Connect with us

Sports

College Football strength of schedule rankings for the 2026 season

College Football strength of schedule rankings for the 2026 season


Playing a high-quality schedule is now more important than ever before as the College Football Playoff places significant weight on teams’ opposing teams before deciding to include them in their official rankings.

The question remains: how do you determine a quality plan? One way is to simply add up your opponents’ wins and losses from the previous season.

That method is far from perfect, however, as the transfer portal, changes in recruiting fortunes, teams organically getting better or worse from year to year, and players leaving for the NFL all force schools to make major surgery on their roster virtually every offseason.

Additionally, not all wins are created equally, meaning that one team may play an opponent with fewer overall wins but against better quality opposition, while another team may play a school with more wins but against substandard competition.

That said, at this point in the preseason, with no film to see of teams in their current form, adding up the W’s and L’s for each team on the schedule is simply the best we can do with the information we actually have. How are things shaping up as we head into the summer months?

Strength of the college football rankings in 2026

The strength of college football in the schedule rankings for the 2026 season

USA Today Sports | IMAGINE

138. Buffalo ─ 64-88 (42.1%)

137. North Dakota State ─ 64-86 (42.7%)

T-135. Louisiana ─ 66-86 (43.4%)

T-135. Tulsa ─ 66-86 (43.4%)

134. Houston ─ 65-84 (43.6%)

133. MTSU ─ 66-85 (43.7%)

132. UConn ─ 68-82 (45.3%)

131. Coastal Carolina ─ 69-83 (45.4%)

130. Eastern Michigan ─ 68-81 (45.6%)

T-128. Virginia ─ 69-82 (45.7%)

T-128. Texas Tech ─ 69-82 (45.7%)

T-126. Toledo ─ 69-80 (46.3%)

T-126. Hawaii ─ 69-80 (46.3%)

124. Wisconsin ─ 69-79 (46.6%)

123. Ohio ─ 71-80 (47%)

T-120. UL Monroe ─ 72-81 (47.1%)

T-120. Louisiana Tech ─ 72-81 (47.1%)

T-120. Pittsburgh ─ 72-81 (47.1%)

119. UMass ─ 70-78 (47.3%)

118. Marshall ─ 72-80 (47.4%)

T-114. Kennesaw State ─ 72-79 (47.7%)

T-114. Appalachian State ─ 72-79 (47.7%)

T-114. Miami (OH) ─ 72-79 (47.7%)

T-114. Maryland ─ 72-79 (47.7%)

T-112. Old rule ─ 73-80 (47.7%)

T-112. Notre Dame ─ 73-80 (47.7%)

110. Navy ─ 72-77 (48.3%)

109. Rutgers ─ 74-79 (48.4%)

T-106. Sacramento State ─ 73-77 (48.7%)

T-106. New Mexico ─ 73-77 (48.7%)

T-106. Miami (FL) ─ 73-77 (48.7%)

105. San Diego State ─ 75-79 (48.7%)

104. Wyoming ─ 74-77 (49%)

103. Fresno State ─ 75-78 (49%)

102. Ball status ─ 74-76 (49.3%)

101. Clemson ─ 76-78 (49.4%)

100. James Madison ─ 76-77 (49.7%)

T-97. New Mexico State ─ 76-76 (50%)

T-97. Akron ─ 77-77 (50%)

T-97. UTEP ─ 74-74 (50%)

96. San Jose State ─ 82-81 (50.3%)

95. Northern Illinois ─ 78-77 (50.3%)

94. Eastern Carolina ─ 77-76 (50.3%)

93. State of Georgia ─ 78-76 (50.6%)

T-91. Western Michigan ─ 77-75 (50.7%)

T-91. Washington State ─ 77-75 (50.7%)

90. UCF ─ 76-74 (50.7%)

T-88. Freedom ─ 78-75 (51%)

T-88. Arkansas State ─ 78-85 (51%)

