Today’s date too

The documents show that after the first atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima on August 6, 1945, news began to flow to the imperial headquarters in Tokyo that the city had been wiped out. The Japanese army did not believe this: no fleet of bombers appeared on their radar near Hiroshima.

The Americans came and went the night before. The city infrastructure has been set up to handle earthquakes in the region as well. What was coming over the radio was impossible. So the army sent a staff officer on a plane to attend.

Radio Response: Hiroshima is destroyed. Something.

A few hours later, the President of the United States read a statement announcing to the world that his country had developed and used an atomic bomb on Hiroshima. And Harry S Truman left no doubt that the Americans would finish what began in Pearl Harbor:

“We are now ready to wipe out every productive enterprise the Japanese have above the ground in any city more quickly and completely. We will destroy their docks, factories, and communications. Let there be a mistake: We will completely destroy Japan’s war-making power.

“The ultimatum was issued on July 26 in Potsdam to spare the Japanese people total devastation. Their leaders immediately rejected this warning. If they do not now accept our terms, they may expect rains of devastation in the air, like never before on this earth. And behind this air attack, the naval and land forces will follow in numbers and strength that they have not yet seen, and with combat skill they know well … “.

Had the Imperial Japanese Army surrendered that day, Nagasaki wouldn’t have been needed on August 9, 1945. Seventy-five years ago today.

George Weil of The Washington Post said last week, on the 75th anniversary of Summer of Desolation in Japan, that one of humanity’s greatest achievements was that no third bomb had been dropped on the enemy. But there had to be a second. Regardless of what those who rewrote or ignore history say in 2020, a second atomic bomb had to be in place to end the war that month, without an invasion that year.

On August 6 every year, apparently, the world debates whether the atomic bomb should be used against Japan. The controversy turns into a slow simmer by August 9, when the news cycle gives us one more thing to argue about. But books say that more than 80,000 people died in the second explosion. It is a horror that should not be overlooked.

Horror, no doubt. The most suspicious matter is whether or not the atomic bomb should be dropped. Or, after the first, if one was needed in Nagasaki.

she was. Unfortunately, it was tragic.

After the bombing of Hiroshima, Admiral Sumo Toyoda visited the city, then allowed his country to bear the devastation but “the war will continue.” The Japanese officially rejected calls for unconditional surrender, and even demanded that any trials for war crimes by Japanese soldiers should be dealt with. The US Secretary of War, Henry Stimson, continued preparing for the invasion that he knew would cost millions of lives. Note: Most of these spirits could have been Japanese.

In the hours after the Hiroshima Declaration and President Truman, the Japanese showed no inclination to give up the fight. Not officially. Not through the back channels. Sure, the Soviet declaration of war against Japan upset Toyiko, but President Truman’s biography says only after Nagasaki panic gripped the Japanese government – and surrender talks began pouring into Washington.

Truman’s decision was ugly and necessary. But it was a hideous and necessary war.

Last week, The Washington Post published an opinion piece by an author of books on Nagasaki and the bombing. In print, I wondered: Was the bombing “correct”? She accuses the Americans of “freezing the debate” and says that we have ignored or even denied the human impact of the bomb. We do not know someone in this discussion who has denied the human impact of the bombs dropped in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. But as to being “correct,” the bombs were the right way to end the war. Otherwise, many more people would have died in the bombardment of massive fire, artillery shelling, and every other nightmare of all-out war.

There were also calls last week for the United States to formally apologize for dropping the bombs. It happens every summer, but this summer marks the 75th anniversary of the end of the war, and those who survived Hiroshima and Nagasaki are now very old. Calls to apologize don’t get stronger the more impatience.

Two years ago, as President Obama was preparing to visit Japan, the Los Angeles Times wrote a story asking: Does Japan even want to apologize? The answer is no. For several reasons:

First, the newspaper reported that Japan did not need more people with a “sensitivity” to nuclear energy, a situation which has worsened recently after the Fukushima Collapse / Earthquake / Tsunami.

Second, the US president’s apology could reignite those Japanese demands for an apology for its role in WWII. Grant Newsham, a senior research fellow at the Japan Forum for Strategic Studies, told the Los Angeles Times in 2016: “If Obama apologizes in Hiroshima, he draws attention to Japanese behavior elsewhere in Asia during the 1930s and 1940s. And that might be the case. Student government The Japanese and the emperor to go to Singapore and apologize for the slaughter of 25,000 Chinese there in 1942. Or to Australia to apologize for the way they treat prisoners of war, or to the Philippines for the few hundred thousand murders at the hands of the Japanese Imperial Army as well. ”

The demands of an apology for the 1945 Resolutions come mostly from people in the West. Because at this point, we are safely far from the belated and uninhibited threat of the Imperial Japanese Army. We can afford to be sensitive now.

What we cannot bear is to forget. Today’s date is a horrific, ugly, and necessary memory too. And while there were a lot of controversies over the use of A-bombs 75 years ago, there is one thing that everyone agrees on:

There may not be a third.

What Are The Main Benefits Of Comparing Car Insurance Quotes Online

LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 24, 2020, / Compare-autoinsurance.Org has launched a new blog post that presents the main benefits of comparing multiple car insurance quotes. For more info and free online quotes, please visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/the-advantages-of-comparing-prices-with-car-insurance-quotes-online/ The modern society has numerous technological advantages. One important advantage is the speed at which information is sent and received. With the help of the internet, the shopping habits of many persons have drastically changed. The car insurance industry hasn't remained untouched by these changes. On the internet, drivers can compare insurance prices and find out which sellers have the best offers. View photos The advantages of comparing online car insurance quotes are the following: Online quotes can be obtained from anywhere and at any time. Unlike physical insurance agencies, websites don't have a specific schedule and they are available at any time. Drivers that have busy working schedules, can compare quotes from anywhere and at any time, even at midnight. Multiple choices. Almost all insurance providers, no matter if they are well-known brands or just local insurers, have an online presence. Online quotes will allow policyholders the chance to discover multiple insurance companies and check their prices. Drivers are no longer required to get quotes from just a few known insurance companies. Also, local and regional insurers can provide lower insurance rates for the same services. Accurate insurance estimates. Online quotes can only be accurate if the customers provide accurate and real info about their car models and driving history. Lying about past driving incidents can make the price estimates to be lower, but when dealing with an insurance company lying to them is useless. Usually, insurance companies will do research about a potential customer before granting him coverage. Online quotes can be sorted easily. Although drivers are recommended to not choose a policy just based on its price, drivers can easily sort quotes by insurance price. Using brokerage websites will allow drivers to get quotes from multiple insurers, thus making the comparison faster and easier. For additional info, money-saving tips, and free car insurance quotes, visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ Compare-autoinsurance.Org is an online provider of life, home, health, and auto insurance quotes. This website is unique because it does not simply stick to one kind of insurance provider, but brings the clients the best deals from many different online insurance carriers. In this way, clients have access to offers from multiple carriers all in one place: this website. On this site, customers have access to quotes for insurance plans from various agencies, such as local or nationwide agencies, brand names insurance companies, etc. "Online quotes can easily help drivers obtain better car insurance deals. All they have to do is to complete an online form with accurate and real info, then compare prices", said Russell Rabichev, Marketing Director of Internet Marketing Company. CONTACT: Company Name: Internet Marketing CompanyPerson for contact Name: Gurgu CPhone Number: (818) 359-3898Email: [email protected]: https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ SOURCE: Compare-autoinsurance.Org View source version on accesswire.Com:https://www.Accesswire.Com/595055/What-Are-The-Main-Benefits-Of-Comparing-Car-Insurance-Quotes-Online View photos