Health
Correspondence of functional connectivity gradients across human isocortex, cerebellum, and hippocampus
Barbas, H. General cortical and special prefrontal connections: principles from structure to function. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 38, 269–289 (2015).
García-Cabezas, M. Á., Zikopoulos, B. & Barbas, H. The structural model: a theory linking connections, plasticity, pathology, development and evolution of the cerebral cortex. Brain Struct. Funct. 224, 985–1008 (2019).
Haueis, P. Multiscale modeling of cortical gradients: the role of mesoscale circuits for linking macro- and microscale gradients of cortical organization and hierarchical information processing. NeuroImage 232, 117846 (2021).
Hilgetag, C. C., Goulas, A. & Changeux, J.-P. A natural cortical axis connecting the outside and inside of the human brain. Netw. Neurosci. 6, 950–959 (2022).
Hilgetag, C. C. & Goulas, A. ‘Hierarchy’ in the organization of brain networks. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 375, 20190319 (2020).
Mesulam, M. From sensation to cognition. Brain 121, 1013–1052 (1998).
Paquola, C. et al. Convergence of cortical types and functional motifs in the human mesiotemporal lobe. eLife 9, e60673 (2020).
Paquola, C. et al. Microstructural and functional gradients are increasingly dissociated in transmodal cortices. PLoS Biol. 17, e3000284 (2019).
Paquola, C. et al. The unique cytoarchitecture and wiring of the human default mode network. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.22.469533 (2021)
Pijnenburg, R. et al. Biological characteristics of connection-wise resting-state functional connectivity strength. Cereb. Cortex 29, 4646–4653 (2019).
Valk, S. L. et al. Shaping brain structure: genetic and phylogenetic axes of macroscale organization of cortical thickness. Sci. Adv. 6, eabb3417 (2020).
Valk, S. L. et al. Genetic and phylogenetic uncoupling of structure and function in human transmodal cortex. Nat. Commun. 13, 2341 (2022).
Xu, T. et al. Cross-species functional alignment reveals evolutionary hierarchy within the connectome. NeuroImage 223, 117346 (2020).
Scholtens, L. H., Feldman Barrett, L. & van den Heuvel, M. P. Cross-species evidence of interplay between neural connectivity at the micro- and macroscale of connectome organization in human, mouse, and rat brain. Brain Connect. 8, 595–603 (2018).
van den Heuvel, M. P. et al. Multimodal analysis of cortical chemoarchitecture and macroscale fMRI resting-state functional connectivity. Hum. Brain Mapp. 37, 3103–3113 (2016).
Markov, N. T. et al. Cortical high-density counterstream architectures. Science 342, 1238406 (2013).
Hong, S.-J. et al. Toward a connectivity gradient-based framework for reproducible biomarker discovery. NeuroImage 223, 117322 (2020).
Huntenburg, J. M., Bazin, P.-L. & Margulies, D. S. Large-scale gradients in human cortical organization. Trends Cogn. Sci. 22, 21–31 (2018).
Vos de Wael, R. et al. BrainSpace: a toolbox for the analysis of macroscale gradients in neuroimaging and connectomics datasets. Commun. Biol. 3, 1–10 (2020).
Buckner, R. L., Krienen, F. M. & Yeo, B. T. T. Opportunities and limitations of intrinsic functional connectivity MRI. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 832–837 (2013).
Biswal, B., Zerrin Yetkin, F., Haughton, V. M. & Hyde, J. S. Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar mri. Magn. Reson. Med. 34, 537–541 (1995).
Bethlehem, R. A. I. et al. Dispersion of functional gradients across the adult lifespan. NeuroImage 222, 117299 (2020).
Margulies, D. S. et al. Situating the default-mode network along a principal gradient of macroscale cortical organization. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 12574–12579 (2016).
Vázquez-Rodríguez, B. et al. Gradients of structure–function tethering across neocortex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 21219–21227 (2019).
Zhang, J. et al. Intrinsic functional connectivity is organized as three interdependent gradients. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–14 (2019).