T-86. Tulaan ─ 79-75 (51.3%)

T-86. Minnesota ─ 79-75 (51.3%)

85. Iowa State ─ 77-73 (51.3%)

T-83. State of Texas ─ 80-74 (51.9%)

T-83. Oregon ─ 80-74 (51.9%)

82. Kansas ─ 78-72 (52%)

81. Sam Houston State ─ 81-74 (52.3%)

T-79. Troy ─ 80-73 (52.3%)

T-79. California ─ 80-73 (52.3%)

T-74. USF ─ 79-72 (52.3%)

T-74. Utah ─ 79-72 (52.3%)

T-74. UNLV ─ 79-72 (52.3%)

T-74. SMU ─ 79-72 (52.3%)

T-74. Oklahoma State ─ 79-72 (52.3%)

T-72. Western Kentucky ─ 82-74 (52.6%)

T-72. North Texas ─ 82-74 (52.6%)

T-70. Nevada ─ 81-73 (52.6%)

T-70. Illinois ─ 81-73 (52.6%)

T-68. UAB ─ 81-72 (52.9%)

T-68. UCLA ─ 81-72 (52.9%)

67. Air Force ─ 80-71 (53%)

66. Central Michigan ─ 82-72 (53.2%)

T-63. Kent State ─ 81-71 (53.3%)

T-63. Army ─ 81-71 (53.3%)

T-63. Iowa ─ 81-71 (53.3%)

62. South Alabama ─ 83-72 (53.5%)

T-60. Jacksonville State ─ 82-71 (53.6%)

T-60. Bowling green ─ 82-71 (53.6%)

59. Kansas State ─ 82-70 (53.9%)

58. Chestnut brown ─ 85-72 (54.1%)

57. Delaware ─ 84-71 (54.2%)

T-54. Missouri State ─ 83-70 (54.2%)

T-54. Georgia Tech ─ 83-70 (54.2%)

T-54. NC State ─ 83-70 (54.2%)

53. Arizona State ─ 82-69 (54.3%)

52. BYU ─ 81-68 (54.4%)

51. Virginia Tech ─ 85-71 (54.5%)

50. Texas A&M ─ 84-70 (54.5%)

49. South Georgia ─ 86-70 (55.1%)

48. Florida Atlantic Ocean ─ 84-68 (55.3%)

47. Colorado State ─ 86-69 (55.5%)

46. ​​​​Vanderbilt ─ 87-69 (55.8%)

45. South Carolina ─ 86-68 (55.8%)

44. Colorado ─ 85-67 (55.9%)

43. Boise State ─ 89-70 (56%)

42. Georgia ─ 87-68 (56.1%)

41. Florida State ─ 89-69 (56.3%)

40. Utah State ─ 88-68 (56.4%)

39. Boston College ─ 87-67 (56.5%)

38. Alabama ─ 86-66 (56.6%)

37. Southern miss ─ 88-67 (56.5%)

36. Ole Miss ─ 87-66 (56.9%)

35. Missouri ─ 88-66 (57.1%)

34. Wake Forest ─ 90-67 (57.3%)

T-31. Louisville ─ 89-66 (57.4%)

T-31. Memphis ─ 89-66 (57.4%)

T-31. Temple ─ 89-66 (57.4%)

T-28. UTSA ─ 88-65 (57.5%)

T-28. Florida ─ 88-65 (57.5%)

T-28. Michigan State ─ 88-65 (57.5%)

27. TCU ─ 87-64 (57.6%)

26. LSU ─ 90-66 (57.7%)

25. USC ─ 91-66 (58%)

T-23. Rice ─ 90-64 (58.4%)

T-23. Tennessee ─ 90-64 (58.4%)

21. Oregon State ─ 93-65 (58.9%)

20. Charlotte ─ 92-64 (59%)

19. Purdue ─ 91-63 (59.1%)

18. Oklahoma ─ 92-63 (59.4%)

17. Cincinnati ─ 91-62 (59.5%)

16. Syracuse ─ 92-62 (59.7%)

T-14. Duke ─ 94-63 (59.9%)

