UK riots expose double standards on far-right and Islamist violence | Far Right

The recent UK riots, which began with the Southport knife attack, have exposed concerns about the double standards in how society perceives and responds to far-right violence, and in comparison to Islamic extremism. This imbalance demands a serious rethinking of how we deal with far-right extremism, and recognize the serious threat it represents.

While far-right-led violence is often categorized as simple violence or hooliganism, similar acts led by Islamist extremists are more likely to be quickly categorized as terrorism. This discrepancy undermines the perceived seriousness of the far-right threat and hinders the political will to take equal action.

Minimizing the ideological implications also contributes to distorting public perceptions of extremism, as it ignores the influence of widespread social biases such as racism, religious discrimination, and anti-immigrant sentiment.

The language used in public, political, and media discourse matters. It shapes how communities understand and respond to various forms of violence, and thus affects the effectiveness of counter-extremism measures.

A study conducted in 2015 and 2016 by the Royal United Services Institute (Rusi), a defence and security think tank, in areas affected by far-right extremism found that communities often associated such violence with hooligans or criminals rather than terrorism or violent extremism. In contrast, extremism was commonly associated with Islamism and violent jihad.

This perception has significant implications for community-based efforts to counter the far right. It influences who is responsible for leading the response, often leaving it to the police rather than other actors involved in counter-terrorism and counter-violent extremism work, and how such responses are conducted, typically focusing on punitive measures against individuals who do not address more widely held underlying ideologies.

So how people define and understand far-right extremism affects the likelihood of success in measures to prevent it.

Research in Russia suggests that far-right violence is often seen as less influential and fragmented, and is often linked to institutional bias and racism, which has historically not garnered the same level of response from politicians, security services, or the media as jihadist violent extremism.

Keir Starmer’s characterization of the recent riots as far-right violence illustrates this problem. While the Prime Minister’s intention was to acknowledge the ideological underpinnings of the violence, the term violence narrows down the individuals and groups involved in the organized, networked and ideological components of the riots.

The riots must be understood in the context of a steady stream of attacks and attacks against migrants and refugees in Britain in recent years. These incidents reveal a pattern of violence that has been largely ignored by politicians and the public.

Moreover, these attacks are not isolated incidents but part of a wider pattern of far-right extremism seen across Europe. For example, similar far-right riots occurred in Dublin in 2023 and in Kemis, Germany in 2018, both in response to stabbing incidents that stoked widespread anti-immigrant sentiment, and which far-right groups used to incite violence against migrants and refugees.

Recent discussions about considering terrorism charges for the most serious incidents of far-right violence challenge the current framework and approach to dealing with far-right violence. While the label of terrorism does not apply to all incidents of violence that occur in the context of a riot, and many incidents would be better classified as hate crimes or extremism, recognizing serious incidents of far-right violence as terrorism would be consistent with a more equitable legal strategy to ensure that all forms of extremism are prosecuted with the same degree of severity.

It is time to reassess how we address far-right violence, address it with urgency, and create a future where extremism in all its forms is addressed with equal resolve and precision.

What Are The Main Benefits Of Comparing Car Insurance Quotes Online

LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 24, 2020, / Compare-autoinsurance.Org has launched a new blog post that presents the main benefits of comparing multiple car insurance quotes. For more info and free online quotes, please visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/the-advantages-of-comparing-prices-with-car-insurance-quotes-online/ The modern society has numerous technological advantages. One important advantage is the speed at which information is sent and received. With the help of the internet, the shopping habits of many persons have drastically changed. The car insurance industry hasn't remained untouched by these changes. On the internet, drivers can compare insurance prices and find out which sellers have the best offers. View photos The advantages of comparing online car insurance quotes are the following: Online quotes can be obtained from anywhere and at any time. Unlike physical insurance agencies, websites don't have a specific schedule and they are available at any time. Drivers that have busy working schedules, can compare quotes from anywhere and at any time, even at midnight. Multiple choices. Almost all insurance providers, no matter if they are well-known brands or just local insurers, have an online presence. Online quotes will allow policyholders the chance to discover multiple insurance companies and check their prices. Drivers are no longer required to get quotes from just a few known insurance companies. Also, local and regional insurers can provide lower insurance rates for the same services. Accurate insurance estimates. Online quotes can only be accurate if the customers provide accurate and real info about their car models and driving history. Lying about past driving incidents can make the price estimates to be lower, but when dealing with an insurance company lying to them is useless. Usually, insurance companies will do research about a potential customer before granting him coverage. Online quotes can be sorted easily. Although drivers are recommended to not choose a policy just based on its price, drivers can easily sort quotes by insurance price. Using brokerage websites will allow drivers to get quotes from multiple insurers, thus making the comparison faster and easier. For additional info, money-saving tips, and free car insurance quotes, visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ Compare-autoinsurance.Org is an online provider of life, home, health, and auto insurance quotes. This website is unique because it does not simply stick to one kind of insurance provider, but brings the clients the best deals from many different online insurance carriers. In this way, clients have access to offers from multiple carriers all in one place: this website. On this site, customers have access to quotes for insurance plans from various agencies, such as local or nationwide agencies, brand names insurance companies, etc. "Online quotes can easily help drivers obtain better car insurance deals. All they have to do is to complete an online form with accurate and real info, then compare prices", said Russell Rabichev, Marketing Director of Internet Marketing Company. CONTACT: Company Name: Internet Marketing CompanyPerson for contact Name: Gurgu CPhone Number: (818) 359-3898Email: [email protected]: https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ SOURCE: Compare-autoinsurance.Org View source version on accesswire.Com:https://www.Accesswire.Com/595055/What-Are-The-Main-Benefits-Of-Comparing-Car-Insurance-Quotes-Online View photos