Braga, R. M., Sharp, D. J., Leeson, C., Wise, R. J. S. & Leech, R. Echoes of the brain within default mode, association, and heteromodal cortices. J. Neurosci. 33, 14031–14039 (2013).
Sepulcre, J., Sabuncu, M. R., Yeo, T. B., Liu, H. & Johnson, K. A. Stepwise connectivity of the modal cortex reveals the multimodal organization of the human brain. J. Neurosci. 32, 10649–10661 (2012).
Szinte, M. & Knapen, T. Visual organization of the default network. Cereb. Cortex 30, 3518–3527 (2020).
Sydnor, V. J. et al. Neurodevelopment of the association cortices: patterns, mechanisms, and implications for psychopathology. Neuron 109, 2820–2846 (2021).
Finlay, B. L. & Uchiyama, R. Developmental mechanisms channeling cortical evolution. Trends Neurosci. 38, 69–76 (2015).
Valk, S. L. et al. Changing the social brain: plasticity along macro-scale axes of functional connectivity following social mental training. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.11.377895 (2021).
Fernandino, L. et al. Concept representation reflects multimodal abstraction: a framework for embodied semantics. Cereb. Cortex 26, 2018–2034 (2016).
Corbetta, M. & Shulman, G. L. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 3, 201–215 (2002).
Dosenbach, N. U. F. et al. Distinct brain networks for adaptive and stable task control in humans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 11073–11078 (2007).
Miller, E. K. & Cohen, J. D. An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 24, 167–202 (2001).
Uddin, L. Q. Salience processing and insular cortical function and dysfunction. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 16, 55–61 (2015).
Mckeown, B. et al. The relationship between individual variation in macroscale functional gradients and distinct aspects of ongoing thought. NeuroImage 220, 117072 (2020).
Guell, X., Schmahmann, J. D., Gabrieli, J. D. & Ghosh, S. S. Functional gradients of the cerebellum. eLife 7, e36652 (2018).
Guell, X. et al. Functional territories of human dentate nucleus. Cereb. Cortex 30, 2401–2417 (2020).
Kharabian Masouleh, S., Plachti, A., Hoffstaedter, F., Eickhoff, S. & Genon, S. Characterizing the gradients of structural covariance in the human hippocampus. NeuroImage 218, 116972 (2020).
Przeździk, I., Faber, M., Fernández, G., Beckmann, C. F. & Haak, K. V. The functional organisation of the hippocampus along its long axis is gradual and predicts recollection. Cortex 119, 324–335 (2019).
Vos de Wael, R. et al. Anatomical and microstructural determinants of hippocampal subfield functional connectome embedding. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 10154–10159 (2018).
Shadmehr, R., Smith, M. A. & Krakauer, J. W. Error correction, sensory prediction, and adaptation in motor control. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 33, 89–108 (2010).
Sokolov, A. A., Miall, R. C. & Ivry, R. B. The cerebellum: adaptive prediction for movement and cognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 21, 313–332 (2017).
Buzsáki, G. & Tingley, D. Space and time: the hippocampus as a sequence generator. Trends Cogn. Sci. 22, 853–869 (2018).
Kumaran, D., Hassabis, D. & McClelland, J. L. What learning systems do intelligent agents need? Complementary learning systems theory updated. Trends Cogn. Sci. 20, 512–534 (2016).
Babayan, B. M. et al. A hippocampo-cerebellar centred network for the learning and execution of sequence-based navigation. Sci. Rep. 7, 17812 (2017).
Iglói, K. et al. Interaction between hippocampus and cerebellum Crus I in sequence-based but not place-based navigation. Cereb. Cortex 25, 4146–4154 (2015).
Onuki, Y., Van Someren, E. J. W., De Zeeuw, C. I. & Van der Werf, Y. D. Hippocampal–cerebellar interaction during spatio-temporal prediction. Cereb. Cortex 25, 313–321 (2015).
Watson, T. C. et al. Anatomical and physiological foundations of cerebello-hippocampal interaction. eLife 8, e41896 (2019).
Yu, W. & Krook-Magnuson, E. Cognitive collaborations: bidirectional functional connectivity between the cerebellum and the hippocampus. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 9, 177 (2015).
