Connect with us

International

Fury as US opposes climate obligations at UN's highest court | Climate crisis

Fury as US opposes climate obligations at UN's highest court | Climate crisis

 


Climate justice campaigners have condemned the United States after the world's largest historic emitter of greenhouse gases objected to countries being legally obligated to tackle the climate crisis.

The US intervention came Wednesday as part of the historic climate hearing at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague, where island nations and other climate-vulnerable countries are demanding that rich and pollutants most responsible for climate degradation are judged legally. responsible.

Climate disasters are wreaking havoc across the planet, with less and less hope that current climate commitments will reduce global temperatures as the United States and other fossil fuel-using countries continue to increase production.

Yet, according to the United States, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), the 2015 Paris Agreement, and other existing non-binding treaties should be preserved and are the best path forward.

The current UN climate change regime embodies the clearest, most specific and most timely expression of the consent of States to be bound by international law on climate change, said Margaret Taylor, Legal Adviser at the State Department, before ICJ judges on Wednesday.

Any other legal obligations relating to climate change mitigation identified by the Court must be interpreted consistently with States' obligations under this treaty regime, Taylor added.

Climate justice activists reacted with fury.

Once again, we are witnessing a discouraging attempt by the United States to evade its responsibilities as one of the world's largest polluters, said Vishal Prasad, director of the University Students' Association. Pacific Islands fighting climate change. The United States is content with its status quo approach and has taken every possible step to shirk historical responsibility, ignore human rights, and reject climate justice.

Ashfaq Khalfan, director of climate justice at Oxfam Americas, said: “It is absurd that the Biden administration is arguing before the ICJ that countries do not have clear legal obligations to reduce carbon pollution, d 'especially as it prepares to entrust executive power to a tested climate. a climate denier like President-elect Trump, whose policies risk profound harm to U.S. climate action.

Australia, China and Saudi Arabia, the world's largest fossil fuel economies and among the world's worst emitters of greenhouse gases, have also opposed legal accountability sought by developing countries.

After years of campaigning by vulnerable nations and the global climate justice movement, the UN has asked the ICJ to provide an advisory opinion on the obligations of states in combating climate change and the legal consequences that could result if they do not do so. More than 100 countries and organizations will testify over two weeks, and many hope the hearings will elevate science to the forefront, ensuring international law reflects the realities of climate breakdown and the urgent need for transformative action.

ICJ advisory opinions are not binding but carry significant legal and political weight, and they will likely be considered an authoritative document in future climate litigation and international climate negotiations.

The countries most vulnerable to climate change, mainly Pacific countries led by Vanuatu, are pushing for fair financial support and compensation for irreversible loss and damage from the states most responsible, as they face to an existential threat from rising tides, floods, drought and other climate disasters.

On Wednesday, Vanuatus' special envoy for climate change, Ralph Regenvanu, said his country was disappointed by the United States and others. These countries, among the largest emitters of greenhouse gases in the world, have highlighted existing treaties and commitments which have unfortunately failed to motivate substantial reductions in emissions. These treaties are essential, but they cannot hide inaction or substitute for legal accountability.

Taylor also appears to reject the idea that the ICJ should propose in its opinion that legacy emitters be held responsible for past pollution. An advisory procedure is not the way to challenge whether individual states or groups of states have violated their climate change obligations in the past or whether they take responsibility for reparations… nor would it be appropriate to do so, she said.

The ICJ is one of three international courts responsible for producing an advisory opinion on the climate crisis, alongside the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (Itlos) and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Itlos discovered earlier this year that greenhouse gases are pollutants that states have a legal responsibility to control that goes beyond the UNFCCC. The Inter-American Court held hearings in Barbados and Brazil this year and is expected to be next to issue its opinion. The ICJ's decision will likely take several months.

Sources

1/ https://Google.com/

2/ https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/dec/04/us-climate-crisis-legal-court

The mention sources can contact us to remove/changing this article

What Are The Main Benefits Of Comparing Car Insurance Quotes Online

LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 24, 2020, / Compare-autoinsurance.Org has launched a new blog post that presents the main benefits of comparing multiple car insurance quotes. For more info and free online quotes, please visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/the-advantages-of-comparing-prices-with-car-insurance-quotes-online/ The modern society has numerous technological advantages. One important advantage is the speed at which information is sent and received. With the help of the internet, the shopping habits of many persons have drastically changed. The car insurance industry hasn't remained untouched by these changes. On the internet, drivers can compare insurance prices and find out which sellers have the best offers. View photos The advantages of comparing online car insurance quotes are the following: Online quotes can be obtained from anywhere and at any time. Unlike physical insurance agencies, websites don't have a specific schedule and they are available at any time. Drivers that have busy working schedules, can compare quotes from anywhere and at any time, even at midnight. Multiple choices. Almost all insurance providers, no matter if they are well-known brands or just local insurers, have an online presence. Online quotes will allow policyholders the chance to discover multiple insurance companies and check their prices. Drivers are no longer required to get quotes from just a few known insurance companies. Also, local and regional insurers can provide lower insurance rates for the same services. Accurate insurance estimates. Online quotes can only be accurate if the customers provide accurate and real info about their car models and driving history. Lying about past driving incidents can make the price estimates to be lower, but when dealing with an insurance company lying to them is useless. Usually, insurance companies will do research about a potential customer before granting him coverage. Online quotes can be sorted easily. Although drivers are recommended to not choose a policy just based on its price, drivers can easily sort quotes by insurance price. Using brokerage websites will allow drivers to get quotes from multiple insurers, thus making the comparison faster and easier. For additional info, money-saving tips, and free car insurance quotes, visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ Compare-autoinsurance.Org is an online provider of life, home, health, and auto insurance quotes. This website is unique because it does not simply stick to one kind of insurance provider, but brings the clients the best deals from many different online insurance carriers. In this way, clients have access to offers from multiple carriers all in one place: this website. On this site, customers have access to quotes for insurance plans from various agencies, such as local or nationwide agencies, brand names insurance companies, etc. "Online quotes can easily help drivers obtain better car insurance deals. All they have to do is to complete an online form with accurate and real info, then compare prices", said Russell Rabichev, Marketing Director of Internet Marketing Company. CONTACT: Company Name: Internet Marketing CompanyPerson for contact Name: Gurgu CPhone Number: (818) 359-3898Email: [email protected]: https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ SOURCE: Compare-autoinsurance.Org View source version on accesswire.Com:https://www.Accesswire.Com/595055/What-Are-The-Main-Benefits-Of-Comparing-Car-Insurance-Quotes-Online View photos

ExBUlletin

to request, modification Contact us at Here or [email protected]