NHS Prime Minister Treasury Fights £10 Billion In Emergency

The NHS boss accused the prime minister, Rishi SnackBroke its pledge to provide “anything needed” to healthcare services after refusing to provide £10 billion of cash infusions needed to avoid the inconvenience of the second wave of coronaviruses.

Without money to the minister NHS Doctors believe that the next winter and the second spike of infection will be unavoidable, leaving them unprepared in danger. Nor can they reopen non-Covid services or treat the growing backlog of patients who need surgery.

The line will pressure Sunak on Wednesday to find more money for the NHS before his summer statement.

Simon Stevens, CEO of NHS England, said he needed at least £10 billion in additional funding this year to cover the costs of fighting the virus and resuming normal service. I told the Ministry. This amount means that the NHS can create an extra bed in the hospital, hold a nightingale facility, send the patient to a private hospital for surgery, and provide front-line staff with personal protective equipment.

But for weeks the negotiations are in a stalemate, and sources have said they are not close to agreement. Observer.. They hoped to end the agreement by Sunday and mark the 72nd anniversary of the post-war Labor Party of Clement Atley, where the NHS was founded in 1948. But disagreements made that impossible.

“There’s a line in progress. It’s pretty difficult. Here’s the problem. There is an ongoing armed conflict between the NHS and the government,” said one person with knowledge of the meeting. “But the Treasury is playing hardball and isn’t ready to truncate money.”

Another well-positioned source said: “They are in complete loggerhead turtles. Now there is a deadlock. There is no settlement or agreement.”

This controversy shattered the close ties between the NHS and the government during the Coronavirus crisis. Over the last few months, the minister has been praising the response and offering services, and the hospital has significantly expanded its intensive care unit to deal with Covid-19.

NHS leaders personally blame Prime Minister returning to his words.. One advanced diagram states: There is a huge difference between the phrase “NHS gets everything you need” and what the Treasury is currently doing. “

Standoffs also split the government. Downing Street supports the Treasury’s skeptical approach to the NHS’s demands, but Matt Hancock’s Department of Health and Human Services places that weight behind the NHS and requires the amount the NHS is seeking. I believe that. Sunak is keen to further limit the government’s urgent spending in the subsequent fight against the virus. Already allocated £123 billion Measures to support employment, health and other public services. The NHS has already guaranteed at least £6.6 billion of the coronavirus reserve fund that Sunak created in March with his first budget.

The problem is the NHS’s claim that the Treasury continues to underwrite the £400 million monthly fee that the Treasury agreed with private hospitals in March to treat patients with NHS. This is a temporary measure to ensure that people who need surgery such as cancer surgery, hip and knee replacements have access to it while the NHS Hospital is working on Covid-19. Was thought Stevens, however, found that the total number of people on the waiting list for planned hospital care was Reach 10 million By Christmas.

The Treasury claims that the NHS is committed to keeping its waiting list (currently 4.4 million people) at a certain level by a certain date through a private hospital performing an agreed number of steps. .. We believe that much of the £1.2 billion spent so far has been wasted, as many hospitals were scared of surgery during the early stages of the pandemic and rarely performed it.

“In the Treasury’s view, you can’t pass an empty check. They want to reduce the specific guarantee from the NHS that the waiting list will be reduced. The list is expected to reach 8 or 10 million, so it’s properly petrified,” said the insider. However, Stevens refuses to provide such a guarantee.

As one Trust Chief Executive at a hospital said: “The need for strict infection control procedures means that NHS hospitals only operate at about 60% of their normal capacity, so it’s important to extend contracts in the private sector.”

Dr. Nick Scriven, formerly chairman of the Acute Medicine Society, supported the NHS bid. “It’s a pity that what seemed to be promised is now attached to various actions and consequences that weren’t implemented when the first announcement of additional funding was made. However, it seems incorrect to tie the money really needed to receive emergency and urgent service over the next few months with selective surgical output at the appropriate private hospital. Governments need to follow their own advice and protect the NHS.” Observer..

NHS providers, representing the NHS Trust, have recently revealed that additional funding is also needed to help mental health services address the additional demand created by the psychological impact of Covid-19. Community services will also need support to help tens of thousands of people who have survived spells in hospitals because of illnesses have recovered.

The Treasury has declined to discuss ongoing negotiations with NHS leaders.