Van Essen, D. C. et al. The WU-Minn human connectome project: an overview. NeuroImage 80, 62–79 (2013).
Holmes, A. J. et al. Brain genomics superstruct project initial data release with structural, functional, and behavioral measures. Sci. Data 2, 1–16 (2015).
Yeo, B. T. T. et al. The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J. Neurophysiol. 106, 1125–1165 (2011).
Coifman, R. R. & Lafon, S. Diffusion maps. Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 21, 5–30 (2006).
Li, Q. et al. Atypical neural topographies underpin dysfunctional pattern separation in temporal lobe epilepsy. Brain 144, 2486–2498 (2021).
Yang, S. et al. The thalamic functional gradient and its relationship to structural basis and cognitive relevance. NeuroImage 218, 116960 (2020).
Kulaga-Yoskovitz, J. et al. Multi-contrast submillimetric 3 Tesla hippocampal subfield segmentation protocol and dataset. Sci. Data 2, 1–9 (2015).
Katsumi, Y., Theriault, J. E., Quigley, K. S. & Barrett, L. F. Allostasis as a core feature of hierarchical gradients in the human brain. Netw. Neurosci. 6, 1010–1031 (2022).
Alexander-Bloch, A. F. et al. On testing for spatial correspondence between maps of human brain structure and function. Neuroimage 178, 540–551 (2018).
Blazquez Freches, G. et al. Principles of temporal association cortex organisation as revealed by connectivity gradients. Brain Struct. Funct. 225, 1245–1260 (2020).
Faber, M., Przezdzik, I., Fernandez, G., Haak, K. V. & Beckmann, C. F. Overlapping connectivity gradients in the anterior temporal lobe underlie semantic cognition. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.28.121137 (2020).
Haak, K. V., Marquand, A. F. & Beckmann, C. F. Connectopic mapping with resting-state fMRI. NeuroImage 170, 83–94 (2018).
Raut, R. V., Snyder, A. Z. & Raichle, M. E. Hierarchical dynamics as a macroscopic organizing principle of the human brain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 20890–20897 (2020).
Shafiei, G. et al. Topographic gradients of intrinsic dynamics across neocortex. Elife 9, e62116 (2020).
Vogel, J. W. et al. A molecular gradient along the longitudinal axis of the human hippocampus informs large-scale behavioral systems. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–17 (2020).
Marquand, A. F., Haak, K. V. & Beckmann, C. F. Functional corticostriatal connection topographies predict goal-directed behaviour in humans. Nat. Hum. Behav. 1, 1–9 (2017).
Buckner, R. L., Krienen, F. M., Castellanos, A., Diaz, J. C. & Yeo, B. T. T. The organization of the human cerebellum estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J. Neurophysiol. 106, 2322–2345 (2011).
Ábrahám, H. et al. Myelination in the human hippocampal formation from midgestation to adulthood. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. 28, 401–410 (2010).
Aggleton, J. P. Multiple anatomical systems embedded within the primate medial temporal lobe: Implications for hippocampal function. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 36, 1579–1596 (2012).
Rolls, E. T. Pattern separation, completion, and categorisation in the hippocampus and neocortex. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 129, 4–28 (2016).
van Strien, N. M., Cappaert, N. L. M. & Witter, M. P. The anatomy of memory: an interactive overview of the parahippocampal–hippocampal network. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 272–282 (2009).
Fox, M. D. et al. The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 9673–9678 (2005).
Fanselow, M. S. & Dong, H.-W. Are the dorsal and ventral hippocampus functionally distinct structures? Neuron 65, 7–19 (2010).
Strange, B. A., Witter, M. P., Lein, E. S. & Moser, E. I. Functional organization of the hippocampal longitudinal axis. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 15, 655–669 (2014).
Barrett, L. F. The theory of constructed emotion: an active inference account of interoception and categorization. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 12, 1–23 (2017).
Kleckner, I. R. et al. Evidence for a large-scale brain system supporting allostasis and interoception in humans. Nat. Hum. Behav. 1, 1–14 (2017).
Levinthal, D. J. & Strick, P. L. The motor cortex communicates with the kidney. J. Neurosci. 32, 6726–6731 (2012).
