Health
National Questionnaire Survey on Post-Acute Symptoms and Health Problems After SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Denmark
participant
In this study, 430,173 people (40.0% were test positive) were invited to complete the questionnaire. A total of 153,412 (35.7%) participants answered the questionnaire completely, while 16,125 (3.7%) partially answered the questionnaire, while 260,637 (60.7%) individuals did not. did. Of those who responded to the questionnaire, 532 test negatives were excluded because they were reported to be seropositive, and responses from 152,880 participants became available for analysis. The survey was completed approximately 6 months (14.7%), 9 months (69.7%), and 12 months (15.5%) after the test.
Compared to non-responders, participants who completed the baseline questionnaire are more likely to be women born in Denmark, the elderly (ages 50-70), working in medical institutions, and living outside the metropolitan area. In many cases (supplementary table 1).
The response rates were very similar between the 171,992 test positives and the 258,181 test negatives that were asked to participate, at 35.5% and 35.8%, respectively.Participants consisted of 93,494 women (61.2%) and 59,386 men (38.8%) with median ages of 50 years (IQR: 36, 60) and 54 years (IQR: 41, 64), respectively. Was (table) 1).Compared to test negatives, test positives are more often: male, young, student or have full-time employment, are more physically active and less frequently: pensioners or smokers ( table 1).
At least one comorbidity was reported by 36.6% of participants (Supplementary Table) 1).
Symptoms before and after the test date (acute symptoms)
Of the test positives, 84.3% reported at least one acute symptom during the period from 1 week before the test to 4 weeks after the test, with a median of 6 symptoms, but a median of 4 negative tests. , The symptom was a trial indication. .. Of all test negatives, 13.5% reported at least one symptom before and after the test date, regardless of test indication, with a median of two different symptoms. The most common acute symptoms among positive tests were fever (55.0%), fatigue / fatigue (47.2%), and headache (44.1%) (supplementary figure). 1). The largest risk difference (RD) between test positive and test negative tested for symptoms is dysgeusia (change / decrease in taste) (RD = 34.49%, 95% CI 33.74–35.28%), dysosmia (Change / decrease) was observed. Smell) (RD = 33.87%, CI 95% 33.06–34.73%) and fever (RD = 23.90%, 95% CI 22.35–25.28%) (Supplementary figure. 1).
Symptoms 6 to 12 months after the test (post-acute symptoms)
Of the test positives, 29.6% reported at least one symptom 6-12 months after the test, compared to 13.0% of all test negatives. In both groups, two were median reported symptoms. The three most common symptoms 6-12 months after a positive test were fatigue / fatigue (11.1%), dysosmia (10.9%), and dysgeusia (8.8%) (Figure. 1). The most notable difference in risk between test positive and test negative 6-12 months after the test is dysosmia (RD = 10.92%, 95% CI 10.68-11.21%), dysgeusia (RD = 8.68%, It was 95% CI 8.43-8.93%). , And fatigue / fatigue (RD = 8.43%, 95% CI 8.14–8.74%) (Figure. 1). In addition, dyspnea, weakened legs / arms, sleeping legs / arms, muscle / joint pain, headache, dizziness, chest pain, loss of appetite, hot water / sweat, chills, fever, nausea, diarrhea, abdominal pain, and redness. All nasal discharges were significantly more common among test positives (figure. 1).
New diagnosis and general health problems 6-12 months after test
At least one diagnosis of depression, anxiety, chronic fatigue symptoms (CFS), fibromyalgia, or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is within the first 6, 9, or 12 months after testing. New onset, reported by 7.2% of tests. Positive compared to 3.3% of test negatives. The most frequently reported diagnoses were chronic fatigue syndrome (4.0%), depression (3.5%), and anxiety (3.4%) (Figure. 2). All three diagnoses are more common among test positives compared to test negatives, with statistically significant risk differences of 2.53% (2.35–2.71%) and 1.00% (95% CI 0.81–1.19%). ), And 1.15% (95% CI 0.95–1.34). %), Each (figure). 2). PTSD was also slightly more common among test positives, with a statistically significant risk difference of 0.16% (95% CI 0.03–0.28%).
Of the test positives, 53.1% reported at least one of the following new problems within the first 6, 9, or 12 months from the date of the test. Memory problems; mental malaise; physical malaise or sleep disorders, while the test negative rate was 11.5%. The most common test positives are physical fatigue (RD = 40.45%, CI 95% 39.99–40.97%), mental fatigue (RD = 32.58%, 32.11–33.09%), and poor concentration. (RD = 28.34%, CI 95%). 27.91–28.78%) and memory issues (RD = 27.25%, CI 95% 26.80–27.71%) (Figure. 3). All of the aforementioned health problems were more often reported by test positives than by test negatives, which have a large risk difference (Figure). 3).
Duration of individual symptoms
Looking at the estimated RD of the questionnaire, which was completed separately at 6, 9, or 12 months, the RD tended to decrease over time.Of the 10 symptoms with the highest overall RD, the estimates decreased over time for all symptoms except for dysosmia and dysgeusia, which had the highest estimates at 9 months (Supplementary Table). 3).
