Health
Comparison of 18F-based PSMA radiotracers with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 in PET/CT imaging of prostate cancer—a systematic review and meta-analysis
![Comparison of 18F-based PSMA radiotracers with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 in PET/CT imaging of prostate cancer—a systematic review and meta-analysis](https://media.springernature.com/m685/springer-static/image/art:10.1038/s41391-023-00755-2/MediaObjects/41391_2023_755_Fig1_HTML.png "Comparison of 18F-based PSMA radiotracers with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 in PET/CT imaging of prostate cancer—a systematic review and meta-analysis")
International W. Prostate cancer statistics. Latest prostate cancer data. London: WCRF International 2020.
FDA. FDA approves first PSMA-targeted PET imaging drug for men with prostate cancer. US; 2020.
Hofman MS, Lawrentschuk N, Francis RJ, Tang C, Vela I, Thomas P, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer before curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA): a prospective, randomised, multicentre study. Lancet. 2020;395:1208–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30314-7
Emmett L, Buteau J, Papa N, Moon D, Thompson J, Roberts MJ, et al. The additive diagnostic value of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography computed tomography to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging triage in the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PRIMARY): a prospective multicentre study. Eur Urol. 2021;80:682–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2021.08.002
Ghosh A, Heston WD. Tumor target prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) and its regulation in prostate cancer. J Cell Biochem. 2004;91:528–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.10661
Van de Wiele C, Sathekge M, de Spiegeleer B, de Jonghe PJ, Beels L, Maes A. PSMA-targeting positron emission agents for imaging solid tumors other than non-prostate carcinoma: a systematic review. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20194886.
Bagguley D, Ong S, Buteau JP, Koschel S, Dhiantravan N, Hofman MS, et al. Role of PSMA PET/CT imaging in the diagnosis, staging and restaging of prostate cancer. Future Oncol. 2021;17:2225–41. https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2020-1293
FDA. FDA approves second PSMA-targeted PET imaging drug for men with prostate cancer. US; 2021.
FDA approves flotufolastat fluorine-18 injection, first radiohybrid PSMA-targeted PET imaging agent for prostate cancer [Internet]. [cited 2023 Nov 24]. Available from: https://ascopost.com/news/may-2023/fda-approves-flotufolastat-fluorine-18-injection-first-radiohybrid-psma-targeted-pet-imaging-agent-for-prostate-cancer/
Whiting PFRA, Westwood ME, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:529–36.
Draulans C, Pos F, Smeenk RJ, Kerkmeijer L, Vogel WV, Nagarajah J, et al. (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET, (18)F-PSMA-1007 PET, and MRI for Gross Tumor Volume Delineation in Primary Prostate Cancer: Intermodality and Intertracer Variability. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2021;11:202–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2020.11.006
Pattison DA, Debowski M, Gulhane B, Arnfield EG, Pelecanos AM, Garcia PL, et al. Prospective intra-individual blinded comparison of [(18)F]PSMA-1007 and [(68) Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging in patients with confirmed prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022;49:763–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05520-y
Sharma P, Watts A, Singh H. Comparison of internal dosimetry of 18 F-PSMA-1007 and 68 Ga-PSMA-11-HBED-CC. Clin Nucl Med. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000004353.
Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:135.
Kuten J, Fahoum I, Savin Z, Shamni O, Gitstein G, Hershkovitz D, et al. Head-to-head comparison of (68)Ga-PSMA-11 with (18)F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in staging prostate cancer using histopathology and immunohistochemical analysis as a reference standard. J Nucl Med. 2020;61:527–32. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.234187
Chandekar KR, Singh H, Kumar R, Kumar S, Kakkar N, Mittal BR, et al. Comparison of 18 F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT With 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for initial staging in intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer. Clin Nucl Med. 2023;48:e1–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000004430
Hoffmann MA, von Eyben FE, Fischer N, Rosar F, Muller-Hubenthal J, Buchholz HG, et al. Comparison of [(18)F]PSMA-1007 with [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in restaging of prostate cancer patients with PSA relapse. Cancers. 2022;14. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14061479.
Alberts I, Mingels C, Zacho HD, Lanz S, Schoder H, Rominger A, et al. Comparing the clinical performance and cost efficacy of [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and [(18)F]PSMA-1007 in the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer: a Markov chain decision analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05620-9.
Emmett LEJ, Amin A, Sheehan-Dare G, Cusick T. Pilot trial comparing the performance of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT to 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in the detection of prostate cancer recurrence in men with rising PSA following radical prostatectomy. J Radiol Med Imaging. 2021;4:1039.
