Will Trump's hush money conviction be upheld? The judge will rule on the immunity request on Tuesday

NEW YORK (AP) A blow to most of the defendants, Donald Trump has turned his criminal conviction into a rallying cry. His supporters wrote “I Vote for Felon” on T-shirts, hats and lawn signs.

“The real verdict will be delivered by the people on November 5,” Trump proclaimed after his conviction in New York last spring on 34 counts of falsifying business records.

WATCH: Trump calls for dismissal of sex abuse and defamation case after delay in secret sentencing

Now, just a week after Trump's resounding election victory, a Manhattan judge is poised to decide whether to uphold the hush verdict or throw it out because of a July U.S. Supreme Court ruling which granted presidents broad immunity from criminal prosecution.

Judge Juan M. Merchan said he would issue a written opinion Tuesday on Trump's request to vacate his conviction and order a new trial or dismiss the indictment entirely.

Merchan was expected to take power in September, but he postponed it “to avoid any appearance” that he was trying to influence the election. His decision could be frozen again if Trump takes further steps to delay or end the case.

If the judge upholds the verdict, the case could go to trial on Nov. 26, although that could change or disappear depending on appeals or other legal maneuvers.

Trump's lawyers have been fighting for months to overturn his conviction, which involved efforts to conceal a $130,000 payment to porn actor Stormy Daniels, whose affair allegations threatened to disrupt his 2016 campaign.

Trump denies the claim, maintains he did nothing wrong and denounced the verdict as the “rigged and shameful” result of a politically motivated “witch hunt” intended to damage his campaign.

The Supreme Court's decision grants former presidents immunity from prosecution for official acts they perform in their job as president and prohibits prosecutors from using evidence of official acts to try to prove that 'purely personal conduct violated the law.

Trump was a private citizen campaigning for the presidency, but he was neither elected nor sworn in when his lawyer at the time, Michael Cohen, paid off Daniels in October 2016.

But Trump was president when Cohen was reimbursed, and Cohen said they discussed repayment terms in the Oval Office. According to jurors, those reimbursements were falsely recorded in Trump's records as legal fees.

Trump's lawyers say the Manhattan district attorney's office “tainted” the case with evidence, including testimony about Trump's first term as president, that should not have been allowed.

Prosecutors argue that the high court's decision provides “no reason to disturb the jury's verdict.” Trump's conviction, they said, involved unofficial personal acts for which he is not immune.

WATCH: Brooks and Capehart on what awaits the country after Trump's victory

The Supreme Court did not set an official act, leaving that task to the lower courts. He also did not clarify how his ruling, stemming from one of Trump's two federal criminal cases, related to state-level cases, like Trump's hush money prosecutions.

“There are several murky aspects of the court's decision, but one that is particularly relevant in this case is the question of what constitutes an official act,” said Ilya Somin, a law professor at George Mason University. “And I think it's extremely difficult to argue that this award to this woman can be considered an official act, for a number of fairly obvious reasons.”

Trump's efforts to expunge the verdict have become more urgent since his election, with a sentencing date looming at the end of the month and possible penalties ranging from a fine or probation to four years in prison.

Presidents-elect don't typically enjoy the same legal protections as presidents, but Trump and his lawyers could try to leverage his unique status as former and future commander in chief into a sort of “get out of jail free” card. .

A likely argument: Trump would not only spare himself a potential prison sentence, he would spare the nation the calamity of its leader behind bars, however remote that possibility may be.

“He will ask every court in the world to intervene if he can, including the Supreme Court, so that it can drag things out a little bit,” said David Driesen, a law professor at Syracuse University , author of the book “The specter of dictatorship: judicial authorization of presidential power.

At the same time, Trump tried again to move the case from state court to federal court, where he could also assert his immunity. His lawyers asked the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to overturn a judge's September ruling denying the transfer.

If Merchan orders a new trial, it seems unlikely to happen while Trump is in office.

Trump's lawyers argued in court papers that, given the Supreme Court's ruling, jurors should not have been allowed to hear about topics such as his conversations with Hope Hicks, then communications director of the White House, nor another aide's testimony about his work practices.

Prosecutors' use of Trump's 2018 financial disclosure report, which he was required to file as president, was also verboten, they said. A footnote noted that Trump reimbursed Cohen in 2017 for unspecified expenses from the previous year.

Trump's lawyers, Todd Blanche and Emil Bove, argued that prosecutors were trying to “attribute a criminal motive” to some of Trump's actions in office in order to “unjustly harm” him. For example, they wrote, prosecutors advanced the “dubious theory” that some of Trump's tweets in 2018 were part of a “pressure campaign” aimed at preventing Cohen from turning against him.

The immunity decision “precludes any investigation into these motivations,” Blanche and Bove wrote.

Prosecutors countered that the ruling does not apply to the evidence in question and that, in any event, it is “only a fragment of the mountains of testimony and documentary evidence” considered by the jury. .

What Are The Main Benefits Of Comparing Car Insurance Quotes Online

LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 24, 2020, / Compare-autoinsurance.Org has launched a new blog post that presents the main benefits of comparing multiple car insurance quotes. For more info and free online quotes, please visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/the-advantages-of-comparing-prices-with-car-insurance-quotes-online/ The modern society has numerous technological advantages. One important advantage is the speed at which information is sent and received. With the help of the internet, the shopping habits of many persons have drastically changed. The car insurance industry hasn't remained untouched by these changes. On the internet, drivers can compare insurance prices and find out which sellers have the best offers. View photos The advantages of comparing online car insurance quotes are the following: Online quotes can be obtained from anywhere and at any time. Unlike physical insurance agencies, websites don't have a specific schedule and they are available at any time. Drivers that have busy working schedules, can compare quotes from anywhere and at any time, even at midnight. Multiple choices. Almost all insurance providers, no matter if they are well-known brands or just local insurers, have an online presence. Online quotes will allow policyholders the chance to discover multiple insurance companies and check their prices. Drivers are no longer required to get quotes from just a few known insurance companies. Also, local and regional insurers can provide lower insurance rates for the same services. Accurate insurance estimates. Online quotes can only be accurate if the customers provide accurate and real info about their car models and driving history. Lying about past driving incidents can make the price estimates to be lower, but when dealing with an insurance company lying to them is useless. Usually, insurance companies will do research about a potential customer before granting him coverage. Online quotes can be sorted easily. Although drivers are recommended to not choose a policy just based on its price, drivers can easily sort quotes by insurance price. Using brokerage websites will allow drivers to get quotes from multiple insurers, thus making the comparison faster and easier. For additional info, money-saving tips, and free car insurance quotes, visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ Compare-autoinsurance.Org is an online provider of life, home, health, and auto insurance quotes. This website is unique because it does not simply stick to one kind of insurance provider, but brings the clients the best deals from many different online insurance carriers. In this way, clients have access to offers from multiple carriers all in one place: this website. On this site, customers have access to quotes for insurance plans from various agencies, such as local or nationwide agencies, brand names insurance companies, etc. "Online quotes can easily help drivers obtain better car insurance deals. All they have to do is to complete an online form with accurate and real info, then compare prices", said Russell Rabichev, Marketing Director of Internet Marketing Company. CONTACT: Company Name: Internet Marketing CompanyPerson for contact Name: Gurgu CPhone Number: (818) 359-3898Email: [email protected]: https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ SOURCE: Compare-autoinsurance.Org View source version on accesswire.Com:https://www.Accesswire.Com/595055/What-Are-The-Main-Benefits-Of-Comparing-Car-Insurance-Quotes-Online View photos