T-14. Texas ─ 94-63 (59.9%)

13. Arkansas ─ 92-61 (60.1%)

T-11. Kentucky ─ 94-61 (60.1%)

T-11. Indiana ─ 94-61 (60.1%)

10. Arizona ─ 94-59 (61.4%)

T-8. West Virginia ─ 95-59 (61.7%)

T-8. Baylor ─ 95-59 (61.7%)

T-6. Northwestern ─ 99-60 (62.3%)

T-6. Michigan ─ 99-60 (62.3%)

5. Mississippi State ─ 100-57 (63.7%)

4. Nebraska ─ 102-57 (64.2%)

3. Stanford ─ 101-56 (64.3%)

2. Ohio State ─ 102-56 (64.6%)

1. North Carolina ─ 103-55 (65.2%)

Add us as a preferred source at Googling

Sources

1/ https://Google.com/

2/ https://www.si.com/fannation/college/cfb-hq/rankings/college-football-strength-of-schedule-rankings-2026

The mention sources can contact us to remove/changing this article

What Are The Main Benefits Of Comparing Car Insurance Quotes Online

LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 24, 2020, / Compare-autoinsurance.Org has launched a new blog post that presents the main benefits of comparing multiple car insurance quotes. For more info and free online quotes, please visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/the-advantages-of-comparing-prices-with-car-insurance-quotes-online/ The modern society has numerous technological advantages. One important advantage is the speed at which information is sent and received. With the help of the internet, the shopping habits of many persons have drastically changed. The car insurance industry hasn't remained untouched by these changes. On the internet, drivers can compare insurance prices and find out which sellers have the best offers. View photos The advantages of comparing online car insurance quotes are the following: Online quotes can be obtained from anywhere and at any time. Unlike physical insurance agencies, websites don't have a specific schedule and they are available at any time. Drivers that have busy working schedules, can compare quotes from anywhere and at any time, even at midnight. Multiple choices. Almost all insurance providers, no matter if they are well-known brands or just local insurers, have an online presence. Online quotes will allow policyholders the chance to discover multiple insurance companies and check their prices. Drivers are no longer required to get quotes from just a few known insurance companies. Also, local and regional insurers can provide lower insurance rates for the same services. Accurate insurance estimates. Online quotes can only be accurate if the customers provide accurate and real info about their car models and driving history. Lying about past driving incidents can make the price estimates to be lower, but when dealing with an insurance company lying to them is useless. Usually, insurance companies will do research about a potential customer before granting him coverage. Online quotes can be sorted easily. Although drivers are recommended to not choose a policy just based on its price, drivers can easily sort quotes by insurance price. Using brokerage websites will allow drivers to get quotes from multiple insurers, thus making the comparison faster and easier. For additional info, money-saving tips, and free car insurance quotes, visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ Compare-autoinsurance.Org is an online provider of life, home, health, and auto insurance quotes. This website is unique because it does not simply stick to one kind of insurance provider, but brings the clients the best deals from many different online insurance carriers. In this way, clients have access to offers from multiple carriers all in one place: this website. On this site, customers have access to quotes for insurance plans from various agencies, such as local or nationwide agencies, brand names insurance companies, etc. "Online quotes can easily help drivers obtain better car insurance deals. All they have to do is to complete an online form with accurate and real info, then compare prices", said Russell Rabichev, Marketing Director of Internet Marketing Company. CONTACT: Company Name: Internet Marketing CompanyPerson for contact Name: Gurgu CPhone Number: (818) 359-3898Email: [email protected]: https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ SOURCE: Compare-autoinsurance.Org View source version on accesswire.Com:https://www.Accesswire.Com/595055/What-Are-The-Main-Benefits-Of-Comparing-Car-Insurance-Quotes-Online View photos