Rauscher I, Kronke M, Konig M, Gafita A, Maurer T, Horn T, et al. Matched-pair comparison of (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and (18)F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT: frequency of pitfalls and detection efficacy in biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Nucl Med. 2020;61:51–7. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.229187
Hoberuck S, Lock S, Borkowetz A, Sommer U, Winzer R, Zophel K, et al. Intraindividual comparison of [(68) Ga]-Ga-PSMA-11 and [(18)F]-F-PSMA-1007 in prostate cancer patients: a retrospective single-center analysis. EJNMMI Res. 2021;11:109. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-021-00845-z
Dias AH, Jochumsen MR, Zacho HD, Munk OL, Gormsen LC. Multiparametric dynamic whole-body PSMA PET/CT using [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and [(18)F]PSMA-1007. EJNMMI Res. 2023;13:31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-023-00981-8
Dietlein M, Kobe C, Kuhnert G, Stockter S, Fischer T, Schomacker K, et al. Comparison of [(18)F]DCFPyL and [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC for PSMA-PET imaging in patients with relapsed prostate cancer. Mol Imaging Biol. 2015;17:575–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-015-0866-0
Dietlein F, Kobe C, Neubauer S, Schmidt M, Stockter S, Fischer T, et al. PSA-stratified performance of (18)F- and (68)Ga-PSMA PET in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:947–52. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.116.185538
Ferreira G, Iravani A, Hofman MS, Hicks RJ. Intra-individual comparison of (68)Ga-PSMA-11 and (18)F-DCFPyL normal-organ biodistribution. Cancer Imaging. 2019;19:23 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-019-0211-y
Dietlein F, Hohberg M, Kobe C, Zlatopolskiy BD, Krapf P, Endepols H, et al. An (18)F-labeled PSMA ligand for PET/CT of prostate cancer: first-in-humans observational study and clinical experience with (18)F-JK-PSMA-7 during the first year of application. J Nucl Med. 2020;61:202–9. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.229542
De Man K, Van Laeken N, Schelfhout V, Fendler WP, Lambert B, Kersemans K, et al. (18)F-PSMA-11 versus (68)Ga-PSMA-11 positron emission tomography/computed tomography for staging and biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: a prospective double-blind randomised cross-over trial. Eur Urol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2022.05.010.
Kroenke M, Mirzoyan L, Horn T, Peeken JC, Wurzer A, Wester HJ, et al. Matched-pair comparison of (68)Ga-PSMA-11 and (18)F-rhPSMA-7 PET/CT in patients with primary and biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: frequency of non-tumor-related uptake and tumor positivity. J Nucl Med. 2021;62:1082–8. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.120.251447
Kesch C, Kratochwil C, Mier W, Kopka K, Giesel FL. (68)Ga or (18)F for prostate cancer imaging? J Nucl Med.2017;58:687–8. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.117.190157.
Lengana T, Lawal IO, Rensburg CV, Mokoala KMG, Moshokoa E, Ridgard T, et al. A comparison of the diagnostic performance of (18)F-PSMA-1007 and (68)GA-PSMA-11 in the same patients presenting with early biochemical recurrence. Hell J Nucl Med. 2021;24:178–85. https://doi.org/10.1967/s002449912401
Scobioala S, Kittel C, Wolters H, Huss S, Elsayad K, Seifert R, et al. Diagnostic efficiency of hybrid imaging using PSMA ligands, PET/CT, PET/MRI and MRI in identifying malignant prostate lesions. Ann Nucl Med. 2021;35:628–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-021-01606-7
Seifert R, Telli T, Opitz M, Barbato F, Berliner C, Nader M, et al. Unspecific (18)F-PSMA-1007 bone uptake evaluated through PSMA-11 PET, bone scanning, and MRI triple validation in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2023;64:738–43. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.118.215434
Arnfield EG, Thomas PA, Roberts MJ, Pelecanos AM, Ramsay SC, Lin CY, et al. Clinical insignificance of [(18)F]PSMA-1007 avid non-specific bone lesions: a retrospective evaluation. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48:4495–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05456-3
Maisto C, Aurilio M, Morisco A, de Marino R, Buonanno Recchimuzzo MJ, Carideo L, et al. Analysis of pros and cons in using [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and [(18)F]PSMA-1007: production, costs, and PET/CT applications in patients with prostate cancer. Molecules. 2022;27. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27123862.
