Enthed by Trump, AI companies are pressure for fewer rules

For a little over two years, the heads of technology at the forefront of the development of artificial intelligence had made an unusual request from the legislators. They wanted Washington to regulate them.

Technology leaders have warned legislators that generative AI, which can produce text and images that imitate human creations, had the potential to disturb national security and elections, and could possibly eliminate millions of jobs.

The AI ​​could be mistaken, Sam Altman, the director general of Openai, testified in the congress in May 2023. We want to work with the government to prevent this from happening.

But since the president has prevailed over the election, technological leaders and their companies have changed their melody, and in some cases, has reversed the course, with daring demands of government to stay away, in what has become the most energetic push to advance their products.

In recent weeks, Meta, Google, Openai and others have asked the Trump administration to block AI laws and declare that it is legal for them to use copyright -protected equipment to train their AI models. They also lobby to use federal data to develop technology, as well as for easier access to energy sources for their computer requests. And they asked for tax reductions, subsidies and other incentives.

The change was made in place by Mr. Trump, who said that AI is the most precious weapon of nations to overcome China in advanced technologies.

During his first day in power, Trump signed an executive decree to ensure that the safety test rules for AI used by the government. Two days later, he signed another order, requesting suggestions from the industry to create a policy to support and improve the world domination of AI.

Technological companies are really embarked on by the Trump administration, and even problems such as security and responsible AI have completely disappeared from their concerns, said Laura Cara, a senior member of the Wadhwani IA Center at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a non -profit reflection group. The only thing that matters is to establish American leadership in AI

Many AI political experts fear such frantic growth can be accompanied, among other potential problems, of the rapid spread of political disinformation and health; Discrimination by automated screening for financial candidates, jobs and housing; and cyber attacks.

The overthrow of technology chiefs is austere. In September 2023, more than a dozen of them approved AI regulation at a Capitol Hill summit organized by Senator Chuck Schumer, Democrat in New York and the majority leader at the time. During the meeting, Elon Musk warned against the risks of civilization posed by the AI

Following, the Biden administration began working with the largest IA companies to voluntarily test their systems for security and security weaknesses and compulsory security standards for the government. States and California have introduced legislation to regulate technology with safety standards. And publishers, authors and players have continued technological companies for their use of copyright -protected equipment to train their AI models.

(The New York Times continued Openai and its partner, Microsoft, accusing them of copyright violation concerning news content linked to AI systems. Openai and Microsoft denied these claims.)

But after Mr. Trump won the elections in November, technology companies and their leaders immediately increased their lobbying. Google, Meta and Microsoft each donated $ 1 million to the inauguration of Mr. Trumps, just like Mr. Altman and Apples Tim Cook. Metas Mark Zuckerberg organized an inauguration game and met Mr. Trump several times. Mr. Musk, who has his own IA company, XAI, has spent the presidents almost every day.

In turn, Mr. Trump praised AI announcements, including an Openai, Oracle and Softbank plan to invest $ 100 billion in AI data centers, which are huge buildings full of servers that provide calculation power.

We have to rely on the future of AI with optimism and hope, said vice-president JD Vance, government representatives and technology leaders last week.

During an AI summit in Paris last month, Mr. Vance also called for pro-commune policies of the AI ​​and warned the world leaders against excessive regulations which could kill a transformative industry as well as its takeoff.

From now on, technological companies and other people affected by AI offer answers to the presidents of the second Decree of AI, removing obstacles to American leadership in artificial intelligence, which has forced the development of a pro-growth policy within 180 days. Hundreds of them submitted comments to the National Science Foundation and the Office of Science and Technology Policy to influence this policy.

OPENAI has submitted 15 pages of comments, asking the federal government to pre -empt states to create AI laws. The company based in San Francisco also invoked Deepseek, a Chinese chatbot created for a small fraction of the cost of chatbots developed in the United States, saying that it was an important gauge of the state of this competition with China.

If Chinese developers have unhindered access to data and American companies find themselves without equitable access, the AI ​​race is actually finished, said Openai, asking that the United States government puts the data back to feed its systems.

Many technological companies have also argued that their use of the work protected by copyright for the training of AI models was legal and that the administration should take sides. OPENAI, Google and Meta declared that they thought they had legal access to works protected by copyright such as books, films and art for training.

Meta, which has its own AI model, called Llama, pushed the White House to issue an executive decree or another action to clarify that the use of data accessible to the public to form models is unequivocal.

