End California’s Secrets About COVID Incidents at Work

All workers deserve to know if a potentially deadly virus is widespread in their workplace. For example, all consumers in restaurants, grocery stores, and bowling alleys need to be able to see if they have recently occurred in a company that they may patronize. About half of the state’s population is fully vaccinated. But even the inoculated person has no absolute protection. In addition, children under the age of 12 are not yet vaccinated, and a significant subset of other children are not vaccinated due to their existing medical condition.

And there remains an insignificant segment of the population that continues to endanger the lives of them and others by refusing to be vaccinated. This all happens when new, more contagious variants are infecting parts of our country. For example, about 171 cases were reported at Richmond HelloFresh last July, 187 cases were reported at the newly opened Amazon facility in Beaumont, Riverside County, and 50 cases were reported at the air conditioning company in Vacaville. In addition, the number of cases at Amazon’s facilities exceeds 1,700 in five counties: Riverside, Solano, Contra Costa, San Joaquin, and Khan.

In response to a record request from Bay Area newsgroup reporter Fiona Kerihar, about one-third of the county provided a list of recent outbreaks, number of cases, and dates. This is the information that the worker should have been able to access when reporting the work. Not in weeks and months. In many cases, it turns out that the employer retained the information from the employee.

Fortunately, some of California’s 58 counties recognize the importance of providing basic information to help people make informed decisions about whether workplaces and grocery stores are safe. doing. For all these reasons, it’s time for state and county health authorities to end the rude secrets to COVID-19 information in the workplace.

From now on, if state legislatures and governors really care about consumers and workers, especially important employees of colored races who are often poor and most vulnerable to viruses, state and county officials will inform you. We guarantee to provide timely data that enables based decisions-make. It should be readily available on each county’s website. Contra Costa and San Mateo County handed over the record to Kerihar. Jeff Smith, executive of Santa Clara County, said Friday that his county plans to release data this weekend. Alameda County rejected the case filed by the news agency, which forced the disclosure of more than 400 infections at Tesla’s Fremont plant, in a privacy discussion similar to what was previously dismissed in court. ..

To eliminate ambiguity, Reyes introduced the cleanup bill AB 654. But so far, it hasn’t been able to get two-thirds of the parliamentary support needed for emergency legislation. Not only did the Republicans not support the first parliamentary floor vote on June 1, but also 10 Democrats, including Discovery Bay’s Bay Area lawmaker Jim Frazier and Concord’s Tim Grayson. When workers and consumers want to know who doesn’t care about their welfare, they only need to look at those who voted against or simply abstained. Indeed, the release of such a record was the clear purpose of AB685 from San Bernardino County Democrat Eloise Reyes, who passed last year. However, many counties that oppose the disclosure of data rely on the absurd interpretation of the bill, claiming that the company name does not need to be disclosed.

News Highlights Health

• End California’s Secrets About COVID Incidents at Work
• Check out all the news and articles from Health news Information update.