Jussing E, Milton S, Samén E, Moein MM, Bylund L, Axelsson R, et al. Clinically applicable cyclotron-produced gallium-68 gives high-yield radiolabeling of DOTA-based tracers. Biomolecules. 2021;11. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11081118.
Kersemans K, De Man K, Courtyn J, Van Royen T, Piron S, Moerman L, et al. Automated radiosynthesis of Al[(18)F]PSMA-11 for large-scale routine use. Appl Radiat Isot. 2018;135:19–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2018.01.006
von Hippel PT. The heterogeneity statistic I(2) can be biased in small meta-analyses. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015;15:35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0024-z
Zhang YN, Lu ZG, Wang SD, Lu X, Zhu LL, Yang X, et al. Gross tumor volume delineation in primary prostate cancer on (18)F-PSMA-1007 PET/MRI and (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI. Cancer Imaging. 2022;22:36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-022-00475-1
Hammes J, Hohberg M, Tager P, Wild M, Zlatopolskiy B, Krapf P, et al. Uptake in non-affected bone tissue does not differ between [18F]-DCFPyL and [68Ga]-HBED-CC PSMA PET/CT. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0209613. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209613
Jansen BHE, Kramer GM, Cysouw MCF, Yaqub MM, de Keizer B, Lavalaye J, et al. Healthy Tissue Uptake of (68)Ga-Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen, (18)F-DCFPyL, (18)F-Fluoromethylcholine, and (18)F-Dihydrotestosterone. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:1111–7. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.118.222505
Bodar YJL, Veerman H, Meijer D, de Bie K, van Leeuwen PJ, Donswijk ML, et al. Standardised uptake values as determined on prostate‐specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography is associated with oncological outcomes in patients with prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2022;129:768–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.15710
|
Sources 2/ https://www.nature.com/articles/s41391-023-00755-2 The mention sources can contact us to remove/changing this article |
What Are The Main Benefits Of Comparing Car Insurance Quotes Online
LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 24, 2020, / Compare-autoinsurance.Org has launched a new blog post that presents the main benefits of comparing multiple car insurance quotes. For more info and free online quotes, please visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/the-advantages-of-comparing-prices-with-car-insurance-quotes-online/ The modern society has numerous technological advantages. One important advantage is the speed at which information is sent and received. With the help of the internet, the shopping habits of many persons have drastically changed. The car insurance industry hasn't remained untouched by these changes. On the internet, drivers can compare insurance prices and find out which sellers have the best offers. View photos The advantages of comparing online car insurance quotes are the following: Online quotes can be obtained from anywhere and at any time. Unlike physical insurance agencies, websites don't have a specific schedule and they are available at any time. Drivers that have busy working schedules, can compare quotes from anywhere and at any time, even at midnight. Multiple choices. Almost all insurance providers, no matter if they are well-known brands or just local insurers, have an online presence. Online quotes will allow policyholders the chance to discover multiple insurance companies and check their prices. Drivers are no longer required to get quotes from just a few known insurance companies. Also, local and regional insurers can provide lower insurance rates for the same services. Accurate insurance estimates. Online quotes can only be accurate if the customers provide accurate and real info about their car models and driving history. Lying about past driving incidents can make the price estimates to be lower, but when dealing with an insurance company lying to them is useless. Usually, insurance companies will do research about a potential customer before granting him coverage. Online quotes can be sorted easily. Although drivers are recommended to not choose a policy just based on its price, drivers can easily sort quotes by insurance price. Using brokerage websites will allow drivers to get quotes from multiple insurers, thus making the comparison faster and easier. For additional info, money-saving tips, and free car insurance quotes, visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ Compare-autoinsurance.Org is an online provider of life, home, health, and auto insurance quotes. This website is unique because it does not simply stick to one kind of insurance provider, but brings the clients the best deals from many different online insurance carriers. In this way, clients have access to offers from multiple carriers all in one place: this website. On this site, customers have access to quotes for insurance plans from various agencies, such as local or nationwide agencies, brand names insurance companies, etc. "Online quotes can easily help drivers obtain better car insurance deals. All they have to do is to complete an online form with accurate and real info, then compare prices", said Russell Rabichev, Marketing Director of Internet Marketing Company. CONTACT: Company Name: Internet Marketing CompanyPerson for contact Name: Gurgu CPhone Number: (818) 359-3898Email: [email protected]: https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ SOURCE: Compare-autoinsurance.Org View source version on accesswire.Com:https://www.Accesswire.Com/595055/What-Are-The-Main-Benefits-Of-Comparing-Car-Insurance-Quotes-Online View photos
to request, modification Contact us at Here or [email protected]
 |
 |
 |