Google, Meta, Openai and Microsoft said that their use of copyright protected data was legal because the information has been transformed in the process of training their models and was not used to reproduce the intellectual property of rights holders. The actors, the authors, the musicians and the publishers argued that technological companies should compensate for them for obtaining and using their works.

Some technological companies have also put pressure on the Trump administration to approve the Open Source AI, which essentially makes the IT code freely available to be copied, modified and reused.

Meta, who owns Facebook, Instagram and Whatsapp, has pushed the hardest for a policy of Open Sourcing policy, than other AI companies, such as Anthropic, have described as increasing vulnerability to security risks. Meta said open source technology accelerates AI development and can help start-ups catch up with more established companies.

Andreessen Horowitz, a venture capital company of Silicon Valley with issues in dozens of AI start-ups, also called to support open source models, on which many of his companies count to create AI products.

And Andreessen Horowitz gave the most sudden arguments against new regulations for existing security, consumer protection and civil rights, said the firm.

Prohibit damage and punish bad actors, but do not require that developers jump through expensive regulatory hoops based on speculative fear, Andreessen Horowitz said in his comments.

Others continued to warn that AI should be regulated. Civil rights defense groups have called for systems audits to ensure that they do not discriminate vulnerable populations in housing and employment decisions.

The artists and publishers said that AI companies should disclose their use of copyright equipment and asked the White House to reject the arguments of technology industries technology that their unauthorized use of intellectual property to train their models was within the limits of the law on copyright. The Center for ia Policy, a reflection group and a lobbying group, called for third -party audits of systems for national security vulnerabilities.

In any other industry, if a product harms or negatively hurts consumers, this project is defective and the same standards should be applied for AI, said Kj Bagchi, vice-president of the Civil For Civil Rights and Technology, who submitted one of the requests.

What Are The Main Benefits Of Comparing Car Insurance Quotes Online

LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 24, 2020, / Compare-autoinsurance.Org has launched a new blog post that presents the main benefits of comparing multiple car insurance quotes. For more info and free online quotes, please visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/the-advantages-of-comparing-prices-with-car-insurance-quotes-online/ The modern society has numerous technological advantages. One important advantage is the speed at which information is sent and received. With the help of the internet, the shopping habits of many persons have drastically changed. The car insurance industry hasn't remained untouched by these changes. On the internet, drivers can compare insurance prices and find out which sellers have the best offers. View photos The advantages of comparing online car insurance quotes are the following: Online quotes can be obtained from anywhere and at any time. Unlike physical insurance agencies, websites don't have a specific schedule and they are available at any time. Drivers that have busy working schedules, can compare quotes from anywhere and at any time, even at midnight. Multiple choices. Almost all insurance providers, no matter if they are well-known brands or just local insurers, have an online presence. Online quotes will allow policyholders the chance to discover multiple insurance companies and check their prices. Drivers are no longer required to get quotes from just a few known insurance companies. Also, local and regional insurers can provide lower insurance rates for the same services. Accurate insurance estimates. Online quotes can only be accurate if the customers provide accurate and real info about their car models and driving history. Lying about past driving incidents can make the price estimates to be lower, but when dealing with an insurance company lying to them is useless. Usually, insurance companies will do research about a potential customer before granting him coverage. Online quotes can be sorted easily. Although drivers are recommended to not choose a policy just based on its price, drivers can easily sort quotes by insurance price. Using brokerage websites will allow drivers to get quotes from multiple insurers, thus making the comparison faster and easier. For additional info, money-saving tips, and free car insurance quotes, visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ Compare-autoinsurance.Org is an online provider of life, home, health, and auto insurance quotes. This website is unique because it does not simply stick to one kind of insurance provider, but brings the clients the best deals from many different online insurance carriers. In this way, clients have access to offers from multiple carriers all in one place: this website. On this site, customers have access to quotes for insurance plans from various agencies, such as local or nationwide agencies, brand names insurance companies, etc. "Online quotes can easily help drivers obtain better car insurance deals. All they have to do is to complete an online form with accurate and real info, then compare prices", said Russell Rabichev, Marketing Director of Internet Marketing Company. CONTACT: Company Name: Internet Marketing CompanyPerson for contact Name: Gurgu CPhone Number: (818) 359-3898Email: cgurgu@internetmarketingcompany.BizWebsite: https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ SOURCE: Compare-autoinsurance.Org View source version on accesswire.Com:https://www.Accesswire.Com/595055/What-Are-The-Main-Benefits-Of-Comparing-Car-Insurance-Quotes-Online View photos