Post-acute symptoms of inpatients
We compared the occurrence of post-acute symptoms between test-positive individuals who were hospitalized for covid-19 (4.0%) and those who were not hospitalized (96.0%) (supplementary figure). 2). Significant fatigue / fatigue (RD = 8.64%, 95% CI 6.70–10.74%), weakened arms / legs (RD = 7.13%, 95% CI 5.55–8.66%), dyspnea (RD = 6.71) The risk difference was observed. %, 95% CI 5.17–8.39). The risk of all symptoms except dysgeusia, olfactory dysfunction, and runny nose was higher in hospitalized people than in non-hospitalized people.
Post-acute symptoms stratified by age and gender
To assess the presence of subgroups at high risk of post-acute symptoms, the risk differences for symptoms 6-12 months after the test were stratified by age group and gender (Figure. Four And supplementary data 1). Based on descriptive results, the majority of post-acute symptoms tended to be reported by women, especially participants aged 30-59 years. Stratified RDs who experienced at least one of fatigue / fatigue, dysgeusia, dysosmia, and 6-12 months post-test symptoms were female (RD = 18.5-18.5%) compared to males (RD = 18.5-18.5%). 18.0%, 95% CI 17.5-18.5%) were higher. 13.1%, 95% CI 12.6–13.5%). In addition, the RD for experiencing at least one of these symptoms is 30-59 years (RD = 18.2%, 95% CI 17.7-) compared to all other age groups (15-29 and 60+). It was high at 18.7%) (RD = 13.5%, 95% CI 13.0–13.9%).
Similar trends and more pronounced differences were observed for new developments of memory, concentration, or sleep problems, as well as mental or physical fatigue (supplementary figure). 3 And supplementary data 2). The risk difference for new onset of anxiety diagnosis was highest among women aged 20-29 years (supplementary figure). Four And supplementary data 3). Depression was reported more frequently between the ages of 30 and 39, regardless of gender.
Sick leave
Full-time or part-time sick leave was more common after SARS-CoV-2 infection. 12.0% of test positives reported taking sick leave 4 weeks and 6-12 months after the test until they completed the questionnaire. In contrast, 7.7% of test negatives (RD = 4.32%, 95% CI 4.00-4.64%). Full-time sick leave was reported in 9.4% of test positives and 6.5% of test negatives (RD = 3.20, 95% CI 2.88–3.47%), while part-time sick leave was compared to 1.7. It was reported in 4.2% of test positives. Test negative% (RD = 2.43%, 95% CI 2.25–2.62%). Some individuals reported both full-time and part-time sick leave.
Sources 2/ https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-31897-x The mention sources can contact us to remove/changing this article |
What Are The Main Benefits Of Comparing Car Insurance Quotes Online
LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 24, 2020, / Compare-autoinsurance.Org has launched a new blog post that presents the main benefits of comparing multiple car insurance quotes. For more info and free online quotes, please visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/the-advantages-of-comparing-prices-with-car-insurance-quotes-online/ The modern society has numerous technological advantages. One important advantage is the speed at which information is sent and received. With the help of the internet, the shopping habits of many persons have drastically changed. The car insurance industry hasn't remained untouched by these changes. On the internet, drivers can compare insurance prices and find out which sellers have the best offers. View photos The advantages of comparing online car insurance quotes are the following: Online quotes can be obtained from anywhere and at any time. Unlike physical insurance agencies, websites don't have a specific schedule and they are available at any time. Drivers that have busy working schedules, can compare quotes from anywhere and at any time, even at midnight. Multiple choices. Almost all insurance providers, no matter if they are well-known brands or just local insurers, have an online presence. Online quotes will allow policyholders the chance to discover multiple insurance companies and check their prices. Drivers are no longer required to get quotes from just a few known insurance companies. Also, local and regional insurers can provide lower insurance rates for the same services. Accurate insurance estimates. Online quotes can only be accurate if the customers provide accurate and real info about their car models and driving history. Lying about past driving incidents can make the price estimates to be lower, but when dealing with an insurance company lying to them is useless. Usually, insurance companies will do research about a potential customer before granting him coverage. Online quotes can be sorted easily. Although drivers are recommended to not choose a policy just based on its price, drivers can easily sort quotes by insurance price. Using brokerage websites will allow drivers to get quotes from multiple insurers, thus making the comparison faster and easier. For additional info, money-saving tips, and free car insurance quotes, visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ Compare-autoinsurance.Org is an online provider of life, home, health, and auto insurance quotes. This website is unique because it does not simply stick to one kind of insurance provider, but brings the clients the best deals from many different online insurance carriers. In this way, clients have access to offers from multiple carriers all in one place: this website. On this site, customers have access to quotes for insurance plans from various agencies, such as local or nationwide agencies, brand names insurance companies, etc. "Online quotes can easily help drivers obtain better car insurance deals. All they have to do is to complete an online form with accurate and real info, then compare prices", said Russell Rabichev, Marketing Director of Internet Marketing Company. CONTACT: Company Name: Internet Marketing CompanyPerson for contact Name: Gurgu CPhone Number: (818) 359-3898Email: [email protected]: https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ SOURCE: Compare-autoinsurance.Org View source version on accesswire.Com:https://www.Accesswire.Com/595055/What-Are-The-Main-Benefits-Of-Comparing-Car-Insurance-Quotes-Online View photos
to request, modification Contact us at Here or [email protected]