of proceeding.

Monday’s ruling comes after Williams took the extraordinary step of reopening the case at the request of a group of retired federal judges. She previously closed the case after Trump voluntarily withdrew his claims once the deal was reached.

In his 56-page ruling, Williams presented evidence explaining why it was clear the lawsuit was filed in bad faith and the outcome was collusive.

For example, one of Trump’s lawyers, Daniel Epstein, never attempted to seek permission to appear in the case in the Southern District of Florida — something he had done in other cases — and Williams took that as a sign that he never intended to pursue the case.

She also noted that the Justice Department never attempted to answer obvious questions about whether such an agreement ran afoul of the emoluments clause of the constitution or a law preventing the president from ordering or terminating an audit of a particular taxpayer. And Williams said the fact that the government was able to unilaterally end the slush fund part of the deal suggested the parties were not actually opposed.

“Acting Attorney General Blanche’s apparent ability to speak on behalf of both plaintiffs and defendants, sign a ‘settlement’ document on behalf of all parties to this action, and then repudiate part of that agreement, demonstrates that there was only one party whose interests were represented throughout this case.

Williams referred one of Trump’s lawyers, Alejandro Brito, to the Florida Bar for possible disciplinary action. And she blocked Epstein from appearing on behalf of clients in the Southern District of Florida for a year.

The plaintiffs, she said, should have known that the statute of limitations had expired on their claim and that the amount of money they were seeking was “not supported by the facts or the law.”

“This lawsuit was not brought to assert rights; it was brought to manipulate the legal process to obtain benefits not available in litigation because the parties were not on opposing sides,” she said.

She also criticized Blanche and Deputy Attorney General Stanley Woodward, close Trump allies, for their conduct in the matter, and referred them to the bars of New York and the District of Columbia, where disciplinary proceedings are underway against them.

Williams also ordered the parties to pay the legal fees of retired judges and other third parties who filed friend-of-the-court briefs.

Blanche is expected to be asked about the settlement when he faces lawmakers Wednesday in a confirmation hearing to become permanent attorney general.

Critics still want Congress to act to prevent the regulation from taking effect.

“The court’s decision is important, but it does not eliminate the need for congressional action to undo the entire agreement and prevent any attempts at similar presidential operations in the future,” said Brandon DeBot, policy director at the Tax Law Center.

Sources

1/ https://Google.com/

2/ https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jul/13/trump-irs-ruling-judge-kathleen-williams

The mention sources can contact us to remove/changing this article

What Are The Main Benefits Of Comparing Car Insurance Quotes Online

LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 24, 2020, / Compare-autoinsurance.Org has launched a new blog post that presents the main benefits of comparing multiple car insurance quotes. For more info and free online quotes, please visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/the-advantages-of-comparing-prices-with-car-insurance-quotes-online/ The modern society has numerous technological advantages. One important advantage is the speed at which information is sent and received. With the help of the internet, the shopping habits of many persons have drastically changed. The car insurance industry hasn't remained untouched by these changes. On the internet, drivers can compare insurance prices and find out which sellers have the best offers. View photos The advantages of comparing online car insurance quotes are the following: Online quotes can be obtained from anywhere and at any time. Unlike physical insurance agencies, websites don't have a specific schedule and they are available at any time. Drivers that have busy working schedules, can compare quotes from anywhere and at any time, even at midnight. Multiple choices. Almost all insurance providers, no matter if they are well-known brands or just local insurers, have an online presence. Online quotes will allow policyholders the chance to discover multiple insurance companies and check their prices. Drivers are no longer required to get quotes from just a few known insurance companies. Also, local and regional insurers can provide lower insurance rates for the same services. Accurate insurance estimates. Online quotes can only be accurate if the customers provide accurate and real info about their car models and driving history. Lying about past driving incidents can make the price estimates to be lower, but when dealing with an insurance company lying to them is useless. Usually, insurance companies will do research about a potential customer before granting him coverage. Online quotes can be sorted easily. Although drivers are recommended to not choose a policy just based on its price, drivers can easily sort quotes by insurance price. Using brokerage websites will allow drivers to get quotes from multiple insurers, thus making the comparison faster and easier. For additional info, money-saving tips, and free car insurance quotes, visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ Compare-autoinsurance.Org is an online provider of life, home, health, and auto insurance quotes. This website is unique because it does not simply stick to one kind of insurance provider, but brings the clients the best deals from many different online insurance carriers. In this way, clients have access to offers from multiple carriers all in one place: this website. On this site, customers have access to quotes for insurance plans from various agencies, such as local or nationwide agencies, brand names insurance companies, etc. "Online quotes can easily help drivers obtain better car insurance deals. All they have to do is to complete an online form with accurate and real info, then compare prices", said Russell Rabichev, Marketing Director of Internet Marketing Company. CONTACT: Company Name: Internet Marketing CompanyPerson for contact Name: Gurgu CPhone Number: (818) 359-3898Email: [email protected]: https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ SOURCE: Compare-autoinsurance.Org View source version on accesswire.Com:https://www.Accesswire.Com/595055/What-Are-The-Main-Benefits-Of-Comparing-Car-Insurance-Quotes-Online View photos