Connect with us

Health

A letter to science breaks the “gag” of the story about the origin of Covid – Manomet Current

 


For over a year, a group of researchers ridiculed the idea that Covid-19 might have initially escaped from a laboratory in Wuhan, China, and treated it as a conspiracy theory. Today, their control over this story within the scientific community is diminishing as more and more experts seek to scrutinize this hypothesis of laboratory leaks.

In a letter released at Science on Friday, 18 scientists are calling for an investigation into the cause of the pandemic that does not rule out the possibility of a leak in the laboratory.Theory of accidental release from the laboratory and the theory of zoonotic overflow [quando um patógeno é transmitido de animais para humanos] “They write” remains viable. Knowing how Covid-19 occurred is essential in guiding global strategies to mitigate the risk of future outbreaks. “”

These researchers include Dr. Shi Zhengli of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, Dr. Ralph Baric, a leading coronavirus expert who studied bat coronaviruses, and several other major virologists. They worked with WHO Director General, intelligence officials, and other U.S. government experts to make such a theory “very unlikely, despite WHO collaborative research and findings from China. “. Like US President Joe Biden and the governments of 13 other countries who signed a US-led statement after the report was released, they are concerned about how the group came to a conclusion.

The researcher’s letter arrives when members of the US Congress begin to step up their investigation into potential laboratory leaks as a source of the new coronavirus. The scientist’s letter has already caught the attention of US lawmakers involved in Covid’s research efforts. Representatives of Cathy McMorris Rogers, Brett Guthrie and Morgan Griffiths said in a statement:

Jamie Mezel, a WHO consultant and senior member of the Atlantic Council, a research group on international affairs, explained the meaning of the letter on Twitter. “The Gag Order on the general perception of laboratory accidents as a possible cause of a pandemic has just been broken. After the publication of the letter to science, it is not possible for scientific journals and the media to present this viable hypothesis in detail. I’m irresponsible.

The authors of the scientific letter consider the joint report of WHO and China to be flawed and assess the probabilities of various theories about the origin of the virus evaluated by the Panel. In a laboratory accident, the team rated the hypothesis of zoonotic overflow from an intermediate host as “very likely” and the laboratory accident as “very unlikely”. I evaluated it.

The author of the letter adds: “In addition, the two theories were not considered in a balanced manner. Only four of the report and its appendix, page 313, dealt with the possibility of an accident in the laboratory.”

This letter does not show that the laboratory leak hypothesis is more viable than the theory of origin of zoonotic diseases. However, it is important that the letters of important scientific journals put these two theories on an equal footing.

Another scientific journal, Lancet, rejected a letter submitted by 14 biologists and geneticists in January, stating that “the origin of the lab cannot be formally ruled out.”

Several key figures related to The Lancet describe the Labreak scenario as a conspiracy theory, including Jeffrey Sachs, chairman of the Covid committee of the medical magazine, and Peter Daszak, chairman of the Covid committee subcommittee. .. Dazak, a non-profit research group receiving hundreds of thousands of dollars from the U.S. National Institutes of Health for bat coronavirus research at the Wuhan Institute of Vase, is a member of a joint group of WHO and China, revealing potential Faced with accusations that did not. Conflict of interest.

Richard Ebright, a professor of chemical biology at Rutgers University, told the National Review last month that their initiative helped create a false impression that there was a scientific consensus on potential laboratory leaks. It was. “There was no such consensus at the time. Currently, there is no such consensus,” he said.

This latest participation in the debate on the pages of major scientific journals shows that the base has moved away from the empty and widespread story since the beginning of the pandemic.

© National Review 2021. Published with permission.English original

What Are The Main Benefits Of Comparing Car Insurance Quotes Online

LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 24, 2020, / Compare-autoinsurance.Org has launched a new blog post that presents the main benefits of comparing multiple car insurance quotes. For more info and free online quotes, please visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/the-advantages-of-comparing-prices-with-car-insurance-quotes-online/ The modern society has numerous technological advantages. One important advantage is the speed at which information is sent and received. With the help of the internet, the shopping habits of many persons have drastically changed. The car insurance industry hasn't remained untouched by these changes. On the internet, drivers can compare insurance prices and find out which sellers have the best offers. View photos The advantages of comparing online car insurance quotes are the following: Online quotes can be obtained from anywhere and at any time. Unlike physical insurance agencies, websites don't have a specific schedule and they are available at any time. Drivers that have busy working schedules, can compare quotes from anywhere and at any time, even at midnight. Multiple choices. Almost all insurance providers, no matter if they are well-known brands or just local insurers, have an online presence. Online quotes will allow policyholders the chance to discover multiple insurance companies and check their prices. Drivers are no longer required to get quotes from just a few known insurance companies. Also, local and regional insurers can provide lower insurance rates for the same services. Accurate insurance estimates. Online quotes can only be accurate if the customers provide accurate and real info about their car models and driving history. Lying about past driving incidents can make the price estimates to be lower, but when dealing with an insurance company lying to them is useless. Usually, insurance companies will do research about a potential customer before granting him coverage. Online quotes can be sorted easily. Although drivers are recommended to not choose a policy just based on its price, drivers can easily sort quotes by insurance price. Using brokerage websites will allow drivers to get quotes from multiple insurers, thus making the comparison faster and easier. For additional info, money-saving tips, and free car insurance quotes, visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ Compare-autoinsurance.Org is an online provider of life, home, health, and auto insurance quotes. This website is unique because it does not simply stick to one kind of insurance provider, but brings the clients the best deals from many different online insurance carriers. In this way, clients have access to offers from multiple carriers all in one place: this website. On this site, customers have access to quotes for insurance plans from various agencies, such as local or nationwide agencies, brand names insurance companies, etc. "Online quotes can easily help drivers obtain better car insurance deals. All they have to do is to complete an online form with accurate and real info, then compare prices", said Russell Rabichev, Marketing Director of Internet Marketing Company. CONTACT: Company Name: Internet Marketing CompanyPerson for contact Name: Gurgu CPhone Number: (818) 359-3898Email: [email protected]: https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ SOURCE: Compare-autoinsurance.Org View source version on accesswire.Com:https://www.Accesswire.Com/595055/What-Are-The-Main-Benefits-Of-Comparing-Car-Insurance-Quotes-Online View photos



Pictures Credit

ExBUlletin

to request, modification Contact us at Here or [email protected]