Levinthal, D. J. & Strick, P. L. Multiple areas of the cerebral cortex influence the stomach. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 13078–13083 (2020).
Touroutoglou, A., Andreano, J., Dickerson, B. C. & Barrett, L. F. The tenacious brain: how the anterior mid-cingulate contributes to achieving goals. Cortex 123, 12–29 (2020).
Kong, R. et al. Spatial topography of individual-specific cortical networks predicts human cognition, personality, and emotion. Cereb. Cortex 29, 2533–2551 (2019).
Hong, S.-J. et al. Atypical functional connectome hierarchy in autism. Nat. Commun. 10, 1–13 (2019).
Karapanagiotidis, T. et al. The psychological correlates of distinct neural states occurring during wakeful rest. Sci. Rep. 10, 21121 (2020).
van den Heuvel, M. P., Mandl, R. C. W., Kahn, R. S. & Hulshoff Pol, H. E. Functionally linked resting-state networks reflect the underlying structural connectivity architecture of the human brain. Hum. Brain Mapp. 30, 3127–3141 (2009).
Barrett, L. F. & Simmons, W. K. Interoceptive predictions in the brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 16, 419–429 (2015).
Chanes, L. & Barrett, L. F. Redefining the role of limbic areas in cortical processing. Trends Cogn. Sci. 20, 96–106 (2016).
Hutchinson, J. B. & Barrett, L. F. The power of predictions: an emerging paradigm for psychological research. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 28, 280–291 (2019).
Friston, K., FitzGerald, T., Rigoli, F., Schwartenbeck, P. & Pezzulo, G. Active inference: a process theory. Neural Comput. 29, 1–49 (2017).
Pezzulo, G., Zorzi, M. & Corbetta, M. The secret life of predictive brains: what’s spontaneous activity for? Trends Cogn. Sci. 25, 730–743 (2021).
Smith, R., Thayer, J. F., Khalsa, S. S. & Lane, R. D. The hierarchical basis of neurovisceral integration. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 75, 274–296 (2017).
Rao, R. P. N. & Ballard, D. H. Predictive coding in the visual cortex: a functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects. Nat. Neurosci. 2, 79–87 (1999).
Keller, G. B. & Mrsic-Flogel, T. D. Predictive processing: a canonical cortical computation. Neuron 100, 424–435 (2018).
Picard, F. & Friston, K. Predictions, perception, and a sense of self. Neurology 83, 1112–1118 (2014).
Barron, H. C., Auksztulewicz, R. & Friston, K. Prediction and memory: a predictive coding account. Prog. Neurobiol. 192, 101821 (2020).
Gravina, M. T. & Sederberg, P. B. The neural architecture of prediction over a continuum of spatiotemporal scales. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 17, 194–202 (2017).
Liu, K., Sibille, J. & Dragoi, G. Generative predictive codes by multiplexed hippocampal neuronal tuplets. Neuron 99, 1329–1341.e6 (2018).
Sherman, B. E. & Turk-Browne, N. B. Statistical prediction of the future impairs episodic encoding of the present. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 22760–22770 (2020).
Ito, M. Control of mental activities by internal models in the cerebellum. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 9, 304–313 (2008).
Kawato, M. Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 9, 718–727 (1999).
Wolpert, D. M., Miall, R. C. & Kawato, M. Internal models in the cerebellum. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2, 338–347 (1998).
Berkes, P., Orbán, G., Lengyel, M. & Fiser, J. Spontaneous cortical activity reveals hallmarks of an optimal internal model of the environment. Science 331, 83–87 (2011).
Feldman, H. & Friston, K. J. Attention, uncertainty, and free-energy. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 4, 215 (2010).
Kanai, R., Komura, Y., Shipp, S. & Friston, K. Cerebral hierarchies: predictive processing, precision and the pulvinar. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 370, 20140169 (2015).
Parr, T. & Friston, K. J. Attention or salience? Curr. Opin. Psychol. 29, 1–5 (2019).
Beul, S. F. & Hilgetag, C. C. Towards a “canonical” agranular cortical microcircuit. Front. Neuroanat. 8, 165 (2015).
