Connect with us


Why Australia's changes to Olympic funding could widen the divide between rich and poor sports

Why Australia's changes to Olympic funding could widen the divide between rich and poor sports


The Australian Olympic Committee (AOC) has submitted a proposal a new strategy to strengthen the financial health of Olympic sports.

At the heart of this initiative is a plan to enable individual sports federations to independently market the iconic Olympic rings in Australia.

This marks a significant departure from the traditional approach to collective Olympic team sponsorship.

Led by AOC CEO Matt Carroll, this move is intended to channel sponsorship revenue directly to the sports themselves. This is especially critical for sports that face significant financial challenges. As Carroll said, for a small sport, $50,000 is a lot of money.

Carroll has highlighted the precarious financial position of these organizations and pointed out that even a modest influx of commercial funding could dramatically improve their position. sustainability and growth.

The first hurdle you have to jump over

Despite the ambition of this strategy, the AOC faces an uphill battle in its implementation, with two major obstacles standing in the way.

The first is the capacity gap within smaller sports organizations.

Effectively deploying the Olympic brand requires a sophisticated marketing approach. Many smaller federations are already overloaded and lack the resources, expertise and human resources to set up successful marketing campaigns.

This wealth gap raises questions about their ability to take full advantage of the opportunities presented by the AOC's new policies.

Fear of obstruction and oblivion

The second major hurdle is rooted in the governance structure of Australian sport.

While the federated system has its advantages, it also poses significant challenges to the coherent and strategic application of the AOC initiative.

In a federated sports system, independent organizations oversee various levels (regional and state) of the sport under a central governing body (national), while maintaining autonomy in their respective jurisdictions.

This system tends to encourage isolated activities rather than unified, collaborative efforts.

Kieren Perkins, CEO of the Australian Sports Commission, has criticized this model leading to obstruction and forgetfulness.

Money matters

The AOC plan is not merely a theoretical exercise, it is driven by financial necessity.

The committee has made an estimate Another $2 billion is needed) by 2032 to meet the needs of elite sport in Australia, with $1.5 billion specifically earmarked to improve athletes' competitiveness.

This substantial figure underlines the crucial need for innovative financing solutions, of which the AOC strategy is a key component.

While the AOC initiative is interesting, it is only one of many possible avenues to address the funding gap facing Olympic sports in Australia.

Other models and strategies have emerged around the world that provide valuable lessons and alternatives.

For example, the United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee (USOPC) has introduced this access to their Team USA House in Paris as part of a hospitality package. This move underlines the potential to use Olympic assets for direct financing, independent of government support.

Similarly, the concept of a national sports lottery has been put forward in Australia. Such schemes have had a significant impact in other countries, particularly Britain.

The British Sports Lotterywhich has played a major role in the country's Olympic success, especially after the London 2012 Games, illustrates how targeted financing mechanisms can transform a country's Olympic fortunes.

Another innovative approach to sports financing is to redirect some of the government taxes collected from sports betting.

Seen prevalence of sports betting in Australiathis represents a potentially untapped source of revenue that could provide a sustainable funding stream for sports organizations.

World Athletics' recent decision to award the award cash prizes for medal achievements introduces an extra dimension to the discussion about the financing of athletes and sports.

World Athletics has announced it will become the first international federation to award prize money at an Olympic Games.

In Australia, gold, silver and bronze medalists receive bonuses of $20,000, $15,000 and $10,000 respectively. This is likely to rise as Australia prepares to host the 2032 Games.

While such measures could benefit major sports with greater visibility, they also risk widening the financial gap between these sports and the smaller, less commercially attractive disciplines such as table tennis.

In other words, sports with larger budgets can compensate their athletes while smaller sports cannot, potentially widening the gap.

Looking ahead to the 2032 Olympic Games in Brisbane

Looking ahead to 2032, it is critical for Australia to find strong, sustainable ways to support sport.

This challenge goes beyond just helping elite athletes: it's about improving the entire sporting landscape to make it more inclusive and fun for everyone.

Initiatives such as Toysin addition to Queensland's investments within a new center for Parasports at the University of Queensland are steps towards improving access to sport for individuals, regardless of their ability.

These efforts highlight the need for cross-sector collaboration and the importance of innovative financing methods.

John CairneyHead of Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland; Richard Baka, Honorary Professor, School of Kinesiology, Western University, London, Canada; Adjunct Fellow, Olympic Scientist and Co-Director of the Olympic and Paralympic Research Centre, Institute for Health and Sport, Victoria UniversityAnd Tracy TaylorAdjunct professor of sports management, Victoria University

This article is republished from The conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

The conversation




The mention sources can contact us to remove/changing this article

What Are The Main Benefits Of Comparing Car Insurance Quotes Online

LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 24, 2020, / Compare-autoinsurance.Org has launched a new blog post that presents the main benefits of comparing multiple car insurance quotes. For more info and free online quotes, please visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/the-advantages-of-comparing-prices-with-car-insurance-quotes-online/ The modern society has numerous technological advantages. One important advantage is the speed at which information is sent and received. With the help of the internet, the shopping habits of many persons have drastically changed. The car insurance industry hasn't remained untouched by these changes. On the internet, drivers can compare insurance prices and find out which sellers have the best offers. View photos The advantages of comparing online car insurance quotes are the following: Online quotes can be obtained from anywhere and at any time. Unlike physical insurance agencies, websites don't have a specific schedule and they are available at any time. Drivers that have busy working schedules, can compare quotes from anywhere and at any time, even at midnight. Multiple choices. Almost all insurance providers, no matter if they are well-known brands or just local insurers, have an online presence. Online quotes will allow policyholders the chance to discover multiple insurance companies and check their prices. Drivers are no longer required to get quotes from just a few known insurance companies. Also, local and regional insurers can provide lower insurance rates for the same services. Accurate insurance estimates. Online quotes can only be accurate if the customers provide accurate and real info about their car models and driving history. Lying about past driving incidents can make the price estimates to be lower, but when dealing with an insurance company lying to them is useless. Usually, insurance companies will do research about a potential customer before granting him coverage. Online quotes can be sorted easily. Although drivers are recommended to not choose a policy just based on its price, drivers can easily sort quotes by insurance price. Using brokerage websites will allow drivers to get quotes from multiple insurers, thus making the comparison faster and easier. For additional info, money-saving tips, and free car insurance quotes, visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ Compare-autoinsurance.Org is an online provider of life, home, health, and auto insurance quotes. This website is unique because it does not simply stick to one kind of insurance provider, but brings the clients the best deals from many different online insurance carriers. In this way, clients have access to offers from multiple carriers all in one place: this website. On this site, customers have access to quotes for insurance plans from various agencies, such as local or nationwide agencies, brand names insurance companies, etc. "Online quotes can easily help drivers obtain better car insurance deals. All they have to do is to complete an online form with accurate and real info, then compare prices", said Russell Rabichev, Marketing Director of Internet Marketing Company. CONTACT: Company Name: Internet Marketing CompanyPerson for contact Name: Gurgu CPhone Number: (818) 359-3898Email: [email protected]: https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ SOURCE: Compare-autoinsurance.Org View source version on accesswire.Com:https://www.Accesswire.Com/595055/What-Are-The-Main-Benefits-Of-Comparing-Car-Insurance-Quotes-Online View photos


to request, modification Contact us at Here or [email protected]