Bastos, A. M., Lundqvist, M., Waite, A. S., Kopell, N. & Miller, E. K. Layer and rhythm specificity for predictive routing. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 31459–31469 (2020).
Muckli, L. et al. Contextual feedback to superficial layers of V1. Curr. Biol. 25, 2690–2695 (2015).
Buckner, R. L. The serendipitous discovery of the brain’s default network. NeuroImage 62, 1137–1145 (2012).
Stawarczyk, D., Bezdek, M. A. & Zacks, J. M. Event representations and predictive processing: the role of the midline default network core. Top. Cogn. Sci. 13, 164–186 (2021).
Smallwood, J. et al. The default mode network in cognition: a topographical perspective. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 22, 503–513 (2021).
Dixon, M. L. et al. Heterogeneity within the frontoparietal control network and its relationship to the default and dorsal attention networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E1598–E1607 (2018).
Hasson, U., Chen, J. & Honey, C. J. Hierarchical process memory: memory as an integral component of information processing. Trends Cogn. Sci. 19, 304–313 (2015).
Deneve, S. Bayesian spiking neurons I: inference. Neural Comput. 20, 91–117 (2008).
Power, J. D. et al. Functional network organization of the human brain. Neuron 72, 665–678 (2011).
Touroutoglou, A., Hollenbeck, M., Dickerson, B. C. & Barrett, L. F. Dissociable large-scale networks anchored in the right anterior insula subserve affective experience and attention. NeuroImage 60, 1947–1958 (2012).
Ullsperger, M., Danielmeier, C. & Jocham, G. Neurophysiology of performance monitoring and adaptive behavior. Physiol. Rev. 94, 35–79 (2014).
Craig, A. D. How do you feel — now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 59–70 (2009).
Workman, A. D., Charvet, C. J., Clancy, B., Darlington, R. B. & Finlay, B. L. Modeling transformations of neurodevelopmental sequences across mammalian species. J. Neurosci. 33, 7368–7383 (2013).
Sherwood, C. C., Bauernfeind, A. L., Bianchi, S., Raghanti, M. A. & Hof, P. R. Human brain evolution writ large and small. Prog. Brain Res. 195, 237–254 (2012).
Sherwood, C. C., Bauernfeind, A. L., Verendeev, A., Raghanti, M. A. & Hof, P. R. 4.08 – Evolutionary Specializations of Human Brain Microstructure. in Evolution of Nervous Systems (ed. Kaas, J. H.) 121–139 (Academic Press, 2017).
Barrett, L. F. & Finlay, B. L. Concepts, goals and the control of survival-related behaviors. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 24, 172–179 (2018).
Sultan, F. et al. Unravelling cerebellar pathways with high temporal precision targeting motor and extensive sensory and parietal networks. Nat. Commun. 3, 924 (2012).
Tanaka, H., Ishikawa, T., Lee, J. & Kakei, S. The cerebro-cerebellum as a locus of forward model: a review. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 14, 19 (2020).
Roth, M. J., Synofzik, M. & Lindner, A. The cerebellum optimizes perceptual predictions about external sensory events. Curr. Biol. 23, 930–935 (2013).
Synofzik, M., Lindner, A. & Thier, P. The cerebellum updates predictions about the visual consequences of one’s behavior. Curr. Biol. 18, 814–818 (2008).
Molinari, M. & Masciullo, M. The implementation of predictions during sequencing. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 13, 439 (2019).
Herzfeld, D. J., Vaswani, P. A., Marko, M. K. & Shadmehr, R. A memory of errors in sensorimotor learning. Science 345, 1349–1353 (2014).
Wei, K. & Körding, K. Relevance of error: what drives motor adaptation? J. Neurophysiol. 101, 655–664 (2009).
Smith, M. A., Ghazizadeh, A. & Shadmehr, R. Interacting adaptive processes with different timescales underlie short-term motor learning. PLoS Biol. 4, e179 (2006).
Thach, W. T. Discharge of cerebellar neurons related to two maintained postures and two prompt movements. I. Nuclear cell output. J. Neurophysiol. 33, 527–536 (1970).
Schmahmann, J. D. & Pandya, D. N. The Cerebrocerebellar System. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 41, 31–60 (1997).
Apps, R. & Watson, T. C. 48 – Cerebro-Cerebellar Connections. in Handbook of the Cerebellum and Cerebellar Disorders (eds. Manto, M., Schmahmann, J. D., Rossi, F., Gruol, D. L. & Koibuchi, N.) 1131–1153 (Springer, 2013).
Glickstein, M., May, J. G. & Mercier, B. E. Corticopontine projection in the macaque: the distribution of labelled cortical cells after large injections of horseradish peroxidase in the pontine nuclei. J. Comp. Neurol. 235, 343–359 (1985).
Kelly, R. M. & Strick, P. L. Cerebellar loops with motor cortex and prefrontal cortex of a nonhuman primate. J. Neurosci. 23, 8432–8444 (2003).
Schmahmann, J. D. From movement to thought: anatomic substrates of the cerebellar contribution to cognitive processing. Hum. Brain Mapp. 4, 174–198 (1996).
Zhu, J.-N. & Wang, J.-J. The cerebellum in feeding control: possible function and mechanism. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 28, 469–478 (2008).
Zhu, J.-N., Yung, W.-H., Kwok-Chong Chow, B., Chan, Y.-S. & Wang, J.-J. The cerebellar-hypothalamic circuits: potential pathways underlying cerebellar involvement in somatic-visceral integration. Brain Res. Rev. 52, 93–106 (2006).
Lisman, J. & Redish, A. D. Prediction, sequences and the hippocampus. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 364, 1193–1201 (2009).
Pezzulo, G., Kemere, C. & der Meer, M. A. A. Internally generated hippocampal sequences as a vantage point to probe future-oriented cognition. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1396, 144–165 (2017).
Witter, M. P., Doan, T. P., Jacobsen, B., Nilssen, E. S. & Ohara, S. Architecture of the entorhinal cortex A review of entorhinal anatomy in rodents with some comparative notes. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 11, 46 (2017).
Insausti, R. & Amaral, D. G. 24 – Hippocampal Formation. in The Human Nervous System(eds. Mai, J. K., Paxinos, G.) 896–942 (Elsevier, 2012).
Amaral, D. G. & Cowan, W. M. Subcortical afferents to the hippocampal formation in the monkey. J. Comp. Neurol. 189, 573–591 (1980).
Barbas, H. & Blatt, G. J. Topographically specific hippocampal projections target functionally distinct prefrontal areas in the rhesus monkey. Hippocampus 5, 511–533 (1995).
Insausti, R. & Muñoz, M. Cortical projections of the non-entorhinal hippocampal formation in the cynomolgus monkey (Macaca fascicularis). Eur. J. Neurosci. 14, 435–451 (2001).
Paleja, M., Girard, T. A., Herdman, K. A. & Christensen, B. K. Two distinct neural networks functionally connected to the human hippocampus during pattern separation tasks. Brain Cogn. 92, 101–111 (2014).
Rochefort, C., Lefort, J. & Rondi-Reig, L. The cerebellum: a new key structure in the navigation system. Front. Neural Circuits 7, 35 (2013).
Bohne, P., Schwarz, M. K., Herlitze, S. & Mark, M. D. A new projection from the deep cerebellar nuclei to the hippocampus via the ventrolateral and laterodorsal thalamus in mice. Front. Neural Circuits 13, 51 (2019).
Arrigo, A. et al. Constrained spherical deconvolution analysis of the limbic network in human, with emphasis on a direct cerebello-limbic pathway. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8, 987 (2014).
Baldassano, C. et al. Discovering event structure in continuous narrative perception and memory. Neuron 95, 709–721.e5 (2017).
Molinari, M. et al. Cerebellum and detection of sequences, from perception to cognition. Cerebellum 7, 611–615 (2008).
Van Overwalle, F., Manto, M., Leggio, M. & Delgado-García, J. M. The sequencing process generated by the cerebellum crucially contributes to social interactions. Med. Hypotheses 128, 33–42 (2019).
Zacks, J. M. et al. Event perception: a mind-brain perspective. Psychol. Bull. 133, 273–293 (2007).
Hasselmo, M. E. What is the function of hippocampal theta rhythm?—Linking behavioral data to phasic properties of field potential and unit recording data. Hippocampus 15, 936–949 (2005).
Barrett, L. F., Quigley, K. S. & Hamilton, P. An active inference theory of allostasis and interoception in depression. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 371, 20160011 (2016).
Smith, R., Badcock, P. & Friston, K. J. Recent advances in the application of predictive coding and active inference models within clinical neuroscience. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 75, 3–13 (2021).
Park, B. et al. An expanding manifold in transmodal regions characterizes adolescent reconfiguration of structural connectome organization. eLife 10, e64694 (2021).
Tian, Y., Margulies, D. S., Breakspear, M. & Zalesky, A. Topographic organization of the human subcortex unveiled with functional connectivity gradients. Nat. Neurosci. 23, 1421–1432 (2020).
Glasser, M. F. et al. The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project. NeuroImage 80, 105–124 (2013).
Smith, S. M. et al. Resting-state fMRI in the Human Connectome Project. NeuroImage 80, 144–168 (2013).
Griffanti, L. et al. ICA-based artefact removal and accelerated fMRI acquisition for improved resting state network imaging. NeuroImage 95, 232–247 (2014).
Salimi-Khorshidi, G. et al. Automatic denoising of functional MRI data: Combining independent component analysis and hierarchical fusion of classifiers. NeuroImage 90, 449–468 (2014).
Glasser, M. F. et al. A multi-modal parcellation of human cerebral cortex. Nature 536, 171–178 (2016).
Robinson, E. C. et al. MSM: a new flexible framework for multimodal surface matching. NeuroImage 100, 414–426 (2014).
Beckmann, C. F. & Smith, S. M. Probabilistic independent component analysis for functional magnetic resonance imaging. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 23, 137–152 (2004).
Fischl, B., Liu, A. & Dale, A. M. Automated manifold surgery: constructing geometrically accurate and topologically correct models of the human cerebral cortex. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 20, 70–80 (2001).
Fischl, B., Sereno, M. I., Tootell, R. B. H. & Dale, A. M. High-resolution intersubject averaging and a coordinate system for the cortical surface. Hum. Brain Mapp. 8, 272–284 (1999).
Fischl, B., Sereno, M. I. & Dale, A. M. Cortical surface-based analysis: II: inflation, flattening, and a surface-based coordinate system. NeuroImage 9, 195–207 (1999).
Li, J. et al. Global signal regression strengthens association between resting-state functional connectivity and behavior. NeuroImage 196, 126–141 (2019).
Fischl, B. FreeSurfer. NeuroImage 62, 774–781 (2012).
Jenkinson, M., Beckmann, C. F., Behrens, T. E. J., Woolrich, M. W. & Smith, S. M. FSL. NeuroImage 62, 782–790 (2012).
Avants, B. B. et al. A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration. NeuroImage 54, 2033–2044 (2011).
Greve, D. N. & Fischl, B. Accurate and robust brain image alignment using boundary-based registration. NeuroImage 48, 63–72 (2009).
Power, J. D. et al. Methods to detect, characterize, and remove motion artifact in resting state fMRI. NeuroImage 84, 320–341 (2014).
Jenkinson, M., Bannister, P., Brady, M. & Smith, S. Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. NeuroImage 17, 825–841 (2002).
Power, J. D., Barnes, K. A., Snyder, A. Z., Schlaggar, B. L. & Petersen, S. E. Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion. NeuroImage 59, 2142–2154 (2012).
Smith, S. M. et al. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. NeuroImage 23, S208–S219 (2004).
Gordon, E. M. et al. Generation and evaluation of a cortical area parcellation from resting-state correlations. Cereb. Cortex 26, 288–303 (2016).
Diedrichsen, J., Balsters, J. H., Flavell, J., Cussans, E. & Ramnani, N. A probabilistic MR atlas of the human cerebellum. NeuroImage 46, 39–46 (2009).
Desikan, R. S. et al. An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. NeuroImage 31, 968–980 (2006).
Frazier, J. A. et al. Structural brain magnetic resonance imaging of limbic and thalamic volumes in pediatric bipolar disorder. Am. J. Psychiatry 162, 1256–1265 (2005).
Li, Q. et al. Atypical neural topographies underpin dysfunctional pattern separation in temporal lobe epilepsy. Brain 144, 2486–2498 (2021).
Manjón, J. V. & Coupé, P. volBrain: An Online MRI Brain Volumetry System. Front. Neuroinform. 10, 30 (2016).
Romero, J. E., Coupé, P. & Manjón, J. V. HIPS: a new hippocampus subfield segmentation method. NeuroImage 163, 286–295 (2017).
Lowe, A. J. et al. Targeting age-related differences in brain and cognition with multimodal imaging and connectome topography profiling. Hum. Brain Mapp. 40, 5213–5230 (2019).
Royer, J. et al. Myeloarchitecture gradients in the human insula: Histological underpinnings and association to intrinsic functional connectivity. NeuroImage 216, 116859 (2020).
Katsumi, Y. et al. yutakatsumi/gradient_correlations: v1.0.0. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7764905 (2023).
|
Sources 2/ https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-023-04796-0 The mention sources can contact us to remove/changing this article |
What Are The Main Benefits Of Comparing Car Insurance Quotes Online
LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 24, 2020, / Compare-autoinsurance.Org has launched a new blog post that presents the main benefits of comparing multiple car insurance quotes. For more info and free online quotes, please visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/the-advantages-of-comparing-prices-with-car-insurance-quotes-online/ The modern society has numerous technological advantages. One important advantage is the speed at which information is sent and received. With the help of the internet, the shopping habits of many persons have drastically changed. The car insurance industry hasn't remained untouched by these changes. On the internet, drivers can compare insurance prices and find out which sellers have the best offers. View photos The advantages of comparing online car insurance quotes are the following: Online quotes can be obtained from anywhere and at any time. Unlike physical insurance agencies, websites don't have a specific schedule and they are available at any time. Drivers that have busy working schedules, can compare quotes from anywhere and at any time, even at midnight. Multiple choices. Almost all insurance providers, no matter if they are well-known brands or just local insurers, have an online presence. Online quotes will allow policyholders the chance to discover multiple insurance companies and check their prices. Drivers are no longer required to get quotes from just a few known insurance companies. Also, local and regional insurers can provide lower insurance rates for the same services. Accurate insurance estimates. Online quotes can only be accurate if the customers provide accurate and real info about their car models and driving history. Lying about past driving incidents can make the price estimates to be lower, but when dealing with an insurance company lying to them is useless. Usually, insurance companies will do research about a potential customer before granting him coverage. Online quotes can be sorted easily. Although drivers are recommended to not choose a policy just based on its price, drivers can easily sort quotes by insurance price. Using brokerage websites will allow drivers to get quotes from multiple insurers, thus making the comparison faster and easier. For additional info, money-saving tips, and free car insurance quotes, visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ Compare-autoinsurance.Org is an online provider of life, home, health, and auto insurance quotes. This website is unique because it does not simply stick to one kind of insurance provider, but brings the clients the best deals from many different online insurance carriers. In this way, clients have access to offers from multiple carriers all in one place: this website. On this site, customers have access to quotes for insurance plans from various agencies, such as local or nationwide agencies, brand names insurance companies, etc. "Online quotes can easily help drivers obtain better car insurance deals. All they have to do is to complete an online form with accurate and real info, then compare prices", said Russell Rabichev, Marketing Director of Internet Marketing Company. CONTACT: Company Name: Internet Marketing CompanyPerson for contact Name: Gurgu CPhone Number: (818) 359-3898Email: [email protected]: https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ SOURCE: Compare-autoinsurance.Org View source version on accesswire.Com:https://www.Accesswire.Com/595055/What-Are-The-Main-Benefits-Of-Comparing-Car-Insurance-Quotes-Online View photos
to request, modification Contact us at Here or [email protected]
 |
 |
 |
